Modèle Janus et débats scientifiques

En résumé (grâce à un LLM libre auto-hébergé)

  • L'auteur présente son modèle cosmologique Janus et exprime sa frustration face au manque de réaction de la communauté scientifique.
  • Il critique certaines personnes qui remettent en question ses travaux et ses publications dans des revues de haut niveau.
  • Il évoque son projet de vidéos pour rendre ses idées accessibles au grand public et son désir d'obtenir une reconnaissance académique.

Defining styles

I decided to participate in the VERSUS experiment organized by Belgian Sam Buisseret.

VERSUS #3

I should, in principle, receive by the end of June a response from the organizing committee of the international conference COSMO17, to be held in Paris between August 28 and September 1.

Since early June, I have contacted Roland Triay, co-organizer of the annual meeting (Centre de Physique Théorique de Marseille), which takes place each autumn in Cargèse, Corsica, asking whether I could present my Janus model there.

No response .....

Ask him why he isn't replying to me, even negatively:

Alain Riazuelo, researcher at the Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris, has since 2006 (for 11 years) maintained on his lab's website what he believes to be a refutation of my cosmological theories. He has clearly not read my work, and this page is a collection of false and erroneous claims. Today, he goes further: he tells internet users outright that if I managed to publish articles in high-level journals, it's only because the referees didn't see through my work—that is, that I am a fraud. I asked him whether he still holds this position, and under these conditions, in line with professional ethics, whether he would send "comments" to these journals, pointing out the flaws that escaped the experts.

No response .....

Ask him the question.

For those who wish to learn more

June 14, 2017

The god Janus, looking both toward the future and the past

****The best interview, by Stéphane Allix

I decided to participate in the VERSUS experiment organized by Belgian Sam Buisseret.

The first five thousand copies have been sent out.

The book has been released. The first five thousand copies were sold out in 48 hours. The publisher, Trédaniel, is reprinting.

******A website allows you to view the first 28 pages

This page will function as a kind of blog.

The blocking is everywhere—in the scientific world, in science popularization media, and in the general press. Of course, the presidential election currently occupies the entire audiovisual landscape. But I am confirmed in my perception of things. If a movement of interest arises, it can only happen within the public, across various social groups. In my Janus videos, I strive to be understood by as many people as possible, which prevents me from using any formalism. Only after completing this series will I create "extra videos" aimed at internet users at the "math-sup" level, representing tens or even hundreds of thousands of individuals (students and engineers).

I will also create "translatable" videos using short sentences of the subject-verb-object type. The dubbing will be handled by the team of Savoir sans Frontières.

Regarding major media, my co-author Jean-Claude Bourret will be a guest on Ardisson's show "Salut des Terriens" on May 4, 2017. I was not invited to participate.

It is perfectly clear that no scientist will respond to my work.

Within the scientific community:

  • There are those who have invested in cosmology and astrophysics. If I am right, then all their work must be discarded. Two examples among academicians: Thibaud Damour and Françoise Combes.

  • There are others who, although not working in these fields, are fully capable of reading and understanding my writings, such as mathematician Alain Connes, who is also a geometer. Yet he "remains courageously silent." Connes could easily invite me to present my work at the seminar of the École Normale Supérieure or at the Institut des Hautes Études, where he holds a professorship. But in these institutions, he is neighbors with Thibaud Damour, head of the cosmology seminar. Between scientific honesty and the desire not to offend this neighbor, he has made his choice—and has not replied to my messages for a long time.

Thus, things are not looking promising on this front.

Internet users have attempted to spark a debate about my work on various science forums, the most well-known being Futura-Science. They were immediately expelled, with the message stating:

http://www2.iap.fr/users/riazuelo/cosmo/jpp/p2.html

  • Jean-Pierre Petit's theories are considered personal theories. For a theory to be discussed on Futura, it must be genuinely accepted (even merely as a working hypothesis) at an academic level, meaning the researcher's work must be recognized by peers. This is no longer the case for Jean-Pierre Petit, who has been excluded from the community for over a decade. He now uses the internet to disseminate his theories. We do not wish to participate in what we consider an illegitimate and futile way of engaging in scientific debate. His theories will only gain credibility when they receive favorable judgment from the cosmological community."

You can read a French critique of his theory of twin universes:

The link points to a page hosted on the Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris website from... 2008. For eleven years, Riazuelo has consistently denied me my legitimate right to respond in a seminar at this laboratory (so no member, not even Luc Blanchet, see the article published in April 2017 in the journal La Recherche, has replied to my messages).

Riazuelo even goes so far as to question, without providing any arguments, the quality of the articles I published in 2014 and 2015 in two high-level peer-reviewed journals. Here are the references.

******J.P. Petit, G. D’Agostini: Negative Mass hypothesis in cosmology and the nature of dark energy. Astrophysics And Space Science, A 29, 145-182 (2014)

J.P. Petit, G. D’Agostini: Cosmological Bimetric model with interacting positive and negative masses and two different speeds of light, in agreement with the observed acceleration of the Universe. Modern Physics Letters A, Vol.29; N° 34, 2014; Nov 10th

J.P. Petit & G. D’Agostini: Cancellation of the singularity of the Schwarzschild solution with natural mass inversion process. Mo. Phys. Lett. A vol. 30 n°9 2015

Here is the message Alain Riazuelo sent me:

- What I was trying to tell you was that, being retired and a bit rusty, you are not in the most favorable environment for research, due to the absence of regular interlocutors, the great difficulty in accessing scientific literature, and therefore the great difficulty in grasping the current state of the art on topics that interest you.

I do not deny that you have written articles in which you have poured in your own ideas.

