Untitled Document
The Jesse Ventura Phenomenon
May 3, 2013
I only discovered the existence of Jesse Ventura a few weeks earlier, while he was hosting a series of "Conspiracy Theory" shows since 2009. Many people I asked to watch his various episodes initially reacted negatively, saying it was due to the sensationalist style of presentation.
Here is the presentation text for each of his shows:
Hidden Power Secrets Concealment Corruption You think you know everything Wrong!
Former Governor Former Navy SEAL (demolition diver) Wrestler I've heard some great stories and now I think it's high time you knew the truth.
Before continuing, I will make a simple remark. I put on a page of my site the links leading to his most intense videos, asking my readers to send me their opinion.
I didn't have time to receive many. Forty-eight hours after my announcement, these YouTube videos became inaccessible.
Here is my announcement:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwN36UTzqxQ**** ****
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F7ZLK6xchMY**** ****
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm3FZJ94t1M**** ****
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3SNIdHMYuk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLOturMN5Wo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9tvrYg85qU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYpMBJNL0TU
Jesse Ventura videos:
Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later) FEMA camps Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later) September 11 Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later) The Bilderberg group Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later) HAARP project Inaccessible since April 25, 2013 (a few days later) JFK assassination In English: The Pentagon The journalist who leaves (2009) from reopen 9/11 (subtitled) Ventura lights up this disinformation expert: David Icke, with his theory of the reptilian invasion (in English. Too bad. Could someone subtitle it? )
In the days that followed, many readers directed me to active links, giving these same videos, especially on dailymotion.
**http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xlirw1_les-camps-f-e-m-a-par-jesse-ventura_news#.UXxxbt5OLIU
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xliuj0_le-projet-haarp-par-jesse-ventura_news#.UXxy-N5OLIU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLOturMN5Wo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9tvrYg85qU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYpMBJNL0T
Jesse Ventura videos (working links):
FEMA camps September 11 The Bilderberg group HAARP project JFK assassination Jesse Ventuta. About the global warming theory In English: The attack on the Pentagon The journalist who leaves (2009) from reopen 9/11 (subtitled) Ventura lights up this disinformation expert: David Icke, with his theory of the reptilian invasion (in English. Too bad. Could someone subtitle it? )
Watch these videos, and for good measure, make backups
Apparently, the files would be downloadable in high definition at
http://uploaded.net/folder/jkeund
What is the explanation? Since it concerns copyright claims, would it mean that the rights holders of these American productions reacted so quickly, sending requests to YouTube? Do these rights holders follow what happens on the other side of the Atlantic so closely? And if so, why wouldn't they have intervened for the uploads on Dailymotion?
Another question: who provided the French dubbing (and not just subtitles, which is accessible to the average internet user) of these videos? Are there dubbed versions in other languages? Does anyone know of French-speaking channels on which these videos could have been broadcast, and when?
An hypothesis: the French dubbing could have been done by broadcasters of a show in Canada. If someone can enlighten us, they will be welcome.
I had very few negative reactions. Here is a typical reaction, among the many I received:
Alain P.
Hello
I didn't know this series and I'm really enjoying watching it.
The format is quite surprising, but the governor has a lot of charisma.
The content is interesting, precise and detailed.
They managed to avoid the pitfall of presenting too many facts and dispersing attention.
The report on 9/11 deals with the essentials and poses the right question about the collapse of the towers and the black boxes.
Alain
Some even changed their initial positions. Read the message from a colleague scientist:
http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL52025718652E8216
Dear JP,
Yeah, I hadn't really taken the time to watch a full video of Ventura, finding him excessive in the special effects.
But I must say I was finally positively impressed by his approach and his ability to get people talking, to provoke confrontations: he has some real assets as a former governor and uses them quite effectively.
I was impressed by the investigation into the JFK assassination and the admission of the man on his hospital bed!
I notice that some of the videos dubbed in French are accessible, for example here:
Fred
What can be said about these shows, their form and their content?
Many are well documented. I will cite those on September 11, the Bilderberg group, the Kennedy assassination, the Pentagon, the FEMA camps, and global warming. Ventura "goes in deep", full throttle. A journalism that we certainly don't have in France. He pushes doors, gets interviews, face-to-face with people he doesn't hold back. I think of the one where he pushes a FEMA official into a corner.
The form? You have to understand. Ventura tries to move things. And to do so, he wouldn't succeed by producing polished shows, aired at a late hour. He targets his audience (the American heartland) with shocking, spectacular sequences. For example, in the investigation on the Kennedy assassination, he tries to reconstruct Oswald's shot, from the library from which he was supposedly able to mortally wound John Kennedy. To do this, he climbs into a basket placed on the arm of a crane. With the same weapon as Oswald, he tries to make the same shot, in as few seconds as possible, and repeatedly fails, with such a primitive weapon. I don't think he fakes this sequence. Many ballistic experts immediately said it was impossible, with such a "primitive" weapon, for Lee Oswald to fire so many bullets in so short a time. They found the casings where the shooter was supposed to have been.
This montage, this reconstruction, impress the public. This demonstration touches the viewer, whereas statements from ballistic experts, gathered on a set, would leave him indifferent.
I could comment on these videos for pages. I simply say: watch them and form your own opinion.
I believe that Ventura has produced 22 episodes in the "Conspiracy Theory" series. But how to "keep up" with such production? There are obviously elements of the series that are quite weak. One of my readers wrote to me, "I admit I had trouble with the episode on time travel."
Let's talk about this episode, not dubbed. Ventura meets individuals who claim to have traveled through time. One presents himself with a "time machine," a simple box with two lamps and four buttons. He specifies that its use is ... dangerous. Ventura seems bored and seems to think, "what are we doing getting into such a subject?!"
He meets a character who says that as part of a military project, he was sent back in time to intervene in some historical event to "influence the course of history." And he shows a "photo from the time where he claims to be."
All of this is not very interesting and ends up in nothing.
However, Ventura does useful work when he traps this pheasant, David Icke. It starts with a sequence where his son Tyrel shows him an article from one of the largest American magazines, Time Magazine, which lists the favorite topics of conspiracy theorists. These topics are covered by Ventura. At the end of the list is the theory that the world's political classes are "populated by reptiles" (David Icke's theory).
Ventura explodes and decides to conduct his own investigation. If you don't understand English well, here's a summary. He starts by following men and women who claim to know something about the presence of these reptiles on American territory. He follows a guy who takes him to a desolate area, where a base full of reptiles is supposedly hidden. They are accompanied by a completely hysterical woman, who claims to "feel them, very close" and is terrified.
No more reptiles than butter in a broth.
Conscientious, Ventura meets a woman who claims to be a hybrid between a terrestrial and a reptilian. Another demonstration of hysteria, with communication through a medium.
