Big Brother unveils its plans while God goes AWOL.
May 28, 2005
With the invasion of Iraq we had already seen that the Americans granted themselves the right to attack a country "preventively," the alleged motive, which was later disproved, being the existence and development of "weapons of mass destruction" in that country. Yet it turned out that there were none.
It is hard to resist a comparison with the Hitlerian strategy before 1939. The USA "move their pawns" although this invasion of Iraq can hardly be compared to... the Anschluss, the Nazi Germany's takeover of Austria.
We know that currently the elements in power, who are merely the emanation of the American military-industrial lobby, are actively working to amend the laws so as to be able to have judges appointed by simple majority and thus populate the country with far-right judges. Only in recent days was I able to watch Moore's film "Bowling for Columbine." I find it lesser, less structured than "The Nerve of War," whose subject is the close link, denounced by Eisenhower in his farewell address, between political power and the military-industrial lobby in the United States. Moore's film contains a few shock images, including this interview with the lamentable president of the National Rifle Association, the actor Charlton Heston, who ends up fleeing pitifully into his property to avoid having to answer Moore's questions. The actor found a way to go to the town of Columbine, shortly after the slaughter produced by two young high-schoolers in their school, before they took their own lives, to lend his support to the creed of the association he presides over: the imprescriptible right that every American holds to possess and carry weapons, loaded, which is written into the American constitution. He repeated the operation the day after a six-year-old black boy, having found a loaded Colt at one of his uncles' place while he was unsupervised, his mother having gone off to work, had gone to the home of a friend his age, a white girl, and killed her with a bullet to the head.
Just like on TV.
What emerges from this film (in the USA 11,500 people are killed by bullets annually) is that Americans are literally sick with their violence, sick with weapons, and... scared to death. Everyone is afraid of everyone. Everyone barricades themselves in, arms themselves. A large majority of the population is in the grip of complete paranoia. The hyper-violent series broadcast in the American media only accentuate this unhealthy state, which even manifests itself at the level of children's parties like "Halloween."
Monstrosity becomes, in the United States, a game. For a long time now the shrinks have been telling us that children need weapons, as phallic substitutes, to better blossom their personalities. Others will tell us that they need to dress up as monsters or witches "to better exorcise their fears." In the USA horror films are big business and children suck all that in from their earliest age. I had already mentioned this in a past editorial. In summary, I would say that here is the image of today's America, which shows itself without complexes:
Things therefore follow their course as logically as can be. We have seen implantable chips appear, which now fall under nanotechnology and can find their energy source by exploiting the thermal energy of the living beings in which they are implanted. People would be quite naive to believe that all this is science fiction or lies in a very distant future. It is moreover not excluded that to reach such a level the Americans may have benefited from some "outside" help. Remember that the name of the company that was to equip Gillette razors with chips a tenth of a millimeter in diameter was "Alien Technology."
Active implantable chips, capable of emitting signals likely to be received by beacons, or even by satellites, already exist. It is planned to distribute them through a vast vaccination campaign. The USA plans to move to phase II: setting up space stations allowing them to operate a "crowd control" from space, a "population control" by pulsed microwaves. In fact it is the absurd way in which they plan to take control of the planet. Read on this subject a French account of an article recently published in the New York Times of May 18, 2005. In two words this new American space program is part of this ambient madness which is growing. By withdrawing from the Antiballistic Missile Treaty which prohibited the deployment of armaments in space, Bush was already preparing the ground for a complete militarization of space for the benefit of the United States, always with the logic of "preventive strikes" in the background. Also planned is the placing in orbit of mini-jamming satellites capable of putting out of action all non-American satellites which would broadcast information not in conformity with their vision of the "Grand Future". This program evokes the establishment of the United States in this "intermediate space" (30-120 km altitude, too high for planes, too low for satellites), an approach which would involve the development of a device named "Common Aero Vehicle" capable of delivering unstoppable strikes on the ground and in space. General Lord testified before the members of Congress saying that it would be an "incredible capability for destroying command centers and missile launch sites wherever they are in the world" which could reach its target in 45 minutes after going halfway around the world. The development of this vehicle is considered the maximum priority.
In my humble opinion this craft has existed since 1990, as a spy plane, replacing the tri-sonic SR-71 "Black Bird". It is the Aurora, of which there are many versions, including those which make the craft a firing station. I leave it to the reader to discover the extravagant facets of this marvelous American space program (at a time when many people are starving). But in the United States one does not take out one's wallet, one takes out one's revolver.
Implantable chips will make it possible to hold vast populations under a permanent threat. One day it will be enough to press a button to kill millions of people remotely. In the meantime, BIG BROTHER wishes to generalize the chip identity card according to its own standards and that is the subject of the following article:
Original text inhttp://news.independent.co.uk/uk/politics/story.jsp?story=641731
Translated by Michel Actis
The USA wants to be able to access the future file of British identity cardsBy Kim Sengupta May 27, 2005
The United States wants the proposed identity cards of Great Britain to have the same chip and technology as those used on American documents.
