The Jesse Ventura Phenomenon
May 3, 2013
May 15, 2013: The Ray of Death
I discovered the existence of Jesse Ventura only a few weeks earlier, while he was hosting a series of "Conspiracy Theory" programs since 2009. Quite a few people I asked to watch his different episodes initially reacted negatively, saying it was due to the sensationalist style of the presentation.
Here is the presentation text for each of his programs:
Hidden Power
Secrets
Concealment
Corruption
You think you know everything
Error!
Former Governor
Former Navy SEAL (minesweeper)
Wrestler
I've heard some great things, and now I think it's high time you knew the truth.
Before continuing, I'll make a simple remark. I put on a page of my website the links leading to his most intense videos, asking my readers to send me their opinions.
I didn't have time to receive many. Forty-eight hours after my announcement, these YouTube videos became inaccessible.
Here was my announcement:
Jesse Ventura Videos
:
Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later)
FEMA camps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwN36UTzqxQ
Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later)
September 11
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7ZLK6xchMY
Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later)
The Bilderberg Group
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm3FZJ94t1M
Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later)
HAARP Project
Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3SNIdHMYuk
Assassination of JFK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLOturMN5Wo
In English: The Pentagon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9tvrYg85qU
The journalist who leaves (2009) from reopen 9/11 (subtitled)
Ventura confronts this disinformation expert: David Icke, with his theory of an invasion by reptilians
( in English. Too bad. Could someone subtitle it? )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYpMBJNL0TU
In the days that followed, many readers directed me to active links, giving these same videos, especially on dailymotion.
Jesse Ventura Videos (working links)
:
FEMA camps
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xlirw1_les-camps-f-e-m-a-par-jesse-ventura_news#.UXxxbt5OLIU
September 11
The Bilderberg Group
HAARP Project
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xliuj0_le-projet-haarp-par-jesse-ventura_news#.UXxy-N5OLIU
Assassination of JFK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLOturMN5Wo
Jesse Ventuta. About the global warming theory
In English: The attack on the Pentagon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9tvrYg85qU
The journalist who leaves (2009) from reopen 9/11 (subtitled)
Ventura confronts this disinformation expert: David Icke, with his theory of an invasion by reptilians
( in English. Too bad. Could someone subtitle it? )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYpMBJNL0T
Watch these videos, and for good measure, make backups
It seems that the files could be downloaded in high definition at
http://uploaded.net/folder/jkeund
What is the explanation? Since it's about copyright claims, could it mean that the rights holders of these American productions reacted quickly, submitting requests to YouTube? Do these rights holders follow what is happening on the other side of the Atlantic that closely? And if so, why wouldn't they have intervened for the uploads on Dailymotion?
Another question: who provided the French dubbing (and not just subtitles, which is accessible to the average internet user) of these videos? Are there dubbed versions in other languages? Does anyone know of French-speaking channels where these videos could have been broadcast, and when?
An hypothesis: the French dubbing could have been done by broadcasters of a Canadian show. If someone can shed light on this, they will be welcome.
I received very few negative reactions. Here is a typical reaction, among the many I received:
Alain P.
Hello
I didn't know this series and I really enjoy watching it.
The format is quite surprising, but the governor has a lot of charisma.
The content is interesting, precise and detailed.
They managed to avoid the pitfall of presenting too many facts and dispersing attention.
The report on 9/11 deals with the essentials and poses the right question about the collapse of the towers and the black boxes.
Alain
Some even changed their initial positions.
Read the message from a colleague scientist:
Dear JP,
Yeah, I also hadn't really taken the time to watch a full video of Ventura, finding him excessive in special effects.
But I must say I was finally positively impressed by his approach and his ability to make people talk, to provoke confrontations: he has some real assets as a former governor and uses them quite effectively.
I was impressed by the investigation on the assassination of JFK and the confession of the man on his hospital bed!!
I notice that some of the videos dubbed in French are accessible, for example here:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL52025718652E8216
Fred
What can be said about these programs, their form and their content?
Many are well documented. I will cite those on September 11, the Bilderberg Group, the Kennedy assassination, the Pentagon, the FEMA camps, and global warming. Ventura "goes in deep". A journalism that, in France, we certainly aren't used to. He breaks down doors, gets interviews, face-to-face confrontations with people he doesn't hold back. I think of the one where he pushes a FEMA official into a corner.
The form? You have to understand. Ventura tries to move things. And to do so, he wouldn't succeed by producing polished programs, aired at a late hour. He targets his audience (the American heartland) with shocking, spectacular sequences. For example, in the investigation on the Kennedy assassination, he tries to reconstruct Oswald's shot, from the library from which he was supposedly able to mortally wound John Kennedy. To do this, he climbs into a basket placed on the arm of a crane. With the same weapon as Oswald, he tries to perform the same shot, in as few seconds as possible, and repeatedly fails, with such a primitive weapon. I don't think he fakes this sequence. Many ballistics experts immediately said that it was impossible, with such a "primitive" weapon, for Lee Oswald to fire so many bullets in such a short time. They found the casings where the shooter was supposedly located.
This editing, this reconstruction, impress the public. This demonstration touches the viewer, whereas statements from ballistics experts, gathered on a set, would leave him indifferent.
I could comment on these videos for pages. I simply say: watch them and form your own opinion.
I believe that Ventura has produced 22 episodes in the "Conspiracy Theory" series. But how to "keep up" with such production? There are obviously elements of the series that are quite weak. One of my readers wrote to me, "I admit I had trouble with the episode on time travel."
Let's talk about this episode, not dubbed. Ventura meets individuals who claim to have traveled through time. One presents them with a "time machine," a simple box with two lamps and four buttons. He specifies that its use is ... dangerous. Ventura seems bored and seems to think, "what are we doing getting into such a subject?!"
He meets a character who says that as part of a military project, he was sent back in time to intervene in some historical event to "influence the course of history." And he shows "a photo from the time where he claims to be present."
All of this is not very interesting and ends in nothing.
However, Ventura does good work when he traps this "quack" that is David Icke. It starts with a sequence where his son Tyrel shows him an article from one of the largest American magazines, Time Magazine, which lists the favorite topics of conspiracy theorists. These topics are covered by Ventura. At the end of the list is the theory that the world's political classes are "populated by reptilians" (David Icke's theory).
Ventura explodes and decides to conduct his own investigation. If you don't understand English well, here's a summary. He starts by following men and women who claim to know something about the presence of these reptilians on American territory. He follows a guy who takes him to a desolate area, where a base full of reptilians is supposedly hidden. They are accompanied by a completely hysterical woman, who claims to "feel them, very close" and is terrified.
No more reptilians than there is butter in a broth.
Conscientious, Ventura meets a woman who claims to be a hybrid between a terrestrial and a reptilian. Another demonstration of hysteria, with communication through a medium.
After a quest that turns more and more into nothing, Ventura decides to meet David Icke. A filmed meeting.
As with all good gurus, one must admit that Icke manages quite well with the beautiful women, even if the photo may be old. For those who are content with beautiful blondes who don't seem to breathe intelligence:
David Icke, in his small shoes, arrives at the agreed meeting to face the bogeyman Jesse Ventura (former wrestler, former combat swimmer, and former governor of the state of Minnesota)
David Icke, immediately uncomfortable, facing Jesse Ventura
If someone could at least subtitle this dialogue, it would enlighten more than one person, and more than one. You have to see the expression of Icke, facing Ventura. It is clear that he is not a match and has a bad look from the start.
