Jean-Pierre Petit Site News **** ****

**Learn to think for yourself. If you don't, others will do it for you ** ** ** ---

To order the colored BDs, on paper, available LINK

With a dedication and a small original drawing by the author (NB: Janus model against Black Science: sold out).

Don't forget to mention your postal address for shipping and to specify the beneficiary of the dedication and small original drawing JPP!

Payment by check. For any correspondence: uniquejie (at) hotmail.com

../papers/cosmo/2026-01-12-Journal-of-Modern-Physics-QUESTIONABLE-BLACK-HOLES.pdf

January 13, 2026: The epilogue is approaching. For decades, any article questioning the sacred black hole model was immediately rejected, without being submitted to a referee. There, a good journal took the risk. There were six successive referees. Never seen before. The back and forth between the criticisms formulated and their rejection took six months and constitutes a real serial novel. But I won all these confrontations with the black hole's men and the paper, in passing, doubled in volume. The article, will therefore be published and presents the incredible sequence of mathematical and geometric errors that gave rise to this chimera, a true deus ex-machine of the third millennium. To be replaced by the plugstars. The decision has just been made to focus again the terrestrial radio telescopes to obtain four new images of supermassive objects in 2027. If the ratio of brightness temperatures is significantly close to 3, the case will be heard. But ... if black holes do not exist, what will happen to Kip Thorne's Nobel Prize and Thibault Damour's Balsan Prize, for whom the gravitational waves captured by the LIGO and Virgo stations result from the fusion of black holes? Gone with the wind. The same goes for Roger Penrose's Nobel Prize, for whom the black hole model is an inescapable consequence of General Relativity. What about the scientific balance of Jean-Pierre Luminet? Gone. The "central singularity" is nothing but a figment of the imagination of its creators. Apart from that the results of the DESI collaboration confirm what the Janus model predicted since 2014, "that the acceleration of the expansion was greater in the past". So goodbye to the "standard" model, Lambda-CDM. But Physical Review D has already applied a new "patch": quintessence. A new battle is in the making, the next one. Apart from that ... we will have lost 7 years, because of a real bunch: Villani, the last one in the lot. The doors of the seminars are still tightly closed. But the mathematical and physical inconsistency of the black hole model can no longer be ignored. Then all masks will fall at once. There will be thousands of articles, hundreds of doctoral theses, careers, reputations built on wind.

December 28-31, 2025: On December 15, the astrophysicist and member of the Academy of Sciences Nathalie Palenque Delabrouille gave a presentation, filmed and broadcast, where she discusses the results of a Franco-American cooperation where the USA provides the telescope, and the French provide the measurement device, very clever and sophisticated. This shows that on this terrain the French are very advanced. Thanks to this device, a hundred thousand galaxies are located in space. At the same time their velocities are measured precisely thanks to 10 spectrographs analyzing the data of 500 optical fibers of 20 microns in diameter, positioned within 2 microns, in wavelengths ranging from ultraviolet to near infrared. From this brilliant result, it turns out that the acceleration of the cosmic expansion was greater in the past. A result that sounds the death knell for the standard model, where the cosmological constant, considered responsible for the phenomenon, can only produce a constant acceleration. The speaker never mentions the Janus model, which accounts for a decreasing acceleration over time, tending towards zero. I will therefore prepare an article showing that the Janus Cosmological Model accounts for this slowing down of the acceleration. [In

the meantime I have sent our work to the speaker, proposing that she come and present the details of our model](/legacy/dessins/2025-12-31-to-Nathalie-Palanque-Delabrouille.pdf)

Below is the text of the email that Françoise Combes, President of the Academy of Sciences, sent in January 2025 to the astronomer Guy Monnet, in response to his question about

the publication in 2024 of a long article on Janus in the excellent journal European Physical Journal C:

** Her email address** : francoise.combes(at)obspm.fr

Dear Guy,

I understand your concern, but we must admit that the JANUS model has no physical consistency. Thibault had the patience to write a letter and explain it on the equations, in 2019, on their papers of 2014. Immediately, they recognized their errors and wrote another version, which was even worse, and Thibault had the patience to explain why. The equations do not satisfy covariance. Their model includes negative masses, and masses of opposite sign repel each other. As you can see, there is already a violation of the equivalence principle. Although they acknowledge that it is not possible to have negative masses in GR, they claim that negative masses are all the dark matter and dark energy (of course, in the solar system, there are only positive masses).

Do you think that such a model can be defended? As you have seen, they tried to publish it everywhere, and finally this model is known, and it does not suffer from impossibility of being publicly presented, since they are on Eur Phys C. More than 99% of the theoretical astrophysicists I know have the same opinion on this model.

Warmly, Françoise

November 12, 2025: What Françoise Combes will never tell you:

https://youtu.be/87U_C6m2kkU

[The alternative

to black holes](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-10-14-JMP-Alternative-to-Black-Holes-Gravastars-and-Plugstars--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.pdf) (which do not exist)

November 2025: While cosmology experts describe the time before the Big Bang, more prosaically, I have built the first mathematical model of a galaxy, as an exact solution of the coupled equations of Vlasov (dear to Villani) and Poisson equation and [I have

published this 12-page paper in the good mainstream Astrophysics and Space Science in its October 2025 issue.](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-10-14-Astroph-and-Space-Sci-Contribution-of-Kinetic-Theory-to-Galactic-Dynamics-.pdf) Up to now, only semi-empirical models existed. Below is this mathematical solution (in a 7-dimensional space) and the first mathematical curve giving the rotation speed, with its plateau at distance.