The goal of obtaining the same chip is to ensure compatibility in screening terrorist suspects. But it will also mean that the information contained in British cards can be consulted across the Atlantic.
Michael Chertoff, the newly designated US secretary for homeland security, has already had talks with the home secretary, Charles Clarke, and the transport secretary, Alistair Darling, to discuss the subject. He said yesterday that it was essential to seek compatibility. "I hope that we have the same chip... It would be very bad for us if all the enormous amounts invested in biometric systems did not allow them to work together.
Mr. Chertoff also proposed that British citizens wishing to visit the USA could adopt a "trusted traveler" pact. Thus, they would send their personal information to the US embassy for checking. If approval is given, they would receive a document allowing them to use the "fast lane" during immigration control once they arrive in the USA.
This pilot arrangement will begin in a few months between the USA and Holland, allowing Dutch visitors to use a "trusted traveler" card to enter the USA without being subjected to questioning or search.
Great Britain is one of 27 countries whose citizens do not need visas to enter the USA if they intend to stay less than 90 days. The American government has indicated it wants the 27 to issue new passports by October 26 this year containing a chip and a digital photograph.
According to Mr. Chertoff the verification system was designed solely to detect "terrorists and criminals" and that the main objective was to provide "a fair and balanced system".
US diplomatic sources subsequently stated that Washington does not wish to interfere in the domestic affairs of other countries.
"When we examine only names, we are dependent on primary data and the least of identification technologies - it is the most likely to have spelling mistakes, or identity changes, or fraud," he said.
According to several diplomats this system will avoid errors of suspects as was the case with Yusuf Islam the singer formerly known as Cat Stevens, who was prevented from entering the USA because his activities "could be potentially linked to terrorism". The British government insists that such a link does not exist in the case of Mr. Islam.
However, it is the latest controversy to surround the proposed combined identity card and passport that Britain is due to introduce in three years' time. Rising costs have pushed the cost up to £93 each after the overall estimated cost over ten years to develop the project is £3.1 to 5.8 billion.
There have also been problems with the efficiency of the biometric technology that is supposed to safeguard the security of the cards. There were also verification problems with 30 per cent of those whose fingerprints were taken during an enrolment trial of 10,000 volunteers.
My comment: *A good wave of attacks in France and across all the European countries will be enough to prompt all of these countries to join this "security policy" by adopting the same chip as the USA and England. *
*Will we too have our "9/11"? That does not seem to me to be out of the question. *
To put an end once and for all to misery, famine and disease
The Nazis had a madly expansionist programme, and the Japanese yielded nothing to them on that front. See the dossier devoted to bacteriological weapons developed by General Hishi from the early thirties. These are not exceptions. These are not ethnic or national specificities. It is not because they were Germans or Japanese. No ethnic group is safe from such a monstrosity. If I had had the time to put online the dossier I had prepared on the Algerian War you would have seen to what level of barbarity the French and the Algerians were able to descend.
The Nazis tried to exterminate the Jews, the Gypsies, homosexuals, etc.
Why particularly the Jews? In fact Nazi ideology classified human beings into two categories. There were the dominant and the dominated (the untermenshen, or sub-humans). They did not hide it. All of it was written, in black and white. If the Germans had managed to overcome the "Slavs" in the East, they would have reduced them to slavery. The Japanese would have done the same in another part of the world, they who treated the Chinese of Manchuria as mere animals, slaves, or even laboratory guinea pigs.
This monstrosity is not specific to the Germans and the Japanese. It is everywhere, in each of us. History has shown us how "emblematic figures of communism" like Stalin had reigned by killing millions of people.
If you refer to the special issue of Science et Vie of November 2004 you will find there a testimony from Paul Delouvrier, who was in 1960 Delegate General of France in Algeria. The photograph below shows him, leaving the Elysée in 1960. I am putting this under your nose so that you know, so that you do not lose sight of what we are capable of.
This document is taken from a 90-minute recording. Here are extracts produced in the special issue of Science et Vie, page 107. So it is not corridor gossip, nor a second-hand testimony.:
*Why was the gas not pierced? The pipes, that was easy, with the Fellaghas. Well simply because I came to an agreement with Tunis (it was in Tunis that the GPRA, the Provisional Government of the Algerian Republic, sat). The *
*"Circus" (code name for the oil worksite in the Sahara) was rolling out its thing thanks to Bouakouir, who served as my intermediary... the gas came out because I came to an agreement so that the Fellaghas would never touch it. And the companies took enough risk, and they greased the palms of the people who afterwards went to buy weapons to kill Frenchmen. *
Delouvrier made these revelations shortly before he died. More than forty years have passed. Will this dossier, of the utmost gravity, one day be investigated? One may doubt it. There would be so many things to investigate, so many people to "place under examination". One would get lost in it. And that is how politics is done, the world over. In "high places" they do not say "you only have to pay the Fellaghas so that they do not touch our gas", they say "do what is necessary so that this gas reaches the Mediterranean, it is very important for the future energy independence of France. I insist". The man, who is thinking of his career and does not want to disappoint, answers "Understood, my general", and withdraws backwards. It should also be remembered that the companies were state companies, not private companies.
