Aller au contenu

Are there any visible traces of tests of climate weapons? September 23, 2002; reprinted on September 30, 2002. Animation 3

autre

Are there any visible signs of attempts to test climate weapons? September 23, 2002; reposted September 30, 2002. Animation 3

About twenty years ago, I flew in the lower Alps using what was then called a “glider”. Mine was a “Mosquito” – an intermediate model between the old-fashioned Manta gliders, which appeared in France in 1974 (I bought one of the first ones, sold by a man named Danis), and the newer, larger gliders like the Nuage, which is what I fly now. The Manta had a glide ratio of three; this is less than that of the Space Shuttle, which resembles a clothes iron in shape. Its descent speed was 2.5 m/s. The Mosquito performed slightly better, but back then, to stay airborne, one needed to find strong updrafts. One day, I encountered an “updraft confluence” – that is, an area where updrafts converged above a rocky ridge. Thanks to this helpful phenomenon, I was able to climb up the rocky ridge, then follow along its edge for about thirty kilometers, almost reaching Sisteron. This confluence was natural.

It’s easy to imagine that this phenomenon could be artificially created by creating long channels across thousands of kilometers of land, thereby heating the surface. This would result in the formation of long clouds at high altitudes due to water vapor condensation. The following animated GIF, from 312 K, shows two long cloud formations stretching thousands of kilometers over Central Asia. These formations seem unrelated to the region’s overall weather patterns. They appear as if they were “hair strands floating in soup.” I’m not a meteorologist.

Is this phenomenon “normal”? We know that the atmosphere consists of layers, and at any given moment these layers can exhibit completely different characteristics (for example, wind directions may reverse between layers). Only a knowledgeable meteorologist could answer this question. Hopefully, someone will do so. Assuming this is indeed an artificially created phenomenon, it suggests how one might dry out parts of the Red Sea so that Moses and his people could cross it on foot. As shown in the previous GIF, two straight, parallel cloud formations formed – whether naturally or artificially, we have no idea. The diagram below shows the resulting wind patterns. If this effect is strong enough, these opposing winds could dry out shallow bodies of water. Since both channels run over the Caspian Sea, it’s possible that Jews tried to replicate this effect, hoping to imitate how Yahweh did it.

Even if this effect were limited, we know it’s possible to measure sea-level changes down to the centimeter level via satellites. Perhaps more miracles are being studied right now. By the way, regarding microwave weapons, it’s possible to communicate directly into someone’s mind – possibly in Hebrew or Arabic.

How to obtain the CD containing my 550-page comic about the Bible

If Israelis and Palestinians remained more innocent, we could send messages from both Yahweh and Allah, recommending intermarriage to populate Judea. But nowadays, naive people are becoming rarer. Even a Taliban member knows how to use anti-aircraft missiles, and soon they’ll also know how to use microwave grenades. So, trying to recreate the “burning bush” scenario is doomed to failure from the start.

On the left, we see a bush receiving two beams of non-ionizing microwaves with frequencies N1 and N2. Only in the area where the frequencies differ (N2-N1) does ionization occur. This creates plasma, which doesn’t burn the bush. On the right, Moses is exposed to 3 GHz radiation modulated at audible frequencies. For obvious religious reasons, Yahweh isn’t depicted here.

By introducing motion, we get Fatima.

Previous animation

Back to News Back to Guide Back to Home Page

Number of connections since September 23, 2002: