Untitled Document
Science without conscience is only the ruin of the soul
Aluminum in drinking water: a matter of state
June 2, 2011
Watch this video. Another affair, with Bernard Kouchner in the middle (who would be surprised?).
Aluminum sulfate is used to capture clay particles in water, to "reprocess" it in treatment plants. However, Aluminum is a neurotoxin, degenerative. Studies from the late 1990s had shown that it could double the number of Alzheimer's disease cases.
First, a quick return to reason by a researcher, brought by the Secretary of State for Health, Bernard Kouchner, to recant in front of TF1 cameras.

The Omertà
This video then shows how journalists hit a wall when asking Marie Favrot, head of the AFSSA (French Agency for Food Safety), the wrong question. She states that the AFSSA has set the aluminum sulfate addition standard at 200 milligrams per liter. When the journalist tells her that in many regions of France, this level is exceeded by a factor of 6, and asks what recommendations the AFSSA gives for such situations, she simply replies:

"Cut the broadcast!"
Hide this rate, I can't see it
Some links on the subject: the water flowing from your tap:
http://cdurable.info/L-eau-du-robinet-est-elle-dangereuse-pour-notre-sante-alzheimer,804.html
http://frenzy.chez.com/Fluor.htm
In the world of research or health, or both, such behaviors are common. One could even say that a different behavior is an aberrant exception. It often takes many years before the cowardice of others is discovered.
At the beginning of the 1990s, I had computer simulations where a clump of positive matter rotated in a negative mass matter alveolus (invisible to our eyes and devices, since it can only emit or capture negative energy photons). Things happened very quickly. The calculations were done at the time on a large computer located in a German laboratory, the Daisy Particle Physics Laboratory. Very quickly, the clump turned into a beautiful barred galaxy, stable, which did not lose its arms.
A young researcher, Frédéric, who owed the tranquility of his career to a carefully guarded anonymity, came to see me.
- I read your books, and I came to see if you were crazy or not.
A few days later:
- No, you are not crazy. What you are doing is interesting. But you will never achieve much with your improved boullier. I have in Germany a system of power you could never have dreamed of (to be placed in the technological context of the time. Today, such machines are everywhere).
Fred therefore launched calculations.
-
So, what does it give?
-
I have the result before my eyes.
-
What does it look like?
-
I want to say "call me God."

My 1992 barred spiral, stable.
Around, clumps that are only calculation artifacts, which could be eliminated by changing the "calculation space" (by calculating on a sphere and not on a square grid)
Today, astrophysicists remain unable to recreate these structures through their simulations. Their digital galaxies quickly lose their arms.
Ours were stable for dozens of rotations.
I showed this to my colleague Evangélina Athanassoula (of Greek origin), at the Marseille Observatory, during the thesis defense of one of her students. With her husband, Albert Bosma (of Dutch origin), she would masturbate each morning a powerful computer system, in search of the Holy Grail. In vain.
,
Albert Bosma, in the 1990s
A career entirely devoted to butyrogenesis (from butyros, the butter and kinésis, the movement)
On that day, Françoise Combes came to be part of the jury for a thesis that left no memory, like all those directed by Athanassoula, or even her own.

Françoise Combes, of the Paris Academy of Sciences
She sees the animation that my friend Frédéric and I had installed on a small Mac and makes a long face. Immediately:
-
I get the same thing with cold hydrogen.
-
Cold hydrogen?
-
Yes, cold hydrogen.
-
Ah...
In the months that followed, I vainly tried to publish this work, as well as other similar jobs. It got to the point that I lost the file where you could see this beautiful barred galaxy forming. A reader may have kept it somewhere.
The conclusion is simple. The spiral arms of galaxies result from a kind of "friction" (a "dynamic friction" that only occurs through the force of gravity, and that acts on gas disks, in contact with the surrounding negative mass matter, the "geminal matter" that surround galaxies, which nest in cavities similar to gruyère holes. This same interaction explains the peripheral survivals, the flat shape of the rotation curves. See "We lost half the universe", J.P. Petit 1997, Albin Michel then Hachette in pocket.
Finally, if you want the closest image of a spiral galaxy, it's the one of coffee, which, while turning in your cup, rubs on its edges. The "bar" is something else. It is a resonance phenomenon that does not exist in coffee.
One day someone will find this. It allows to understand, not only how galaxies form, but how they evolve, why they have such a shape and not another.
Lady Combes claimed to have the key. Indeed, beautiful photos of gas spirals appeared in popular science magazines, and the thing was immediately hailed as a major discovery. According to this woman, these structures formed when "cold hydrogen" fell into rotating galaxies, like raindrops on a bicycle wheel, lying on its side, after a severe fall.
But no one ever found any trace of this cold hydrogen. Between galaxies there is a very hot medium, at millions of degrees, as revealed by observations in the X-ray range, a decade ago. These are simply atoms that were expelled at the time of galaxy formation, at the time of the active phase of the first generation stars.
Why this temperature and not another? The temperature, in a gas, is only a measure of the thermal agitation kinetic energy of its components. And what is it? Necessarily higher than the escape velocity of the galaxies. Let's say a thousand kilometers per second...