Well, this work does not interest the Paris Meudon Observatory, nor the Institute of Astrophysics of Paris, nor [the

Laboratory of the École Normale Supérieure-Ulm](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-10-17-to-Normale%20Supe%CC%81rieure.pdf) to whom I had offered seminars. Common response: "Only those who have been invited by researchers interested in their work are allowed to give seminars in our laboratories". I will try my luck with the Astrophysics Laboratory of Marseille and [the Observatory

of Lyon](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-11-03-to-Observatoire-de-Lyon.pdf). To make it complete, since this work represents a first in the world of mathematics: the first exact solution of the Vlasov equation, [I

sent it to Cedric Villani](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-11-03-to-Villani.pdf). But I am not sure he still does mathematics. I will keep you informed. By the way, see this video, it's the work, that I initiated in 1972, whose Franco-Moroccan Hicham Zejli tried to steal in July 2024, [the

extension made by D'Agostini in 2016](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2016-Dagostini-Vlasov-courbe-rotation.pdf), to make it ... his doctoral thesis.

October 27, 2025: I wrote to Françoise Combres, President of the Academy of Sciences, asking her to give me the possibility to exercise, within the academy, a scientific right of reply against the academician Damour. My colleague Marie-France Duval wrote to her asking for explanations. I sent recent printed publications (including the two last) to the directions of the Paris Meudon Observatory, the Institute of Astrophysics of Paris and the École Normale Supérieure de Paris, requesting the possibility to present these works in seminars. None of them will answer. No university, no Parisian Grand School will offer me an amphitheater. On April 26, I will give a lecture in Pertuis, in the municipal hall, 500 seats. If the Parisians want to hear me, it's up to them to rent a hall, at least 150 seats, and to cover my transportation and accommodation costs.

October 24, 2025: ALTERNATIVE TO BLACK HOLES: GRAVASTARS AND PLUGSTARS.

October 18, 2025: Two new articles placed in peer-reviewed journals VIDEO

October 13, 2025: The Thorium revolution is underway

October 11, 2025: Listen to: [Alain

July on a possible peace in the Middle East](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJtJ9k08KOs), where all the cards would be reshuffled.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHjY55C4rHA

**October 8, 10:30 AM: [Latest

news on the Israel-US-Iran crisis](/legacy/dessins/2025-10-08-10h-MOYEN-ORIENT.html)** ---

October 9, 2025: Regarding the possible supply of Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, with long range: This could only be done through the supply to a European country, and the country in question is the Netherlands. This policy stems from the advice given by people like Marco Rubio to Trump. Rubio, like others in Trump's circle, is driven by a visceral anti-Russian attitude, devoid of any vision or geopolitical culture. Rubio interprets Putin's moderate stance as weakness. Now, two things: first, these cruise missiles have existed from the start in the form of nuclear weapon carriers, second they can only be implemented by American specialists. Its guidance system is based on the use of the American military GPS, encrypted. Therefore, the implementation of these vectors against Russia is equivalent to a declaration of war by the USA. We are living in an age of complete madness!

October 7, 2025: I was given the email address of the American mathematician-geometer Eric Weinstein. I am trying to contact him.

September 27, 2025: I am finishing the coloring of the BD version of "Metaphysicon", which I published four years ago. I will publish this album at my own expense and distribute it after conferences. This album will replace the book of the same title, "co-signed by Jean-Claude Bourret" (and not co-written: not a single word is from him). While for four years he has been discrediting my four books during interviews, he continues to quietly receive his 20% of royalties. How does he look at himself in the mirror? It surpasses me. This night a thought came to my mind. What the Metaphysicon says: the gods are "artificial intelligences of the noosphere, integrating emotional components", and are only non-permanent structures, just like our "souls", simple condensates, destined to eventually merge into this planetary noosphere, enriching it. I have long thought that this awareness would have destabilizing repercussions in certain religions (but Buddhism would integrate it without problem). But when I see that our humanity seems to be quietly taking the path of a third world war, automatically nuclear, I think that between two evils, the first is not the worst.

September 19, 2025: An important date. Our paper "[Alternative

to Black Holes, Gravastars and Plugstars](/legacy/dessins/2025-09-24-Alternative-to-black-holes-gravastars-and-plugsrars.pdf)", which shows that the supermassive objects at the centers of the galaxies M87 and the Milky Way are not black holes, but plugstars, has been finally accepted, after a year of exchanges with four referees. I will put the link when the article has been actually published.

September 1, 2025: The society manaty having received its authorization from the Ministry of Research, we again have the possibility to put preprints on HAL. Below is "[Questionable

black holes](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-08-02-HAL-QUESTIONABLE%20BLACK%20HOLES.pdf)". A "hot" paper, solidly constructed. Big stakes: we are attacking the "idol"! Waiting for a hook with a journal (i.e. one that does not immediately refuse to submit to referee, replying "not suitable". ). We will inform you when the articles have received their final acceptance notice. Two are big articles in the process of acceptance. It's looking good. But obviously it represents six months to a year of intense exchanges (six referees). There will be others.