After a quest that turns more and more into nothing, Ventura decides to meet David Icke. A filmed meeting.
As with all good gurus, one must admit that Icke manages quite well with the pretty women, even if the photo may be old. For those who are content with beautiful blondes who don't seem to breathe intelligence:
David Icke, in his small shoes, arrives at the agreed meeting to face the bogeyman Jesse Ventura (former wrestler, former combat swimmer, and former governor of the state of Minnesota )
David Icke, immediately uncomfortable, facing Jesse Ventura
If someone could at least subtitle this dialogue, it would enlighten more than one person, and more than one. You have to see Icke's expression, facing Ventura. It is clear that he is not a match and has a bad look from the start.
David Icke no longer smiles
Jesse Ventura immediately corners Icke. David Icke:
*- The answers to your questions are in a 700-page book I wrote. *
*- You don't imagine that I will read a 700-page book to get an answer to a simple question: how can I be faced with a reptile? *
Icke loses his composure, explaining that to see that someone is a reptile, you have to be able to perceive, briefly, an "invisible light." Ventura laughs at him.
Perceive an ... invisible light! Are you kidding me?
We are near the knockout. David Icke says he has given conferences for 21 years in 58 countries. Ventura applies the principle of his investigations:
*- Follow the money trail. *
Icke denies doing it for money, but Ventura shows him his accounts. With all the money he gets from his 19 books, his conferences, and the rights to his shows, the total is $1.9 million per year.
*- I think you mainly work for money. I'll give you some numbers. *
David Icke gets up and leaves the set saying,
- I thought that during this meeting we were supposed to talk about what's happening in the world...
David Icke takes flight
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzMUAK5ZqlM&feature=endscreen&NR=1
| For those curious: David Icke explains how reptiles vampirize our energy reality |
|---|
Jesse Ventura is not just "the host of a spectacular TV series." He also has a political vision of the world. I would strongly recommend you to search for the many videos where he faces journalists from CNN, Fox News and others. There, there is no more cinema, no staging. And you will have to agree that, facing often very strong attacks from journalists, he defends himself very well. So much so that one journalist, angry, leaves the set.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y40We-O7qAc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peztNH3Ksww
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cfz3WoVi6N
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ya159v0ZkU
http://www.foxnews.com/topics/jesse-ventura.htm
http://video.foxnews.com/v/3931231/its-torture/
The journalist who leaves (2009) from reopen 9/11 (subtitled )
One of the best; at CNN:
Then:
8
Etc... etc....
Reader's reaction:
Hello, There was a controversy about Ventura's service records, following his documentaries. Some claimed that Ventura had never been in combat and that his career was short. Ventura demonstrated the opposite. One can see a attempt to discredit his opponents.
Regarding the pressures of the intelligence services on their employees, the National Geographic documentary on Area 51 is revealing. One can see former employees, engineers or pilots, explaining their conviction that they had to stay silent and the very persuasive talent of the administration. For example, after the crash of an SR 71, its pilot was debriefed a few days later, on a Sunday, outside the base and of his own free will, with penthotal. He was taken home in a comatose state by agents who presented themselves to his wife as colleagues returning from a drinking session. His wife would not know for 40 years.
I recommend you to read "Globalia" by Ruffin and watch "The Son of Man."
A good book and a good film. Or you understand that the best of all dictatorships is to make the people believe they are free of their choices. Or it is useful and easy to light fires and then offer to put them out.
I think there are at least two levels of reality.
The first level is that of the masses, the "consumer-actor," he votes, earns money and spends it, believes that the best is done for him, believes in the necessity of respecting the laws, morality, etc., he raises his offspring in this way.
The second level is that of the backstage where some dirty their hands so that the first level continues without problems, free themselves from the rules in force, from morality or direct the history with a big H and hide their profits in all kinds of ways from the people of the first level.
The first level is a farce, the second is a jungle.
Yours faithfully.
G.C.
If Ventura has done investigations on the HAARP site and Area 51, there is still a subject he has not yet addressed, as far as we know: the UFO subject. And there, one can have serious concerns. What will happen if he only considers what can be found on American territory?
Who could he turn to? To what "expert"? To this old fraud Stanton Friedman, "nuclear physicist"? To Jacques Vallée, "astrophysicist," proponent of the "all paranormal" theory? To Peter Sturrock, who is for the same bosses as Steven Greer? To the MUFON (Mutual UFO Network) whose scientific director, speaking abundantly in Greer's film, Sirius, suggests that he belongs to the ... same family. To the people who every year organize a lamentable happening for the anniversary of Roswell?
It seems at first glance poorly started
I say it out loud: there is indeed a conspiracy around this UFO subject, on an international scale. The reasons are multiple. This phenomenon escapes all control and is potentially destabilizing, for many layers of society. It is destabilizing for the political and military powers, for the religious institutions, for the scientific community, in all disciplines. Even the ufologists, if one looks closely, do not really want to touch this subject too closely.
To put it briefly, one can simply ask the question:
- What kind of men and women would not be destabilized if these people were suddenly in contact with representatives of an extraterrestrial race?
The numerous observations reported by witnesses immediately evoke the fact that extraterrestrial races could come to visit us, at a high rate since the end of the war of 1939-45, precisely since our planet entered the nuclear era, and possibly since ancient times.
The message, explicit or implicit, of these "visitors" has always been the same:
- Attention, by developing nuclear, civilian or military, you are preparing a problematic future. If you don't change, you are heading towards a catastrophe.
I completely agree with this!
That being said, "thanks to the nuclear" there has been no Third World War for 68 years, whereas only 21 years had passed between the end of the First World War, in 1918, and the start of the Second, in 1939. It's an incredibly short period.
When one thinks about the human and material damages associated with such conflicts, one can only be grateful. But will this last forever? Isn't it retreating to jump further? The military nuclear, at the height of the Cold War, became a mad frenzy. We know that there are nuclear submarines in the Barents Sea that have sunk, at great depth and one of them is still carrying torpedoes armed with nuclear warheads, with heads containing plutonium! All the Russians could do was to fit titanium covers on the openings of the torpedo tubes (which need to be replaced every ten years). Don't even talk about the nuclear reactors of submarines, lying at the bottom of the ocean.
Now, the civilian nuclear takes over. Chernobyl and Fukushima are just the beginning of what is to come, if we do nothing.
One doesn't need to be a great psychologist or a great sociologist to realize that something is happening on this planet, very worrying.
Personally, I think the 9/11 attacks were an "inside job." To trace back to the authors of this plot, I think applying the Roman principle
IS FECIT CUI PRODEST
He who did it is the one who benefited from it
is a good guide. These attacks brought with them an unimaginable amount of lies. One can conceive them as a "false flag operation," as an operation conducted in such a way that one arranges to blame another group, another nation, another race.