However, I cannot say that the content of these articles convinced me.

The fact that you found referees who accepted your articles does not change my reservations, and there is no reason for me to invite you to give a seminar.

And without any scientific arguments...

Perhaps, on this matter, you will have better luck than I did. Here is his email address:

If you contact scientists or science journalists, you can attach the PDFs of these three articles, which you can download by clicking on these links.

You can also mention these three simpler links, which point to the same files.

****/legacy/janus1.pdf

/legacy/janus2.pdf

/legacy/janus3.pdf/legacy/janus3.pdf

Which trigger the download of these three files, named then:

janus1.pdf janus2.pdf janus3.pdf

Nothing prevents you from going to science forums (or those pretending to be such) and simply asking:

- I would like to hear the opinion of specialists regarding the Janus cosmological model (without mentioning my name), with the three reference articles published in high-level journals accessible at the addresses below:

****/legacy/janus1.pdf

/legacy/janus2.pdf

/legacy/janus3.pdf/legacy/janus3.pdf

Such a message can also appear in the comment sections following videos of our "cosmology stars," like Luminet, Aurélien Barrau, Françoise Combes, Thibaud Damour, and others. You can also pose this question to Alain Connes, Carlo Rovelli, etc.

On the Futura Science forum, mentioning these references invalidates the moderator's statement placing me "outside the scientific community."

I continue working tirelessly to create and upload a long series of videos culminating in the presentation of my Janus cosmological model. It is April 18, and I am finishing the fourteenth episode, on the geometric context of my Janus model. Here are the first thirteen.

JANUS 1, Cosmology: Aristotle and Ptolemy Link

JANUS 2: Copernicus and Kepler Link

JANUS 3: Galileo Link

JANUS 4: Newton and Laplace Link

JANUS 5: The bankruptcy of common sense Link

JANUS 6: The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox Link

JANUS 7: On the non-existence of vacuum Link

JANUS 8: Special Relativity, Part I Link

JANUS 9: Special Relativity, Part II Link

JANUS 10: General Relativity Link

JANUS 11: The contemporary crisis in cosmology: Link

JANUS 12: The question of primordial antimatter: Link

JANUS 13: The (non) reactions of the Academy of Sciences Link

The next one, JANUS 14, will be titled "A paradigm shift."

Meanwhile, a PDF:

****My Cosmological Model Janus, 40 years of work

The video series will include about fifteen episodes. It's a lot of work. It's also a response to the... total silence that greeted my attempts to contact around fifteen prominent scientists in astrophysics and cosmology.

Thibaud Damour, academician (cosmology)

Françoise Combes, academician (astrophysics)

Pierre Fayet, academician (particle physics)

Aurélien Barrau, cosmology, member of the CNRS national committee

Jean-Pierre Luminet, black hole specialist, LAM Marseille

Alain Connes, Fields Medalist, Crafoord Prize in Astronomy and Mathematics

Alain Blanchard, cosmology lab, Toulouse

Albert Bosma, galaxy dynamics, LAM Marseille

Carlo Rovelli, loop gravity, Marseille

Pierre Anglès, mathematician, geometer, Toulouse

Boris Kolev, mathematician, geometer

Christian Magnan, Collège de France

Etienne Klein, philosophy of science

Evangelina Athanassoula, galaxy dynamics

Pierre Bescond, scientific steering committee of GEIPAN

Marc Lachièze-Rey, cosmology, cosmology expert

David Elbaz, CEA, galaxy dynamics, CEA

Gabriel Chardin, antimatter weighing, CNRS

Lee Smolin, Perimeter Institute, "Nothing is working in physics"

Joao Magueijo, Imperial College, "Faster than light"

Sabine Hossenfelder, bimetric geometry, Nordic Institute for Theoretical Physics

Daniel Kunth (head of conferences at the Institute of Astrophysics of Paris)

Jean Mouette (head of conferences at the Institute of Astrophysics of Paris)

Hélène Courtois (discovery of the "Great Repeller")

Daniel Pomarède (discovery of the "Great Repeller")

No response, nothing...

Even silence from the secretariats of N laboratories in these specialties, in response to a seminar proposal.

Seminar at the Institute des Hautes Études in Bures-sur-Yvette (head: T. Damour)

Secretariat of the seminar at the Centre de physique des particules de Marseille (CPPM)

Secretariat of the seminar at the Centre de Physique Théorique de Marseille (CPT)

Secretariat of the seminar at the Laboratoire Univers Théorie (LUTH) in Meudon

Secretariat of the seminar at the Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM)

Secretariat of the Laboratory of Subatomic Physics and Cosmology. CPT Grenoble-Alpes

Secretariat of the Centre de Physique Théorique de l'École Normale Supérieure

Secretariats of the observatories in Meudon, Paris, Toulouse, Lyon,

etc...

No response, nothing...

The design of a UFO-catch station by Jean-Christophe Doré

http://www.ufo-science.com/services/surveillance/

Extraordinary....

The current news is entirely focused on the presidential election, whose lamentable spectacle discredits us in the eyes of foreign observers. Bourret and I are supposed to appear on Ardisson's show "Salut les Terriens" on May 4.

Everything I reveal, expose, and present in this series of videos should provoke reactions, both negative and positive. And it's not over. We can assume, hope, that it will provoke reactions. I want Ardisson to have access to the videos presenting Janus. I have three weeks. What disturbs me most is the silence of someone like Alain Connes, Fields Medalist mathematician. There are important geometric questions to address. But he cohabits with Thibaud Damour at the Institut des Hautes Études as a professor. This explains it.

Let’s continue...

News Guide (Index) Home Page