The Climate Weapon
September 12, 2002
page 2
Why in the wheat fields?
Because there is no human being in tall wheat, especially at night. And if these pulsed microwaves are powerful enough to kill a bird or a hedgehog, they would have the same effect on a human being. So, what is the purpose of these experiments? To kill people one day, making it look like the work of E.T.?
You know the Chinese proverb: "When a man points at the Moon, the wise look at the star, the fool at the finger." For twenty years, the majority of people have asked, "Why these shapes?" while only a few wondered how they could possibly be made. The entire Mendelbrojt ensemble, the face in the wheat, and more recently E.T.'s face—none of this matters. What matters is what lies behind it, and admit it: it's something.
When someone finally determines the carrier frequency and modulation frequency that optimally affect the wheat nodes, what will happen? At the very least, we might even sell detectors tuned to these frequencies. Will Anglo-American military forces risk continuing these "interesting experiments"? Stay tuned.
I return now from this digression on the theme of this dossier. Is a "weather weapon" conceivable? For a long time, I, too, remained skeptical. But lately, since my contact with the HAARP project and its extensions, I've reconsidered the question.
Recently, a radio listener reminded us of the mysterious luminous formations observed in Norway (not a new phenomenon), phenomena that had mobilized a whole army of ufologists equipped with cameras and photographic devices. Yet we now learn that the HAARP project has ramifications... in that country. Don't the puzzle pieces seem to be slowly coming together? Let's begin with a digression on nuclear winter. The Earth receives 1.5 kilowatts of solar energy per square meter on its sunlit side. That’s enormous. When you extend this to regions covering hundreds of kilometers on each side, you accumulate staggering amounts of energy over hours, days. This energy drives terrestrial weather phenomena—winds, updrafts. Thanks to these, polluted, germ-laden air near the ground is carried aloft and sterilized by UV rays. You know well that "air is purer at high altitudes." That’s even where, in the past, they sent tuberculosis patients. The same solar energy causes water evaporation and triggers the entire subsequent cycle, with the same sterilization effect. Of course, violent phenomena occur—storms, cyclones, tornadoes. To this basic thermal energy, derived from the atmosphere absorbing solar energy, is added the energy associated with water evaporation and condensation (the "latent heat of vaporization" that powers tropical cyclones). I won't give a meteorology lesson here. But we'll do the opposite. Let's imagine exploding several thousand nuclear warheads in the Northern Hemisphere (as would have happened in case of a conflagration between East and West before the collapse of the USSR). This would hurl a billion tons of dust—averaging one micron in diameter—into the upper atmosphere. All this was calculated and studied in the early 1980s by my friend Vladimir Alexandrov, who died in Madrid after revealing what the powers that be didn’t want the common people to know: the dangers of what he called
nuclear winter
—a concept that took ten years to reach the public ear.
Back then, I tried to warn people. The media turned a deaf ear (without forgetting, for those who remember: L'Humanité!). Foolishness, short-sightedness, the journalistic world’s deafness. No one cared about the assassination of this courageous man in the Spanish capital, where he was abducted in broad daylight in front of prostitutes who testified. A flawless operation. Today, Alexandrov must lie buried in some cement pillar somewhere in the capital. Back then, it was a "hot" issue. A secret service agent (according to Gonzalez Matta, then a collaborator at Actuel, former Spanish secret service agent working for the magazine) was also murdered in a city parking lot for having investigated too closely into this disappearance. "Don’t get close to this," Matta had warned us, "it bites very hard." Later, Scientific American published a reassuring article, and the scientific community unanimously agreed that Alexandrov had exaggerated, and that at worst it would be an "nuclear autumn." Another digression, but excuse me—memories rise like bubbles from the bottom of a swamp. Back then, I visited Stenchikov, Alexandrov’s collaborator, in Moscow. He had continued their work and confirmed the values they had found two years earlier—such as an average temperature drop of 25°C, and a light occlusion factor of 400 (the light of a full moon at noon). I wrote to the Americans, sending them Stenchikov’s latest publications. They replied... that they were unaware of these studies. Nonsense. Scientists had been paid by the military to "de-dramatize" the issue of nuclear winter. This won’t be the first nor the last time scientists lend a hand to the military to divert public attention from a subject the general public must continue to remain ignorant of. In passing, beyond the complicit scientists, there are the journalists.
Why bring up the issue of nuclear winter in connection with a possible climate weapon? To illustrate a concept. The injection into the stratosphere of fine particles, linked to the plumes of nuclear explosions, would create, within a week, a veil over the entire Northern Hemisphere, preventing solar energy from reaching the ground. Later, atmospheric mixing would spread this cover across the entire planet. Normal conditions would not return for 18 months. Why? Because that’s how long it takes a one-micron particle to fall back to the ground, simply due to air resistance. The meteorological consequences would be colossal. The Earth would be deprived of an extraordinary amount of joules for ten months. Do the calculation. The atmosphere becomes "super-stable." Indeed, solar energy being blocked at altitude, the air mass there heats up, becoming warmer than the air in contact with the ground. Hence: no updrafts, no continuous sterilization of air by UV rays. The ground surface turns into a breeding ground. But we won’t list all the ills associated with nuclear winter (see the chapter devoted to it in "Les Enfants du Diable," Albin Michel, 1995). What matters is that a phenomenon involving an enormous amount of energy was created by a nuclear war that itself involved a million times less energy. In other words: with a "good nuclear war" and the follow-up provided by this nuclear winter phenomenon...