Untitled Document
September 11, controlled demolitions: the proof
November 28, 2007
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2939164701791209176
duration: 1 hour 45
There are five ways to approach the September 11th case.
1 - The first consists of keeping one's head in the sand, never questioning for a single moment the official theory of attacks carried out by suicide bombers belonging to the "tentacled" Al Qaeda network and obeying orders from the awful Bin Laden, for various reasons. One may be that it is too disturbing for the mind to consider another possibility. Another is not wanting to upset "our American friends and our Jewish friends" (or the deafening silence of our press, our journalists, under the subtle but effective pressure of their editor-in-chief, himself under orders of ... etc).
2 - The second position consists of keeping the idea that they were terrorist attacks based on plane hijackings, that the American authorities had been warned of the preparation of such attacks, and that they simply showed an exceptional negligence. Moreover, the fact that all the military aircraft that could have intervened had been mobilized at that time by maneuvers (precisely on plane hijackings by terrorists, but ... elsewhere) would be nothing more than a pure coincidence.
3 - Third attitude: it was indeed plane hijackings. Yes, the American government knew. But, in some way, they let things happen, or even manipulated terrorist groups, and ensured the success of their operation, at least by triggering these maneuvers on the same day, taking the surveillance planes 35 miles off the American coasts. Launching maneuvers at the very moment when the attacks were carried out was then the best way to create confusion in the American air surveillance system. Indeed, faced with an alert, the operators, whether civilian or military, could only ask for confirmation "is it a real hijacking or a maneuver?"
4 - Fourth position: the theory of plane hijackings is maintained, in which the American government, or at least an active faction, would have acted in a much more criminal way: by not informing the residents of the second tower of the World Trade Center of the need for an immediate evacuation, and by coldly carrying out a criminal destruction of these buildings, as well as building number 7, by means of a "controlled demolition", using explosives, these buildings having been prepared for a long time for this operation, which would imply full complicity in this "terrorist" operation, a planning or "coplanning".
5 - The fifth analysis is based on factual data concerning the impacts on the targets. It seems practically impossible to continue to claim that it was a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon. Many American personalities doubt this. The analysis of flight 77's route, deduced from the data supposedly from the plane's black box (provided by American officials three years after the event) also fits poorly with a hijacking of the plane by terrorists "armed with cutters" in four minutes. If it was not a Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon, would it be, if we believe Rumsfeld's famous slip of the tongue and the opinion of American military personnel, a ... missile? In that case, would Islamic terrorists have been able to implement a cruise missile (for example, of the Tokamak type) from American territory, which would have approached the final stage just above the rooftops before hitting the Pentagon, at an altitude of about a meter? This seems doubtful. If we then look at the other "hijacking cases" with the same skepticism, we find a large number of intriguing and suspicious facts. Were the planes that hit the World Trade Center really commercial airplanes? If so, why did one of them have such a protruding object under its belly? What happened to the black boxes of these two planes? Why this light, captured by three video cameras located at three different points, appearing on the building's wall, a fraction of a second before the impact? Why did the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania, after a perfectly vertical fall, leave only a single round hole, very similar to a bomb crater? Where are the traces of the wing and engine impacts? Would these planes have the ability, when they hit a building or the ground, to fold their wings in the manner of the frigatebirds when they dive into the sea?
The frigatebird
and its fishing technique
This fifth position is much more serious and suggests the implementation of a vast conspiracy, an hypothesis we will analyze at the end of the page.
Here is a document (above link) which represents a very detailed and convincing study made from a video taken by an American, on the other side of the Hudson, at the moment when the twin towers of the World Trade Center are burning, then when they collapse. The man who took these images was at a certain distance from the towers, and the time of sound wave propagation was taken into account: several seconds. Therefore, you will hear very clearly (and you will see it doubled on the attached sonograms)
the explosions that preceded the collapse of the towers.
You will be moved by the testimony of the man who took these images, who, despite all his efforts, sheds a tear at the end of his interview. An American like so many others, who feels the ground shaking under his feet, who sees the values he clings to collapsing, like these twin towers.
To carry out such a controlled demolition, it is necessary to cut with a very precise timing of numerous structural elements of the building at the moment it collapses, but it is also necessary to cut these structures at the base of the building* and these are the explosions you will hear, as well as you will clearly see smoke rising from the base of the tower which is in the foreground* while the supposed commercial airplanes hit the two buildings at a great height.
This document is long: one hour and forty-five, but make the effort to watch it in its entirety. I believe it is difficult to cling to the official version after that. I am deeply shocked by the behavior of certain people. There is a man I know, first a fighter pilot, then a commercial pilot, now retired, who is living peacefully in a beautiful vineyard property in the south of France where I was once invited to dinner by him and his wife. As a young pilot, he "served" during the Algerian war by bombing "rebel villages" with bombs, napalm barrels, then emptying the 20 mm cannons of his plane. All of this aboard a Mistral jet, a copy of the British Vampire aircraft.
The Mistral planes used in Algeria for "the maintenance of the gold..."