David Icke no longer smiles
Jesse Ventura immediately corners him. David Icke:
-
The answers to your questions are in a 700-page book I wrote.
-
You don't imagine that I will go through a 700-page book to get an answer to a simple question: how can I be faced with a reptilian?
Icke loses his composure, explaining that to see that someone is a reptilian, you have to be able to perceive, briefly, an "invisible light." Ventura laughs at his face.
Perceive an ... invisible light! You're joking?
We are near the knockout. David Icke says he has given conferences for 21 years in 58 countries. Ventura applies the principle of his investigations:
- Follow the money trail.
Icke denies doing it for money, but Ventura shows him his accounts. With all the money he gets from his 19 books, his conferences, and the rights to his programs, the total is $1.9 million per year.
- I think you mainly work for money. I'll give you some numbers.
David Icke gets up and leaves the set saying:
- I thought that during this meeting we were supposed to talk about what's happening in the world...
.
David Icke takes flight
For those who are curious: David Icke explains how reptilians vampirize our energy reality
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzMUAK5ZqlM&feature=endscreen&NR=1
Jesse Ventura is not just "a host of a spectacular television series." He also has a political view of the world. I would strongly recommend you to search for the very numerous videos where he faces journalists from CNN, Fox News and others. There, there is no more cinema, no staging. And you will have to agree that, facing often very strong attacks from journalists, he defends himself very well. So much so that a journalist, enraged, leaves the set.
The journalist who leaves (2009) from reopen 9/11 (subtitled)
One of the best; at CNN:
Then:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y40We-O7qAc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peztNH3Ksww
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cfz3WoVi6N
8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ya159v0ZkU
http://www.foxnews.com/topics/jesse-ventura.htm
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3931231/its-torture/
Etc... etc....
Reader's reaction:
Hello,
There was a controversy about Ventura's service records, following his documents. Some claimed that Ventura had never been in combat and that his career was short. Ventura proved the opposite. One can see an attempt to discredit his opponents.
Regarding the pressures of the intelligence services on their employees, the National Geographic documentary on Area 51 is enlightening. One can see former employees, engineers or pilots, explaining their conviction that they had to remain silent and the very persuasive talent of the administration.
For example, after the crash of an SR 71, its pilot was debriefed a few days later, on a Sunday, outside the base and of his own free will, with the help of penthotal. He was taken home in a comatose state by agents who presented themselves to his wife as colleagues returning from a drinking session. His wife would not know for 40 years.
I recommend you read "Globalia" by Ruffin and watch "The Son of Man."
A good book and a good film. One understands that the best of all dictatorships is to make the people believe they are free of their choices. Or it is useful and easy to light fires and then offer to put them out.
I think there are at least two levels of reality.
-
The first level is that of the masses, the "consumer-actor," he votes, earns money and spends it, believes that the best is done for him, believes in the necessity of respecting the laws, the morality, etc., he raises his offspring in this way.
-
The second level is that of the backstage, where some get their hands dirty so that the first level can continue without problems, they free themselves from the rules in force, from morality or guide history with a big H and hide their profits of all kinds from the people of the first level.
The first level is a farce, the second is a jungle.
Yours faithfully.
G.C.
If Ventura has done investigations on the HAARP site and Area 51, there is still a subject he has not yet addressed, as far as we know:
the UFO subject
. And there, one can have serious concerns. What will happen if he only considers what can be found on American territory?
Who could he turn to? To which "expert"? To this old fraud Stanton Friedman, "nuclear physicist"? To Jacques Vallée, "astrophysicist," proponent of the "all paranormal" theory? To Peter Sturrock, who works for the same bosses as Steven Greer? To the MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) whose scientific director, speaking abundantly in Greer's film, Sirius, suggests that he belongs to the ... same family. To the people who, every year, organize a lamentable happening for the anniversary of Roswell?
It seems at first glance poorly started
I say it loudly: there is indeed a conspiracy around this UFO subject, on an international scale. The reasons are multiple. This phenomenon escapes all control and is potentially destabilizing, for many layers of society. It is destabilizing for the political and military powers, for the religious institutions, for the scientific community, in all disciplines. Even the ufologists, if one looks closely, do not really want to touch this subject too closely.
In short, one can simply ask the question:
- What kind of men and women would not be destabilized if these people were suddenly in contact with representatives of an extraterrestrial race?
The countless observations reported by witnesses immediately evoke the fact that extraterrestrial races could be visiting us, at a high rate since the end of the war of 1939-45, precisely since the entry of our planet into the nuclear era, and possibly since ancient times.
The message, explicit or implicit, of these "visitors" has always been the same:
- Attention, by developing nuclear, civil or military, you are preparing a problematic future. If you don't change, you are heading for a catastrophe.
I fully agree with this!
This being said,
"thanks to the nuclear" there has been no third world war for 68 years, whereas only 21 years had passed between the end of the first World War, in 1918, and the beginning of the second, in 1939. It is indeed an incredibly short period.
When one thinks about the human and material damage associated with such conflicts, one can only be grateful.
But will this last forever?
Is it not retreating to jump better? The military nuclear, at the height of the Cold War, became madness. We know that there are Russian nuclear submarines that have sunk, at great depth, and that one of them is still carrying torpedoes armed with nuclear warheads, with heads containing plutonium! All the Russians could do was to adapt titanium covers on the outlets of the torpedo tubes (which must be replaced every ten years). Don't even talk about the nuclear reactors of submarines, lying at the bottom of the ocean.
Now, the civil nuclear takes over. Chernobyl and Fukushima are only the beginning of what is to come, if we do nothing.
One does not have to be a great psychologist or a great sociologist to realize that something is happening on this planet, very worrying.
Personally, I think that the September 11 attacks were an "inside job." To trace back to the authors of this conspiracy, I think that applying the Roman principle
IS FECIT CUI PRODEST
He who did it is the one who benefited from it
is a good lead. These attacks brought with them an unimaginable amount of lies. One can conceive them as a "false flag operation," as an operation carried out in such a way that one arranges to blame another group, another nation, another race.
A friend told me yesterday:
- But this has always existed, throughout history.
That's true. Sometimes, the facts resurface. Ventura mentions in a face-to-face with a journalist the verified way in which President Johnson and his government staged
the Gulf of Tonkin incident
, information according to which American ships had been attacked by North Vietnamese. This perfectly false incident provoked a reaction from the Americans, and the entry of the USA into a war in which
fifty thousand Americans
lost their lives, for nothing, actually.
Many stories in the past of the United States are suspicious, like the fire of the
Maine
in the harbor of Havana, causing
the Spanish-American War
. Etc...
The American battleship Maine, on fire in the harbor of Havana. 200 sailors killed.
The American intervention in Cuba is the very example of a pseudo-humanitarian operation (like the one carried out in Libya, and which is currently taking place in Syria).
Discover the story of Cuba
. After centuries of slavery, the population of the island revolts. Two hundred thousand dead. After having "helped" the Cuban revolutionaries, the Americans take over the island, which becomes the property of the United Fruit. In 1934 the USA changes its policy and prefers to install "puppets," like Batista.
General Batista in 1952
The island also became the stronghold of the Mafia, until Fidel Castro drove Batista away and nationalized United Fruit. In the process, the Mafia fled and returned quickly to Florida.
