Seismic Climate Weapons: HAARP
Are there visible signs of climate weapon tests?
September 23, 2002, reposted September 29, 2002
Animation 1
For several months, many things have come to light. They weren't entirely new, but now they're being discussed. Microwave weapons, non-lethal weapons, ionospheric manipulation using microwaves (the HAARP project), and even... seismic weapons! Readers discover all these topics with alarm, wondering whether it's fact or fiction. As scientists and physicists, we're hardly better off. We have only a few conceptual tools to think through these matters, since we can't investigate on-site. I had solid knowledge in the physics of ionized gases. When I read that extremely powerful electric generators could be mounted on ordinary American Tomawhak cruise missiles, I immediately confirmed that this was feasible. Plans for this type of "flow-compression" generator were actually already in one of my books, published in 1995, The Children of the Devil. Inventor (in the 1950s): Andrei Sakharov. So we have a solid, verifiable fact. Yes, these systems can deliver massive instantaneous power and create electromagnetic conditions beyond imagination. In the 1950s, Sakharov achieved 100 million amperes. From this, one can conclude that microwave weapons are credible and not science fiction. In a dossier, I presented reliable data on the EMP effect (electromagnetic pulse), particularly related to nuclear explosions above the atmosphere at around 500 kilometers altitude. The Compton effect then generates electrical discharges on the ground that are hard to imagine. A single one-megaton bomb exploding at 500 km altitude could conceivably fry all electronics on the ground over an area the size of a continent. No one has ever dared to test this at full scale. One can understand why.
By the way, we've discovered yet another application of the HAARP project. By emitting microwaves from the ground with sufficient power, one can ionize the air. Thus, one can create a shield made of ionized gas. In the EMP scenario, the hydrogen bomb explodes outside the atmosphere, irradiating the upper atmosphere with intense gamma-ray flux. These rays trigger a "recoil" movement in the electron population, known as the Compton effect. This effect is far more pronounced on lightweight electrons than on ions. As a result, an electric field arises due to charge separation. This field is felt at ground level—about 500 volts per centimeter, enough to fry anything. How to protect against it? By surrounding electrical and electronic installations with a Faraday cage. What is a Faraday cage? It's an enclosure made of the most electrically conductive material possible, usually copper. It's expensive and heavy. One can literally enclose installations in a fully sealed copper chamber. Or one can use mesh, which is generally what is done. The key is that this enclosure must effectively absorb incident electromagnetic energy, acting like an efficient antenna.
A layer of ionized gas also behaves as an excellent absorber of electromagnetic fields (since radar waves are electromagnetic waves, surrounding a flying machine with plasma makes it highly stealthy). If HAARP can create a strongly ionized layer at high altitude, this layer could serve as a shield against the electromagnetic pulse caused by a high-altitude, high-yield nuclear explosion. A simple thought that just occurred to me.
When the issue of "new weapons" surfaced, we felt we had to "consider everything," and in fact discovered that an enormous number of such things have existed for decades—carefully hidden from the public. We were stunned to learn that the famous crop circles might actually be tests of weapons (dangerously lethal ones, capable of burning hedgehogs, rabbits, and birds on the ground), operational since... 1981. Tests disguised by complex geometric patterns, possibly intended to "frame aliens." This would mean we've been lied to for decades about countless matters. It's dizzying.
Going further, we realized that the concept of seismic weapons isn't entirely unreasonable.
Following this, we began to consider the possibility that climate weapons might not only be under study, but have been experimentally tested for... a long time! We tried to identify the basic principles: locally altering the amount of solar energy reaching the Earth's surface—either by "opening a window" in the ionosphere to increase insolation, or by creating a reflective layer at high altitude, i.e., establishing hot and cold air masses in two regions, possibly very distant from each other. I suggested that chemtrails might represent atmospheric marking to enable satellite-based evaluation of such experiments.
Could there be signs indicating that climate weapon experiments are underway, detectable from satellites? What effects might be detectable?
The Earth's surface has a certain reflectivity, known as albedo. A perfectly reflecting object has an albedo of 1; a perfectly absorbing object has an albedo of zero. Fresh snow has an albedo of 0.9. That's why it doesn't melt easily. A burned surface can have an albedo as low as that of coal (0.05). You can find albedo values for various planets in encyclopedias:
Mars: 0.54
Earth: 0.39
Venus: 0.7
Jupiter: 0.47
Saturn: 0.45
Mercury: 0.055
We see that Mercury's albedo is close to that of graphite! The Moon's albedo is 0.07, barely higher than Mercury's. Thus, the night sky's bright object has a reflectivity similar to basalt. A piece of Moon held in your hand is... very dark gray. It appears so bright in the sky only because its luminosity contrasts sharply with the dark background of the sky. The value given for Earth is an average. Locally, it depends on factors such as the state of the ionosphere, which both absorbs certain frequencies (like UV) and reflects others. If we modify the ionosphere to make it more "transparent," more solar energy will reach the Earth's surface and be absorbed. A distant observer would notice a local darkening of the Earth's surface—unexplained, not linked to cloud formation.
Have such darkening events already been observed...