Daniel Lecomte, journalist, presents here a documentary produced by the company Doc en Stock, for the channel ARTE, in April 2006
A quick look at Google shows that he is not an amateur journalist, a simple presenter with limited experience. He began his career at Monde Diplomatique. Then he became a Senior Reporter for the newspaper Libération before producing documentaries for television. An experienced man, he is credited with extensive knowledge of Asian, African, Middle Eastern, and Eastern European countries, and is presented as an expert on the former USSR. In short, in the journalistic world, he is a professional, confident in himself and his statements. In 2004, three years after the events, he ordered, on behalf of the channel Arte and through the company Doc en Stock, a dossier on the events of September 11, to two directors, Barbara Lessek and Antoine Vitkine, which would be titled "The 11th of September Did Not Happen."
The issues regarding rights related to television documents prevent us from presenting a video that has been commercially exploited on a website. However, it is still possible to capture some images here and there and to accompany them with the written transcription of the statements made by the person. Here is therefore the introduction of this intervention by Daniel Lecomte, a professional journalist. The very first sentences are missing. If a reader sends them to me, I will add them.
Source:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xubdb_complot-11-septembre_news
or, more complete:
First part:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x34s4w_11-septembre-arte-partie-1-sur-3_politics
Second part:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x355e8_11-septembre-arte-partie-2-sur-3_politics
This second part of the show begins with an intervention by the sociologist Pierre Lagrange. You be the judge.
He considers that Meyssan's approach raises a debate "where there should not be any debate."
Third part:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x356eo_11-septembre-arte-partie-3-sur-3_politics
March 18, 2008: The "debate" that ends this fantastic demonstration of incompetence of French journalism
http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/Vitkine/video/x43186_debat-sur-le-11-septembre1_politics
and
Daniel Lecomte's mocking opinion on the events of September 11, 2001.
His own words:
Among all the bad jokes that regularly cause trouble and make the headlines, there is one that surpasses all others, both by the exceptional nature of the event and by the scale of the madness. It's September 11, 2001. Remember!
A few months after the attack on America, a version circulated on the internet. With pseudo-evidence, authors, political figures, editors, and sometimes even journalists, assert without nuance that everything we have been told so far is null and void.
No, September 11 was not an attack organized by Bin Laden and his killers to bring America to its knees.
September 11, they say, is a huge manipulation, thought out, planned and masterfully executed by the American army.
And why?
Well, to create a shock in the American public opinion so that America could deploy its troops in Iraq and reshape the Middle East?
Of course...
The trick is huge, yet the scheme is taking hold.
So, what happened that so many people have fallen into stupidity?
What happened that mass media offer them a royal platform to reach the general public?