You will also read that the Spanish-American War ended with the
Treaty of Paris
, according to which not only the dreams of the Cuban revolutionaries were dashed, but also according to which the Philippines were simply sold to the USA for 20 million dollars. Thus, at the dawn of the century, after the American army had made its teeth in its war of independence, came
American imperialism
(after Spanish imperialism, British imperialism, the failed imperialisms of the Nazis and the Japanese, etc.). See:
the war between the United States and the new free state of Manila
.
Excerpt from Wikipedia:
-
With the Treaty of Paris, Spain recognized the independence of Cuba, while ceding the Philippines, Puerto Rico and Guam to the United States in exchange for a payment of 20 million dollars.
-
The same year, in an independent act, the United States annexed the islands of Hawaii.
-
The following year, they acquired part of the Samoa archipelago.
Thus, the American territory suddenly increased by several territories beyond North America.
The war of 1898 was undoubtedly a turning point in American history. The United States took its place in the tight circle of the great powers of the planet. The Washington Post had written before the war in an editorial:
- We are faced with a strange destiny. The taste for empire reigns in each of us as the taste for blood in the jungle.
Now, the Americans no longer wanted to be content with only dealing with their internal affairs.
The United States had established its supremacy over the Caribbean and extended its influence to the shores of Asia. They had become a world power through the manifestation of their strength, and this would now affect the international politics of all the great powers.
The historian Howard Zinn writes:
- Now, the taste for empire possessed both politicians and business circles throughout the country. Racism, paternalism, and profit questions mixed with the discourses on the destiny of civilization.
Below is this illustration from the Philadelphia press of 1898, just after the
Treaty of Paris, December 1898
, after the annexation of the Philippines, showing how the American eagle now extends its wings over "more than ten thousand miles"
Back to the theme of false flag operations, which allow the triggering of wars. After the incident of the Tonkin Gulf, serving as a pretext for the American war in Vietnam, let's mention
the Gleiwitz incident
, on August 31, 1939. There, the Nazis claimed, with the help of the media (radio, at the time. Hitler was one of the first to use this modern means of information, faster than the printed press) that Polish terrorists had seized a transmitter located in the Sudetes, in Gleiwitz, on the border of Poland and what was then Germany.
The radio transmitter of Gleiwitz, current state. Built in larch
It is the tallest wooden tower in Europe: 118 meters
Radio messages, widely broadcast throughout Germany, explained that Polish terrorists, having seized the Gleiwitz transmitter, called all non-German residents to rise up to overthrow Hitler's regime. Thus, the invasion of Poland became the legitimate response of the Germans, against this "Polish aggression."
The affair would have remained unnoticed if a certain
Alfred Naujoks
, questioned as a Nazi during the Nuremberg trial, about other charges, had not revealed this plot.
Alfred Naujoks at the time of the Nuremberg trial
This was imagined and staged entirely by Himmler, who named it "
Himmler Operation
". As often happens in such affairs, the terrorists, who die during the clash with "the forces of order," are unable to speak (like Lee Oswald in the assassination of Kennedy). Naujoks says that they had brought in common criminals, who were not even Polish, and that these were killed, then dressed in Polish uniforms, before being photographed.
Thus, the pattern of a "false flag operation" emerges, which allows the triggering of a war. The United States narrowly escaped such an operation in 1962, proposed by an American general, General Northwoods, aiming to simulate an attack on the American base in Guantanamo by Cubans. It was the Americans themselves, disguised as "Cuban terrorists," who were supposed to attack their own base, causing the death of American soldiers, in order for this aggression to justify the invasion of the island by the United States. Kennedy did not accept this plan, named
Northwoods Operation.
The content of the Northwoods Plan
(Wikipedia)
The plan designed by Craig consisted of
causing damage to American civilian and/or military property, sufficiently significant to provoke strong indignation directed against Fidel Castro and his regime.
Thus, it was planned to:
• spread rumors using clandestine radios,
• allow Cuban allies in uniform to enter the Guantanamo base,
• simulate riots near the base entrance,
• explode ammunition inside the base and cause fires,
• sabotage a plane and ships of the Guantanamo base,
• bomb the base with mortar shells,
It was also considered to:
• sink an American warship in Cuban territorial waters with the presence of nearby ships or planes to attribute it
(...),
• simulate funerals for the fake victims,
• conduct a communist Cuban terrorist campaign against the Cuban exiles in Florida by organizing attacks against them "going as far as inflicting injuries, events that would be widely publicized";
sink, either actually or in simulation, a refugee boat fleeing the Castro regime.
-
Fake Cuban agents would be arrested and forced to confess to exhibit evidence,
-
Bombs would explode in well-chosen locations.
-
Pre-established compromising documents would be disseminated,
• violate the airspace of neighboring states with fake Cuban planes.
•
simulate the destruction of a charter plane, a commercial airline owned by the CIA, whose passengers, students on vacation, would be transferred to a similar plane, then the drone would explode empty over Cuba while sending radio messages indicating an attack by a Cuban fighter.
In addition to these projects, the Department of Defense advanced several ideas for operations, such as the "Vicious Blow" operation, part of a set of projects named "Operation Mongoose," which envisioned
a possible accident of the Mercury flight to send John Glenn into space and to blame the Cubans with pre-established evidence of electronic interference.
Aware of the difficulty in a democratic state like the United States to maintain the secrecy of such operations, the joint chiefs emphasized the need to limit participation to people of total trust.
Below is the "Northwoods Memorandum," a secret document supporting this proposal, issued by General Lemnitzer, in charge of "secret operations," at the CIA.
Translation:
The members of the group in charge of the "Cuba" project respond by providing, attached, a brief but precise description of the pretexts that would be suitable to provide a justification for a military intervention in Cuba.
The entire group recommends that this document be disseminated and considered for approval to define a schedule. It is assumed that other documents of this kind would be submitted to the different agencies and that all this would constitute a starting point for defining an operation schedule.
Moreover, it was assumed that the responsibility for developing the military and paramilitary aspects of this plan would be assigned to a single agency. It was further recommended that all these operations—whether overt or covert—be placed under the control of the group.
L.L. Lemnitzer
(Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff)
Chairman
Group responsible for these combined operations.
Not bad, huh?
General Lyman Lemnitzer, architect of the Northwoods plan
The Northwoods plan was a false flag operation designed to blame terrorist attacks carried out by Americans against other Americans on Cubans. At this point, one might say, "Yes, but this never went beyond a paper project. Kennedy opposed it."
A year earlier, Kennedy had just assumed the presidency of the United States. He was asked to approve a plan devised by the Eisenhower administration before his election. The plan involved sending commandos composed of Cuban exiles living in Florida from Nicaragua, transported there so that any attack originating from Florida could not be immediately attributed to the United States. These commandos were trained by American instructors. Here is the attack scenario:
...
The attack was carried out both by sea, using speedboats, and by air, using a version of the famous World War II ground-attack bomber, the Marauder, in its Invader variant (which would be heavily used by the French during the Algerian War).
The B-26 Marauder
Preparing a B-26 Invader for a bombing mission during the Algerian War
The idea was to destroy the Cuban air force on the ground by unannounced strafing of airfields. At the same time, speedboats carrying 1,400 Cuban counter-revolutionaries would land on the island from the south, in the Bay of Pigs, in hopes of establishing a beachhead and splitting the island in two. The U.S. military had a task force ready to land "to assist the men rising up against the tyrant, Fidel Castro." But very quickly, the 1,400 troops landed were blocked by the fierce reaction of the Cuban population. They surrendered to avoid a bloodbath. Castro later exchanged them for... their weight in medicine.