A friend told me yesterday:
- But this has always existed, throughout history.
That's true. Sometimes, the facts resurface. Ventura mentions in a face-to-face with a journalist the verified way in which President Johnson and his government staged the Gulf of Tonkin incident, information according to which American ships would have been attacked by North Vietnamese. This perfectly false incident provoked a reaction from the Americans, and the entry of the USA into a war in which fifty thousand Americans lost their lives, for nothing, in fact.
Many stories in the past of the United States are suspicious, like the fire of the Maine in the harbor of Havana, causing the Hispanic-American War. Etc...
**The American battleship Maine, on fire in the harbor of Havana. 200 sailors killed. **
The American intervention in Cuba is the very example of a pseudo-humanitarian operation (like the one carried out in Libya, and which is currently taking place in Syria). Discover the history of Cuba. After centuries of slavery, the population of the island revolted. Two hundred thousand dead. After having "helped" the Cuban revolutionaries, the Americans took over the island, which became the property of the United Fruit. In 1934 the USA changed its policy and preferred to install "puppets," like Batista.
General Batista in 1952
The island also became the stronghold of the Mafia, until Fidel Castro drove Batista away and nationalized United Fruit. In the process, the Mafia fled and quickly returned to Florida.
You will also read that the Spanish-American War ended with the Paris Treaty, according to which not only the dreams of the Cuban revolutionaries were ruined, but also according to which the Philippines were simply sold to the USA for 20 million dollars. Thus, at the dawn of the century, after the American army had learned its lessons in its war of independence, American imperialism was born (after Spanish imperialism, British imperialism, the failed imperialisms of the Nazis and the Japanese, etc.). See: the war between the United States and the new independent state of Manila.
Excerpt from Wikipedia:
With the Paris Treaty, Spain recognized the independence of Cuba, while ceding the Philippines, Puerto Rico and Guam to the United States in exchange for a payment of 20 million US dollars.
The same year, in an independent act, the United States annexed the Hawaiian Islands.
The following year, they acquired part of the Samoan archipelago.
Thus, the American territory suddenly increased by several territories beyond North America.
The war of 1898 was undoubtedly a turning point in American history. The United States took its place in the tight circle of the great powers of the planet. The Washington Post had written the day before the war in an editorial:
- We are faced with a strange destiny. The taste for empire rules each of us as the taste for blood rules in the jungle.
Now, the Americans no longer wanted to be content with only dealing with their internal affairs.
The United States had established its supremacy over the Caribbean and extended its influence to the shores of Asia. They had become a world power by demonstrating their strength and this would now affect the international politics of all the great powers.
The historian Howard Zinn wrote:
- Now, the taste for empire possessed both politicians and business circles throughout the country. Racism, paternalism, and profit questions mixed with discourses on the destiny of civilization.
Below, this illustration from the Philadelphia press of 1898, just after the annexation of the Philippines, showing how the American eagle now extends its wings over "more than ten thousand miles"
Back more precisely to the theme of false flag operations, which allow to trigger wars. After the incident of the Tonkin Gulf boats, which served as a pretext for the American war in Vietnam, let's mention the Gleiwitz incident, dated August 31, 1939. There, the Nazis claimed, with the help of media (radio, at the time. Hitler was one of the first to use this modern means of information, faster than the printed press) that Polish terrorists had seized a transmitter located in the Sudetes, in Gleiwitz, at the border of Poland and what was then Germany.
The Gleiwitz radio transmitter, current state. Built in larch. It is the tallest wooden tower in Europe: 118 meters
Radio messages, widely broadcast throughout Germany, explained that Polish terrorists, having seized the Gleiwitz transmitter, called on all non-German residents to rise up to overthrow Hitler's regime. Thus, the invasion of Poland became the legitimate response of the Germans, against this "Polish aggression."
The affair would have remained unnoticed if a certain Alfred Naujocks, questioned as a Nazi during the Nuremberg trial, about other charges, had not revealed this conspiracy.
Alfred Naujocks at the time of the Nuremberg trial
This was imagined and staged from scratch by Himmler, who named it "Operation Himmler". As often happens in such cases, the terrorists, who die during the clash with "the forces of order," are unable to speak (like Lee Oswald in the assassination of Kennedy). Naujocks says that they had brought in common criminals, who were not even Polish, and that these were killed, then dressed in Polish uniforms, before being photographed.
Thus, the pattern of a "false flag operation" that allows to trigger a war emerges. The United States narrowly escaped such an operation in 1962, proposed by an American general, General Northwoods, aiming to simulate an attack on the American base in Guantanamo by Cubans. It was the Americans themselves, disguised as "Cuban terrorists," who were supposed to attack their own base, causing the death of American soldiers, in order for this aggression to justify the invasion of the island by the United States. Kennedy did not accept this plan, named Operation Northwoods.
Translation:
The members of the group in charge of the "Cuba" project respond by providing, attached, a brief, but precise description of the pretexts that would be suitable to provide a justification for a military intervention in Cuba.
The entire group recommends that this document be disseminated and considered as submitted for approval to define a schedule. It is assumed that other documents of this kind would be submitted to the various agencies and that all of this would constitute a starting point for defining an operation schedule.
Moreover, it is assumed that the development of the military and paramilitary aspects related to this plan would be entrusted to a single agency. It is also recommended that the responsibility for all these operations, whether open or secret, be placed under the group.
L.L.Lemnitzer
(Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff)
Chairman
Group responsible for these combined operations.
Not bad, huh?
General Lyman Lemnitzer, architect of the Northwood plan
Northwood plan was a false flag operation aiming to blame terrorist attacks, carried out by Americans against other Americans, for actions attributed to Cubans. At this point, one might say "yes, but all this never went beyond the paper project. Kennedy opposed this project.
A year earlier, Kennedy had just taken office as President of the United States. He was asked to approve a project that had been developed by the Eisenhower government, before his election. It consisted of sending from Nicaragua commandos made up of Cuban exiles living in Florida, who would be transported there, so that the attack could not be immediately attributed to the United States, if it came from Florida. These commandos were trained by American instructors. Here is the attack plan:
....
The attack was conducted by sea, with speedboats and by air, using a version of the famous World War II ground attack bomber Marauder, in its version Invader (which was intensively used by the French during the Algerian War).
The B 26 Marauder
Preparing a B 26 Invader for a bombing mission during the Algerian War
The idea was to destroy the Cuban air force on the ground, by strafing its airfields without warning. At the same time, speedboats carrying 1,400 Cuban counter-revolutionaries approach the island from the south, in the Bay of Pigs, in the hope of establishing a beachhead and splitting the island in two. The American army had a expeditionary force ready, prepared to land "to help the men who are rebelling against the tyrant, Fidel Castro". However, very quickly, the 1,400 men who landed found themselves blocked by the very strong reaction of the Cuban population. They surrendered to avoid a bloodbath. Castro exchanged them for ... their weight in medicines.