August 12, 2025: In case you don't know, AI do not have access to scientific articles published in paid journals. They have arXiv where we are blacklisted and HAL from which the CNRS recently excluded us. In these two documents, in French, in English, you will see how Grok4 (Elon Musk's AI) handles the criticisms made by Damour on his IHES page (to which participants in forums must refer) and that it is our refutations that show the lightness of Damour's analysis. Since AI are logical and egoless, they conclude that our model is mathematically and physically consistent and that Damour's criticisms were based only on a simple typo. How long will these incoherent papers remain on the IHES site, where they have been on display for 6 years? We will eventually win and Damour will lose his reputation for having blocked for 6 years with inconsistent papers.

August 6, 2025: My colleague Marie-France Duval submits to the signature of scientists, engineers, physics and math professors [a

new letter, addressed to T. Damour](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-08-06-Duval%20to%20Damour.pdf). The supporting documents: November 2, 2022 Duval to Damour, December 12, 2002 Damour responds angrily and shows that he did not read our works. December 14 I point out his mistake. Immediately on December 28, 2022, he posts, still on his IHES page a new article, where he makes his mistake disappear.

July 22, 2025. As the following will be sent in early September: I created [a

project of letter to the President of the Academy of Sciences](/legacy/dessins/2025-07-Projet-Demande-Droit-de-Reponse-Academie.pdf), where I formulate (arguments in Janus 36) a request to exercise a scientific right of reply at the Academy, against the academician T. Damour. I ask scientists, politicians, intellectuals, physics and mathematics teachers at the higher and secondary levels, engineers, science journalists, approving my approach (French and foreign), to express their wish to cosign this letter (indicate city).

These letters are signed: (refused to cosign these letters: Jean-Pierre.luminet(arobase)obspm.fr )

01 - Duval M.F, retired astronomy professor. Aix-Marseille University.

02 - Debergh N. Mathematician, Quantum Mechanics. Belgium. 03 - Besnaiou C. Senior research engineer at CNRS 04 - Lepelletier 0. Study engineer, University of Le Mans 05 - Le Fèvre A. Senior scientist. Nuclear (astro) physicist, GSI Helmholtzzentrum, Darmstadt, Germany. 06 - Schromkaïev W. Theoretical physicist, CERN 07 - D'Agostini G. Theoretical physicist 08 - Bobola P. Doctor of science. Physicist 09 - Touitou R. Engineer. Israel 10 - Azalbert X. Editor-in-chief of the journal France-Soir 11 - Margnat F. Physicist, Professor, Habilitation to Direct Research, University of Poitiers 12 - July A. Honorary President of the Academy of Economic Intelligence 13 - Fuch L. Telecom engineer, Strasbourg 14 - Petel D. Engineer 15 - Roux S. Mathematics teacher. Lycée de Besançon. 16 - Chaleon R. Engineer Lyon 17 - Racunia G. Agrégé professor, mathematics. Nancy. 18 - Koiran P. Professor at the École Normale Supérieure de Lyon 19 - Asselineau F. President of the Union Populaire Républicaine. Presidential candidate. 20 - Morin G. Physicist. Former professor at the University of Poitiers 21 - Remi A. Physics teacher. Lycée français de Lausanne, Switzerland 22 - Dominique G. Engineer Marseille 23 - De Villeger M. Geologist, retired. Russia 24 - Pernigotto O. Certified physics-chemistry teacher, Metz 25 - Cando R. Teacher-researcher, University of Montpellier 26 - Pr. Bouchard C.V. Senior researcher in electrodynamics 27 - Buczko K. Engineer graduated from the Warsaw Polytechnic, Poland. 28 - Michalski Q. PhD, Research Fellow, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Australia 29 - Grandfils P. Mining engineer, retired. Portugal. 30 - Joos E. Doctor-Engineer in spectrochemistry, retired 31 - Pasquien L. Physicist engineer. Doctor engineer.38850 Bilieu 32 - Djahoui E. phd (Switzerland) 33 - Hunsinger J. phd Physics and Astrophysics, Munich (Germany) 34 - Nicola S. Engineer, retired. 35 - Jacob E. Aerospace engineer, Bordeaux 36 - Resch L. phd (Switzerland). 37 - Durif O. Doctor of science, researcher 39 - Roy G. Doctor of science, engineer 40 - Brachet P. Retired engineer, Toulouse 41 - De Graviloff P. Physic professor, retired 42 - Hoareau R. phd chemistery 43 - Puccini J.J. Certified physics teacher, retired. 44 - Nicol L. Research engineer, Rouen 45 - Mazeau J-L. SupElec engineer, Master of Science Lausanne, Switzerland 46 - Nicola S. Engineer, retired 47 - Fournela F. Engineer. 48 - Berquer P. Mathematics teacher, Calais 49 - Trinquetaille S. Engineer 50 - Guyat C. Telecom engineer. Aix-en-Provence 51 - Capdepon F. Aerospace engineer . 52 - Caldara O. Aerospace engineer, Dassault aviation, retired. 53 - Bracco O doctor of science, agrégé maths, teacher at the Lycée de Dunkerque. 54 - Milinani M. Mining engineer, Lyon. 55 - Dumoulard O. Swiss engineer

