twin universe astrophysics and cosmology

En résumé (grâce à un LLM libre auto-hébergé)

  • The text explores the concept of a twin universe in astrophysics and cosmology, focusing on 2D numerical simulations.
  • It presents a calculation method based on a Euclidean torus, with particular attention to antipodal points and their gravitational influence.
  • Figures illustrate geodesic paths on different types of tori, highlighting the complexity of gravity in these structures.

astrophysical twin universe and cosmology

Matter ghost matter astrophysics.
5: Results of 2D numerical simulations. VLS.
About a possible scheme for galaxy formation.

.(p2)

Another method, also mentioned, introduces a distance truncation at the antipode of each point. Note that our square is an Euclidean, flat torus, with zero curvature everywhere. See figure 3.

Fig. 3 :** The "Euclidean torus".** We have indicated the center P of the square. From a geometric point of view, the points A, B, C and D must be identified to an antipode of P on the torus. On our square, straight lines represent the geodesics of the Euclidean torus. The lower-left image of figure 3 is incorrect, because we simply cannot draw a "flat torus". The gravitational action of a mass located at the antipodal point (a, B, C, D) on the point P is also zero. Same for a mass located in (H, K) or (M, N). See figure 4.

Fig. 4 :** On a torus, a point P has three antipodal points :**

(A, B, C, D) (M, N) (H, K)

The corresponding geodesic path lengths are fundamentally different :
(1)

Note that, on a torus (whatever its curvature), we have an infinite number of geodesics joining two given points P and Q, one being the shortest. Figure 5 corresponds to the spatially periodic description.

Fig. 5 :** Two geodesics joining two distinct points P and Q.** Spatially periodic description.

On figure 6, we have indicated the shortest path. The non-Euclidean torus representation is just a topological description, because this torus has local positive and negative curvature. A geodesic of such a torus is obviously not a geodesic of our "flat torus".

**Fig. **6 : The shortest path from P to Q.

On figure 7, we have indicated a longer path.

Fig.7 : A longer path, from point P to point Q.

We see that things are not as simple as they seem at first glance.

If we place the mass points on a S2 sphere, a unique geodesic connects two given points. See figure 8.

Fig. 8 : Two points on a sphere, connected by a single geodesic.

When calculating the corresponding gravitational interaction, we must consider two lengths :
(3)

d = a R
d' = R ( 2ap - a )

If the two points attract each other, they tend to meet. Conversely, if they repel each other, they tend to occupy diametrically opposite positions.