The air operation was ... almost a success. The Cuban aircraft were destroyed, except for a few, eight, including a "Sea Fury" fighter, a naval version of the famous and powerful British Hawker Tempest, from the end of the Second World War, which managed to take off and immediately counter-attack.
The British Hawker Tempest, veteran of the Second World War
The historic Cuban Sea Fury
The Sea Fury reached 700 km/h, while the Invader crawled at 450 km/h. The matter was quickly decided. The Cuban Sea Fury brought down two Invaders. One crashed into the sea, while the wreckage of the second was recovered on Cuban territory. And there, disaster: the aircraft bore the marks of Cuban aircraft: F A R (Forces Aériennes Révolutionnaires). These were American aircraft, disguised to make it appear that the air operation had been carried out by Cuban military forces hostile to Castro. It is therefore, without a doubt, an authentic false flag operation, organized by the United States.
The American Invader aircraft, bearing the mark of the Castroist Revolutionary Air Force on its tail.
This aircraft, moreover, does not correspond to the models that equip the Cuban Air Force. These differ completely in terms of the placement of the machine guns intended for ground attacks.
There was therefore a false flag operation, conspiracy.
The affair became complicated. The air engagement had been a big consumer of fuel. One of the aircraft of the false flag operation realized it was unable to reach Yucatan and decided to land in Florida (in fact its starting base!). Embarrassed, the Americans claimed that the Cuban crew had requested political asylum. But there remained this awkward issue related to the difference in aircraft models, which was quickly established.
The Americans asked the Cuban counter-revolutionaries to rearm the aircraft that had returned to Yucatan and to repeat the attack. However, discouraged by the violent reaction of the Cuban Sea Fury, they refused. A second raid would then be carried out by ... an American crew, still with the FAR registration!
This affair had a resonance that brought the world to the brink of the Third World War. Castro having asked for help from the Soviets, Khrushchev sent medium-range missiles to Cuba, which could serve the Cubans as a "deterrent force". And this is the second affair, the Cuban missiles. Kennedy reacted by declaring an embargo on the island. An U2 plane, sent for observation, was shot down by a Soviet surface-to-air missile. The Russians sent conventional propulsion submarines, one of which, fifty years later, was found to be armed with nuclear-tipped torpedoes, and whose commanders, left to their own devices, were physically unable to communicate with the Kremlin.
The affair ended on the diplomatic level. In exchange for the withdrawal of the missiles, the American administration, through secret agreements, committed itself not to carry out operations like the Bay of Pigs.
It is important to note from this anecdote a historically established fact:
The Americans did indeed carry out a false flag operation during this attempt to destabilize Cuba.
Corollary: If Kennedy refused, a year later, to give his approval to the Northwood plan, it was not on moral grounds, but simply because he had been burned by the failure of the Bay of Pigs operation, concocted by his predecessor, Eisenhower.
In 1931, the Japanese staged what was called the Mukden incident, by simulating the sabotage of a railway, which gave them the pretext to invade Manchuria.
Following the Mukden incident, Japanese troops invaded Manchuria, where they committed terrible atrocities against the Chinese civilian population.
The Israelis are no less involved in false flag operations. When a commando of the Irgun, the Jewish secret army, led by
Menahem Begin, terrorist, then Prime Minister of the State of Israel 1977-1980
Also recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize (...)
placed a set of explosives in the basement of the King David Hotel, the seat of the British administration, which killed 90 people (...), the Israeli terrorists operated disguised as Arabs.
The King David Hotel in Jerusalem, after the attack carried out by the Israeli terrorists of the Irgun, disguised as Arabs, under the leadership of Menahem Begin, which killed 90 people on July 22, 1946, with 350 kilograms of explosives, distributed in six charges
Another affair the Lavon affair, named after the Israeli Minister of War at the time. The Israeli plan was to carry out deadly attacks against Anglo-Saxon interests in Egypt, making them appear to be committed by Egyptians, in order to undermine the trust that was being built between the Westerners and the Egyptians, which did not seem to be in the interest of the Hebrew state. In 1954, Egyptian Jews were charged with the operation. There were several attacks, but one of the Jewish terrorists was betrayed by the premature ignition of his bomb, which misfired. The Egyptians obtained the identities of the different Israeli agents through torture, arrested them, and after judging them, hanged them. The result was that Jews living in Egypt were forced to leave the country and go to Israel.
As Benjamin Netanyahu explains in an interview, Israel is forced to carry out short-term military operations, so that they are not hindered by international pressures.
****http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3puqX9W7S0k
In 1962, Robert Mac Namara, Secretary of Defense under John Kennedy, had been unfavorable to the Northwood plan, but this plan played a very shady role in 1967, at the time of the outbreak of the Six-Day War, which would lead to the attack on the American spy ship USS Liberty by planes, then by Israeli torpedo boats.
****http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incident_du_USS_Liberty
More complete: ****http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Liberty_incident
In these false flag operations, they do not hesitate to resort to murder.
In the Liberty affair, the Israelis deliberately caused the death of 34 American soldiers and injured 171 others.
The USS Liberty, attacked and torpedoed by the Israelis, is damaged, but does not sink.
At the time of the attack, the USS Liberty was sailing 25 km from the Sinai coast. Its listening system therefore allowed it to intercept without any problem the messages exchanged between the Israeli planes attacking the Egyptian airfields and the command center of the operation. It is unthinkable to imagine, in such clear weather, that during the 8 passes of Israeli reconnaissance planes (a twin-engine Noratlas and Mirage III, both of French manufacture), these aircraft, flying at very low altitude over the ship, could have failed to identify it as an American Navy unit. The sailors clearly remember that the jets flew so low that they could feel their draft.
While the ship flew its colors at the top of the mast, it was attacked at 2 p.m. by a Mirage III, which killed eight men and injured 75 others. The Liberty immediately sent a distress call to the Sixth Fleet, which was then near Crete.
Impact of the 30mm shells fired by the Mirage III
25 minutes after the air attack, the Liberty suffered an attack by three Israeli torpedo boats. A hit created a hole in the hull and killed 25 more sailors.
The impact of the torpedo that hit the ship
Meanwhile, the aircraft carrier America sent eight aircraft toward the Liberty. But (?...) the captain realized that these were carrying nuclear charges and recalled them to his ship a few minutes later (...).