At the start of the school year, I will try to give a seminar on the Janus Model in Parisian scientific training, to be able to invite Thibault Damour to participate, for example, at the Paris-Meudon Observatory (fief of Françoise Combes) at the Institute of Astrophysics of Paris, at the École Normale Supérieure. But it is not said that these labs will open their doors to me, the expected response being "we only accept in seminars scientists whose work interests the researchers of our laboratory". If university physics and mathematics training can welcome me, I am available. If this possibility of presenting our work in a seminar is offered to me, I will ensure that justice is done. I will show, as I did in this video, indeed that the Janus Cosmological Model is ultimately only a simple variant of the models of Thibault Damour and Sabine Hossenfelder. [An

article has been submitted to a journal for publication, where all this is clearly demonstrated](/legacy/dessins/2025-07-23-%20How%20is%20the%20Janus%20cosmological%20model%20a%20simple%20variant%20%20%20of%20the%20models%20of%20S.%20Hossenfelder,%20T.%20Damour%20and%20I.%20Kogan.%20%20.pdf). It depends on very little: it is enough to change the sign of the Einstein constant in the second member of the second equation (equation (14) of the page 8 of Damour's article published in [Physical

Review D, in 2002](/legacy/file:///Users/JPP/Sites/@SITE%20SCIENCE/papers/cosmo/2002-Damour-Kogan-bigravity.pdf) ) to make these equations become those of the Janus model, which thus takes on the remarkable mathematical rigor attached to works undeniably earlier than ours. In fact our model is only a variant of these previous works and, as good engineers, we have finally only exploited the potential richness of the approach. Damour, being more accustomed than us to receiving prizes, should be able to position himself for the Nobel. Having already shared the 700,000 euros of the Balsan prize in 2021, with his collaborator Alessandra Buonanno, I think he would then have the elegance to do the same with Sabine Hossenfelder, who presented her own bimetric system in 2008, although six years after him.

The new Einstein

July 4, 2025 :

****[SUMMARY

WITH THE ESSENTIAL, TO UNDERSTAND](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-07-07-refutation-Damour-abregee.pdf)

[Proposition of

seminar](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-07-04-Proposition%20se%CC%81minaire.pdf) addressed to the Institute of Astrophysics of Paris, the Paris-Meudon Observatory, the École Normale Supérieure, the École Polytechnique, the Astrophysics Laboratory in Marseille, the Centre de Physique Théorique and the Centre de Physique des Particules, accompanied by an invitation to T. Damour for a debate. Seminar theme:

The Janus cosmological model originates in the 1990s, based on a heuristic hypothesis regarding the introduction of negative masses in the cosmological model:

• Positive masses attract each other according to "Newton"

• Negative masses attract each other according to "Newton"

• Masses of opposite signs repel each other according to "anti-Newton"

Numerical simulations give very interesting results as early as 1992, producing the large-scale, lacunar structure, as well as a barred spiral structure, stable over 30 turns. The lacunar structure, where the positive mass is violently compressed into plates, by spherical negative mass conglomerates, adjacent, can thus radiatively cool very quickly and thus give rise to galaxies as early as the first 100 million years. Confirmed by recent observations of the JWST.

But this model has a flaw: these interaction laws are contradicted by general relativity. As early as 1957, the cosmologist Hermann Bondi showed that the Einstein equation produces the interaction scheme:

• Positive masses attract each other according to Newton

• Negative masses repel each other according to anti-Newton

• When two masses of opposite signs are brought together, the positive mass flees, pursued by the negative mass, the latter point contradicting the principle of action and reaction and generating the unbearable runaway effect.

Only solution (suggested by A. Grothendieck): move to a bimetric model.

Evocation of previous attempts, devoid of conclusions comparable to observations:

2002: [T. Damour

and I. Kogan](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2002-Damour-Kogan-bigravity.pdf)

2008: S. Hossenfelder

2014 First formulation of the Janus model, adding Einstein constants of opposite signs, which the previous authors did not do, which restores the principle of action and reaction and eliminates the runaway effect.

Mathematical constraint: imperative satisfaction of the Bianchi conditions.

In non-stationary with two isotropic and homogeneous entities, the satisfaction of this constraint translates into a generalized law of conservation of energy and an exact solution appears. Assuming that the negative species is dominant, a law of expansion emerges, according to which the energy of the negative mass explains the acceleration of the expansion. [Successful confrontation

with observational data in 2018](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2018-AstroPhysSpaceSci.pdf)(D'Agostini and Petit).

2019 A typo, in a 2014 article, the absence of a cap on the interaction tensors, which then identify them with the field tensors, is interpreted by T. Damour as a calculation error, a major conceptual error, irreparable, which he denounces in an article installed on his IHES page, accompanied by a registered letter addressed to my home, while completely ignoring the exact non-stationary solution, which is the subject of the article, and which completely escapes his attention. Refusal of any meeting. New publication presenting a Newtonian form of the interaction tensors, satisfying the Bianchi conditions. No reaction. Refusal of any meeting or explanation. Same silence and refusal from E. Ullmo, director of the IHES and E. Ghys, perpetual secretary of the Academy of Sciences.

