Vehicle with microwave wave emitter
The New World Order
January 29, 2009
Today I created a new folder in the directories of my website: "New World Order". There it is, the word has been spoken. Bling-Bling even went along with his suit. See this video on Karl Zéro's site.
The French probably don't quite realize what is being prepared. It could be much worse than what one imagines. Naomi Klein's book "The Shock Doctrine" is rather hard to digest, too voluminous, but for those who have the courage to read it, it shows that deeply reactionary, antisocial, inhuman or downright fascist measures have always been taken when populations were "in a state of shock" at the moment of a serious crisis. So these measures, these "reforms" as that great progressive Sarkoky calls them, can be rammed through by force. Measures that will then be presented as "our only chance of salvation". Who knows what the future holds for us. An economic crisis means unemployment, and eventually social unrest.
Do we have enough tazers, enough surveillance drones to keep demonstrators at bay? Wouldn't it be appropriate, in order to be ready for any eventuality, to purchase a few crowd-control vehicles, delivering millimeter waves that create intolerable burns?
Vehicle with microwave wave emitter
While that imbecile of a justice minister shows off haute-couture dresses and expensive rings, our prisons are bursting at the seams. Shouldn't we (to govern is to foresee) create a few concentration camps somewhere? Haven't the United States gotten ahead of us in this salutary foresight?
Will the populations accept without moving everything that is about to be put in place? All these little frogs in those pots whose temperature rises imperceptibly, will they agree to be cooked and served to perfection?
We already have articles in the mainstream press, where the plan is mentioned:
Le Nouvel Observateur echoes the positions of the British Minister Gordon Brown:
The newspaper Le Monde follows suit:
Here is this text:
The financial crisis must not be an excuse for a retreat into protectionism but rather be seen as the "difficult birth of a new world order", warned British Prime Minister Gordon Brown.
"As some want, we can close our markets – to capital, to financial services, to trade and to labor – and thus reduce the risks of globalization*. But that would reduce global growth, deprive us of the benefits of world trade and drive millions of people into poverty"*, he continued. "Or we can take these threats and challenges we face today as the painful contractions to give birth to a new world order – and our task today is nothing less than to enable a transition to a new international order for the benefit of an expanding global society", he stressed.
On Friday, statistics confirmed that Britain was in recession. In the preceding days, the government had unveiled a new package of measures intended to inject credit into the economy. But for the prime minister, who is hosting a G20 summit in London on April 2, there is a need to find a global response to allow a return to growth. His Downing Street office let it be known that Mr. Brown wanted to find with his counterparts "the best way to be able to work together at the international level to reform the financial system, economic expansion and job creation in new sectors such as the environment".
This financial (and not economic) crisis had been foreseen by many analysts. It was the doing only of the rapacity of the money makers and of a credit system that could only lead to a catastrophe. Listen to this audio clip where our brilliant economist, Nicolas Sarkozy, before his election, in 2007 advocated the removal of restrictions on credit, by generalizing simple mortgage guarantees, a system that led the United States to the "subprimes" crisis, these mortgage guarantees, in the field of real estate, no longer being able to cover the risks taken by the banks (the eviction of borrowers being only a lesser evil, compared with the difficulties suddenly encountered by the credit organizations).
When you listen to Sarkozy speak, his tone seems convincing. This man is a very talented demagogic orator. But he is an... uncontrollable imbecile. I am surprised to sometimes read messages from people who nonetheless have a certain amount of common sense, who write to me:
- But.. we have to see what this will lead to. Sarkozy is the only one who wants to change things, to act....
Admittedly, in the other parties we are wallowing in the most complete nullity.
We have in a way the choice between a bunch of imbeciles and a bunch of cretins
Stupidity and the total lack of imagination can lead very far. But is there only foolishness and opportunism? Not so sure. Think back to Aaron Russo's sentences, before his death. When will we see micrometric-sized chips injected during a mass vaccination operation, made necessary by a sudden epidemic? Chips picking up the waves emitted by systems of the HAARP type, the " Zorglonde " from the Spirou comic strip. I see that this text dates from... 2004!
I would very much like to be wrong
