twin universe cosmology

En résumé (grâce à un LLM libre auto-hébergé)

  • The article explores the cosmology of twin universes, focusing on the geometric framework and the Newtonian approximation.
  • It presents equations describing the evolution of the universes, with negative curvature indices and different matter densities.
  • The universes are gravitationally coupled, leading to unstable evolution and differences in spatial scales.

twin universe cosmology Astrophysics of matter and ghost matter.
1. The geometric framework. The matter era and the Newtonian approximation. (p3)
(33-a)

(33-b)

(33-c)

(33-d)

… From (33-b) and (33-d), the curvature indices k and k* must be negative; we therefore obtain, with k = k* = –1*. The initial evolution laws are simply linear: R = R* » r*. However, as will be shown later, the matter densities may become different. We then obtain the following system:
(34-a)

(34-b)

(34-c)

(34-d)

from which we immediately deduce:

(35-a)

(35-b)

By introducing mass conservation in both folds:
(36)

w R³ = constant  w* R³ = constant

The system then becomes:
(37-a)

(37-b)

… Notice that R = R** implies R¨ = R¨* = 0*. On the other hand, if the two universes were "fully coupled," that is, if R/R = constant*, they would then correspond to Friedmann models, with "parallel evolutions." However, we consider that they are coupled by the gravitational field, via (37-a) and (37-b), which show that the linear expansion is unstable. For example, if R > R**, then R¨ > 0 and R¨* < 0*. The system can be solved numerically; the typical solution corresponds to Figure 1.

Fig. 1: Evolution of the scale parameters of the universe and the ghost universe.

There is a "common history," described through the common system of coordinates:

{ t, u, q, j }

… Using equations (13) to (16), we can return to the systems { t, r, q, j } and { t* , r* , q, j }. Note that the light velocities c and c**, as well as the characteristic times T and T**, can be different. If c = c** and T = T** = 1, we simply get (t = t ; t* = – t*).

Why can't we simply set r* = r*?
Because the length scales R and R* are found to be different. Consider two sets of conjugated points (A, A** ) and (B, B** ). Assume (q_A = q_B ; j_A = j_B ). The two sets correspond to radial markers u_A and u_B. Since they are conjugated, A and A** refer to the same radial marker u_A. The same applies to the conjugated points B and B**, corresponding to the value u_B. The distance AB is R (u_B – u_A), while the distance AB is R* (u_B – u_A). They are different, since R* ≠ R.

Fig. 2: Different distances between the conjugated points (A, B) and (A, B).**

… If we assume that the coordinates (t, x, y, z) and (t*, x*, y*, z*) describe two observers located in the folds F and F**, they are like two spectators watching the same movie in two different rooms, but:

  • the screens have different sizes (R and R**);
  • the order of events is opposite (t and t* have opposite signs);
  • what is "right" on one screen is "left" on the other (enantiomorphy).

This is an extension of Sakharov's initial idea ([5], [6], [7] and [8]), with different spatial scales.