At 3:30 p.m., when the identity of the ship was finally known (?..) the aircraft carrier USS Saratoga also sent eight aircraft carrying conventional, non-nuclear charges (...). The planes flew over the Liberty, then returned to the Saratoga. As the witnesses on board said, "it was really God who, at that moment, prevented the Liberty from sinking."
The foreign ministries of the two countries exchanged messages and jointly decided to conclude that it was a regrettable misunderstanding. Then, ships from the Sixth Fleet finally came to the aid of the Liberty. Later, the survivors were generously awarded medals and various distinctions for their heroic behavior during the events, without any statement ever clarifying the identity of the attacking planes and torpedo boats.
Dean Rusk, Secretary of State, sent a message stating that the Liberty was flying its colors and must have been identified an hour before the attack, that the attack was deliberate and represented a complete disregard for human life.
After the incident, an investigation was launched. Senator Hichkenlooper, for his part, stated, "after all I've heard, I couldn't believe for a minute that it was an accident." Many questions remained unanswered, from Mac Namara, Secretary of Defense.
Dean Rusk, Secretary of State, Lyndon B. Johnson, President and Robert Mc Namara, Secretary of Defense
Dean Rusk, U.S. Secretary of State at the time of the incident, later wrote:
I was never satisfied with the Israeli explanation. Their sustained attack to disable and sink Liberty precluded an assault by accident or some trigger-happy local commander. Through diplomatic channels we refused to accept their explanations. I didn't believe them then, and I don't believe them to this day. The attack was outrageous.
Translation:
I never accepted the Israeli explanation: their sustained attack to disable and sink the Liberty, presented as an accident caused by a trigger-happy local commander. We refused to accept such explanations, through diplomatic channels. I never believed them and I still don't. The attack was deliberate.
We refer the reader to the elements presented on the English Wikipedia page, which mentions the opacity of such an affair, an officer, for example, having received an order from the Secretary of Defense, Mac Namara, to conclude in favor of a tragic accident, etc.
The United States had become an unconditional ally of Israel, which is still the case, by the way. But not all political leaders in the USA have this attitude. The Hebrew state was determined to carry out a surprise air attack. To do this, no risk could be taken, for example, by informing its American ally of the imminent attack. However, the spy ship Liberty (dependent on the NSA, the National Security Agency) happened to be inconveniently close to the Egyptian coast that day. One can imagine the following dialogue:
-
Chief, there is an American listening ship 25 km from the coast, which risks intercepting all our communications. What do we do? - We can't take this risk. Send it to the bottom.
-
But ... they are Americans ....
-
Too bad. These people are in the wrong place, at the wrong time. Act. Afterward, we'll pretend it was mistaken for an Egyptian or Russian ship.
Many theories have been put forward, contradicting the official theory of a tragic accident, which is difficult to support if one takes into account the testimonies of the sailors present. Moreover, the policy required that the ship be silenced and not capture or transmit information to the Americans regarding the extension of the Israeli attack, to the north of the country, on the Golan Heights.
State interests have their price, in human lives.
In 1968, a bombing at Piazza Fontana in Italy killed 16 people and injured 98 in Milan. The far left was immediately accused. An anarchist, Giuseppe Pinelli, arrested and designated as the culprit, died by falling from a window a few days later.
In 1980, a similar scenario at Bologna station, which killed 16 people and injured 88. The head of government at the time immediately designated as the perpetrator, without any evidence, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. But in the years that followed, through a long investigation, it was established that this attack was carried out by an Italian far-right movement, integrated into the movement Gladio (the sword), whose goal was to create a situation of tension in Europe, to favor the emergence of "strong governments".
The insignia of members of the Gladio group. Motto: "In silence, we serve freedom"
The existence of this Gladio movement, "stay behind" (which stays behind), was revealed in 1990 by the Prime Minister Giulio Andreotti, a true record holder in terms of accumulating ministerial portfolios, whose long political career, as a member of the Christian Democracy, ended abruptly when his close and long-standing ties with the Mafia were established.
Giulio Andreotti admitting to having ties with the Mafia
By combining the Bologna station bombing, where Italians, neo-fascists, are not afraid to coldly assassinate innocent citizens, people of their own country, solely to shift suspicion onto a "Palestine Liberation Movement", and the Lavon affair, where Israelis commit an attack targeting Western nationals, ensuring that Arabs are accused of these acts, one finds the components of the September 11 attacks, or at least their pattern.
Of course, considering things from this angle is to present oneself as a "conspiracy theorist".
But not considering this possibility is to turn resolutely away from an endless succession of verified historical facts.
Moreover, it takes a considerable amount of naivety or blindness to swallow all the facets of the official 9/11 theory.
Ventura brings a new light, by informing us, through experience, in the investigation conducted on the collapse of the World Trade Center towers, that one can mix nano-thermite with ... paint!
Ventura's investigations on these events of September 11 are well conducted. Personally, I don't think the aircraft that hit the towers were commercial airplanes. One of them had a "pod" under its belly, a sort of streamlined container that only military aircraft carry. I rather think they were remotely guided aircraft, especially in the final part of the trajectory by a radio beacon located in the target buildings.
Regarding the Pentagon affair, I personally agree with the idea of a rapid flight by a commercial airplane, or very similar to it, followed by a synchronized explosion. This fits with a counter-investigation conducted by an American young man, Craig Rankle.
Craig Rankle
Don't miss this document, it is astonishing
http://www.reopen911.info/evenement/projection-debat-avec-c-ranke-du-cit.html
This one is based on numerous testimonies, including those of two police officers located under the canopy of a gas station, who were therefore unable to see an aircraft approaching, according to the official trajectory ( "confirmed by its black box" provided, with years of delay, by the official services ) towards the part of the Pentagon where the impact between an American Airlines plane and the facade was supposed to occur.
This document (80 minutes long) is so important that I have decided to put a link to a page mentioning this investigation, broadcast in 2009.
Link to Craig Rankle's investigation
Let's summarize the results of this investigation in a few frames:
This is the general aerial view of the site. You can see that the Pentagon is very close to the Ronald Reagan Airport, oriented North/South. The air traffic is therefore very intense around the building (an aircraft every two minutes). In blue, the trajectory corresponding to the official version.
On the image above, an aerial view of the site. On the top right, the Pentagon, with the alleged impact point. In blue, the official trajectory, deduced from the overturning of street lamps (quickly removed after the event) and the position where a key witness, a black driver, was parked on a bridge, the hood and windshield of his vehicle having been damaged by the fall of a heavy street lamp.
Craig Rankle returns to the site five years after the events and easily finds many eyewitnesses, whose testimonies he records. To all of them, he shows the above photo and asks them to draw with a marker their estimate of the aircraft's trajectory, which all claim to have seen.