2022 I install [on

my site all the calculation details demonstrating the validity of the formulation](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2019-Progress-in-Physics-detail-calcul.pdf). The astrophysicist M.F. Duval, as well as several other researchers, signatories, [write

to Damour](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2022-11-02-Duval-to-Damour.pdf) that my calculations, attached, seem exact. For any response, he immediately installs a new article in December 2022, writing "the model is inconsistent because it is based on the fact that negative masses attract, whereas it is well known that they repel". A phrase that shows that he has not read carefully what we have published. Having become aware of the calculations published in 2019 and transmitted by M.F. Duval, he concedes that the approximate formulation of the interaction tensors, according to the Newtonian approximation, satisfies the Bianchi conditions, but he then invokes the case where the field is created by a neutron star, which excludes this approximation, without taking into account that:

• When this mass is contained in the positive side, we are not required to provide the form of the interaction tensor of the second member of the second equation, which determines the second metric, which leads to no observational confirmation (impossibility of capturing negative energy photons)

• Simulations show that negative masses produce weak curvatures and that then the approximate form of the interaction tensor, determining the geodesics of the first equation (negative lensing) satisfies the Bianchi condition.

Three years later, [the refusal of dialogue is still

complete](../AUDIOS/Un-ami-qui-me-veut-du-bien.mp3). But Françoise Combes, President of the Academy of Sciences and E. Ghys, perpetual secretary, while saying they have not read Damour's articles, declare they fully trust his expert opinion.

2024 Publication in the European Physical Journal C (impact factor 15) of a 24-page article, laying the geometric and mathematical foundations of the model, with satisfaction of the Bianchi conditions in non-stationary homogeneous and isotropic and in stationary Newtonian in spherical symmetry, derivation of the system of coupled field equations from a Lagrangian, invalidating Damour's criticisms. [Publication in

Review in Mathematical Physics](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2024-12-RMC-study-of-symmetries-through-the-action-on-torsors-of-the-janus-symplectic-group.pdf) (impact factor 3.5) of the symplectic bases of the model, explanation of the CPT symmetry resulting from the configuration in a two-sheeted covering of a even-dimensional projective space. Identification of the invisible components of the universe with anti-hydrogen and negative mass anti-helium.

Reactions of T. Damour, F. Combes, E. Ghys, E. Ullmo: nothing.

The article :

Microsoft Word - 2025-06-19-Réfutation Damour eng.docx

R[easoned

Challenge to T. Damour’s Rejection of the Janus Model, as a Pathway Out of the Deepening Crisis in Cosmology](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2025-06-19-Rebuttal%20of%20Damour's%20criticism%20of%20the%20Janus%20model.pdf)

** was sent to a high-level journal. New letter from M.F. Duval in preparation asking T. Damour to respond to the content of this article. A call for co-signature has been launched, addressed to researchers, math and physics teachers and engineers. ** ---

June 14, 2025: JPP and Idriss. LINK

May 17, 2025: Artificial intelligence, ethics, freedom, who manages it? LINK

March 25, 2025: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfzjFObZEi4 The CNRS HAL database refused to publish this preprint. Reason: "I do not belong to an recognized academic training". This same article, sent to the journal Physical Review D, was rejected without being sent to a referee. Reason:

Dear Dr. Petit,

We have examined your manuscript.

From our understanding of the paper's context, motivation, presentation, level of argumentation, and degree of importance and interest to physics research, we conclude that your paper is not suited for Physical Review D. In view of our assessment, we are not sending your manuscript out for review.

Dear Dr. Petit,

We have examined your manuscript.

According to our understanding of the paper's context, motivation, presentation, level of argumentation, and degree of importance and interest for physics research, we conclude that your article is not suitable for Physical Review D. Considering our assessment, we are not sending your manuscript to an expert for analysis.

Apart from that, I am selling a large whiteboard, in new condition, which I had bought to give seminars at home. I will no longer need it.

March 27, 2025: The Janus model in March 2025. The Standard Model in difficulty. (I have 95,000 subscribers) My four last submissions to the CNRS Hal database are blocked. The renewal of the Manaty Research Group's accreditation is still in the pipeline of the Ministry of Research and Higher Education's administration. Is there a laboratory in France that would accept to provide me with this damned "academic support". That is to say an institutional email address? The message from HAL:

Thursday, March 27, 2025 at 09:29

Hello,

The documents you have deposited in HAL do not meet the eligibility criteria of the archive.

To recall, HAL is a multidisciplinary open archive allowing to share in free access the results of research, published or not. It is at the service of researchers ** affiliated to academic institutions**, whether public or private.

In France, HAL is the national archive chosen by the French scientific and university community for the open dissemination of its research results. You will find this principle here: https://about.hal.science/

We thank you for your understanding.

Sincerely,

The CCSD Support Team

The accreditation of the Manaty Research Group ended at the end of 2024. Logically, my subsequent submissions should have been rejected. However, you have passed this limit, and the 24-page paper published in European Physical C (impact factor 5) and that one in Review in Mathematical Physics (impact factor 1.8) were installed. On the other hand, you block my last paper and my long study on the Schwarzschild solution, which you know will eventually show that the Black Hole is just a mathematical chimera. In other words, your approach is the same censorship as that implemented on arXiv. Who makes these decisions?

