Smirnov, a Russian academician's letter on clean fusion

En résumé (grâce à un LLM libre auto-hébergé)

  • The press release from the UFO-science association describes the efforts of V. Smirnov and Julien Geffray in the field of MHD, with test bench projects and financial difficulties.
  • The authors highlight the lack of institutional and technical support for MHD research in France, despite significant scientific ambitions.
  • The text also mentions other projects of the association, such as spectroscopy, data collection on UFOs, and documentation of the Ummo case.

Smirnov's letter, a Russian academician, on proper fusion

UFO-science association press release

January 7, 2009 - revised version January 14, 2009

The letter of V. Smirnov, Russian academician, head of the fusion department at the Moscow Institute of High Temperatures

Julien Geffray came to my house for a few days and we together composed a press release addressed to the three hundred members of the UFO-science association and nine thousand unknown internet users. This is the number of people who became aware of the previous press release dated October 30, 2008.

First, an information.

First question: Who at UFO-science is in charge of the MHD side?

Answer: Two people, Julien Geffray and me. We will go down to my house in Pertuis on March 1, 2008, for the week and we will resume the "low density MHD test bench" project that we have been working on for six months, for which 5,000 euros had been spent on equipment. I will make the missing drawings. We will contact local companies able to make the machining of a valve and some accessories. Then we will go back, him to Paris, and me to Brussels. Then we will have to go down again to perform the experiments when it is ready. These experiments will give quality scientific results, publishable (like the three papers I presented at the Vilnius conference, Lithuania, September 2008, which will be published in Acta Polonica, the Polish journal that will publish the proceedings of the conference). After that, this test bench will go back to Paris and be stored in the garage of Philippe Leynaud, on the outskirts of the capital, the only space that had been made available to us in two years (...). Later, Julien Geffray will continue to set up experiments there, in this 15 square meter shed, alone. I will help him as best I can from a distance. But it is out of the question that I set up an MHD lab on my property in Pertuis, as I had considered. I am too disgusted, especially by the lack of reaction from all the major schools and technical institutes in the capital. Let's not even talk about the reactions of the institutions. Further down you will see that MHD is not "on the roadmap published by Valérie Pécresse". Geffray wants to continue, alone. OK. I will help him. But know what "French MHD" is today: it is a 30-year-old computer scientist, with two years of physics degree, a grabber, passionate and imaginative, but alone, without resources, without technical environment, trying to set something up in a 15 square meter garage, the only space we found in two years!

Me, I say to the French, and especially to the Parisians: "Bravo!"

Now that the thousand copies of the book have been sent, we will have ... 45,000 euros in the cash (the book, which will not be reprinted, has brought in 15,000 euros alone in four months). We have already started to repay the biggest donors who prefer their donation to go to Savoir sans Frontières (which really needs it). For what we have in mind, 45,000 euros is way too much now that we have reduced our ambitions. 15,000 would be enough. We now refuse donations and "renewal of membership" checks. Or else we respond "send us a symbolic one euro check, we will cash it". Some members told me "if we pay our fees, we could guarantee you 2000 euros a month to continue MHD". Unfortunately, these people have no idea what a real laboratory is. In this field, at the Vilnius conference, the poorest had annual budgets of two million dollars. Not only budgets, but also premises, technical support, researchers, and teaching. What can I do with 2000 euros a month? To build a Z-machine in a garage? No, the MHD battle is lost, definitively lost after 35 years of struggle. In a few years, the few pioneers still alive will be six feet under, taking their knowledge and expertise with them. We were four. One died six months ago. Some people tell me "why don't you train young people?" Nonsense! Moreover, final blow, what did I bring back from Vilnius, as new information? The Americans are clumsily trying to misinform about the Z-machine. To hide that they are now entering the race for pure fusion bombs. But the articles I wrote, and that Julien Geffray translated and put on a site he created: http://www.mhdprospects.com, have yielded some results. On the English side of Wikipedia (you know I am "banned for life" on Wikipedia France), people have put articles on the Z-machine, supported by my analyses. The emergence of pure fusion bombs is mentioned (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_fusion_weapon), as well as the related technique (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosively_pumped_flux_compression_generator). I will have at least created a crack in this wall of secrecy.

Subject that I was the first to describe on my site in 2006 (/legacy/science/Z-machine/machines_MHD/machines_MHD_bases.htm). It's better than nothing.

Already, when I came back from Brighton in 2001, I took a hit. Here, it continued. What do you think would happen if France had MHD activities, what do you think this knowledge would be dedicated to? Are you that naive.

More than ever, scientists are truly the Children of the Devil.

Second question: Who at UFO-science is in charge of spectroscopy, automatic detection stations, and the project of networked caps?

Answer: A man alone, Jean-Christophe Doré, 35 years old, a computer scientist in Rochefort, without resources.

Again, I say to the French: "Bravo!"

Third question: Who at UFO-science is in charge of collecting data on UFO landing traces and analyzing the samples taken?

Answer: Another man, alone, without any technical environment: Mathieu Ader

Again, I say to the French: "Bravo!"

But, some may say, what about the efforts that had been made since early 2008? Go look for the answer at the beginning of this page, it needs no comment. I think it is not useless to reveal who the second message was addressed to, intended for "scientific1". It's ... Maurice Viton, the cream of men.

Fourth question: Who is in charge of restoring the documentation of the Ummo file, which I repeat, is not finished "speaking" (of course not!) and is currently, and for ten years, in the hands of a group of vain people who are mostly fools? Look at this text, present on their site and especially its last lines. Who will remove them, which are an insult to the memory of Antonio Ribera? Do you know that during the ceremony held at Farriols' home, upon his death in 2006, none of...