Images of the WTC taken from a helicopter
Images of the World Trade Center taken from a helicopter
October 9, 2009 – April 17, 2010
../../../VIDEOS/PHOTOS INEDITES DU 11 SEPTEMBRE 2001.pps
****[PowerPoint containing photos, presumably taken from a military helicopter](../../../VIDEOS/PHOTOS INEDITES DU 11 SEPTEMBRE 2001.pps)
At a time when journalists like Daniel Lecomte continue to regard the events of September 11, 2001 as definitively closed, it is interesting to examine these various photographs taken from a helicopter.
Journalist Daniel Lecomte, unflappable
Building number 7 is visible in many of them and is recognizable by the trapezoidal shape of its upper section. It is photographed from all angles, before and after the collapse of the twin towers.
Clicking on this link will reveal the photographs that NIST included in its three-year-long study.
Large sections of the building remain intact. At lower levels, a damaged edge can be seen, caused by debris impact, and only very limited fires are visible. It is difficult to believe that these fires could have caused the entire building to collapse "straight down into its own footprint." Especially since building number 7 has a completely different construction than the twin towers—much more conventional: it is of the "cantilever" type. You will discover this very dense internal structure at the end of the video linked below. This reminds me of the statement by the French expert from CSTB (Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment), who, during a television show, said that "the fire spread through a basement passage" (...).
Here is a video posing a series of 12 questions about the official narrative, one of which asks whether Daniel Lecomte has simply made the effort to study it.
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xasydx_11-septembre-12-questions-aux-defen_news
Only at the end of this document is building number 7 addressed. No steel-frame skyscraper has ever collapsed before, so the NIST investigator quickly states that "this is an extremely rare phenomenon" (limited to this unique case, therefore). The NIST argumentation is based on a computer simulation, and it is rather amusing that this simulation fails to reproduce the building’s vertical collapse into itself. In the simulation, the two upper ends fold onto each other.
Considering this systematic refusal of contradictory debate, whether from journalists or so-called "experts," it is not necessarily a matter of bad faith or subordination to some authoritarian structure. As many have already pointed out, admitting that these collapses were not the result of terrorist attacks by Al-Qaeda would represent a qualitative leap that few people are able to make (one wonders if Daniel Lecomte will ever be able to simply consider this possibility). Recall a Russian television broadcast where a journalist said:
*- The reason I can't doubt the official version is that then my entire worldview would collapse instantly, and I would suddenly find myself in a world I wouldn't want to live in (...). *
For those who have crossed this Rubicon, the realization is vertiginous, destabilizing. "False flag operations" have always existed, throughout history. In French, we called them "provocations." But there has never been in history a coup of this scale, targeting American citizens.
If this was indeed an "inside job," a self-inflicted attack, it is difficult to imagine that such a large-scale operation could have been carried out solely by Americans. The involvement of intelligence services from another power is an increasingly evident hypothesis. It would then have to be a state deeply entrenched across the United States, at every level—technical and political. A state with extensive experience in all kinds of deceit, practicing Machiavellianism systematically.
If it could be established that things happened this way and responsibilities could be traced, one can imagine the seismic shock on the international stage and the incalculable repercussions this could have.
We are living... a completely insane time, so insane that many refuse to face this madness, Daniel Lecomte above all.
OBAMA'S SPEECH IN AFGHANISTAN, MARCH 2010
Regarding Obama, if any readers still harbor illusions after his speech to the cadets at West Point—which I have already discussed—read the translation of his March 2010 address at Bagram, Afghanistan (remember that Bagram is also the "Afghan Guantanamo"; recall the scandal caused by American troops' abuses).
Obama in Afghanistan, Nobel Peace Prize winner (...), congratulating Americans and NATO troops
Excerpts from this speech by our ... Nobel Peace Prize winner (but Kissinger was also a recipient of this prize!):
And here in Afghanistan, you have gone on the offensive. And the American people are aware of it. And we are witnessing a massive increase in support throughout the country, because people understand the kind of sacrifices you are making and the significance of your mission. ......
Here in Afghanistan, each of us is part of a long lineage of soldiers who have sacrificed themselves for over two centuries. You protect your fellow citizens from danger. * ...... * Al-Qaeda and its extremist allies pose a threat to Afghanistan and a threat to the American people, but they also represent a threat worldwide, which is why we are so proud to have our coalition partners among us. .......
We must not forget why we are here. We did not choose this war. It was not an act of American expansionism, an act of interference in others’ affairs. We were brutally attacked on September 11. Thousands of our fellow citizens died. And it was here that the perpetrators of the crime, Al-Qaeda, established their headquarters. At the moment I speak to you, plots against our homeland, plots against our allies, plots against the Afghan and Pakistani peoples are being prepared right here.* ......
That is why it is so important for you to know that the entire nation stands behind you. That is why you wear this uniform: because in an unstable world, the United States of America will always be there to defend the security of nations and the dignity of human beings. That is who we are. That is how we act. .....
*But we also know this: The United States of America never abandons a task it has begun. (Applause) You do not give up, the U.S. military does not give up, we persist, we persevere, and together with our partners, we will win. I am absolutely certain. (Applause)
Did he forget Vietnam?
The Russians, who are no innocent bystanders and who had powerful logistical capabilities, lost in Afghanistan. Do Americans imagine they can succeed where the Soviets had to retreat in defeat? This country is simply impossible to control, not least due to its geography, and relying on unwavering support from Pakistan is the height of naivety—or the most cynical blindness.
One should also remember, though I lack time to elaborate, that at the beginning of the century, the British, fearing a Russian advance toward India through Afghanistan, suddenly decided—preemptively—to invade the country. Everything began as a real walk in the park. British soldiers even brought their wives and golf clubs.
The passage toward India (i.e., Pakistan) can only be achieved through two mountain passes, two mountain passes (located in what are now called the "tribal zones"), held for centuries by local tribes. Initially, the British paid local political figures to secure their cooperation. For passage through the two mountain passes, they also had to pay the tribal chiefs. But one day, a new commander of the expeditionary force decided that England did not have to pay "these scum" for passage. The response was immediate. Relations deteriorated, ambushes followed one another. The British lost many men and ultimately had to... evacuate the country.
Obama apparently didn't pay much attention in his history classes.
Nouveautés Guide (Index) Home Page
