In a recent video I presented our alternative theory to the black hole theory (mathematically inconsistent). The black hole model is indeed based on an interpretation error of the solution found in 1916 by the German mathematician Karl Schwarzschild, an interpretation that contains its share of absurdities, among others: "Inside the black hole, the time coordinate becomes r, while t becomes a spatial coordinate". Re-examining this analysis leads to another model, when the mass of an object becomes such that it causes its mutation. We show that at the center of the object, the excess mass inverts. This negative mass, then repelled by the object, is violently ejected from it and disappears into the cosmos. It passes through the hyperdense object without problem, interacting with it only in a (anti) gravitational way. This ejection of excess mass, extremely rapid, continues until ## If it were a black hole, this gravitational redshift would be infinite: that is, its center would be perfectly black. The following drawing shows the reddening of photons, leaving the "event horizon" with difficulty, and which would eventually lose all their energy.
The "black hole" and its infinite gravitational redshift.
Any massive object produces this gravitational redshift, including the Sun, an effect which is then negligible. When the excess mass has been eliminated, the object becomes a "Plugstar", which is just at the edge of criticality. If it subsequently captures a new influx of matter, this will be automatically eliminated, always by inversion and ejection, in the same way that a toilet eliminates water that one would dare to pour into its central drain.
With the ejection of mass by inversion, the object becomes just sub-critical (this mass automatically adjusting to 0.838 times the classic "Schwarzschild mass" (which is supposed to turn the object into a black hole). The gravitational redshift effect then corresponds (schematically) to this:
Gravitational redshift effect for a Plugstar ("sub-critical")
As photons leave the object, they lose energy, but their wavelength increases by a factor of 3 (the brightness temperature of the central part of the object is divided by 3). Here would be (in false colors) the image of such an object, if it did not rotate:
Image of a spherical Plugstar (which does not rotate)
Now compare to the two available images: on the left, the quasar located at the center of the galaxy M-87 and on the right, the object located at the center of our galaxy, the Milky Way:
Far from the objects, the brightness temperature is close to zero. For M-87, the ratio of the maximum temperature and the temperature at the center of the object (gravitational redshift), taking into account the measurement uncertainties, is 5.6/1.8. For Sgr A, we find 13/4. These two ratios are close to 3. Therefore, they are not "giant black holes" but "Plugstars".
This observation confirms what was announced in my video at 1 hour 15 minutes.
" ***There will be other images corresponding to other objects of this type (like the one at the center of the Milky Way) and we conjecture that they will all have a redshift of ***3"
Explanations going back to 1 hour 03 minutes 45 seconds.
In English, "plug" means "drain". The following drawing is an image of such a mechanism.
There will be other images of "black holes" ("giant" or "stellar").
We predict that they will all show a gravitational redshift not exceeding 3.
This will be the case for the remnants of massive stars at the end of their lives, in the form of supernovae. But very massive stars (up to 200 solar masses) have a different fate and give rise to completely different residual objects.
The objects at the centers of galaxies are not the result of the accretion of several supernova remnants. They result from joint fluctuations of the metrics that cause the birth of density waves which, focusing at the centers of galaxies, give rise to a quasar. The object in M-87 is "active", as indicated by the presence of its two plasma emission jets.
One of the two emission lobes of the M-87 quasar. Only the one directed towards us is visible, the other is "redshifted" by the Doppler effect. This emission turbulence has an explanation.
The object at the center of the Milky Way is a quasar remnant. If sufficiently intense metric fluctuations occur, it may temporarily be reactivated. Each time this happens, the object ejects excess mass through its inversion and ejection. The Hoag galaxy (serpens constellation, discovered in 1950) has a density wave which, after its course, will give rise to a quasar at its center in ... a hundred million years:
Hoag galaxy
This phenomenon is similar to a tsunami. When this mass of gas gathers at the center, the density increases and the temperature exceeds a thousand billion degrees. All the mass then becomes the site of fusion reactions and the object emits more energy than all the stars in the galaxy. As it passes, the gas ring, in the form of plasma, gathers the weak magnetic field of the galaxy, in the manner of a harvester gathering wheat stalks. In doing so, the field strength increases, by conservation of flux, and reaches 1000 teslas. This dipolar field then forces the fusion products to be ejected in two opposite lobes. As the field decreases within them, the particles are accelerated, and this "natural particle accelerator" thus gives rise to "cosmic rays".
How much time will pass before the specialists' community and the journalists (especially scientific ones) react to the content of this page?