Weapons that cause unbearable pain
Don't forget your total sunblock cream!
Update of August 6, 2006.
Everything is confirmed.
There is an idiot who sent me in early August 2007 an email where he writes:
One last remark.
You still scream against "the military".
It's nice, but on the other hand I notice that you are fascinated by "future" mass destruction weapons (bucky balls etc). But they only exist in your mind!
There is a contradiction here that you should question. Of course, I see evil everywhere... I see weapons, coercive structures everywhere. In the HAARP project (which is obviously just a peaceful study project of the ionosphere), in implants (which are just markers for consumer products, to facilitate stock management). I refuse to swallow the official theses regarding the state of the art for torpedoes, for the fact that the version of the third millennium of the Strategic Air Command is based on subsonic bombers, capable of operating anywhere on the globe with three in-flight refuelings. I am doing "technological delirium," to use the word of Bernard T., French aeronautical journalist, about Aurora.
Here are some recent, official information about these crowd control devices, "crowd control" weapons. Here is the official presentation of the microwave emitter that inflicts unbearable pain from a distance "but without killing" (non-lethal weapons), at least not immediately.
The CNN comment:
It kills less, grills more! It kills less but grills more!
A volunteer, who seems to greatly amuse these tests:
And the final comment of the journalists:
Heat them up, boys! Roast them, guys!
You will see all this in this video showing tests conducted on American volunteers.
Be aware that if you are shown here the "soft" version, there are more powerful versions, capable of instantly and immediately burning retinas (note the warning "don't forget your suncreen" your total sunblock cream). The "cancer weapon" version has been perfected for a long time. It is enough to use microwaves that penetrate deeper into the human body and are pulsed at low frequencies capable of causing alterations in the DNA.
By the way, the depleted uranium shells (with atomic mass 238, from the refining of natural uranium, from which the 0.7% of the fissile isotope 235 is extracted) are already cancer weapons in action (they have been abundantly used in Iraq, although they have also affected American soldiers), before being considered as high penetration shells. Uranium 238 is as penetrating as steel and heavier than lead. Upon impact, the uranium warheads convert their kinetic energy into heat. They burn, producing oxide and particles of a diameter on the order of a micron. These will contaminate the areas abundantly showered by these projectiles. The inhabitants will contract cancer. Women will give birth to monsters. Thus these enemies of America, who stubbornly refuse democracy, will be well punished.
Note that aircraft manufacturers had equipped their planes with balance weights for flaps made of uranium 238. But during crashes into residential areas, this uranium polluted the sites and caused cancer in firefighters. Since then, the installation of such weights has been banned in newly built aircraft, but many aircraft still in service are equipped with them.
The "psychotronic" or "Zorglonde" (see the Spirou comic strip) version is already as advanced. Thanks to pulsed microwaves, at low power, but modulated in a way to be able to attack subliminally the auditory receptors, it will be possible to induce submissive or suicidal behavior in large human groups, from space.
These waves are very directional. The beams can be used from space, including on wheat fields, forming nice designs, killing insects and hedgehogs instantly, which, by the way, are mammals like you and me.
Americans believe in the virtues of their sophisticated weapons. It is these that will impose peace and democracy in the world. "Si vis pacem, para bellum," said the Romans (if you want peace, prepare for war).
Of course.....
Update of August 6, 2006.
Everything is confirmed.
There is an idiot who sent me in early August 2007 an email where he writes:
One last remark.
You still scream against "the military".
It's nice, but on the other hand I notice that you are fascinated by "future" mass destruction weapons (bucky balls etc). But they only exist in your mind!
There is a contradiction here that you should question. Of course, I see evil everywhere... I see weapons, coercive structures everywhere. In the HAARP project (which is obviously just a peaceful study project of the ionosphere), in implants (which are just markers for consumer products, to facilitate stock management). I refuse to swallow the official theses regarding the state of the art for torpedoes, for the fact that the version of the third millennium of the Strategic Air Command is based on subsonic bombers, capable of operating anywhere on the globe with three in-flight refuelings. I am doing "technological delirium," to use the word of Bernard T., French aeronautical journalist, about Aurora.
Here are some recent, official information about these crowd control devices, "crowd control" weapons. Here is the official presentation of the microwave emitter that inflicts unbearable pain from a distance "but without killing" (non-lethal weapons), at least not immediately.
