Crash at the Pentagon
The Pentagongate
Page 3
**October 7, 2003, completed on October 8, October 23 and November 27, 2003 at the end of the file. **
/Divers/PENTAGATE/Pentagate3.htm#29_5_12
These images are taken from the website of Eric Bart, who presents us, in English, a very rich document of information. Go and check it out if you read English. :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/ericbart/
The text on this site is in English. It mentions many points of view of people who are beginning to believe less and less in the total disappearance of the aircraft one minute after the impact, as if it had "dematerialized". In the following synthetic image, the aircraft is approaching :
1 - Reconstructing the Boeing's approach
The following images are documents. They show the aircraft's trajectory :
2 - Boeing's approach trajectory
**3 - Boeing's approach trajectory. Where were the photographers who took the photos from the ground? **
**3bis - Flight plans of the "hijacked" planes. **
**4 - Simulation of the impact: the aircraft, in real size, just before it fully retracts, wings and tail, before disappearing into the building with its fuel. **
**5 - Viewed from another angle **
**6 - Finally, the impact, viewed from the side. Note the height of the tail, "folded" or "shredded". **
7 - Photo of an American Airlines 757 in flight
Voltaire Network has done an excellent job on this entire 9/11 dossier. Rather than highlighting their writings, we refer the reader to their comment on the computer simulation tests conducted at Purdue University, in the United States :
http://www.reseauvoltaire.net/article8737.html
The aim was to simulate the Boeing's impact on the Pentagon. This study ended in a complete failure, and one can even wonder why it was published. The very data of the problem had been falsified. The aircraft had been supposed to enter a building without a facade and without its engines. Yet, the "anti-conspiracy media" widely covered this work.
All this demonstrates, if it were still necessary, how much our media are under control. At this point, one can no longer talk about the blindness of journalists, their stupidity, or their stubbornness in denying the obvious. It is a deliberate policy of disinformation, of which a clear example was given during the April 13, 2004 broadcast on Arte, Thema series, which is probably the most abhorrent program I have ever seen on television and which completely disgraces the profession of journalist (to the extent that this profession consists of informing the public and not misinforming it).
**New message from a reader who prefers to remain anonymous: **
There are other absurdities regarding the testimonies of September 11, 2001. In particular, the use of mobile phones in the planes which would have allowed passengers to know that their plane was hijacked. I have always wondered how a mobile phone could connect and be tracked by the mobile phone network (PCS or GSM) in a plane flying at an unknown altitude at a speed of 900 km/h. I work for a mobile phone operator and I am waiting to get hold of a network specialist to ask the question.
Until then, while searching on Google for a link between mobile phones and the September 11 attacks, I came across this:
"How do we know the planes were hijacked? The only 'evidence' is based on phone calls made by some of the passengers. Barbara Olson's call, a CNN commentator who was on board flight AA 77 (Pentagon), is decisive for the official version of events. Unfortunately, it is highly questionable. Barbara Olson, who we are told had forgotten her mobile phone and her credit cards at home, would have made a collect call to her husband, Theodore Olson, who is the U.S. Attorney General. However, it is technically impossible to use the in-flight phones embedded in the seat back, without first inserting a credit card. A collect call is therefore useless and excluded. Moreover, the fact that such an essential clue is provided by a man close to power may seem rather strange, when one considers the secrecy that prevails in all areas. One would not be surprised to learn that it was an intentional "leak." As for the other calls, supposedly from mobile phones, it is more than doubtful that such communications could be made from a plane flying at 10,000 meters altitude, at a speed of 800 km/h.".
The text cited can be found here: http://membres.lycos.fr/wotraceafg/etrange.htm
On this page you will see that you are not the only one interested in the implausibilities of the official investigation.
As soon as I have information on the feasibility of a cellular communication from an airplane, I will let you know.
The pieces of the puzzle are coming together to demonstrate the enormity.
Something hit the Pentagon on September 11. But, like Marc Milanini, I find it increasingly difficult to accept that it could have been a Boeing 757 of American Airlines.
October 7, 2003: The Globalization of State Reason
I managed to reach Thierry Meyssan by phone. It was very informative. I just asked him for permission to reproduce the content of his remarks. Here is what resulted.
On the purely technical level, the issue of calls on mobile phones remains unclarified. On commercial airplanes, there are several ways to use them. Some devices, which are autonomous and efficient, although uncommon, can function. On some airplanes, you can use telephones where the communication can be paid by credit card. In both cases, these calls leave traces in the form of billing (on the passenger's bank card who is calling from the plane). Meyssan told me that no such traces could be traced back. The German newspaper Der Spiegel sent a team to the USA for two months to find elements to "discredit Meyssan's fabrications". These people obviously asked questions of this kind. Everywhere they found the door closed. "Investigating the events of September 11 is impious or ... journalistically incorrect.".
Regarding the street lamps near the Pentagon, things have not been clarified either, especially since it is attested that some street lamps had been removed before the event of September 11, for work. In any case, the American authorities have done their best to make all traces disappear and to make any investigation impossible (not ...).