UFO censorship Stéphane Bern UFO science
After the broadcast of Stéphane Bern's show, "L'Arène de France"
March 21, 2007
updated on March 28, 2007 at 2:14 PM
**** --- **
| A | After the broadcast of Stéphane Bern's show, "L'Arène de France" on March 21, 2007, we received numerous messages from viewers who, having read the report I had made after recording the show on March 17, and by comparing it with what was actually broadcast, were able to notice the extent of the cuts. Among other things, the name of the UFO-science association, its address, etc., had simply disappeared. Here is, among the many messages received the day after the show, the one from Mr. José Ripoll from Toulon: | Toulon, March 22, 2007 | Sir, | I really like the way you handle the UFO issue. That's why I read with great interest the report you wrote after recording the show "ARENE DE FRANCE" presented by Stéphane BERN, which you participated in. | Therefore, I made sure to watch this show, which I was supposed to know the content of after reading your text. However, as soon as the first excerpts were shown following the first debate on polygamy, I noticed a clear intention of censorship. Throughout the entire show, I thought I was suffering from severe memory loss. Or, as the psychologist on the show, who never stopped monopolizing the conversation by repeating the same thing, had pointed out, I must have also been a victim of a visual and auditory hallucination. Yet deep down, even if I had gone mad, I remain convinced of one thing. | THE MAJORITY OF YOUR INTERVENTION WAS CENSORED! | By whose will? For what reason? These are questions to which I have no clue of an answer. | I have been interested in your person for several years now, after you participated in a similar show. On the set were the skeptics, the UFO witnesses (some of whom were more related to psychoanalysis than anything else). And then you intervened. Immediately, the journalist took the word from you. I had thought it was a pity to have an interesting person on the set, who was forbidden to speak, while allowing idiots to talk. | But with last night's show, I realize that you are simply a victim of permanent censorship. Who is so afraid that they remove from you, by all means, the possibility to express yourself on the UFO issue? What is hidden in this file that makes it forbidden to carry out any real scientific approach? And at the same time, why do they systematically try to discredit you? | In recent articles you have published on your website, you support the hypothesis, not of a conspiracy, but of a real incompetence of the French state and its representatives over the last thirty years. But with last night's show, I am beginning to think that some people want to silence you! ! ! Is it because you would be able to reveal this incompetence? | When you see the video editing of the show, someone who does not know your work could take you for a simpleton and consider VELASCO as an eminent scientist. | As for the lawyers, both of them benefited from the opposing side. One defended the skeptics' camp with a lot of humor, and the other ridiculed any attempt to take the UFO issue seriously, as he claimed it was part of a dream, the subject belonging to the imagination. | That is why I was shocked by the censorship you suffered and which I was an impotent witness. | José Ripoll, Toulon | T | all of this is not new and it would have been surprising if it had been otherwise. We are still waiting for the interview given by Jean-Pierre Petit on March 16th, which was broadcast on France Inter, where journalist Sophie Becherel collected his comments on the imminent online release of the Gepan-Sepra archives. If someone managed to catch this interview and record it, please contact us. | I | there are two conclusions to draw from this affair. The first, as all such shows are broadcast with a delay, is that we will have to systematically publish a report online, which will allow viewers to measure the extent of the cuts. The second is that we will have to create our own media channels. We don't have a place for UFO-science yet. For the time being, could someone provide us with a small space, even a simple cellar, of minimal size, located in Paris, so that we can record video conferences with Jean-Pierre Petit, which will then be edited, enriched with archive images and animations. These documents will be published on the website and/or stored on CDs that can be sold for the benefit of the association. So far, we have received no proposals for the provision of a room or an auditorium for public lectures (with free entry). | P | more than ever, UFO-science is the implementation of the phrase by Guillaume d'Orange: | - It is not necessary to hope in order to undertake. |
|---|
| A | After the broadcast of Stéphane Bern's show, "L'Arène de France" on March 21, 2007, we received numerous messages from viewers who, having read the report I had made after recording the show on March 17, and by comparing it with what was actually broadcast, were able to notice the extent of the cuts. Among other things, the name of the UFO-science association, its address, etc., had simply disappeared. Here is, among the many messages received the day after the show, the one from Mr. José Ripoll from Toulon: | Toulon, March 22, 2007 | Sir, | I really like the way you handle the UFO issue. That's why I read with great interest the report you wrote after recording the show "ARENE DE FRANCE" presented by Stéphane BERN, which you participated in. | Therefore, I made sure to watch this show, which I was supposed to know the content of after reading your text. However, as soon as the first excerpts were shown following the first debate on polygamy, I noticed a clear intention of censorship. Throughout the entire show, I thought I was suffering from severe memory loss. Or, as the psychologist on the show, who never stopped monopolizing the conversation by repeating the same thing, had pointed out, I must have also been a victim of a visual and auditory hallucination. Yet deep down, even if I had gone mad, I remain convinced of one thing. | THE MAJORITY OF YOUR INTERVENTION WAS CENSORED! | By whose will? For what reason? These are questions to which I have no clue of an answer. | I have been interested in your person for several years now, after you participated in a similar show. On the set were the skeptics, the UFO witnesses (some of whom were more related to psychoanalysis than anything else). And then you intervened. Immediately ...