the bandar logs of the ufo universe
The case of Jean-Marc Roeder
December 27, 2004
A reader sent me a recording of the countless hours of interviews given by a certain Jean-Marc Roeder on the airwaves of the radio station Ici et Maintenant.
Jean-Marc Roeder, pataphysicist
http://pagesperso-orange.fr/quanthommesuite/roederholodynamquant.htm
from pure vacuum
This hearing is... exhausting. I thought about non-scientific listeners and decided I had to intervene, without delay. When he cites my work, it is obvious he has not understood it and is probably not able to understand it. I want to clarify that I have not "reinterpreted other forces at work in the cosmos in terms of new curvatures." It has nothing to do with it. Roeder always remains discreet about his sources. Moreover, he is incapable of relying on his own work, because he has... none. I hear him now saying that antigravity is a subject "less bewildering than it seems." He inundates a listener with a flood of words devoid of any substance. Let's quote him:
- "What is the hand that creates gravity? ... there is no surprise that with current electromagnetic means, and the military do operate antigravity manipulations ... antigravity engines have been made since 1920 ... we are not in the realm of 'maybe' ... spheres of 35 kilograms are flying ... it's pure science ... all of this has been published in extremely serious, peer-reviewed journals ... with my crude and narrow rationalism I say that there is indeed a triangular device that uses antigravity for levitation and MHD for propulsion. It's a mixed system. There, I am completely certain. We have evidence (...) ... you have dozens of articles on the subject ... some publish in the relativistic field, others in the quantum field ... I have decided to make a 180-degree turn ... in the next article I will do in TOP SECRET (...) on the TR3B I plan to cite a bunch of Nobel Prize winners, to make a strong impact ... if tomorrow I published an article, even with a high mathematical level (...) ... if I put the names of Sakharov and Jean-Pierre Petit, then people would calm down a bit ... we have hundreds of testimonies from people who worked in military-industrial contexts (...) ... Philadelphia was an experiment to make a ship invisible ... the ship was surrounded by Tesla coils ... a first setup was made as early as 1939 ... then the Rainbow experiment was conducted as early as 1943 ... Tesla had built a car that ran on free energy ... you know what I mean ... Einstein was simply a consultant on the Rainbow project, but only for a week ... it can be proven (...), Einstein's schedule is known hour by hour ... Tesla's machines are not that complicated ... the Internet provides a lot of plans with which one can build a lot of very simple things that work ... regarding these disks, I am Buddhist, I can talk a bit about it, it's not just a legend, it's actually sound levitation disks (...) ... for quantum mechanics I am closer to the position of Schrödinger ... you know what I mean (...) ... what happens, to make it very simple, if we cancel the inertial mass ... if we go supraluminally, it changes everything ... *"
This morning, December 31, I received a new recording. Driven by the questions of his supporters, Roeder "lets go" more and more and his speech then becomes completely delirious and uncontrollable.
*... Time is a trivector ... space is the rotation of time ... if we are right (...) it is even more revolutionary than special relativity and quantum mechanics ... it is the first time I present the beginnings of holodynamics (...) ... uh ... uh ... you know what I mean ... even if the speed of the electric current is high (...) the speed of the electrons remains low ... one can represent the electron as a ball that rotates and it is this rotation that gives it an electric charge ( ! ... ). Antimatter is a ball that rotates backwards ... you follow me ... that's why if an electron meets an anti-electron, they cancel each other, because we mix two balls rotating in opposite directions ( ! ... ) *"
Roeder does not avoid any question, he flatters his interlocutor before "thanking him infinitely." How long will this circus continue? No one knows. Only de Plaige could put an end to it, but he is probably completely overwhelmed by the events. No scientist would waste his time questioning Roeder about speeches that have now become completely uncontrollable delirium. He answers eagerly to the man in the street. He will never say "this is not within my area of expertise."
Where are Roeder's works, built, published in authentic scientific journals? I know none. There is only empty words, a tedious logorrhea. This man simply takes his listeners for fools and it shocks me. But I confess I have no desire to once again set the clock right. The last time was to enlighten readers about an inconsistent theory of universons.
These speeches do not really excite me personally. What shocks me is that so many honest people without scientific skills end up caught in these ramblings like in sticky traps. It is also shocking to see de Plaige open wide the airwaves of his radio station Ici et Maintenant to such nonsense, which totally discredits his programs where sometimes people more sensible, who had real substantial things to teach us, have expressed themselves. But apart from a few rare strong moments, what a delirium! It has already been more than a year that I asked de Plaige to remove from the archives of Ici et Maintenant any trace of my presence on these airwaves, not wanting to see my interviews mixed with the most inconsistent speeches anymore.
De Plaige found in Roeder a man capable of providing him with hours of pseudo-scientific speeches. Where did this man come from, who claims, at random, to be a Buddhist, to have collaborated on numerous military projects and to be a confidential defense expert at the "Vulcan level"? Mystery. He clings to the microphone, thanking warmly each of his interlocutors, telling them "how infinitely grateful he is."
Due to reader reactions, I have a clarification to make. On the homepage of my website, one can see my invention, dating from the early eighties and presented in the show "Temps X": the Logotron. It is a word generator, a neologism generator. As I had said in the show at that time, I had been inspired by a book published when computing was in its infancy, in the 1950s, written by the late Robert Escarpit: the LITTERATRON. It is a book that has become unavailable and I no longer have a copy myself. The theme of this "Roman Picard" (according to the author's own expression) was a fiction based on an "automatic creation of language..."