أخبار زلزال اليابان 2011

March 26
2011:

A reader,
from CEA, sends me a (daily) report of the Institute of Nuclear and Radiological
Protection, in French (IRSN)

,

he

precises

''this is the real information about site status of Fukushima''.

This report seems less optimistic that the one
given by a French engineer living on site, and commenting information given by
official Japanese services.

The report of IRSN of March 25th 2011

Extract:

IRSN

Institute

of

Nuclear

and Radiological Protection

Information note

Situation of nuclear plants in
Japan after major earthquake occurred March 11 2011

Point position on March 25 at
08h00

State of reactors

IRSN remains heavily preoccupied
by the actual situation of reactors no 1,2 and

3

( failure

risk of some material because of the presence of massive quantities of salt in
tanks and enclosures, lack of a sustainable system able to evacuate residual
power...). That precariousness should last for weeks or months considering the
difficulty.

IRSN examines

scenarios of possible aggravation of the situation

, notably
conceivable

scenarios in case of
breaking tank of the reactor no 3

. It will be difficult to demonstrate the
reality

of

such

a scenario but impact in term of radioactive rejects in environment is under
consideration.

Reactor no 1

The injection rate of sea water
in the tank has been adjusted (10 m3/h) for controlling temperature above the
core. This rate must permit evacuation of residual power. Pressure measured in
the containment enclosure has been stabilized. It shouldn't be necessary to depressurize
this tank in a very short-term.

Reactor no 2

The injection of sea water in the
tank is maintained for assuring cooling of the core, which stays partially out
of water. The containment enclosure could be damaged. The situation has not
evolved and depressurization operations of tank containment are not necessary
at the moment. The control room should be replenished this day.

Reactor no 3

The injection of sea water in the
tank would be maintained in order to ensure core cooling which stays, however, partially
dewatered.

The containment enclosure seems
to be no more waterproof according to pressure indicators; this loss of seal
would be at the origin of ''continuous'' and unfiltered radioactive discharges in
the environment.

The release of smoke detected in
March 23 has stopped. IRSN analyzes potentials causes of failure of containment
of reactor no 3.

One hypothesis examined
by IRSN concerns the eventuality of a rupture of the tank followed by an interaction
between corium (mixture of fuel and molten metal) and concrete at the bottom of
the containment enclosure.

The impact in terms of rejects in
environment is being examined.

Three
operators have been contaminated March 24 in the turbine building of the
reactor no 3.

Audit works of materials have been stopped. These works aim
to restore a reactor feed in freshwater.

Reactor no 4

The core of this reactor does not
contain fuel.

Reactor no 5 and 6

Reactors are correctly cooled
(core and assembly in cooling pool).

It says that the concern of Japanese engineers
is that salt provided by the cooling sea water blocks solenoid valves, which
are only

controllable

from

afar. A malfunction of this kind could have serious
consequences and their concern is to revert back to a freshwater cooling.

So, what is the solution?

I have hot news, which are information of first
hand,

to communicate about
Z-machine, since I have collected them in two congress internationals, Vilnius
in 2008 and

Jeju

, Korea, October 2010, and close to

Malcom

Haines him-self. Nexus accepted to publish this news
article, which will be released in the next issue.

Those

information will multiply jointly hopes and fears linked to this new technology
of ultra-high temperatures. Without spoiling the charm of this subject (this
news article will be quickly written):

Americans
have

achieved

3,7

billions of degrees in 2005 in Z-machine of Sandia. Opting
for military applications in priority (pure fusion bomb), they misinform
anything goes. With ZR, the electrical intensity increased from 17 to 26 million
amps and performances of the machine are now kept secret.

March 20
2011:

Is it
important to make a serial with this Japanese's accident? There are so many
disasters on Earth that we are saturated. What we can say is that this disaster
is due to another human's bloody thing: building nuclear plants on costs (what
is the case for all Japanese's nuclear plants) in a country periodically
devastated by tsunamis. Otherwise, building cheaper nuclear plants and to make benefit.

Not

paying

attention to recommendations of

seismology specialist who were asking
to upgrade security against earthquakes.

Improvidence.

Japanese astound us with their spectacular
progress in robotic. In Japan, robots know how to ride a bicycle, to talk, to
smile. They build humanoid robots

who

have style, they
will probably be sold, as artificial servant dogs, or electronic escort girls,
to city dwellers suffering from loneliness. It remembers me a chapter of

The Martian Chronicles

of Ray

Bradburry

, that

I highly recommend to read or to reread.

But, in Japan, no
one have invested in security robots, able to climb upon rubble, but above all build
with a lead shielded electronic able to resist against the intense radiation
flux. Japan needed to bring them from foreign countries.

We have seen one of
these people responsible of this criminal bad management, ''overwhelmed by the
emotion'', to shed crocodile tears (but who wouldn't accept to sit nearby machine's
operators who dangerously approach reactors to tempt to cool down them). In
Japan, political responsible or economic

actors, who have ruined hundred of
thousand decent people come periodically in front of media for public
apologizes. The responsible of a nuclear disaster shed few tears. This replaces
the traditional Seppuku, a cold steel suicide.

This video shows arrangement of wastes coming
from the running of a boiled water nuclear reactor, those wastes are
manipulated from a distance and stored in a water pool, this water playing role
of a radiations absorbing shield.

