Untitled Document
Content of a one-hour fifty-minute video, which I recorded on ITER
1' : 58" Why I became interested in the ITER topic
5' : 35" : Impossibility to meet with project officials
6' : 27" : Proposed by André Grégoire, chairman of the Public Inquiry Commission, a JPP-debate with ITER officials is rejected by local officials.
7' : 34" : Thesis of Cédric Reux, Concept of disruption. Eurodeputy Michèle Rivasi asks me for a note on this issue.
8' : 34" : Discovery of the thesis of the Englishman Andrew Thornton, similar to Reux's thesis. After Reux sent a protest letter to Michèle Rivasi, I put online on my website the document, of which the 13-page note I had given her was only the result: a 115-page text, citing 880 lines from Reux's thesis.
10' Mention of the video recorded with Michèle Rivasi.
10' : 40" : The meeting of November 16, 2011
10' : 26" : Document on the "public debate" of 2006 on ITER.
Letter to Bernard Bigot. Michel Châtelier invents "intense plasma". Gabriel Marbach praises the validation of ITER materials using experiments conducted on JET (for one second)
18' : ITER and the media
20' : 35" : Silence in the newspaper La Provence
24' : 10" : The officials are in favor of ITER.
25':30" : The attitude of the collective Sortir du Nucléaire.
27' : 14" : Mention of a book project with Michèle Rivasi.
28' Unacceptable attacks
30': 37" : If ITER is a failure, the future of fusion research is compromised
30' : 45" : The Budget Commission approves the extension of the budget from 5 to 15 billion euros
32' Reaction of Mr. Rivasi
34' The distribution of the 13-page document is a failure.
36' : In a 10-page document (website address indicated), the Empire counterattacks. My intellectually dishonest behavior is stigmatized.
40' : 30" : It's my turn to accuse the CEA of intellectual dishonesty.
40' : 50" : Insulting emails from Philippe Ghendrih, research director at the CEA, about fusion.
41' : 50" : Response of P. Ghendrih to the journalist of Enquête et Débat.
44' : 45" : The Princeton conference, September 2011
45' : Beginning of the presentation of the paper by G. Wurden, from Los Alamos
1 h : 14' : 30" : Return to the 2006 public debate.
1 h : 16':17" : ITER is a headless body.
1 h : 18' : 57" : Will ITER be the last tokamak ever built?
1 h : 20' : 04" : The sentence of Andrew Thornton
1 h : 28' : 50" : The surreal organizational chart showing the 28 possible causes that can cause disruptions.
1 h : 30' : 13" : An UFO at the CEA
1 h : 30' : 56" : High voltage on Tore Supra, in 2011
1 h : 32' : 46" : The problem of poisoning by tritium carbides.
1 h : 36' : 45" : IFMIF
1 h 41':58" : Return to the conclusions of Wurden
1 h : 48' : 38" : Mitigation of disruptions, or how to test a lance on a non-fire
1 h : 53':40" Conclusions