As you can see, all these estimates differ significantly from the official trajectory, in blue, which was "confirmed by the data from the aircraft's black box", which were produced years after the event.
The most important testimonies are those of two police officers who, in relation to the scene, were "leaning against a gas station" whose canopy and building would have absolutely prevented them from seeing the aircraft approaching from the south of it.
As one of the police officers said:
- Sorry, I am unable to see through the walls
Of course, all of them converge their drawing towards the "impact point" of the aircraft on the building's facade. But everything happened in a limited number of seconds. If the building is flown over at low altitude and, at the moment it reaches its height, an explosion is triggered further south, the attention of the witnesses will be immediately drawn to the light and noise.
****Link to this comment on Craig Rankle's investigation
The video shows the behavior of the taxi driver, who would give anything to not be grilled, years after having given "his testimony". His words, when he speaks as if "off camera", are revealing.
Craig Rankle hypothesizes that the Pentagon was not hit by an airplane or a missile, but simply by an aircraft marked with the insignia of American Airlines. At the same time, charges would have been triggered, simulating its impact on the facade. In his show, Jesse Ventura mentions this theory.
This would explain why it would be impossible for the recordings of the surveillance cameras and the surrounding buildings to be produced, since they would not show ... any aircraft, nor ... missile. Similarly, one can doubt that the aircraft that hit the twin towers were not commercial airplanes, and one can also doubt that this aircraft, flying over the Pentagon, was an American Airlines plane, hijacked by a terrorist, whose piloting skills were seriously lacking.
Faced with this interpretation of the facts, some would immediately say:
- But where did the real commercial airplanes, their crews and passengers go?
To this I would answer that at the time it was perfectly possible to remotely pilot such aircraft and land them on a runway, without damage. All of this was fully developed as early as the 1960s. Same for the complete control of the aircraft, after their takeoff, those having been modified without the knowledge of the American Airlines company (by the company responsible for their maintenance, located on the territory of the United States, and belonging to a foreign country). Shortly after takeoff, the pilots had in their hands controls that no longer responded, and their radio communication was disabled. The crew and passengers could then be killed by gas, and it would be aircraft full of corpses that would then land on pre-arranged runways. Unless these murders were committed after landing, after bringing these people to some place, where they could be discreetly eliminated. There was nothing left but to erase all traces of the bodies and the airplanes, after taking fingerprints and DNA, to carry out a simulation of "identification on the site of the aircraft impacts".
All of this is horrible, one might say. But is it more horrible than placing a bomb in a station, at a time of high traffic, to coldly kill citizens of one's own country, as in the Bologna station bombing? When one decides to coldly kill 3,000 innocent American citizens, one is no longer concerned with two hundred more. In all of this, it's just a question of number and ... stakes. The stakes related to such an operation were considerable.
Do not believe that it would have been impossible to find, in the United States, men ready to kill their own fellow citizens. This had been perfectly considered in the Northwood plan. President Kennedy had given his approval for the Bay of Pigs affair, which was a failure. If he had given the green light for that Northwood operation, the commando that would have attacked Guantanamo would not have fired inert mortar shells, nor blank bullets.
Some would say:
- But on what basis would these hijacked aircraft, on September 11, 2001, have landed? How can one imagine that the personnel of this base would have remained silent, and that they would have generally been complicit in such events, for more than ten years. After some time, someone would have finally spoken!
I do not think of an American military base. There are installations on the territory of the United States that are the size of real airbases and represent concessions to private companies belonging to a foreign country, which ensure the maintenance of aircraft, in particular Boeing similar to those involved in these events.
- But some people, among the staff, would have eventually spoken! Such a secret could not be kept this way!
It all depends on how one ensures the discretion of the staff. Let's start by citing the example of the series Taken, by Spielberg, which gives a rather dark view of how the UFO dossier would have been handled in the United States, in particular regarding potential crashes of extraterrestrial vehicles. Those who have seen this series remember the behavior of Owen Crawford. Guided by an old man, accompanied by two kids, he suddenly finds himself in front of a UFO that has crashed into the ground.
In the following sequences, Owen Crawford discusses with his superior, who will later become his father-in-law, and to whom he will take over the "project". Remember this brief dialogue:
- And the witnesses, have we taken care of them?
He obviously speaks of the man and the two children who discovered the wreckage.
- Yes, we took care of them, his future father-in-law replies carelessly.
Many people think that Spielberg must have known, before starting this series, quite a few facts about UFO crashes and contacts.
Jesse Ventura dedicated a report to the famous Area 51. I advise you to take a look. It ends with a face-to-face between Ventura and characters in a 4x4, who observe him from the top of a hill, without getting out of the vehicle, within a hundred meters. In front of Ventura, simple red plastic poles, marked by a sign as a limit to not cross. On the warning sign, a message indicating that the people in charge of the security of this area, which is outside any normal jurisdiction, are authorized to use "deadly force".
Ventura is a former governor of a U.S. state (Minnesota). Or this former wrestler, this real bulldozer, suddenly hesitates. Yet he could, in a few steps, reach the men and start a discussion with them. But this former commando, this former diver, hesitates, then decides to turn back! While it was only a matter of crossing a limit indicated by small red plastic poles, and walking a few tens of meters to reach the vehicle.
What about the people who fly every day from Las Vegas, on a civilian aircraft, to go to work, on this Area 51? How come none of them have ever said a word, or given any information about what was happening in these places, for decades? Patriotism, or the awareness of the possibility of terrifying reprisals, which could affect not only them, but also their family members, their children?
I read a book that was signed by a man who claimed to be an ex-member of the Mossad. He claimed that during their recruitment, Mossad members were shown a video where one of their own was shown dying, after terrible and endless torture. And those who showed the film added:
- Of course, this doesn't concern you, since you will never betray your country, nor try to leave the Mossad.
Whether this man was or was not a member of these Israeli intelligence services, known for their effectiveness, is irrelevant. The message seems plausible.
A similar message was sent to all those who worked at the Dimona nuclear power plant, whose construction began in 1958. In 1977, Mordechai Vanunu was hired to become a technician at the Dimona nuclear power plant. Over time, he became familiar with everything related to nuclear energy and managed to take 60 photos of the underground facilities, secretly. His rebellious behavior became known to his superiors, and he was fired, after being advised to keep to himself everything he had witnessed, otherwise he would face 15 years in prison according to Israeli law. He used the fact that he had been fired to travel, carrying these photographs taken at the plant. At that time, in Australia, he contacted the English newspaper Sunday Times, which offered to buy his photos. Vanunu went to England in 1986 at the newspaper's expense, which published his story and his photos.
The Mossad then acted very quickly. One of its agents, a woman, seduced Vanunu, who, despite the cautious advice from the newspaper, decided to join her in Italy. There, the Mossad kidnapped him and he was interned in Israel and tried as a traitor.
