Public Order
September 2, 2004
I caught a glimpse of a recent image from the American Republican Party convention, where Bush’s nomination was confirmed. His wife came forward to speak on his behalf:
"You know, it’s not just because he’s my husband, but he’s really a good man. America needs a strong man like him."
The sensation? The entrance of Schwarzenegger. The beast: not heavy, steel gaze, come to lend his support to Georges Debeliou. We get the impression the game is already over. The Democrats admit to being 4 points behind in polls. The Republicans boast 15. But you know what? Too bad Schwarzenegger isn’t of American descent—he’d sweep any election, any opponent. During this sequence, an elderly American woman said, "I think his election as governor of California is the best thing that ever happened to this state." Why? She probably doesn’t even know.
Reagan was a bit mentally weak. It showed on his face. Bush isn’t much better. Fortunately, he has an earpiece. When he doesn’t have it, he’s bored. Watching that eight-minute sequence from Moore’s film, where, upon learning the Twin Towers had suffered a serious attack, he remains completely unresponsive.
Second attempt: "Mr. President, the country is under attack." He bites his lip and resumes leafing through his book.
A reader wrote to me: "He didn’t want to worry the children." But any ordinary person would have smiled broadly and said, "Kids, you know a President has lots to do. Right now, I’m being called. Excuse me. I’ll try to come back later, if I can, and in the meantime, be good." And once he joined his team, he’d have asked, "What’s this story about an attack?" But he remained motionless, for eight minutes.
I believe Schwarzenegger would have done better. But too bad, he’s not of American origin. In short, we can assume Bush’s re-election will happen. He has all the media on his side. I still see in my mind the incredible clown show that was Schwarzenegger’s campaign, facing off against weak opponents. I couldn’t believe my eyes. It was Einstein who said this country had gone straight from barbarism to decadence. But can we bring it back? How many voted for a puppet with a sullen face, dressed in black, carrying a red rose and his "quiet strength"?
Moore did what he could, letting images speak for themselves through his film. He even accelerated the film’s distribution by encouraging the creation of pirate copies. But we can guess it won’t matter. If Bush is re-elected, where will we go?
Yesterday I heard someone on TV say:
"There hasn’t been a suicide attack in Israel since July."
One day it will be:
"There hasn’t been a suicide attack in 48 hours, but this morning..."
Where are we headed? Good question. It seems 47% of Americans are starting to wonder if the September 11 attacks weren’t entirely clear. I’ve reproduced information about seismic recordings taken at Colombia University just before the twin towers collapsed, lasting 10 and 8 seconds respectively. I haven’t seen these seismograms, but judging by the commentary, everything points to explosives being detonated at the base of the buildings. Why would such abnormally powerful and sharp signals have been recorded before the mass of the towers, reduced to rubble, struck the ground of Manhattan?
But Dominique Baudis, President of the Superior Council of Audiovisual, had written to France Télévision advising against hosting Thierry Meyssan, who “obviously was spreading rumors without any foundation.”
That makes sense. When something is so enormous, it’s not just unbelievable—it becomes outright false.
Files are in place. People are reading them, forming a preliminary idea. But if all this were true, "God protect us," as they used to say in the Middle Ages. Elsewhere, we read about progress in implantable chip technology. In the U.S., people recommend equipping the homeless (potential delinquents!) with them right now. Like stray dogs. A reader sent me a website praising new American technologies.
What I’m saying seems to be confirmed. We see the pattern of the ionized gas mirror, capable of reflecting microwave beams, just as I sketched it a year ago. The emphasis is on the key importance of "weather weapons." There’s an interesting figure: a tropical cyclone equals 10,000 hydrogen bombs. Non-polluting. No traces. It could pass for a natural phenomenon. Too bad there aren’t any cyclones in Iraq.
In the end, more and more people are asking, "Is the end of the world not already underway?" It increasingly looks like it. It’s like 1939, except the madmen now have far greater means—major means, one might say. But mentalities haven’t changed. Perhaps you’ve seen my dossier on Japanese biological weapons, developed as early as the 1930s in Manchuria by General Hishi, who died peacefully in bed after handing over all his notes on his fascinating experiments to the Americans in exchange for silence. Japan wasn’t under threat at the time. But Japanese strategists were pondering how to defeat the U.S. That’s when I recalled those balloon arrivals along the U.S. West Coast, carrying such light payloads. Balloons that were calibrated to cross the entire Pacific by riding a jet stream—something only the Japanese knew about at the time—then descend when rising air currents brought them over the initial rocky foothills of America. But what could you possibly deliver to the U.S. with such a fragile balloon? One kilogram of explosives? Two? No—plague germs, anything at all. Even then, people thought about this coldly. People who wouldn’t have minded killing a hundred or two million people on a new Lebensraum, a new living space for the Rising Sun. And you think this has changed?
People like this exist everywhere, in all countries, more or less powerful, more or less entrenched. The argument of the war against terrorism gives them full power. If we knew what’s going on in military laboratories, we’d be chilled to the bone.
I’m beginning to understand what I might still be useful for. To make you ask questions. A reader wrote to me, "Thank you for providing questions to my answers." So I write something from time to time. As long as it’s still possible. One day, sites like mine might be shut down by the CSA on the grounds:
Disturbing Public Order
Number of visits since September 2, 2004:
Return to News
Return to Guide
Return to Big Brother Summary
Return to Homepage