2 November 2005. The absolute record of the unbelievable:
This morning I receive an email from one of my readers:
|
Hello Sir,
just now on france-inter, I have just heard Paul Delouvrier's son, Matthieu, concerning the institute he directs:
On the presentation page, one can read:
Paul Delouvrier, a senior civil servant of the State under the Fourth and Fifth Republics, is one of the symbolic men of an administration that acts, that invents and that modernizes. He played an important role, often decisive, in the creation of VAT, European construction, the development of the Paris region, the building of new towns and the implementation of the French nuclear power program.
| Hello Sir, |
just now on france-inter, I have just heard Paul Delouvrier's son, Matthieu, concerning the institute he directs:
On the presentation page, one can read:
Paul Delouvrier, a senior civil servant of the State under the Fourth and Fifth Republics, is one of the symbolic men of an administration that acts, that invents and that modernizes. He played an important role, often decisive, in the creation of VAT, European construction, the development of the Paris region, the building of new towns and the implementation of the French nuclear power program.
|
So you see what monstrosities politicians are capable of, even in our own country, for oil and gas money. Do you see a difference in "inhumanity" between the people who were capable of such things and the Nazis, the Japanese? Not me. So tell yourself that such decisions are made daily in every region of the world, by virtue of "superior interests", with the most complete contempt for human lives. As Ziegler shows in his book "L'Empire de la Honte" (Fayard, 2005), poor countries are deliberately starved by forcing them to obtain foreign currency by exporting, for example, coffee instead of cultivating land with food crops to fight famine (example in Brazil, and so many other countries). But things go much further. In fact:
The poor have become a burden on the planet
Why? Because of the nascent rise of robotics. You remember when immigration from the Maghreb was encouraged so that people would go and work on the assembly line in our vehicle production factories. What remains now in those great halls? Robots. You remember the time when cohorts of laborers dug in our streets to dig the slightest trench? Today, perched on one of those marvelous little Japanese machines, a single man does this work. But you haven't seen anything yet. Artificial intelligence is making its way. When it has completed its fusion with robotics there will no longer be any manual work, no service that this combination will not be able to manage. Robots are capable of... everything, of digging trenches, of building houses, bridges, of digging tunnels, of building airplanes, and even of manufacturing... other robots.
So, what use will poor people, the uneducated, all these useless mouths be?
Their elimination has already been planned, in secret. Why do you think civilian populations are showered with depleted uranium shells? Killing the poor is neither more shocking nor less shocking than killing Jews or Gypsies, or homosexuals. It is simply in the logic of things, in the logic of a new world order that is carefully hidden from you but that will find its justification in "terrorism".
On this planet, there are too many people, far too many people, that's obvious. We are literally stepping on each other. And all of that pollutes, emits CO2, creates waste. The Earth would get along very well with "the rich" and robots and without these poor people whom we are not going to educate, house, feed anyway. Seven billion fellows? That would be unmanageable. Discreet solutions must be found to reduce the human herd, even if through "natural phenomena".
That is what will be attempted, as the Nazis once attempted to make themselves masters of the world, after so many others before them.
Try to imagine what would have happened if the Nazis had merely postponed the elimination of the Jews by actively putting their atomic scientists to work. Imagine how history would have evolved if Hitler had been the first to possess the A-bomb, then the H-bomb? England would have been knocked out in no time at all. Russia likewise. Imagine if the Japanese had been able, with the help of rockets developed by the Nazi Von Braun (for he was one and never missed a fine collective hanging in the underground factory of Dora) to ravage the United States with the bacteriological weapons developed by General Hishi.
You remember Otto Hahn's phrase, the discoverer of fission, when the possibility of making a frightfully destructive bomb from it had been mentioned before him:
*- God would not allow it! *
God? I believe he has long since gone absent without leave.
Next to all that, Europe's little problems are enough to make one smile. Our European visionaries do not realize that history runs much faster than they imagine. The truth is that the lords of money, on the scale of the entire planet, are hurrying to come to an agreement and barricading themselves in their castles while distributing to their serfs, future unemployed, future slaves, fallacious and idiotic promises. In this increasingly ubuesque world, weapons to kill are being forged, weapons to stupefy, to brainwash.
There is a very small fringe of people who are beginning to think that we are "ruled" by corrupt imbeciles, informed by paid liars, that thieves move about in complete freedom and murderers with complete impunity, while fence states stash away their hoards.
*Nowadays it is not the Bastilles that should be attacked, but bank secrets and tax havens. *
*There is no theft without receiving. *
But it's funny, from the right to the left, passing through the greens, nobody has this idea, it seems.
Back to New Back to Guide Back to home page
Number of visits since May 28, 2005: