On Human Nature
On Human Nature
February 7, 2009
Following the release on the Rue89 website of a "detox" dossier, summarizing the conclusions of a brainstorming session of 30 students from a journalism school
The authors of this study, conducted over four days, under the direction of journalist Guillaume Dasquié "expert in intelligence"
a dossier compiled after a four-day internship, with undoubtedly much more storm than brain, I have received many emails, calling for a reaction from me. It will be necessary to do this work, to go through the points one by one. The group reopen 9/11 has published a statement, which you can go and consult. But that is not enough, it will not be enough. Very soon, I will refer my readers to a dossier that is already three years old, where the book by Guillaume Dasquié and Jean Guisnel is mentioned:
The terrible lie: thesis and nonsense about the September 11 attacks, by Guillaume Dasquié, published by La découverte, Cahiers libres collection, 2002
Guillaume Dasquié presented as a "specialist in intelligence"
Jean Guisnel, presented as a "specialist in defense issues".
A book that is a fabric of absurdities and nonsense, technically, which I have already commented on in a dossier. I had already reproduced illustrations taken from this book, which speak for themselves and reveal the authors' lack of knowledge regarding airplane crashes:
Dasquié and Guisnel's Book. Extract number 1
Dasquié and Guisnel's Book. Extract number 2, the crash on the Pentagon, as seen by these two journalists
Dasquié and Guisnel's Book. Extract number 3. The crash in Pennsylvania
It is impossible to make such gross errors when listing titles like:
*| Senior Reporter at Point | Professor at the École Spéciale Militaire de Guerre | And at the Coetquidan schools (Saint-Cyr) | Expert in defense and intelligence issues |
|---|---|---|---|
Read: this is on the back cover of their book, these are the ones that Jean Guisnel, "old hand". Look at the drawing on their page 39. Neither Dasquié nor Guisnel know what an airplane is. This drawing is there to explain why only very few debris were found (but still, the black box, long after) at the crash in Pennsylvania. According to the authors, it is simply because the plane arrived vertically and plunged into the ground. There, the plane is seen from the side.
I am a former engineer from Supaéro, the National School of Aeronautics in Paris. Any student from this school, or from any aeronautical school, knows how commercial airplanes are built. And this remark is also valid for the case of the Pentagon. The hardest and most penetrating parts of an airplane, the ones that are most likely to create the most significant impacts, are the jet engine axes, made of steel. These are also the densest, the ones that are likely to create the most significant impacts. However, in both cases of the "crash in Pennsylvania" and that of the Pentagon, these engine impact marks are missing. Any reasonable reader will notice this. These engines "vanish", but not the fuselage. It should be noted that the front of a commercial airplane is a plastic radome and that the entire fuselage is made of light alloy sheets, with a thickness not exceeding 2 mm, except for the element that connects the wings, to which the landing gear is also attached.
So we come across a paradox. These people write, for example, that "the wings of the aircraft disintegrated under the action of the shock wave". What shock wave? The flight is at high speed, 700 km/s, but subsonic. According to these people, the wings are disintegrated, "vaporized", nothing is found. But the fuselage, on the other hand, is able to pierce several successive concrete walls, to the point of piercing the last one, in an inner courtyard (in the case of the Pentagon). After creating such an impressive hole (whose photo was the cover of Meyssan's book, the Pentagate), this impactor also miraculously disappears. There is nothing, in this inner courtyard.
If we follow the argumentation, in the case of the Pentagon the kerosene burns very quickly. The heat from this combustion causes this ball of fire to rise, leaving the lawn intact. But when it comes to the Twin Towers, it burns instead slowly, softening the steel structure.
It would be good to know. In a crash, does kerosene burn quickly or slowly? Perhaps according to the needs of the argumentation.
And what about the light alloy of the airplanes, based on aluminum, how does it behave?
-
In the case of the Pentagon it vaporizes. Nothing is found in front of the building. The wings and tail are transformed into heat and light by "the shock wave" (I would be curious to know the answers of Messrs. Guisnel and Dasquié, when asked "what is a shock wave for you?")
-
In the case of the towers, this alloy forms molten streams along the facade, at high temperature.
Strange, isn't it? Would say Desproges.
It's just a detail. The points raised in Rue89 will have to be addressed one by one. The competence of the experts consulted will be analyzed.
I have just finished two dossiers that required a lot of work. One is called " The Land of Suffering and Hatred ". It traces the history of Zionism and tries to clarify the situation in Palestine by providing little-known or ignored details. You learn from reading this:
*| That Zionism began at the end of the 19th century | That violent actions are much older than the Holocaust, which is real: | I provide my personal testimony on the implementation of an experimental gas chamber on the southern edge of Paris, as early as 1941 | That several Prime Ministers of the State of Israel were verified terrorists, assassins (Yitziak Shamir, Menachem Begin, etc.) | etc. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
I continued with the case of Aymeric Chauprade, immediately removed from his teaching position at the war school. I think Chauprade anticipated this reaction. But, having made up his mind, he could no longer continue to spread lies and look in the mirror. I would have done the same in his place.
I have a lot of work. I must write an article to submit to Physical Review, where it will probably be rejected without reading. But we must not give up. I will write another one for the International Mathematical Physics Colloquium in Prague, August 2009. A third one with Julien Geffray, for the International Colloquium in Bremen, October 2009, on hypersonic flight.
I also have to set up a small publishing house, to compensate for the loss of my wife's salary, when we return to my house in Pertuis, planned for the summer. I write books at a furious pace. Things that have nothing to do with what I have already published. Fairy tales for children, unclassifiable works ("The Wild Grammar"). I have put up 250 new pages of scientific comic strips since August 2008. Mécavol, the Gemellary Universe, Faster than Light. A old friend told me on the phone yesterday:
*- And with your ears, what do you do? *
With my ears, I listen. With my eyes I read, I try to see.
Between the 2nd and 6th, Geffray and I are going down to Pertuis, to make the missing plans, for our low-density MHD test bench (5000 euros of equipment). We will transport the bench to Paris by car. It will be installed in the garage of Fontenay, 15 square meters. Julien is already equipping it with tools. We will produce, in this garage, international class experimental results, which will be published in refereed journals, after being presented at conferences. The first communication presented in Vilnius, last September, was accepted by the referee of the journal Acta Physica Polonica. We are waiting for the other two. Geffray will, alone, continue these researches in the only MHD laboratory in France, a 15 square meter garage, lent by a member.
A friend discussed with Jack Krine, a former fighter pilot, who was present on the set of Guillaume Durand's show "L'objet du Scandale". He came back shocked. It is at the level of the Bern show, "L'Arène de France" from 2007. You have been warned. It will be broadcast on France 2 on February 22 at 4:15 PM. Do not bother with aspirin, it is useless.
I will be 72 years old. I am tired. I have a great need to take care of my back, in the 4000 euro jacuzzi I will install in my house in Pertuis. But one must fight, otherwise who will do it? I think of the young, of the future that their elders have built for them. Often, I say to myself "I would not like to be twenty in 2009".
Do you really want to continue to be taken for fools, by fools like the brilliant authors of the "Terrible Lie"? It is up to you to choose. Will you think for yourself, or will you let people like them do it for you? People like them, or young people in their twenties playing as big reporters.
I will tell you what I am thinking, this Saturday morning, as usual. I think that we are living the most serious situation that the planet has known since man has inhabited it. Many things are converging. Our planet is overpopulated. Some regions are becoming deserts. There are quiet genocides in action.
Quiet Genocides (9 million deaths per year)
At the same time, we spend huge sums to create increasingly sophisticated weapons. Look at these images. They show you a real technological jewel. The American F-35B, a supersonic, stealthy, vertical takeoff aircraft. It has a lift fan located behind the pilot's cockpit which, in stationary flight, is driven by the main engine through a 90° angle redirect and a clutch. Its exhaust nozzle, at the back, curves 90°. The takeoff, landing and transition phases make abundant use of computer-assisted flight, otherwise the maneuvers would be problematic. When the plane is in horizontal flight and flies at a speed sufficient for its wings to support it, the lift fan is disengaged and the flaps are closed. The vectorable nozzle and the ability to switch from a "standard" flight to a mixed or stationary flight give the aircraft unmatched maneuverability. For the aeronautical engineer that I am, this is a high-tech achievement.
**The American F 35 B (F for Fighter. It is a vertical takeoff fighter) **
In A: the aircraft, seen from the front, emerging from its hangar.
In B: upper and lower hatches reveal a lift fan located behind the pilot. You can also see an opening on the back of the aircraft which is an additional air intake for the main engine, located in the axis of the aircraft. This air is also used to cool the clutch.
In C: the rear fuselage is tilted to allow the nozzle to angle 90°, which ends with the classic "petals" of a variable area nozzle. This device is called a "vector thrust system".
In D: the aircraft in takeoff. The arrows indicate the gas flows.
In E: the aircraft in fast flight.
In F: the corresponding configuration. The lift fan is disengaged and the hatches covering the air intake and exhaust are closed. The axial turbojet operates normally.
The French had tried many years ago to equip a Mirage with lift engines. The Russians did the same. But the additional weight reduced the payload. The Americans approached the problem differently by asking the main engine to drive a much lighter fan.
From the deck of an aircraft carrier
Videos of the maneuvers of this aircraft
:
:
:
:
:
This formula is destined for a great future given the versatility of the aircraft, capable of behaving like a fighter and a normal attack aircraft while enjoying the ability to take off and land anywhere, including the deck of a small-tonnage ship. It is an improved version of the famous British Harrier, which you can see, with Schwarzenegger at the controls in the film True Lies (True Lies), dating from 1994, where he overcomes, thanks to a courageous family collaboration, a conspiracy of the Red Jihad, Schwarzie and his close ones playing "the good guys" and the Arabs "the villains"; as usual
.
The movie poster of True Lies ****
The Harrier, an English ground attack aircraft, appeared in the 1960s
Around its air intakes, slits representing additional air intakes
One day there will be a civilian version of this aircraft, in the form of a business jet, fast and able to land anywhere. But the price to pay for having all these deadly toys, destined for maintaining order, for a New World Order, you have it in the previous image.
But let's go back to this film "True Lies" that you have surely seen and which truly deserves its name, if you read this message at a second level. You laughed. The daughter of Schwarzenegger is kidnapped by Arab terrorists of the "Red Jihad"
**The daughter of Schwarzenegger, kidnapped by the brigades of the Red Jihad, in a city in the United States **
**The Palestinian hairstyle, the Kalashnikov, everything is there **
But the young girl does not let herself be intimidated. Courageously, she steals the key to trigger an atomic bomb that will kill millions of people in a large American metropolis. Chase.
The Arab terrorist of the Red Jihad pursuing the daughter of Schwarzenegger on the crane's arm
**The terrible Arab terrorist. Rest assured, Schwarzie will kill him like the others **
Schwarzenegger saves his daughter and, at the controls of a Harrier, manages to fix the leader of the Red Jihad brigades on a missile, which he fires.
**The look of Schwarzenegger as he sends the villain to the death he deserves **
He is therefore carried away at high speed, passes through a building, then hits the helicopter in which the terrorists who Schwarzie had not already shot with the cannons of his Harrier, whose ability to operate in stationary flight allows him to position himself close to the floor where the terrorists are entrenched and to "bomb" them without mercy. Happy End. All the villains are killed. Schwarzie lands his aircraft, kisses his daughter. Everything becomes clear for his wife: he was from the CIA. But everything will be sorted out. The wife will also join the organization. The daughter too, later, probably, when she finishes her studies.
You have swallowed images. You laughed. You found the stunts exciting, the special effects very well done. But have you realized what was put into your head along the way? Not really. This "cult film" has been seen by hundreds of millions of people and on the North American channels it is shown once a week.
A Canadian journalist has released a dossier where he studies the image of the Arab in Western cinema and especially in Hollywood. I encourage you to watch this broadcast, aired on January 10, 2008. :
http://www.alterinfo.net/hollywood-et-les-arabes_a29177.html
It talks about a film that is roughly the same age and where the star is Samuel Johnson, a black, star of American cinema. This film is no longer available to rent in video clubs, but it is shown on a large screen in a store near me. The title is
*The Rules of Engagement (in French, the hell of duty) *
The theme is as follows. The action takes place in an Arab country, in Yemen. The Marines are called in to retrieve the civilian personnel, in an American embassy, with helicopters. Aggressive demonstrations have taken place.
It was decided to evacuate these people.
**A US Marine commando comes to retrieve the staff of its embassy, somewhere in Yemen **
But, there, the Marines are the target of heavy fire. They suddenly find themselves attacked by terrorists, while they are on the roof of a building. The situation is hot and, in a square below, after their departure, two hundred dead, civilians, men, women and children, will be counted.
Photos of the massacre after the heavy fire of the Marines: men, women, children
An investigation is launched, following the report made by the colonel, played by Samuel Jackson
Samuel Jackson, under the heavy fire of Yemeni terrorists
The actor Tommy Lee Jones plays the role of the lawyer who goes on site to clarify this affair
He hears local witnesses.
**" The Marines shot at the crowd " **
Tommy Lee Jones then sees a little girl, one-legged:
The one-legged Yemeni girl
She leads him to a local hospital where he sees survivors of the shooting
A survivor of the massacre
Under a bed, the military lawyer of Colonel Samuel Jackson discovers a cassette tape, bearing an inscription in Arabic.
The audio tape under a bed in the hospital
He decides to ask an interpreter to translate the content of this tape.
What he hears shocks him
" It is the duty of every good Muslim to kill Americans and their allies. "
Tommy Lee Jones hears these words and is shocked.
This tape thus legitimizes the report made by Colonel Samuel Jackson. Thus, we see how things happened.
**Flashback. The film's images show that all the demonstrators, men, women and children, were armed. **
**and opened fire on the Marines **
**Samuel Jackson then delivers the line of the film: **
**" We must kill all these bastards! **
You will notice, by the way, that this "Permission to Kill" (to take up the famous expression of agent 007 James Bond) is given by ... a black, who will later be defended by a white lawyer.
The Marines then fire on this crowd of fanatical rascals with their machine guns
**The heavy fire on the crowd, seen from another angle. The demonstrators have few places to take cover. **
But as Jack Shaheen, the Canadian sociologist, author of a study that made him watch a thousand films where the image of the Arab in Hollywood cinema emerges, "at that moment, we agree". And the massacre is total.
But it is a legitimate massacre
End of the film. Colonel Jackson announces on the radio
To all units: "Mission accomplished"
Last image of the film: the one-legged little girl, who had attracted our compassion, pulls out a nine millimeter and reveals her true face of one-legged terrorist:
**The one-legged little girl turns into a terrorist. End of our last illusions. She too ... **
I will continue this page later. It is a real job to take all these screenshots, to put everything together. But it allows to stop on the images, instead of seeing them fleeting on the screen. What I can tell you is that excerpts from this film are, in loop, on the sequence used as a demo for the plasma screens, in the shopping center, near my home.
I am of the generation that knew the black and white films with the good cowboys fighting against the bad Indians.
I continue to exchange emails with Jews who tell me "but what do the Palestinians have against us? We have built them roads, hospitals. We have developed the country. In general, we get along very well. If it were not for a band of fanatics, everything would be fine.
Literally.
I, I investigate. I try to find out what people have in their heads. I explore the past, as in this dossier on the history of Zionism. What emerges is that throughout history, people have been taken for fools. They have been sent to be shot against those on the other side. We have also gone to others, to develop their region, to bring them our culture. Behind: money, mineral wealth, oil, human weakness.
By the way, I will end with a joke that my old friend Vladimir Golubev taught me 40 years ago:
- You see, in your country, it's the exploitation of man by man. And well, in ours, it's the opposite...
To be continued
Novelties Guide (Index) Home Page