The air operation was... almost a success. Cuban aircraft were destroyed, except for a few—eight in total—including a Sea Fury, a naval version of the famous and powerful British Hawker Tempest fighter from the end of World War II, which managed to take off and immediately counter-attack.
The British Hawker Tempest, veteran of World War II
The historic Cuban Sea Fury
The Sea Fury reached 700 km/h, while the Invader crawled at only 450 km/h. The outcome was quickly decided. The Cuban Sea Fury shot down two Invaders. One crashed into the sea, while the wreckage of the second was recovered on Cuban territory. And there, catastrophe: the aircraft bore the markings of Cuban planes:
F A R
(Forces Aériennes Révolutionnaires). These were American aircraft disguised to make it appear that the air operation had been carried out by Cuban military forces opposed to Castro. This was therefore an undeniable false flag operation orchestrated by the United States.
The American Invader aircraft, bearing the insignia of the Castroist Revolutionary Air Force on its tail.
Moreover, this aircraft did not match the models used by the Cuban Air Force. The placement of the machine guns intended for ground attack differed completely.
Thus, there was a false flag operation, a conspiracy.
The situation grew more complicated. The air engagement had consumed a great deal of fuel. One of the false flag aircraft realized it could not reach Yucatán and decided to land in Florida (in fact, its original base!). Embarrassed, the Americans claimed the Cuban crew had requested political asylum. But there remained the awkward issue of the discrepancy in aircraft models, which was quickly established.
The Americans asked the Cuban counter-revolutionaries to rearm the aircraft that returned to Yucatán and repeat the attack. But demoralized by the fierce reaction of the Cuban Sea Fury, they refused. A second raid was then carried out by... an American crew, still using the FAR registration!
This affair had such repercussions that the world came within a hair's breadth of a third world war. Castro requested help from the Soviets, and Khrushchev sent medium-range missiles to Cuba, capable of serving as a "deterrent" for the Cubans. And this was the second incident—the Cuban missile crisis. Kennedy responded by imposing a blockade on the island. An American U-2 reconnaissance plane sent for observation was shot down by a Soviet surface-to-air missile. The Russians sent conventional-powered submarines, one of which, fifty years later, would be found to be armed with nuclear-tipped torpedoes, and whose commanders, cut off from communication with Moscow, were physically unable to contact the Kremlin.
The affair ended diplomatically. In exchange for the withdrawal of the missiles, the U.S. administration secretly agreed not to carry out any operation like the Bay of Pigs again.
We should retain this historically established fact:
The Americans indeed carried out a false flag operation during this attempt to destabilize Cuba.
Corollary:
If Kennedy refused, a year later, to approve the Northwoods plan, it was not on moral grounds, but simply because he had been burned by the failure of the Bay of Pigs operation, concocted by his predecessor, Eisenhower.
In 1931, the Japanese manufactured out of thin air what became known as the
Mukden Incident,
by staging a railway sabotage, which provided them with the pretext to invade Manchuria.
Following the Mukden Incident, Japanese troops invaded Manchuria,
where they committed horrific atrocities against the Chinese civilian population.
The Israelis are no strangers to false flag operations. When a commando from Irgun, the secret Jewish army led by
Menahem Begin, a terrorist who later became Prime Minister of Israel (1977–1980),
and also a Nobel Peace Prize winner (...),
planted explosives in the basement of the King David Hotel—headquarters of the British Mandate administration—killing 90 people (...), the Israeli terrorists operated
disguised as Arabs.
The King David Hotel in Jerusalem, after the attack carried out by Irgun terrorists
disguised as Arabs
under the leadership of Menahem Begin, which killed 90 people on July 22, 1946, using 350 kilograms of explosives distributed across six charges.
Another case—the
Lavon Affair—named after the Israeli Defense Minister at the time. The Israeli plan involved carrying out deadly attacks against Anglo-Saxon interests in Egypt, making them appear to be Egyptian acts, in order to undermine the growing trust between Westerners and Egyptians, which seemed contrary to Israel’s interests. In 1954, Egyptian Jews were tasked with the operation. Several attacks occurred, but one Jewish terrorist was betrayed by the premature detonation of his bomb, which failed to explode properly. The Egyptians obtained the identities of the various Israeli agents through torture, arrested them, and after trial, hanged them. As a result, Jews living in Egypt were forced to leave the country and settle in Israel.
As Benjamin Netanyahu explains in an interview, Israel is compelled to conduct
short-duration military operations
so they are not hindered by international pressure.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3puqX9W7S0k
While in 1962, Robert McNamara, U.S. Secretary of Defense under John Kennedy, had opposed the Northwoods plan, that same plan played a very dubious role in 1967 during the outbreak of the Six-Day War, which led to the attack on the American spy ship USS Liberty by Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incident_du_USS_Liberty
More complete:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident
In these false flag operations, murder is not shied away from.
In the Liberty affair, the Israelis deliberately caused the deaths of 34 American sailors and wounded 171 others.
The USS Liberty, strafed and torpedoed by the Israelis, sustained damage but did not sink.
At the time of the attack, the USS Liberty was sailing 25 km off the Sinai coast. Its listening system allowed it to intercept without difficulty messages exchanged between Israeli aircraft attacking Egyptian airfields and the operation’s command center. It is inconceivable that on such a clear day, during the eight passes of Israeli reconnaissance planes (a twin-engine Noratlas and French-made Mirage IIIs), these aircraft flying at very low altitude over the ship could have failed to identify it as an American naval vessel. The sailors clearly remember that the jets flew so low they could feel their jet blast.
Although the ship was flying its colors at the masthead, it was attacked at 2 p.m. by a Mirage III firing 30mm cannons, killing eight men and wounding 75 others. The Liberty immediately sent a distress call to the U.S. Sixth Fleet, which was then operating near Crete.
Impact of 30mm shells fired by the Mirage III
Twenty-five minutes after the air attack, the Liberty suffered an assault from three Israeli torpedo boats. One hit created a hole in the hull and killed 25 more sailors.
Impact of the torpedo hitting the ship
Meanwhile, the aircraft carrier America sent eight planes toward the Liberty. But (?...) the captain realized these planes carried nuclear warheads and recalled them back to the ship a few minutes later (...).
At 3:30 p.m., when the ship’s identity was finally confirmed (?..), the aircraft carrier USS Saratoga dispatched eight planes carrying conventional, non-nuclear ordnance (...). The planes flew over the Liberty and returned to the Saratoga. As witnesses on board said, "It was truly God who, at that moment, prevented the Liberty from sinking."
The foreign ministries of both countries exchanged messages and jointly concluded it had been a regrettable misunderstanding. Then ships from the Sixth Fleet finally arrived to rescue the Liberty. Later, survivors were generously awarded medals and various honors for their heroic conduct during the events, without any official statement clarifying the identity of the attacking aircraft or torpedo boats.
Dean Rusk, Secretary of State, sent a message affirming that the Liberty was flying its colors and must have been identified at least one hour before the attack, that the assault had been deliberate, and represented a complete disregard for human life.
After the incident, an investigation was launched. Senator Hickenlooper, meanwhile, declared: "After everything I've heard, I could not believe for a single minute that this was an accident." Many questions remained unanswered from McNamara, Secretary of Defense.