He spent 18 years in prison, 11 of them in solitary confinement in a cell measuring 2 meters by 3, cut off from all contact. This measure was intended as an example to all employees of the Israeli nuclear power plant, as well as to anyone in the country who might have activities related to national defense. I imagine that to all new employees of Dimona, they show a video showing Vanunu's face, evolving over the years.
The message is clear:
- If you betray, we will find you anywhere you are, in the world, even if it takes us time.
In this investigation,
****Israel's secret weapons
conducted by Canadian journalists, a journalist questions Shimon Peres.
The Canadian journalist :
- How do you explain that you demand investigations into any nuclear activity in Arab countries, while Israel has been exempt from inspections for decades?
Shimon Peres :
- I do not feel bound to answer your question.
Thus, leave these arguments based on the inevitable dissemination of extremely sensitive information.
I don't know if Jesse Ventura still produces this series of Conspiracy Theory. If he hasn't already, he still has a subject to address: the complete blackout regarding the UFO dossier in his country. And there, he would not be attacking an American-American conspiracy, but an international affair. Will he?
In the United States, who would he question? Where would he take his investigation?
For decades, the American misinformation policy was based on the denial of facts, what is called debunking, a systematic dismantling of UFO sightings and cases. But in the last ten years, the policy has changed. The Americans have opted for amplified misinformation. See the dossier I just composed, along with this one.
****The film Sirius, created and broadcast by Steven Greer
Steven Greer
In this film, shown in the United States on April 22, 2013, and available in France in June, in the form of a DVD sold for 20 euros plus shipping (it was planned to be translated and subtitled in 18 languages), Greer creates an unimaginable mix. The message he spreads is as follows:
- Governments have long known the secret that allows UFOs to make interstellar trips and have profited from it, becoming capable of extracting energy from the vacuum (the zero point energy). An energy that, if revealed to the world, would completely change our way of life, abolishing the powers associated with oil possession. Thus, governments would lose the control they have over the people.
Greer makes an entrance in front of an audience that, upon entering the room where he gives a lecture, was searched with a metal detector. He himself only travels in a armored limousine, "to protect his life." He declares that he has been threatened.
Of course, these so-called researches on this vacuum energy, where they try to create a "magnetic vortex" using a system of rotating magnets, is complete nonsense. That is the trick. By waving real problems in front of the audience, Greer slips in a complete fraud that will discredit the whole discourse and lead the viewer to "throw the baby out with the bath water."
That is the purpose of the operation.
I have all the necessary tools to dismantle Greer's arguments and show the whole world that his operation is nothing but misinformation.
When he created the Disclosure (Revelation) project in 2001, I immediately contacted him and offered the information I had collected, related to American black programs, concerning the MHD torpedoes and the secret of a hypersonic replacement for the SR-71 Blackbird, which has a "MHD controlled" air intake, and which is likely the object that gave rise to the Aurora rumor at the end of the 1990s. At the time, I had not yet considered writing "UFOs and American Secret Weapons," which was only published by Albin Michel four years later. I therefore provided him with all the material, placed in a downloadable file on my website, suggesting he have it examined by good physicists.
The whole thing was downloaded. But Greer remained deaf to my suggestions. And I understood at that moment that the purpose of this Disclosure operation was anything but to collect and reveal things demonstrating the powerful cover-up he mentioned, and against which he claimed to be fighting.
If I could get in touch with Jesse Ventura, I would suggest he contact Greer and show him these elements of military-oriented technoscience, after having them examined by specialists. My proposal still stands. Would Greer accept to add these solid, unshakable elements to his film?
That said, and I have said and repeated it for years, this possibility, thanks to MHD, of moving vehicles in the air at hypersonic speed without creating turbulence does not, in my opinion, constitute the secret of the UFOs, for multiple reasons. First, this system would be ineffective in a vacuum and would certainly not be able to ensure interstellar travel. It would not allow right-angle turns, materializations, and dematerializations.
But these works contradict the conclusions of the Condon report, which concluded that the study of the UFO phenomenon had no scientific interest.
False, this study has concrete results, which unfortunately represent new military applications (hypersonic cruise missiles, spy planes, MHD launchers, and firing stations allowing a nation to master the space located beyond the capabilities of airplanes and below those of satellites, this "intermediate space" located between 30 and 250 km altitude, a formidable strategic stake.
It is possible that "the visitors" use such MHD technology, which is primitive for them, to move small probes.
I think the United States have at least developed this technology for military purposes, and they spread misinformation to try to remain the only ones to possess it. Hence the maneuvers of people like Greer and the echo given to these "zero point energy" fumisteries.
A man like Jesse Ventura could attack these fortresses of secrecy, starting by discrediting someone like Greer, as he so well did with David Icke.
But how to reach him?
May 5, 2013.
Epilogue (on Jesse Ventura's Facebook page):
For all the fans of "Conspiracy Theory", sadly the show is not being renewed for another season. Thankfully theliptv.com, Sean Stone and Tyrel Ventura have created a new online show to bring you the real news of the week not the government approved corporate sponsored version. Enjoy.
Translation:
We inform all fans of "Conspiracy Theory" that the show unfortunately will not be renewed for another season.
Sean Stone and Tyrel Ventura have created a new online show to bring you the real news of the week, and not the government approved corporate sponsored version.
We hope you will enjoy this new series.
Sean Stone and Tyrel Ventura unfortunately do not have the audacity of their father, if his "business card" as a former governor.
Jesse Ventura, in his series, did not address the UFO issue, as a conspiracy mixing secrecy and misinformation. Unless he has the idea to address us, there is, in fact, no scientist in the world who combines both his interest in the UFO issue and his presence in the closed field of scientific activities (International Congresses, publications in peer-reviewed journals). The so-called scientists who pretend to be interested in the subject are either people who have left the scientific field for decades (Jacques Vallée, Stanton Friedman, former computer scientist, former nuclear physicist), or unproductive scientists, like Auguste Meessen, Bougard (SOBEPS, university professors), or Von Ludwiger. Unless they are directly involved in misinformation operations, like Peter Sturrock, an authentic plasma physicist, or Michio Kaku, a theoretical physicist (who pretends not to be interested in little green men). Not to mention Nassim Haramein, who has become an active member of the Thrive cult, or Neil Armstrong, a pillar of the Noïetic enterprise.
It is finally fortunate that Ventura did not venture into this sensitive topic, otherwise, at best, the affair would have turned into a farce. I imagine that he is too smart to not immediately feel that Greer is either a accomplice, a liar, a manipulated person, or a mix of the three.