The CNN comment:
It kills less, grills more! It kills less but grills more!
A volunteer, who seems to greatly amuse these tests:
And the final comment of the journalists:
Heat them up, boys! Roast them, guys!
You will see all this in this video showing tests conducted on American volunteers.
Be aware that if you are shown here the "soft" version, there are more powerful versions, capable of instantly and immediately burning retinas (note the warning "don't forget your suncreen" your total sunblock cream). The "cancer weapon" version has been perfected for a long time. It is enough to use microwaves that penetrate deeper into the human body and are pulsed at low frequencies capable of causing alterations in the DNA.
By the way, the depleted uranium shells (with atomic mass 238, from the refining of natural uranium, from which the 0.7% of the fissile isotope 235 is extracted) are already cancer weapons in action (they have been abundantly used in Iraq, although they have also affected American soldiers), before being considered as high penetration shells. Uranium 238 is as penetrating as steel and heavier than lead. Upon impact, the uranium warheads convert their kinetic energy into heat. They burn, producing oxide and particles of a diameter on the order of a micron. These will contaminate the areas abundantly showered by these projectiles. The inhabitants will contract cancer. Women will give birth to monsters. Thus these enemies of America, who stubbornly refuse democracy, will be well punished.
Note that aircraft manufacturers had equipped their planes with balance weights for flaps made of uranium 238. But during crashes into residential areas, this uranium polluted the sites and caused cancer in firefighters. Since then, the installation of such weights has been banned in newly built aircraft, but many aircraft still in service are equipped with them.
The "psychotronic" or "Zorglonde" (see the Spirou comic strip) version is already as advanced. Thanks to pulsed microwaves, at low power, but modulated in a way to be able to attack subliminally the auditory receptors, it will be possible to induce submissive or suicidal behavior in large human groups, from space.
These waves are very directional. The beams can be used from space, including on wheat fields, forming nice designs, killing insects and hedgehogs instantly, which, by the way, are mammals like you and me.
Americans believe in the virtues of their sophisticated weapons. It is these that will impose peace and democracy in the world. "Si vis pacem, para bellum," said the Romans (if you want peace, prepare for war).
Of course.....
Maximum Pain Weapons
March 23, 2005
Translation: Charles Lahlou
A reader, Mr. Charles Lahlou, informs me of an article published in the United States in the journal New Scientist, which he has translated into French and which mentions a type of weapon intensively developed in the United States. It is about systems designed to create the most intense pain possible in "targets". One of the "collateral" uses of these systems is the possibility of inflicting "clean" torture from a distance.
The source is :
http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn7077
Maximum pain is aim of new US weapon
19:00 02 March 2005
Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition
David Hambling
Related Articles
Top US biologists oppose biodefence boom (01 March 2005)
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons (15 January 2005)
Sweeping stun guns to target crowds (16 June 2004)
The US military is funding development of a weapon that delivers a bout of excruciating pain from up to 2 kilometres away. Intended for use against rioters, it is meant to leave victims unharmed. But pain researchers are furious that work aimed at controlling pain has been used to develop a weapon. And they fear that the technology will be used for torture.
"I am deeply concerned about the ethical aspects of this research," says Andrew Rice, a consultant in pain medicine at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London, UK. "Even if the use of temporary severe pain can be justified as a restraining measure, which I do not believe it can, the long-term physical and psychological effects are unknown."
The research came to light in documents unearthed by the Sunshine Project, an organisation based in Texas and in Hamburg, Germany, that exposes biological weapons research. The papers were released under the US's Freedom of Information Act.
One document, a research contract between the Office of Naval Research and the University of Florida in Gainesville, US, is entitled "Sensory consequences of electromagnetic pulses emitted by laser induced plasmas".
It concerns so-called Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs), which fire a laser pulse that generates a burst of expanding plasma when it hits something solid, like a person (New Scientist print edition, 12 October 2002). The weapon, destined for use in 2007, could literally knock rioters off their feet.
Pain trigger
According to a 2003 review of non-lethal weapons by the US Naval Studies Board, which advises the navy and marine corps, PEPs produced "pain and temporary paralysis" in tests on animals. This appears to be the result of an electromagnetic pulse produced by the expanding plasma which triggers impulses in nerve cells.
The new study, which runs until July and will be carried out with researchers at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, aims to optimise this effect. The idea is to work out how to generate a pulse which triggers pain neurons without damaging tissue.