Dean Rusk, U.S. Secretary of State, Lyndon B. Johnson, President, and Robert McNamara, Secretary of Defense
Dean Rusk, U.S. Secretary of State at the time of the incident, later wrote:
I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation. Their sustained attack to disable and sink Liberty precluded an assault by accident or some trigger-happy local commander. Through diplomatic channels we refused to accept their explanations. I didn't believe them then, and I don't believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous.
Translation:
I never accepted the Israeli explanation: their sustained attack to disable and sink the Liberty, presented as an accident caused by a rash local commander, could not have occurred by mistake. Through diplomatic channels, we refused to accept such explanations. I didn’t believe them then, and I still don’t believe them today. The attack was deliberate.
We refer the reader to the information presented on the English Wikipedia page, which highlights the opacity surrounding this affair, with one officer reportedly receiving an order from Defense Secretary McNamara to conclude that it had been a tragic accident, etc.
The United States had become unconditional allies of Israel, a relationship that continues today. However, not all U.S. political leaders share this stance. The Israeli state was determined to carry out a surprise air attack. To do so, no risk could be taken—such as alerting their American ally to its imminence. Yet the spy ship Liberty (dependent on the NSA, the National Security Agency) happened to be dangerously close to the Egyptian coast that day. One can imagine the following dialogue:
-
Boss, there's an American listening ship 25 km off the coast, which risks intercepting all our communications. What do we do?
-
We can't take that risk. Sink it.
-
But... these are Americans...
-
Too bad. These people were in the wrong place at the wrong time. Carry out the order. Later, we'll claim we mistook it for an Egyptian or Russian vessel.
Numerous theories have been advanced, contradicting the official "accident" narrative, which is difficult to sustain given the testimonies of sailors present on board. Moreover, the political objective was to silence the ship and prevent it from intercepting or transmitting information to Americans about the expansion of the Israeli attack northward into the Golan Heights.
State interests come at a human cost.
In 1968, a bombing at Piazza Fontana in Milan, Italy, killed 16 people and injured 98. The far left was immediately accused. An anarchist, Giuseppe Pinelli, arrested and named as the culprit, died days later after falling from a window.
In 1980, a similar scenario unfolded at
Bologna Station,
killing 16 people and injuring 88. The then Prime Minister immediately identified without evidence the Palestinian Popular Liberation Front as the perpetrator. But in the years that followed, a long investigation established that the attack had been carried out by an Italian far-right movement, integrated into the Gladio network (the Sword), whose goal was to create tension in Europe to favor the emergence of "strong governments."
The insignia of Gladio members
Motto: "In silence, we serve liberty"
The existence of this Gladio network ("stay behind") was revealed in 1990 by Prime Minister
Giulio Andreotti,
a record-holder for accumulating multiple ministerial portfolios, whose long political career as a member of the Christian Democracy party ended abruptly when his close ties to the Mafia were exposed.
Giulio Andreotti acknowledging his ties to the Mafia
By combining the Bologna train station bombing—where neo-fascist Italians showed no hesitation in cold-bloodedly murdering innocent citizens of their own country, solely to shift suspicion onto a "Palestine Liberation Movement"—with the Lavon affair, where Israelis carried out an attack targeting Western nationals while making it appear that Arabs were responsible, one finds the components of the September 11 attacks—or at least their blueprint.
Of course, viewing things from this angle makes one appear as a "conspiracy theorist."
But refusing to consider this possibility is deliberately turning one’s back on a long succession of verified historical facts.
Furthermore, it takes an extraordinary amount of naivety or blindness to swallow every aspect of the official 9/11 narrative.
Ventura brings new light by demonstrating, through experience, in his investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, that nano-thermite can be mixed with... paint!
Ventura’s investigations into the events of September 11 are well-conducted. Personally, I do not believe the aircraft that struck the towers were commercial airliners. One of them carried a "pod" under its belly—a streamlined container carried only by military aircraft. I suspect they were radio-guided drones, particularly in the final phase guided by a radio beacon located in the target buildings.
Regarding the Pentagon attack, I personally support the idea of a rapid flyover by a commercial airliner—or one very similar to it—followed by a synchronized explosion. This aligns with a counter-investigation conducted by young American Craig Rankle.
Craig Rankle
Do not miss this document—it is astonishing.
http://www.reopen911.info/evenement/projection-debat-avec-c-ranke-du-cit.html
This investigation relies on numerous testimonies, including those of two police officers stationed under a gas station canopy, who were thus unable to see any aircraft approaching from the south along the official trajectory ("confirmed by its black box," provided years later by official services).
This 80-minute documentary is so important that I deemed it necessary to link to a page discussing this investigation, broadcast in 2009.
Link to Craig Rankle’s investigation
Let us summarize the findings of this investigation in a few diagrams:
This is the general aerial view of the site. It shows that the Pentagon is very close to Ronald Reagan National Airport, oriented north-south. Air traffic is therefore extremely dense around the building (one aircraft every two minutes). In blue: the official trajectory.
The image above shows an aerial view of the site. At top right, the Pentagon with the alleged impact point. In blue: the official trajectory, deduced from the reversal of lampposts (quickly removed after the event) and the supposed position of a key witness—a black driver parked on a bridge, whose hood and windshield were damaged by a falling heavy lamppost.
Craig Rankle returned to the site five years after the events and easily found numerous eyewitnesses, recording their testimonies. To each, he showed the above photo and asked them to draw with a marker their estimate of the aircraft’s trajectory, which all claimed to have seen.
As can be seen, all these estimates significantly deviate from the official blue trajectory, which was supposedly "confirmed by data from the aircraft's black box"—produced years after the event.
The most important testimonies come from two police officers who were "backed against a gas station" and thus could not possibly have seen any aircraft approaching from the south.
As one of the officers said:
- Sorry, I can't see through walls.
Of course, all traced paths converge toward the alleged "impact point" on the building’s facade. But everything happened in a very limited number of seconds. If an aircraft were flown at low altitude and, at the moment it reached the building’s height, an explosion were triggered further south, the witnesses’ attention would immediately be drawn to the flash and sound.
Link to this commentary on Craig Rankle’s investigation
The video shows the taxi driver’s behavior—clearly desperate to avoid being grilled years after giving his testimony. His remarks, when he speaks as if off-camera, are telling.
Craig Rankle hypothesizes that the Pentagon was not struck by an aircraft or missile, but merely flown over by a plane marked with American Airlines insignia. At the same moment, explosives were detonated to simulate the impact on the building’s facade. In his show, Jesse Ventura discusses this theory.
This would explain why surveillance camera recordings and footage from surrounding buildings cannot be produced—because they would show neither an aircraft nor a missile. Similarly, just as we can doubt that the planes hitting the twin towers were commercial airliners, we can also question whether the plane flying over the Pentagon was actually an American Airlines aircraft hijacked by a terrorist whose piloting skills were reportedly poor.
In response to this interpretation, some might immediately say:
- But where did the real commercial aircraft, their crews, and passengers go?
I would reply that at the time, it was perfectly possible to remotely pilot such aircraft and land them safely on a runway without damage. This technology was fully developed as early as the 1960s. The same applies to full remote control of aircraft after takeoff—aircraft that had been secretly modified without American Airlines’ knowledge (by the maintenance company, based in the U.S. and owned by a foreign country). Shortly after takeoff, the pilots found their controls unresponsive and their radio communications disabled. Crew and passengers could then have been killed with gas, and the aircraft—now filled with corpses—landed at predetermined locations. Or perhaps the killings occurred after landing, after transporting these people to some remote location for discreet elimination. All that remained was to erase all traces of the bodies and planes, while collecting fingerprints and DNA en route, to stage a fake identification "at the impact site."