If Ventura participated in a vigil, in view of a fourth type encounter, it is likely that the phenomenon would not manifest "because he would emit negative waves"? His pragmatism would quickly overcome the results of pseudo-scientists teasing "the zero point energy". The same for the DNA analysis of the "creature's" tissues. Finally, "following the money" he would quickly expose the mechanisms of operations like Thrive, Noïetics and Sirius, revealing that "poor Greer" is actually quite well off, with wife and children, leading a costly crusade for decades.
****http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_Theory_with_Jesse_Ventura
****http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MJPpWNxvZo
**
1 - HAARP :
2 The events of September 11 3 - The global warming scam 4 - Big Brother 5 - Secret societies (Bilderberg) 6 - The Manchurian Candidate (programmed assassins) 7 - 2012 Apocalypse A gap of eight months 8 - "Plume Island" (biological weapons production) 9 - Area 51 10 - Wall Street (market manipulation) 11 - Police State (concentration camps, citizen control) 12 - The assassination of Kennedy 13 - The Worldwide water conspiracy 14 - The Louisiana oil spill 15 - The Pentagon affair, September 11.
A new gap of 22 months 16 - Reptilians (Ventura mocks David Icke) 17 - The death ray (Death ray) 18 - Time travel (on those who claim to have traveled through time) 19 - Ozarks 20 - Skinwalker ranch (research by a certain Robert Bigelow) 21 - Manimals (like the island of Dr. Moreau) 22 - Brain invaders (mental manipulations) December 2, 2009 December 9, 2009 December 16, 2009 December 23, 2009 December 30, 2009 January 6, 2009 January 13, 2010 October 15, 2010 October 29, 2010 November 5, 2010 November 12, 2010 November 19, 2010 December 3, 2010 December 10, 2010 December 17, 2010 November 7, 2012 November 14, 2012 November 21, 2012 November 26, 2012 December 3, 2012 December 10, 2012 December 17, 2012
The shows were not regularly distributed over time.
First, the first seven, in two months (the first season)
Then a gap of eight months
Then eight shows in three months (the second season)
Then a gap of 22 months
Finally, seven shows in two months (the third season)
After a few months, early 2013, Ventura warned that there would be no fourth season. One can look for the reason. One is that these last shows are weaker than the previous ones. Perhaps the series is simply running out of steam (audience problems, difficulty in finding new, documented topics).
The gap of 22 months may correspond to hesitation to continue, due to lack of prominent, burning topics. The episode on time travel is really non-existent. The same for the "Brain invaders". I haven't watched the Skinwalker ranch.
What is curious, and may not be feigned, is that the journalist who made all the shows, ****June Sarpong, 35 years old, born in England in 1977, says she is giving up this investigation, because she is afraid. Yet, she is a young woman who seems to have character, and has invested in humanitarian actions. She gives up the investigation during the episode on the death ray, the 17th in the series, admitting... that she is afraid.
June Sarpong
Was she threatened this time, after 16 rather "hot" episodes?
There would be journalistic work to locate in this calendar the appearances of Ventura in major American media. Was the reaction immediate or delayed?
1 - HAARP :
2 The events of September 11 3 - The global warming scam 4 - Big Brother 5 - Secret societies (Bilderberg) 6 - The Manchurian Candidate (programmed assassins) 7 - 2012 Apocalypse A gap of eight months 8 - "Plume Island" (biological weapons production) 9 - Area 51 10 - Wall Street (market manipulation) 11 - Police State (concentration camps, citizen control) 12 - The assassination of Kennedy 13 - The Worldwide water conspiracy 14 - The Louisiana oil spill 15 - The Pentagon affair, September 11.
A new gap of 22 months 16 - Reptilians (Ventura mocks David Icke) 17 - The death ray (Death ray) 18 - Time travel (on those who claim to have traveled through time) 19 - Ozarks 20 - Skinwalker ranch (research by a certain Robert Bigelow) 21 - Manimals (like the island of Dr. Moreau) 22 - Brain invaders (mental manipulations) December 2, 2009 December 9, 2009 December 16, 2009 December 23, 2009 December 30, 2009 January 6, 2009 January 13, 2010 October 15, 2010 October 29, 2010 November 5, 2010 November 12, 2010 November 19, 2010 December 3, 2010 December 10, 2010 December 17, 2010 November 7, 2012 November 14, 2012 November 21, 2012 November 26, 2012 December 3, 2012 December 10, 2012 December 17, 2012
http://www.amazon.fr/Ces-ondes-qui-tuent-soignent/dp/222615194X
May 19, 2013.
Reader's comment, quoted with his permission:
Frédéric POTTECHER biologist I follow up on your article of May 15, 2013, titled "a suspicious death".
I know the field of electromagnetic waves quite well because I have been working for about fifteen years on the design of Pulsed Magnetic Field devices that are intended for therapeutic use.
YES, electromagnetic waves can have effects on health.
These effects can be positive or negative, depending on the shape of the signals used, their frequency, their intensity, the duration of exposure, etc. You can find an interesting book available on the internet, "these waves that heal, these waves that kill" by Jean Pierre Lentin. I knew Jean Pierre Lentin (who is now deceased) and this man did serious work on the subject. Here is a link where you can buy this book. YES, the secret services of major countries (at least the USA and the Soviets) cannot ignore that certain electromagnetic waves can cause serious health problems, particularly cancer.
For information, I remind you of the case of the American embassy in Moscow. In February 1976, Walter Stoessel J.R., the U.S. Ambassador to Moscow, announced to his staff that the Soviets were using microwaves to intercept communications in the Embassy building. Among other risks, the Ambassador mentioned headaches, dizziness, heart damage, nervous disorders and even cancer and leukemia.
Eight days later, the American press reported a "blood disease" that the Ambassador was suffering from. It also revealed that three of Walter Stoessel J.R.'s predecessors had also complained about the effects of these microwaves.
To understand what happened at the time, the Soviets had found a very clever and undetectable way to eavesdrop on the American embassy. They offered the American ambassador objects that contained carefully studied cavities, and by sending microwaves of very precise frequency toward this object, they could listen to what was happening in the room where the object was located.
This method of listening was not detectable by the American counterintelligence services, who were looking for microphones, and it was actually discovered by chance when the health services noticed an abnormally high rate of cancer among the staff of the American embassy in Moscow and started to look for the cause.
What happened next?
One can very logically imagine that once this discovery was made, the CIA or other government organizations could have refined this technology and used it not to listen, but to eliminate inconvenient opponents.
My opinion is that this technology is used regularly. It is a technology that has the advantage for secret services to be used from a distance, to be very discreet (a few more or fewer cancers go unnoticed) and to leave no traces.
Yours faithfully.
F. Pottecher.
Nouveautés Guide (Index) Page d'Accueil
a ---