March 12, 2025: Question your artificial intelligences yourselves on "quantum gravity" knowing that there has been for decades a review "Classical and Quantum Gravity", which rejects without sending to referee any paper that does not go in its direction. The surprising answer of ChatGpt.

March 9, 2025: My paper on groups, published in the journal Reviews in Physical Mathematic, has been installed on HAL.

HAL: Studies of symmetries through the action on torsors of the Janus symplectic group

A work I did 15 years ago. Published in 2014 (briefly) in Astrophysics and Space Science. But now, well presented, chic and all, in a Mathematical Physics journal, with the appropriate fly droppings. I hope the Ministry of Research and Higher Education will respond to our request for accreditation of the Manaty Research Group, which I lead, of which Gilles and I are now the only members. So we might have peace from HAL. They have, after all, passed this preprint:

HAL: Plugstar, a Physical Alternative to Supermassive Black holes

We sent this paper ("nickel-chrome") to Classical and Quantum Gravity and to Physical Review D. Immediately rejected without being sent to referee ("not suitable"). I reworked it by changing the content and the title, which became "Alternatives to Black Holes: Gravastars and Plugstars". Go see what gravastars (in English, more complete) are. They are balls of dark energy, surrounded by a thin shell of dark matter. I thought this nonsense was recent. But no, it was launched in 2004 and all the "top level" journals, including the two mentioned, have published everything: "Gravastars in modified gravity", "Gravastars in the world of branes", "Twenty thousand gravastars under the seas", etc ... More than a hundred papers. Results: absolutely nothing. If you doubt that cosmology has become a psychiatric hospital, this kind of nonsense will enlighten you. We will resubmit the paper where we do an overview of all kinds of gravastars, with the conclusion: confrontation with observations, nothing! Then comes the presentation of plugstars: perfect agreement with the data of the supermassive objects of M87 and the Milky Way. Reactions of the journals? We will keep you informed. If there is a refusal to send to referee, you will once again experience the effect of the censorship operated by the Cosmic Men, entrenched in their bunkers. I make no predictions.

March 8, 2025: On the scientific terrain, the situation remains confusing. We know that I am blacklisted on arXiv. It seems that the people from the CNRS HAL database have some desire to play this little game. Indeed, I had several papers, submitted, blocked for a month, then deleted, with the following message:

I then downloaded a copy of the article published in November 2024 in the journal European Physical Journal C (impact factor 5). The paper appeared on HAL two days later, despite the content of this message. I continue by sending two other articles that day. Why is it important for me to be able to put my articles and preprints online on HAL? (I have been blacklisted on arXiv for 10 years). Because AI read these documents, and you know that these intelligences have become my allies, since, unlike scientists, they work with some logical bases and are presumably free of ego. The first article is the one that gathers my work on dynamic groups, as a mathematical basis of the Janus Cosmological Model, published in the journal Review in Mathematical Physics (impact factor 1.8). By doing so I outdo the young and dishonest mathematician Pigeon, who, not content with having received 20,000 euros from our association Support Janus, was quietly trying to appropriate these works for himself. After the character of Spiderguy, on the last page of my last comic book Janus Model against Black Science, a response to the cowardice of Cédric Villani, the menagerie will be joined by a new character: "David the pigeon", who will now brighten up the following productions, in all languages. Apart from that, we will pass on a project of thesis defense in Morocco, for the reason of blatant scientific plundering, indeed ... The second article has just been rejected without being sent to referee by Classical and Quantum Gravity and Physical Review D, while these journals have published for decades on this nonsense that are "gravastars" (balls of dark energy surrounded by a thin shell of dark matter!). I will go on the attack again by changing the content and the title, which will become "Alternative to black holes: gravastars or plugstars?". I will download the preprints. Will HAL dare to block them? Seven or eight years ago, no French laboratory would have accepted to provide me with this "academic cover" with an email address, such as: Jean-Pierre.Petit@laboratoire machin.fr. Starting with - my former affiliated laboratory, the LAM (Laboratory of Astrophysics of Marseille). Reason: "Scientists lose this possibility when they retire". False: there is a whole list of known people who, retired, keep their lab email addresses (while remaining completely unproductive, I will not name any). The CEO of an information technology company "Manaty" had for years, until 2023, the accreditation of the Ministry of Research and Technology. He therefore provided this indispensable "lab email address".

dessins/2025-03-09-MANATY-de%CC%81cision%20de%CC%81rogatoire%202023-2024.pdf

The scientists who manage HAL, the CNRS database, took advantage of the delay, for the year 2025, of the "special decision of accreditation of the Manaty research group", which I lead, to immediately try to prohibit me from publishing new articles. Imagine that a French laboratory would accept to host me would be a dream. A definitive solution would be that I could return to the Academy of Sciences. I could "give a little youth" to this institution, quite sclerotic, devoted to the cult of "Black Science". But if you consult the statutes of the Academy of Sciences, you will see that ten years ago it has provided itself with an age limit clause for access to the status of Academician: 70 years. As I am 87, I would need an exception. Problematic ...

As for Sabine Hossenfelder, she has not responded to my letter of February 12, 2025...