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2011/03/12/world/asia/the-explosion-at-the-japanese-reactor.html?ref=asia

You must understand one thing. In nuclear
industry, the results of activities of electricity production, highly
radioactive and dangerous to manipulate wastes, are simply stored

very close to the reactor,

in ordinary
water pools. Water is enough to block different radiations. Afterwards, those wastes
will be routed to ''reprocessing centers'', like in La Hague, to extract the
future fuel for...Fast Breeder reactors. Those wastes are

not at all passive

and constitute a material as dangerous as the
contents of the reactor itself.

The stock ''pool'' of used elements

This pool is situated in the immediate
neighborhood of the reactor, for reasons of easy manipulations.

A zoom shot on those ''structures'' regrouping
''pencils'':

60 ''pencils'' per ''assembly'' in Japanese's reactors

Zooming a little more, we can see details on
those ''pencils'',

who

constitute those
''structures''. These are zirconium tubes (al

so
called "gines")

, filled with ''fuel pellets'': uranium oxides
or, in the case of the ''MOX'', a mixture of uranium oxide and plutonium oxide.
If water, in which those structures are immersed, is evaporated, waste heat
generated by those structures, stored in compact ranks, is enough to quickly
damage zirconium tubes and allow pellets to escape and gather on the bottom of
the pool. Unless an explosive phenomenon disperses these products around the
reactor.

Here is the source of what follows:

http://allthingsnuclear.org/tagged/Japan_nuclear

The tank (here,
opened) and the ''pool'' are linked by doors, locks acting

Periodically ''the reactor is stopped''. The
control bars are raised, which reduces the activity of the reactor at its
minimum, which is not zero, because products of fission continue evolving,
decomposing while releasing heat (60 megawatts, the tenth of the rated
operating regime). The lock insulating the top of the reactor with the stock
pool is open. Water invades all available space. Handling of the structures is
now operated under water, using the crane and the telescopic arm, either for
removing ''worn'' structures or replacing them by ''new'' structures. Anyway,
unless a reprocessing industry, like La Hague, take over, the ''worn''
structures will be stocked in a proximity pool, where they continuing to warm
water of the ''storage pool of elements consumed and transit for supply of new
elements''.

Handling and assembly, under a blanket of water, radiation shielding

Here is a photo showing such a manipulation,
taken in a reactor set up in the United States, in Brown Ferry's nuclear power
station in Alabama.

Transfer of

an

used assembly to the storage
basin

The ''cattle chute'' name has been chosen
because of the resemblance between those bridges and ways which conduct cattle
to the place where they will be slaughtered.

This photo is taken by the operator of the crane.
Under his feet: the water which protects him from radiations.

At a few meters
below, we clearly distinguish the blue glow which corresponds to the effect of
radiation emitted by ''used'' fuel elements. We can see that it is clearly not
passive!!

Here another photograph of a storage basin for American reactor
(Alabama), empty, before usage.

Few decades ago I visited an experimental pool
reactor

PŽgase

installed in

Cadarache

.
Looking through that water, clear, we saw ''all innards of the reactor'',
surrounded by a blue glow,

located

ten meters lower.
It was like seeing death in front, the nuclear poison close. Speed of particles
emitted was not higher than the speed of light, in the void, but higher than
that speed

in water

, which is more
than 200,000 km/s. The ratio 200,000/300,000 = 1,5 corresponds to the

water's

index

of refraction. Particles were then emitted at ''supersonic speed'' towards
speed of light in this environment and we saw clearly things that looked like
'' shockwaves '', this corresponds to what we call ''

Cherenkov radiation

''. In an environment other than void, time of
propagation of light is expanded because of the absorption-emission time of
photons by atoms and molecules. But between two atoms, photons go at 300,000
km/s.

PŽgase

(35 megawatts thermal), nuclear reactor of research and tests,
divergence at

Cadarache

in 1963, it is

a

atomic pile where tests are made on fuels for gas cooled piles.

The pool of

PŽgase's

reactor
has been converted in 1980 to store 2,703 containers containing 64 kg of
plutonium.

Here are sources of what follows:

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/genpatsu-fukushima

http://allthingsnuclear.org/tagged/Japan_nuclear

Each joint element (see above) weighs 170 kg
and contains 60 ''pencils''. The storage pool of the reactor no 3 contained as
much as high toxic ''used'' bars than... his core.

Below is a picture broadcasted by the NHK of
Japan, which indicates that watering (by sea water) must be done at a height of
22

m.

Watering of Japanese's reactors needs to throw (sea) water at a height
of 22 m (source: Japanese TV NHK)

Watering crane, mounted on a moving vehicle

Test of this watering crane

March 22 2011:

as reported by a reader, it seems to
be a remote beam dump concrete, as indicates this picture that he sent to me
(and I thank him):

Seen on the left the concrete truck carrier with
its concrete mixer rotating.

Of course, we can use a pole like this to drop
down water at a height of 22 m, where cooling can be the most effective. If it used
for flooding the reactor under concrete, it would be clearly more serious. This
would signify that body cooling of the reactors, or one of them could be
destroyed.

Wait...

We can only hope, for Japanese, that the situation
is not so critical that it appears, speaking of nuclear (modulo the fact is
that victims of this tsunami amount to 20,000 at this day).

The fact remains that those events make us
brutally realize again the risks of nuclear power.