All this is horrifying, one might say. But is it more horrifying than planting a bomb in a train station during peak hours to cold-bloodedly kill fellow citizens, as in the Bologna bombing? When you decide to kill 3,000 innocent American citizens, you’re not really concerned about two hundred more. In all this, it’s merely a matter of numbers—and stakes. The stakes involved in such an operation were enormous.
Do not believe it would have been impossible to find men in the U.S. willing to kill their own countrymen. This was already fully anticipated in the Northwoods plan. President Kennedy had approved the Bay of Pigs operation, which was a disaster. Had he approved Northwoods, the commando attacking Guantanamo would not have fired inert mortar shells or blank ammunition.
Some might object:
- But on what basis would these hijacked aircraft on September 11, 2001, have landed? How can we imagine that personnel at such a base remained silent for over ten years, remaining largely complicit in such events? Eventually, someone would have spoken!
I am not thinking of a U.S. military base. There are facilities on U.S. soil as large as full airbases, representing concessions to private companies owned by foreign nations, which handle aircraft maintenance—particularly Boeing models similar to those involved in these events.
- But people among the staff would eventually have talked! Such a secret couldn’t be kept like that!
It depends entirely on how one ensures personnel discretion. Let us take as an example the film series Taken, directed by Spielberg, which presents a rather dark vision of how the U.S. government might have managed UFO incidents—especially crashes involving extraterrestrial craft. Anyone who has seen this series remembers Owen Crawford’s behavior. Guided by an old man and two boys, he suddenly finds himself face to face with a crashed UFO.
In the following scenes, Owen Crawford discusses the incident with his superior officer, who later becomes his father-in-law, and whom he will eventually replace in charge of "the project." Recall this brief exchange:
- And the witnesses? We took care of them?
He is obviously referring to the man and the two children who discovered the wreckage.
- Yes, we took care of them,
his future father-in-law replies casually.
Many people believe Spielberg must have known quite a lot about UFO crashes and contacts before creating this series.
Jesse Ventura dedicated a segment to the infamous Area 51. I recommend you take a look. It ends with a face-to-face confrontation between Ventura and figures in a 4x4, observing him from atop a hill without exiting their vehicle, less than a hundred meters away. Before Ventura stand simple red plastic poles marked by a sign stating "Do Not Cross." On the warning sign, a message reads that personnel responsible for security at this perimeter—outside any normal jurisdiction—are authorized to use "deadly force."
Ventura is a former governor of a U.S. state (Minnesota). This former wrestler, this real bulldozer, suddenly hesitates. Yet he could have walked over in a few steps and started talking with them. But this former commando, former combat diver, stops, then turns back! Despite the fact that it was only a matter of crossing a line marked by small red plastic poles and walking a few dozen meters to reach the vehicle.
What about the people who fly daily from Las Vegas aboard civilian aircraft to work at Area 51? How is it that none have ever said a word, shared any information about what happens there, for decades? Patriotism, or awareness of terrifying reprisals capable of striking not only them but also their families, their children?
I read a book signed by a man who claimed to be a former Mossad member. He stated that during recruitment, Mossad agents were shown a video depicting the death of one of their own, who had betrayed them after horrific, endless torture. And those showing the film added:
- Of course, this doesn’t concern you, since you will never betray your country or try to leave the Mossad.
Whether or not this man was actually a member of these highly efficient Israeli intelligence services is irrelevant. The message seems plausible.
A similar message was delivered to everyone working at the Dimona nuclear facility.
whose construction began in 1958. In 1977, Mordechai Vanunu was hired as a technician at the Dimona nuclear power plant. Over time, he became familiar with all aspects of nuclear technology and managed, secretly, to take 60 photographs of the underground installations. His dissenting behavior having become known to his superiors, he was fired after being advised to keep silent about anything he had witnessed, otherwise he would face 15 years in prison under Israeli law. He used his dismissal as an opportunity to travel, carrying these photographs taken inside the plant. On this occasion, in Australia, he contacted the British newspaper Sunday Times, which offered to buy his photos. Vanunu traveled to England in 1986 at the paper's expense, and they published his story along with his photographs.
The Mossad then acted very quickly. One of its agents, a woman, seduced Vanunu, who, despite the journal’s warnings, decided to meet her in Italy.
There, the Mossad abducted him and he was imprisoned and tried in Israel as a traitor.
He spent 18 years in prison, including 11 in solitary confinement in a cell measuring 2 by 3 meters, cut off from all contact. This measure was intended as a warning to all employees of the Israeli nuclear facility, as well as anyone in the country involved in national defense activities. I imagine that every new employee at Dimona is shown a video of Vanunu’s face, evolving over the years.
The message is clear:
- If you betray us, we will find you wherever you are in the world, even if it takes us years.
In this investigation,
Israel's Secret Weapons,
conducted by Canadian journalists, a journalist questions Shimon Peres.
The Canadian journalist:
- How do you explain that you demand investigations into any nuclear-related activities in Arab countries, while Israel has been exempt from inspection for decades?
Shimon Peres:
- I do not feel obligated to answer your question.
Thus, abandon arguments based on the inevitable dissemination of extremely sensitive and urgent information.
I don't know if Jesse Ventura still produces shows in this series, Conspiracy Theory. If he hasn’t already done so, he still has a topic to address: the complete blackout regarding UFOs in his country. And there, he wouldn’t be confronting an American conspiracy, but an international affair. Will he do it?
In the United States, who would he interview? Where would he take his investigation?
For decades, American disinformation policy was based on denying facts, known as "debunking," a systematic dismantling of UFO testimonies and cases. But over the past ten years, the policy has changed. Americans have opted for "amplified disinformation." See the dossier I've just compiled, alongside this one.
The film Sirius, created and aired by Steven Greer
Steven Greer
In this film, presented in the United States on April 22, 2013, and set to be released in France in June, in DVD format priced at €20 plus shipping (and planned for translation and subtitles in 18 languages), Greer creates an incredible hodgepodge. The message he conveys is as follows:
- Governments have long since uncovered the secret enabling UFOs to perform interstellar travel and have profited from it, becoming capable of extracting energy from the vacuum (zero-point energy). If this energy were revealed to the world, it would completely transform our way of life, abolishing the power associated with oil control. Thus, governments would lose the control they currently exert over populations.
Greer makes his entrance before an audience that has undergone a metal-detection search upon entering the hall where he gives his talk. He himself travels only in a bulletproof limousine, "to protect his life." He claims to have been threatened.
Of course, these supposed researches into vacuum energy, involving attempts to create a "magnetic vortex" using rotating magnets, are complete nonsense. That is the trick. By waving real problems under the audience’s eyes, Greer simultaneously slips in a complete fraud that will discredit the entire discourse and lead viewers to "throw out the baby with the bathwater."
That is precisely the goal of the operation.
I have all the necessary tools to dismantle Greer's arguments and expose to the world that his entire operation is nothing but disinformation.