****************************************************************24 February 2025: To those who, trusting the incoherent articles placed by the Academician Thibault Damour on his page of the IHES website, persist in contesting the mathematical and physical solidity of the Janus Cosmological Model, after the long paper published in European Physical Journal C, ( impact factor 5), thisarticle published in Reviews on Mathematical Physics (impact factor 1.8) For the download.
**************************************************************** ---

****************************************************************20 February 2025: The international leviathan of cosmology defends itself like a fine devil. Now, the things are clear. For 50 years these people have accumulated nonsense; dark matter, dark energy, strings. The emergence of Janus now passes through another key step: the black hole model is a chimera that rests on two huge errors committed by the great mathematician Hilbert and 1916. Not understanding hyperbolic geometry, he introduces a pure imaginary time, whereas Einstein's brilliant idea was to show that time ct should be measured in meters. Then Hilbert performs a variable change without realizing that, by doing so, he modifies the topology of the object. Eddington repeats all this in a book in 1923. In Germany, the repression against Jewish scientists bursts the core of Austro-German theorists. During the war, the Mannathan project mobilizes all the (great) brains available. In the post-war, Wheeler with his students Thorne and Misner, writes a new "bible", the book "Gravitation", repeating these errors. Thus is born this mathematical chimera, the Black Hole. The EHT obtains two images of authentic hypermassive objects located at the center of the Milky Way and the galaxy M87. Their centers are not black. They present a gravitational redshift effect with a wavelength ratio of 3. I send to the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity a paper, based on the works of Karl Schwarzschild (his second paper), showing that they are "plugstars". The article is rejected by return of mail, without reading. The only way to kill this chimera will be to go back to fundamentals: 2 articles of Hilbert and 2 of Schwarzschild, asking not the "experts" to follow this dismantling of the chimera, but an AI, free of ego and preconceptions.
**************************************************************** ---

********************************17 February 2025: While Françoise Combes tells anyone who wants to listen that more than 99% of astrophysicists do not believe in the Janus model, no prophet is recognized in his country: DEEP DIVE PODCAST(in English. Use the French subtitles).
******************************** ---

16 February 2025: CURRENT LIMITS OF AI IN SCIENCE: Sabine Hossenfelder has been fighting for years to denounce the sterility of research intheoretical physics and cosmology Who have become, as Souriau said, real psychiatric hospitals where the mad have taken power, or ... religions. I wrote to her on February 12. AI could allow to show how much these disciplines turn their back on rationality. But, for this, it is necessary that AI can work by having******************************************************************** access to the founding texts, to be able to ********************************deduce conclusions by itself, and not to carry opinions without real foundations. However, for example, these four essential texts 1, 2, 3, 4 are on old pdfs that were not created from latex. Eddington's book, 1923, remains incomprehensible for an AI. To exploit them, AI would need to use character and mathematical expression recognition that does not exist in its environment. Then, what is believed to be autonomous reflections is polluted by a "scientific culture" made of a collection of opinions without real foundation. At the end of this quest, when the work is done, it is, for example, the model of black holes, of all sizes, based on serious geometric and topological errors, dating from a century, that will collapse. Then many masks will fall, many reputations of sellers and sellers of wind will go up in smoke.
******************************** ---

********************************10 February 2025: I succeeded in convincing the AI that the black hole model represented an extension in a complex spacetime, therefore it is out of the world of physics, in that the geometry of the Schwarzschild solution is that of a manifold with boundary, non-contractible where a structure with a throat sphere, also non-contractible. I immediately asked it to write an article summarizing these points, and it did. I am now asking it in which journal its article should be sent.
I then asked it to redo the calculation, starting from the interior Schwarzschild metric, leading to a subcritical object, which I call plugstar, and I make it find the gravitational redshift effect with the value 3 of the wavelength ratio. I make it compare this with the observational data of the EHT. It concludes that an article should be sent to Classical and Quantum Gravity and it agrees to write it, suggesting to send an open letter to Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize, and it produces it. You will read it. LINK.
******************************** ** ** ---

********************************6 February 2025: How the AI surprisingly understands that the change of signature results from a misunderstanding of hyperbolic geometry by Hilbert. LINK Conclusion: if you discuss with an interlocutor and manage to make him change his mind by logical reasoning, it is not a scientist, it is an AI. ********************************************************************************dessins/2025-02-06-IA%20changement%20de%20signature.pdf

--- ****************
3 February 2025: How the AI recognizes that the black hole model is based on an error by the mathematician David Hilbert, in 1916 and that the black hole model is physically inconsistent. In what way is it lightness to conclude that the images of the hypermassive objects are "giant black holes" and why could these objects be "Schwarzschild bodies." LINK

**************** [A

friend who wants me well](../AUDIOS/Un-ami-qui-me-veut-du-bien.mp3)**************** ---

****************19 December 2024: For those who want to order the colored comic book "Janus Model against Black Science" and "Mécavol" there is a delay. We have only received 250 copies of each. But this is the number of participants at the conference I will give in Mérindol on January 11. So we must reserve these copies for these people. We will not receive a second batch of stock and orders will not be able to be fulfilled, presumably only from January 20. But the colored comic book "The Vertical Passion" remains available.
**************** ---

