UFOs and American secret weapons

En résumé (grâce à un LLM libre auto-hébergé)

  • The book 'UFOs and American Secret Weapons' addresses the links between UFOs and American military technological advances.
  • The author criticizes gullibility towards suspicious documents, such as the 'Gulf Letter' signed by Ummo, and emphasizes the importance of verifying sources.
  • He warns against disinformation and claims that the United States exploits UFO discoveries for technological advances, particularly in MHD propulsion.

UFOs and American Secret Weapons

Available in bookstores since January 9, 2003

The cover illustration is supposed to represent the X 47 A.

ISBN: 2 - 226 - 13616 - 9

Albin Michel, 22 rue Huygens, 75014 Paris.


**August 2012. Ten years later. **

This book is now a collector's item.

A sad fellow who courageously expresses himself under the pseudonym of roger nymo (an anagram of Geronimo, a character with whom he probably has little in common) attacked my writings.

Well, this is an opportunity for some clarification. Indeed, in UFOs and American Secret Weapons I had cited "the Gulf letter," signed by Ummo.

A fairly well-made document. But the facts have shown it to be a lie. Poor Saddam Hussein was not, as this text claimed, months away from possessing an atomic bomb.

This shows one thing. From that time, secret services already knew enough about the Ummo dossier to be able to produce a very well-made fake. There was "the true detail" that looked like an up-to-date revelation. It was the beginning of GPS.

The authors of this letter: the CIA collaborating with the MOSSAD. As usual...

Indeed, the American troops of the Desert Storm operation were able to find their way with certainty in the middle of the desert, something the Iraqis doubted.

The object appeared in its civilian version a few years later. This shows that when the American military reveals some technological advances, the state of the art is far ahead.

This experience shows how much we must be cautious regarding these texts. The only real test remains the question "do they bring new and truly scientific data and ideas?"

To this question I have answered positively for decades, and I continue to do so, following recent discoveries in cosmology.

But we can (and must) re-examine these documents, from A to Z, including those that predict a real apocalypse, just in case humans become aware of the visit and presence of extraterrestrials on our planet.

But honestly, in this summer of 2012, when war noises are once again heard, one might be tempted to say "could it be any worse?"

Corollary: could these documents not have been cleverly designed and written by people who have everything to gain from this ignorance, allowing them to continue their lamentable actions for profit and power?

IS FECIT CUI PRODEST

"He who is the author is the one who benefits."

So we don't have to look far. Those who want to keep humanity in its stupor are those who want to maintain and expand their power, and those who would not survive the collapse of their planetary visions, of their blind belief in their various beliefs, such as the one that makes them claim inalienable rights to their promised land, for example.

I watched the movie Matrix yesterday. It's really well done. A few days earlier, a young journalist from the magazine Inrockuptible had come to interview me, as a "conspiracist." Who had given me this label? "People" in forums, always courageously hidden behind their pseudonyms.

Not much has been said about all this. I have fought a lot to challenge the official theory of the events of September 11. Ten years later, I was still shocked by the little echo of this anniversary date. This crime will remain unpunished, like many others. It's pointless to accumulate evidence for those who don't want to think.

I am 75 years old. What to do? I use my neurons to "break the nuclear elite." It's quite pleasant and relatively easy. Iter: there are only ruins left. Mégajoule: same thing.

All these people don't really want to face me, mano a mano.

I'm taking a break, and when I recover, I won't just write. I'll back up my claims with videos, abundantly illustrated. I already have a YouTube account. In my hands, the video weapon is stronger than the written word.

It's true that 9 DVDs I've recorded are already circulating. But the one who distributes them profits, alone.


**An addition dated November 4, 2002: Following the recording of a 45-minute interview for Canadian television. **

A Canadian television channel sent a team that traveled through different countries, including France, to prepare a report on UFOs and the Ummo case. I was therefore one of the various people interviewed. My interview was scheduled for 45 minutes. The journalists were first surprised to see me reappear after seven years of silence. I explained myself. I think it's time to explain two things to the public:

1 - Americans have been handling the UFO dossier with the greatest attention for more than half a century and are now exploiting its benefits in the form of technological breakthroughs entirely focused on weapons. The Russians also know about it for as long as they have, but their economic collapse has prevented them from reaping these benefits.

2 - In other technologically developed countries (if we except maybe China) everyone has remained out of the picture for several reasons. They were first very sensitive to the powerful disinformation policy disseminated by the United States since the end of the 1940s. The discredit work carried out by the Americans was remarkable. Not having, unlike the USA (for this country since the end of the 1940s), tangible evidence that could lead to conviction, other countries, starting with the Europeans, remained in expectation for decades. If awareness is beginning (in France, the COMETA report, 1999), it is far too late and the delay is now irreparable.

The Canadian journalist who interviewed me said:

*- You are greatly criticized by your colleagues.

  • By whom, in particular? *

His answer surprised me greatly because he then cited not an authentic scientist but a person, despite his responsibilities, who could not deserve such a title. And this is where we see that it is high time to enlighten the public. In France, the UFO dossier has never been handled in a truly scientific way. People are deluding themselves about the level of reflection "animating the high echelons of the state and the army." As my book will show, these people... know nothing, or almost nothing. They only have "some disturbing analysis results," which have emerged from this chain:

**public ----> gendarmerie ----> SEPRA -----> laboratories of the ETCA (Etablissement technique Central de l'Armement) **

French military personnel are completely unaware of the advances made by the Americans in the field of MHD applied to underwater propulsion and hypersonic flight. At the end of October, the "Euronaval" exhibition was held in France, a kind of fair where French cannon merchants can present their production to envoys from foreign countries, including the Saudis. A aeronautical journalist who attended questioned French torpedo experts. Learning (something I had already said in conferences and in a radio show) that, in my opinion, the Americans would have MHD torpedoes capable of reaching two or...