When he launched the Disclosure project in 2001, I immediately contacted him, offering the information I had gathered about secret U.S. black programs—specifically regarding hypersonic MHD torpedoes and the secret of a hypersonic aircraft replacing the SR-71 Blackbird, equipped with an "MHD-controlled" air intake, which was likely the origin of the Aurora rumor by the late 1990s. At the time, I hadn't yet considered writing "UFOs and American Secret Weapons," which was only published by Albin Michel four years later. So I provided him with all this material, placed in a downloadable folder on my website, suggesting he have it reviewed by competent physicists.
The entire dossier was downloaded. But Greer remained deaf to my suggestions. And at that moment, I realized the true purpose of this Disclosure operation was anything but collecting and revealing facts proving the powerful cover-up he claimed to oppose.
If I could reach Jesse Ventura, I would suggest he contact Greer and present him with these solid, unshakable military-oriented scientific elements after having them evaluated by specialists. My proposal remains open. Would Greer accept adding these solid, undeniable elements to his film?
That said—and I've said this repeatedly for years—this possibility, thanks to MHD, of moving vehicles through the air at hypersonic speeds without creating turbulence does not, in my view, constitute the ultimate UFO secret, for multiple reasons. First, such a system would be ineffective in a vacuum and could not possibly enable interstellar travel. It would not allow for right-angle turns, materializations, or dematerializations.
But these studies contradict the conclusions of the Condon Report, which concluded that studying the UFO phenomenon held no scientific interest.
False. This study has yielded concrete results, unfortunately representing new military applications (hypersonic cruise missiles, spy aircraft, MHD satellite launchers, and firing stations allowing a nation to dominate space just beyond the reach of conventional aircraft and below that of satellites—this "intermediate space" between 30 and 250 km altitude, a formidable strategic asset.
It's possible that "visitors" use such MHD technology—primitive to them—to move small probes.
I believe the United States has developed this technology at least for military purposes and is disinforming to remain the sole holder. Hence the maneuvers of people like Greer and the echo given to these "zero-point energy" fables.
A man like Jesse Ventura could assault these fortresses of secrecy, starting by discrediting someone like Greer, as he so effectively did with David Icke.
But how to reach him?
May 5, 2013.
Epilogue (on Jesse Ventura's Facebook page):
For all the fans of "Conspiracy Theory," sadly the show is not being renewed for another season. Thankfully, theliptv.com, Sean Stone, and Tyrel Ventura have created a new online show to bring you the real news of the week—not the government-approved, corporate-sponsored version. Enjoy.
Translation:
We inform all fans of "Conspiracy Theory" that the show will unfortunately not be renewed for another season.
Sean Stone and Tyrel Ventura have created a new online show to bring you the real news of the week, not the government-approved, corporate-sponsored version.
We hope you enjoy this new series.
Sean Stone and Tyrel Ventura unfortunately lack the tenacity of the latter's father, if his "business card" as former governor is anything to go by.
Jesse Ventura did not address the UFO topic in his series as a conspiracy involving concealment and disinformation. Unless he has the idea to reach out to us, there is, in fact, no scientist in the world who combines genuine interest in the UFO subject with presence in the closed scientific community (International Congresses, publications in peer-reviewed journals). The so-called scientists who claim interest in the topic are either people who left science decades ago (Jacques Vallée, Stanton Friedman, former computer scientist, former nuclear physicist) or unproductive scientists, like Auguste Meessen, Bougard (SOBEPS, university professors), or Von Ludwiger. Or they are outright involved in disinformation operations, like Peter Sturrock, a genuine plasma physicist, or Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist (who pretends not to be interested in little green men). Not to mention Nassim Haramein, who became an active member of the Thrive cult, or Niels Armstrong, pillar of the Noetic enterprise.
It is ultimately fortunate that Ventura did not venture into this slippery subject, otherwise at best it would have turned into a farce. I imagine he is too intelligent not to immediately sense that Greer is either complicit, delusional, manipulated, or a mix of all three.
If Ventura participated in a vigil aiming for a Type IV encounter, the phenomenon might not manifest "because he emits negative waves"? His pragmatism would quickly expose the failures of pseudo-scientists teasing "zero-point energy." The same goes for DNA analysis of "the creature's" tissues. Finally, by following the money trail, he would quickly dismantle operations like Thrive, Noetics, and Sirius, revealing that poor Greer is actually living quite well with his wife and children, having waged a costly crusade for decades.
May 15, 2013
A suspicious death.
The series ending in early 2013 means the "Jesse Ventura trail" comes to a halt. The twenty-second and final episode of the third season, titled "Brain Invaders," aired in December 2012. See here the list of episodes from the three seasons:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theory_with_Jesse_Ventura
Why did Ventura stop this series?
Several possible explanations can be offered. Before doing so, one must ask questions about the content of these shows, the topics covered, and how the investigations were conducted. We are so accustomed to obfuscation that it's hard to imagine someone plunging headfirst into such matters as Ventura appears to do. Some investigations truly do move mountains. One might wonder:
- Given the United States, how was it possible for this man to go so far?
Good question. This is so intriguing that many have claimed these shows were disinformation operations. Yet the man seems honest. And correspondingly, when he encounters a perfect fool like David Icke, he exposes him.
I like to imagine that if we had been able to enlighten Ventura before he met another charlatan, Steven Greer, he would have seen through him too. The more I think about it, the more I believe Greer’s disinformation operation, with his film released in 11 languages—thus on a global scale—is backed by technology capable of making UFOs appear "on demand."
UFOs that are nothing but ionized gas masses located at high altitude, created by the interaction of two microwave beams. I’ve been considering this technology possible for over twenty years. In fact, the creation of an ionized mass using microwaves has already been reported in a press release linked to the HAARP installation.
Through Ventura’s investigation, we saw that the HAARP story was highly suspect. Two researchers stated that the only military aspect of this project is that the research facility, focused on "ionosphere studies," is located on land owned by the military and leased for these studies. But strangely, gaining access to the site proves utterly impossible.
Some might say the five letters HAARP have triggered "conspiracy delirium" in some people. HAARP is blamed for every conceivable disaster: climate alteration, tsunamis, earthquakes, mental manipulation. There may be something to take or leave in all this. But what exactly? This affair is far from innocent. I’ve written extensively on this topic in previous years, so readers can refer to it using the internal search engine.
The seventeenth episode of Conspiracy Theory is titled "Death Ray" ("The Ray of Death").
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MJPpWNxvZo
Half a century ago, this was a favorite theme in science fiction. But what about today?
What we’re allowed to see: crowd control systems (controlling crowds). A beam of millimeter waves directed at an individual or a group of protesters acts very close to the skin, stimulating nerves and creating an unbearable burning sensation. But any physicist or biologist would say this is merely the tip of the iceberg of a vast arsenal of weapons. In this domain, anything is possible with any conceivable power.
If we decide to use waves as anti-personnel weapons, the sensation of skin burning is just a small appetizer. A powerful beam can blind people, kill them, cause injuries, or even have carcinogenic effects (already proven). These effects can be extremely dramatic, leading to destruction of human tissue comparable to burns generated internally within the body, particularly in tissues most receptive to this frequency.
Take your cat or a laboratory mouse, place it in your microwave oven, set the power to maximum, and watch what happens. With sufficient power, the animal might appear to explode or burn from the inside out.
A microwave oven (developed by Raytheon, the "Light of the Gods," primarily working for the military) is built around a 700-watt source. This magnetron is carefully enclosed in a specialized shield, and the grill-like window, whose mesh corresponds to the wavelength, acts as a Faraday cage, preventing radiation from escaping—more or less. It’s not recommended to press your nose against the glass during cooking.
