In a recent video I presented our alternative theory to black hole theory (mathematically inconsistent). The black hole model is indeed based on a misinterpretation of the solution found in 1916 by German mathematician Karl Schwarzschild, an interpretation that includes its share of absurdities, among others: "Inside the black hole, the time coordinate becomes r, while t becomes a spatial coordinate." Revisiting this analysis reveals another model, when the mass of an object becomes such that it triggers its mutation. We show that at the center of the object, the excess mass reverses. This negative mass, subsequently repelled by the object, is violently ejected from it and lost in the cosmos. It passes through the hyperdense object without issue, interacting with it only in a (anti)gravitational manner. This extremely rapid ejection of excess mass continues until the object returns to a subcritical mass state. This produces a gravitational redshift effect of 3.
If it were a black hole, this gravitational redshift phenomenon would be infinite: meaning its center would be perfectly black. The diagram below shows the reddening of photons, painfully leaving the "event horizon" and ultimately losing all their energy.
The "black hole" and its infinite gravitational redshift effect.
Every massive object produces this gravitational redshift, including the Sun, although the effect is negligible in that case. Once the excess mass has been eliminated, the object becomes a "PLUGSTAR," situated just at the threshold of criticality. If it subsequently captures new matter, this will automatically be eliminated, again through reversal and ejection, in the same way that a toilet flush removes water poured into it via its central drain.
With mass ejection via reversal, the object becomes just subcritical (this mass automatically adjusting to 0.838 times the classical "Schwarzschild mass" (which is supposed to turn the object into a black hole). The gravitational redshift effect then corresponds (schematically) to this:
Gravitational redshift effect for a PLUGSTAR ("subcritical")
As they leave the object, photons lose energy, but their wavelength increases by a factor of 3 (the brightness temperature of the object's central part is divided by 3). Here is what an image of such an object would look like (in false color), if it were not rotating:
Image of a spherical plugstar (non-rotating)
Now compare this with the two available images: on the left, the quasar located at the heart of galaxy M-87, and on the right, the object located at the center of our galaxy, the Milky Way:
Far from the objects, the brightness temperature is close to zero. For M-87, the ratio of the maximum temperature to the temperature at the object's center (gravitational redshift), modulo measurement uncertainties, is 5.6/1.8. For Sgr A, we find 13/4. These two ratios are close to 3. Therefore, these are not "giant black holes" but "PLUGSTARS."
This observation confirms what was stated in my video at 1 hour and 15 minutes.
" In the future, there will be other images corresponding to other objects of this type (such as the one located at the center of the Milky Way), and we conjecture that they will all have a redshift of 3"
Explanations starting at 1 hour, 3 minutes, and 45 seconds.
In English, "plug" means "drain stopper." The diagram below is an image of such a mechanism.
There will be other images of "black holes" ("giant" or "stellar").
We predict that they will all exhibit a gravitational redshift not exceeding 3.
This will be the case for the end-of-life remnants of massive stars, in the form of supernovae. However, very high-mass stars (up to 200 solar masses) have a different fate and produce totally different residual objects.
The objects located at the centers of galaxies do not result from the accretion of multiple supernova remnants. They result from joint fluctuations in the metrics that cause the birth of centripetal density waves which, focusing at the centers of galaxies, give rise to a quasar. The M-87 object is "active," as indicated by the presence of its two plasma emission jets.
One of the two emission lobes of the M-87 quasar. Only the one directed towards us is visible; the other is "redshifted" by the Doppler effect. The turbulence of this emission has an explanation.
The object located at the center of the Milky Way is a quasar remnant. If sufficiently intense metric fluctuations occur, it may find itself momentarily reactivated. Each time this happens, the object evacuates excess mass through its reversal and ejection. The Hoag's Object galaxy (Serpens constellation, discovered in 1950) possesses a centripetal density wave which, once its course is complete, will give rise to a quasar at its center in ... about a hundred million years:
Hoag's Object galaxy
This phenomenon is similar to a tsunami. When this mass of gas gathers at the center, the density increases and the temperature exceeds one trillion degrees. The entire mass then becomes the site of fusion reactions, and the object emits more energy than all the stars in the galaxy combined. As it passes, the gas ring, in plasma form, gathers the lines of the galaxy's weak magnetic field, much like a harvester gathering wheat stalks. In doing so, the field intensity increases due to flux conservation, reaching 1000 teslas. This dipolar field then forces the fusion products to eject along two diametrically opposed lobes. As the field decreases within these lobes, the particles are accelerated, and this "natural particle accelerator" thus gives birth to "cosmic rays."
How long will it be before the community of specialists, and journalists (particularly science journalists), react to the content of this page?