The contract, heavily censored before release, asks researchers to look for "optimal pulse parameters to evoke peak nociceptor activation" - in other words, cause the maximum pain possible. Studies on cells grown in the lab will identify how much pain can be inflicted on someone before causing injury or death.
Long-term risk
New Scientist contacted two researchers working on the project. Martin Richardson, a laser expert at the University of Central Florida, US, refused to comment. Brian Cooper, an expert in dental pain at the University of Florida, distanced himself from the work, saying "I don't have anything interesting to convey. I was just providing some background for the group." His name appears on a public list of the university's research projects next to the $500,000-plus grant.
John Wood of University College London, UK, an expert in how the brain perceives pain, says the researchers involved in the project should face censure. "It could be used for torture," he says, "the [researchers] must be aware of this."
Amanda Williams, a clinical psychologist at University College London, fears that victims risk long-term harm. "Persistent pain can result from a range of supposedly non-destructive stimuli which nevertheless change the functioning of the nervous system," she says. She is concerned that studies of cultured cells will fall short of demonstrating a safe level for a plasma burst. "They cannot tell us about the pain and psychological consequences of such a painful experience."
Maximum Pain: The Goal of New US Weapons
02 March 2005 19:00
Exclusive article from New Scientist, print edition by David Hambling
Related articles
-
Top US biologists oppose biodefence boom (1st March 2005)
-
Pentagon reveals rejected chemical weapons (15 January 2005)
-
Sweeping stun guns to target crowds (16 June 2004)
The US military is funding the development of a weapon that can cause excruciating pain from up to two kilometers away. Designed for use against rioters, the idea of this new weapon is to leave the victims unharmed. But pain researchers are furious that work aimed at controlling pain has been used to develop a weapon.
And they are afraid that this technology could be used for torture.
"I am deeply concerned about the ethical aspects of this research," reports Andrew Rice, a consultant in pain medicine at Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in London (UK). "Even if the use of temporary severe pain could be justified as a restraint measure, which I don't believe it can, the long-term physical and psychological effects are unknown."
The research came to light in documents revealed by the "Sunshine Project", an organization based in Texas and Hamburg (Germany), which works on research into biological weapons. The documents were revealed under the "Freedom of Information Act".
A document, a research contract between the Office of Naval Research and the University of Florida in Gainesville (USA), is titled "Sensory consequences of electromagnetic pulses emitted by laser-induced plasmas".
It concerns so-called Pulsed Energy Projectiles (PEPs), which fire a laser pulse that generates a burst of expanding plasma when it hits something solid, like a person (New Scientist print edition of 12 October 2002). The weapon, intended for use from 2007, could literally knock rioters off their feet.
Pain trigger
According to a 2003 review of non-lethal weapons by the US Naval Studies Board, which advises the navy and marine corps, PEPs produced "pain and temporary paralysis" in tests on animals. This seems to be the result of an electromagnetic pulse produced by the expanding plasma which triggers impulses in nerve cells.
The new study, which runs until July and will be conducted with researchers at the University of Central Florida in Orlando, aims to optimize this effect.
The idea is to understand how to generate a pulse that triggers pain neurons without damaging the tissues.
The research contract, heavily censored before release, asks researchers to find "optimal pulse parameters to evoke peak nociceptor activation" - in other words, cause the maximum pain possible. Studies on cells grown in the lab will identify how much pain can be inflicted on someone before causing injury or death.
Long-term risk
New Scientist contacted two researchers working on the project. Martin Richardson, a laser expert at the University of Central Florida in the USA, refused to comment. Brian Cooper, an expert in dental pain at the University of Florida, distanced himself from the work, reporting "I have nothing interesting to reveal. I just provided some background for the group." His name appears on the public list of the university's research projects next to the $500,000-plus grant.
John Wood of University College London (UK), an expert in how the brain perceives pain, says the researchers involved in the project should be censured. "It could be used for torture," he says, "the [researchers] must be aware of this."
Amanda Williams, a clinical psychologist at University College London, fears that victims risk long-term harm. "Persistent pain can result from a range of supposedly non-destructive stimuli which nevertheless change the functioning of the nervous system," she reports. She is concerned that studies of cultured cells will fall short of demonstrating a safe level for a plasma burst. "These studies cannot tell us about the pain and psychological consequences of such a painful experience."