For the record, the potential of microwaves for cooking was first imagined by inventor Percy Spencer, who noticed that a chocolate bar in his pocket had melted next to a radar station.
It could just as easily have melted in his stomach—or worse...
In the USA, where people do anything, many men have described how to dismantle and modify a microwave oven to direct radiation and turn it into... a weapon, capable of being focused on a neighbor, even through a wall. With this gadget, you could burn out someone’s retina from hundreds of meters away! Thus, potentially, a directed-energy weapon is already in your kitchen.
It seems that microwave weapons were used during the Second Gulf War, during the capture of Baghdad Airport, or in other locations where vehicles filled with strangely carbonized bodies were found. Doubting this possibility amounts to the greatest naivety.
When Ventura ventures into this domain, his assistants immediately lay out a stack of files referring to an impressive list of people who died under suspicious circumstances, all having approached a sensitive subject too closely.
- It seems that everyone who tried to get too close to this topic of directed-energy weapons quickly died under unexplained conditions.
The investigator in the group, young June Sarpong, despite having appeared in her seventeenth episode, warned about the danger, chooses to drop the investigation.
Then Ventura meets a 60-year-old man, Dr. Fred Bell.
Dr. Fred Bell, delighted to be alongside Jesse Ventura
A man who appears to have been deeply involved in countless activities and affairs.
He claims to know a great deal about this sensitive topic. He immediately announces he worked on the "Star Wars" project. Ventura then asks if he fears for his life.
-
Fear for my life? No, times have changed...
-
No, times have changed now. Americans are beginning to wake up (...). If I were killed, there would be an immediate massive investigation.
Ventura objects:
- There was a "massive investigation" when Kennedy was assassinated...
But the man seems unimpressed. Two days later, this sixty-year-old dies in a hotel room where he was with his "girlfriend."
Dr. Fred Bell and his young companion, Mikelle Williams
Tyrel, Ventura’s son, collects the testimony of the young woman.
- Suddenly, he collapsed...
We’ll never know more. Ventura says:
- The coroner said he died of natural causes.
In fact, a precisely targeted and dimensioned microwave beam could cause exactly the same result, even at autopsy. It is the perfect crime.
End of the episode. Ventura can only add this additional file to his stack:
In English:
What to conclude?
If it’s just a coincidence, it’s still unsettling. Did Dr. Fred Bell really know disturbing things, and was he ready to reveal them?
This episode is not the last of the series. But when looking at the broadcast dates, they appear quite close together.
1 - HAARP
2 - The events of September 11
3 - The climate change hoax
4 - Big Brother
5 - Secret societies (Bilderberg)
6 - The Manchurian Candidate (programmed assassins)
7 - Apocalypse 2012
A gap of eight months
8 - "Plume Island" (biological weapons fabrication)
9 - Area 51
10 - Wall Street (market manipulation)
11 - Police State (concentration camps, citizen control)
12 - The assassination of Kennedy
13 - The worldwide water conspiracy
14 - The Louisiana oil spill
15 - The Pentagon affair, September 11
A new gap of 22 months
16 - Reptilians (Ventura mocks David Icke)
17 - The Death Ray
18 - Time travel (those claiming to have traveled through time)
19 - Ozarks (bunkers for the privileged)
20 - Skinwalker Ranch (research by Robert Bigelow)
21 - Manimals (like Dr. Moreau’s island)
22 - Brain Invaders (mental manipulation)
December 2, 2009
December 9, 2009
December 16, 2009
December 23, 2009
December 30, 2009
January 6, 2009
January 13, 2010
October 15, 2010
October 29, 2010
November 5, 2010
November 12, 2010
November 19, 2010
December 3, 2010
December 10, 2010
December 17, 2010
November 7, 2012
November 14, 2012
November 21, 2012
November 26, 2012
December 3, 2012
December 10, 2012
December 17, 2012
The episodes were not distributed regularly over time.
First, the first seven, within two months (first season).
Then an eight-month gap.
Then eight episodes in three months (second season).
Then a 22-month gap.
Finally, seven episodes in two months (third season).
After a few months, early 2013, Ventura announced there would be no fourth season. One possible reason is that these final episodes were weaker than the previous ones. Perhaps the series was simply losing steam (audience issues, difficulty finding new, documented topics).
The 22-month gap might correspond to hesitation in continuing due to lack of major, burning topics. The time travel episode is truly nonexistent. The same goes for "Brain Invaders." I haven’t watched the Skinwalker Ranch episode.
What’s curious—and might not be feigned—is that the investigator who has done all the episodes, June Sarpong, 35, born in England in 1977, says she’s dropping the investigation because she’s afraid. Yet she seems like a woman with character and has been deeply involved in humanitarian actions. She abandons the investigation during the "Death Ray" episode, the seventeenth in the series, admitting... she’s afraid.
June Sarpong
Was she threatened this time, after 16 rather intense episodes?
There is journalistic work to be done in situating Ventura’s appearances in major American media within this timeline. Was the reaction immediate or delayed?
May 19, 2013.
Reader comment, quoted with permission
:
Frédéric POTTECHER
biologist
I am following up on your article from May 15, 2013, titled "A Suspicious Death."
I am quite familiar with the field of electromagnetic waves, as I have worked for about fifteen years designing Pulsed Magnetic Field devices intended for therapeutic use.
YES, electromagnetic waves can affect health.
These effects can be positive or negative, depending on the signal shape, frequency, intensity, exposure duration, etc.
You may find an interesting book available secondhand online: "These Waves That Heal, These Waves That Kill," by Jean Pierre Lentin. I knew Jean Pierre Lentin (who has since passed away), and he conducted serious work on this subject. Here is a link where you can purchase the book:
http://www.amazon.fr/Ces-ondes-qui-tuent-soignent/dp/222615194X
YES, intelligence services of major countries (at least the USA and the Soviets) cannot ignore that certain electromagnetic waves can cause serious health problems, including cancer.
For information, I recall the case of the U.S. Embassy in Moscow. In February 1976, Walter Stoessel Jr., the U.S. Ambassador to Moscow, informed his staff that the Soviets were using microwaves to intercept communications within the embassy building. Among other risks, the Ambassador mentioned headaches, dizziness, heart damage, nervous disorders, and even cancer and leukemia.
Eight days later, American press reported a "blood disease" affecting the Ambassador. It also revealed that three of Walter Stoessel Jr.'s predecessors had similarly complained about the effects of these microwaves.
To understand what happened at the time, the Soviets had found a very clever and undetectable way to spy on the U.S. Embassy. They offered the American ambassador objects containing carefully studied cavities, and by sending precisely tuned microwave beams toward these objects, they could listen in on conversations in the room where the object was placed.
This eavesdropping method was not detectable by American counterintelligence services, which were searching for traditional spy microphones. It was only discovered by chance when health services noted an abnormally high rate of cancer among embassy staff in Moscow and began investigating the cause.
What happened next?
It is entirely logical to imagine that once this discovery was made, the CIA or other government organizations refined this technology and began using it not just for listening, but to eliminate inconvenient opponents.
In my opinion, this technology is used regularly. It has the advantage for intelligence services of being usable remotely, highly discreet (a few more cancers go unnoticed), and leaving no traces.
Sincerely,
F. Pottecher.
News
Guide (Index)
Home Page
a ---
