Crowd control using microwave weapon

autre

Crowd control using microwave weapons

August 26, 2005

  • Updated October 11, 2007, two years later

It was already known that Americans were developing microwave weapons, some capable of being deployed from space (see the dossier on crop circles). For years, units consisting of relatively lightweight vehicles carrying an antenna on their roof had existed. This antenna emits at 95 GHz (radar waves). At high power, these waves cause an unbearable burning sensation. There is no doubt they can cause damage, including brain injuries, if pulsed at frequencies that allow targeting of specific organs.

Sheriff battery with 94 GHz microwave emitter for "dispersing demonstrators."

Here is the version intended to equip guard posts, preventing any approach:

The same system, designed for guarding a post.

The Americans plan to deploy these systems in Iraq as early as 2006, believing this "non-lethal" weapon will be sufficient to restore order in the country. It should be noted that this weapon was developed in Kirkland, New Mexico—a location also where Americans, capable of both the best and worst in humanity, developed their solar generators coupled with Stirling engines. See my dossier on this subject.

A Reuters news item, whose URL is already expired:

The new American weapon, the Active Denial System, classified as "less lethal" by the Pentagon, emits a pulsed microwave beam at 95 GHz toward enemy combatants, causing them to feel heat and intense pain in under five seconds! This device is designed to repel people hit by the microwave beam, which is supposed to allow "riot controllers" to break up and direct crowds. However, New Scientist magazine reported that during tests conducted at Kirtland Air Force Base in New Mexico, participants were asked to remove glasses and contact lenses to protect their eyes. In another test, they were also invited to remove any metal objects they might be wearing (coins, clothing, etc.) to avoid creating hot spots on their skin.

"What happens if someone in a crowd is unable for any reason to move away from the beam?" asked Neil Davison, co-ordinator of the non-lethal weapons research project at the University of Bradford in the UK. "How can you be sure the dose won't exceed the threshold for permanent damage? Does the weapon have an automatic safety feature to prevent overexposure?"

The magazine also notes that the vehicle-mounted version, as shown in the photo below, has been named Sheriff. Its deployment in Iraq is scheduled for 2006.

Marines and police forces should soon be equipped with portable versions.

Thus, the United States now possesses an extremely effective weapon to swiftly conclude the Iraqi conflict. The external microwave beam will allow them to quickly "cook" any recalcitrant Iraqi. After fixed, mobile, and portable versions, when will we see the "annihilation of a city from a satellite" version?

This "Zorglonde" has existed for a long time already...

Crowd control: two years later

October 11, 2007

I had already prepared a fairly advanced dossier two years ago, in August 2005.

See at the beginning of this page. A few months ago, videos showed tests of this system emitting millimeter waves, producing a burning sensation in those affected. Here is the device intended for future crowd control:

A Hum Vee vehicle equipped with a microwave emitter.

In these videos, the test subjects were soldiers who jumped and laughed when hit by the beam, experiencing an (entirely neurological) sensation of unbearable burning. Everything was done in good humor. Yesterday, October 10, Karl Zero posted a new video on his site showing a military officer and a brilliant (and large) scientist, Dr. Diana Laury, "Medusa," clearly pleased with herself, presenting this wonderful invention, which expands the arsenal already including the Taser, and now a new model capable of firing autonomous projectiles up to twenty meters away while delivering 50,000-volt discharges. The two even brought a "tabletop" power source and invited journalists to place their fingers in the beam. Immediate laughter. The final comment was:

It's cool!

http://leweb2zero.tv/video/thefens_4146a3f34853e8f

Einstein described the United States as the first nation to have transitioned directly from barbarism to decadence. In this sequence, it's barbarism and decadence. I won't do what Philippe Val, editor-in-chief of Charlie Hebdo, would call primary anti-Americanism. The USA are simply a mirror of our future. I've already discussed this in relation to the expansion of drugs, the normalization of violence, and serial killers.

What's truly alarming about this video is the normalization of what will soon become an absolute horror: fascistic coercion. Colonel Kirk Heim, one of the two presenters of this new weapon, explains it is intended to neutralize those who, during demonstrations, are "troublemakers," "disruptors"—what were called "agitators" in 1900 when referring to strikes. The neutralization of such troublemakers appears to him an absolutely normal act. The same applies to the obese scientist, Dr. Diana Laury, who explains this weapon penetrates only four millimeters beneath the skin, leaving no trace. What a wonderful invention!

Soon for household use

Hardly had I posted this article when a reader pointed out that Sandia Laboratories already had a lighter version of this weapon:

As can be seen, progress continues. And if Sandia, working jointly with the Department of Defense (DoD) and Raytheon laboratories (microwave ovens), has achieved such a fully operational system, I leave you to imagine the state of classified defense research. Miniaturization won't stop here. After the Taser, the "guardians of the new world order" will soon have handheld millimeter-wave microwave weapons. This radiation acts on the nervous system at a depth of 5 mm. It is harmless only if the exposure is brief—either the subject exits the beam or the "deterrent" action is stopped. Otherwise, in addition to extreme pain, there is irreversible nerve tissue damage.

The people currently in power in the United States are not seeking to alter their global policy but rather relying on their technological edge to reinforce their dominance. I wish I were wrong, but unfortunately what we are seeing unfold only confirms what I have always said: the American technological lead in weaponry. As I've said before:

The worst is yet to come.

Things we are probably incapable of imagining. I think of a complete fool, an "aeronautical journalist," who claimed that what I was advancing as early as 2003...