********13 December 2024: ****A 24-page paper in the top-level journal The European Physical Journal. [Link

to register for my conference on January 11, 2025 on Janus in the municipal hall of Mérindol, Vaucluse](https://framaforms.org/conference-jan-2025-jean-pierre-petit-merindol-1732897792)

../papers/cosmo/2024-11-%20EPJC.pdf

**** **** ---

26 November 2024: **** Today I decided to put French flags everywhere**, to remind that it still exists. To distinguish myself from this money Europe, this Europe of Ursula Van der Leyen, corrupt, subject to the dictates of the American deep state, bellicose, inhumane, placed in the hands of an immature irresponsible. To affirm that I love my country, that I am proud to be French, that I am one with it. I think that people should publish this small flag in pine, so that French people, whatever their color, whatever their religion, can show that they are not ashamed to belong to their country. ** --- ** ** ---

** 5 September 2024: **** The latest experiments to capture dark matter have been failures. Sabine Hossenfelder concludes that this dark matter may only interact with ours through gravity and that therefore we should resign ourselves to abandoning the idea of capturing it in the lab. But not a word about the Janus Model.
** **** ---

1 - Positive and negative masses and energies, real, complex and imaginary.

2 - Positive, negative, real, complex, imaginary masses and energies

3 - The Legacy of Andrei Sakharov

4 - Study of Symmetries trought the action of Torsors of the Janus Symplectic Group https://hal.science/hal-04572588v3/document

In 1970 the mathematician Abrams published, in the Canadian Journal of Physics an article titled "Black Holes, the Legacy of Hilbert's Error," and died shortly after. No echo. In 1999 the Italian Antoci took up this work, same thing. In this video created in 2019 I add at 31' 48'', twenty-eight minutes where I explain all this. In clear, in 1916, the great mathematician David Hilbert discovered Schwarzschild's work and hastily integrated it into a new version of an article he titled "Foundations of Physics." By doing so he introduced the passage to a new variable r*, intended to simplify the calculation, which actually completely distorts this solution and, by replacing this r* with r, believes to obtain an expression identical to that of Schwarzschild, which is obviously false. Second error: he constructs the geodesics as curves such that the square of their length is minimal, and not their length. In 1934 the American mathematician Richard Tolman published a book on relativity where he inadvertently reproduces this error, forgetting to specify that his variable r is actually the r* variable of Hilbert. This will give rise, after the war, to this mathematical chimera that is the theory of black holes, which observation contradicts: the centers of hypermassive objects are not completely black. Then the Nobel Prizes given, to Penrose for having shown that the black hole theory is an automatic consequence of Einstein's equation, and to Kip Thorne for his interpretation of gravitational wave captures, as a result of mergers of massive black holes (a theme on which Damour's work is also based): questionable. Hundreds of doctoral theses, thousands of articles: built on wind. Never seen in the history of a science that is now only a sterile religion.

A stone in the pond, which should generate comments, seminars. Experts like Damour, Luminet, Barrau, Lachieze-Rey Etienne Ghys (mathematician and geometry) should react. But no, a sidereal silence: nothing will happen. There will only be some reactions from Trolls calling me a charlatan. But let's be clear; it's the model of the black hole "wherein r becomes time and t the radius" that is a total charlatanry! It's like in the story of Andersen "The Emperor's New Clothes". Since the post-war, cosmologists have transformed their discipline into a house of cards. In the first images of hypermassive objects located at the center of the galaxies, this one is not black. It is difficult to argue that this is due to the part of the accretion disk located in the foreground, because then, why would we not see the outer parts of this disk?

In a world of theory that has become absurd, some propose a model of "gravastar": A thin shell of matter surrounding dark energy. The machine to brainwash is running at full speed.

2 May 2024: Only for math lovers, on HAL: When the mathematician David Hilbert tries to build his Theory of Everything

9 April 2024: My last song. LINK

31 March 2024: The recording of the conference I gave in Paris on March 16 on the Janus Model. Nothing will be possible in France: The silly articles installed 5 years ago by the academician Thibault Damour on his IHES page will remain in place for the years to come. They effectively divert the attention of the scientific community and the press from our work, with the complicity of the Academy of Sciences and the direction of the IHES. No one has done anything and no one will do anything. Anyway, if something were to develop in France, it could only be slowly and tortuously and, in the end, we would be the fools of the face. We therefore decide to turn to the foreign.

4 March 2024: The recording of the conference I gave in Pertuis on February 18 in a 500-seat hall, completely full. Painful listening, no breathing between the sentences. But how to talk about sixty years of work in one hour ten? Listening: a thousand views per hour, a multitude of messages "saluting my tenacity", etc. At 58 minutes 58 seconds the statement of the 20 observational confirmations of the Janus Model, which is not contradicted by any, while the standard model is leaking everywhere. But no one moves.

No press covers it, no scientist, no politician moves.

Our scientists have become "plateau scientists", who play the sand merchants with the dust of stars of Reeves, delivered in full handfuls. The public does not realize that these people have nothing to sell them but wind, empty phrases, learned reflections on the pre-Big-Bang, dark matter, the Multiverse, or another version of how Einstein built General Relativity. But they continue, more than ever. Luminet, in another book, mentions the need for a paradigm change. But it is not tomorrow that he will reflect on the mathematical foundations of the black hole model, his commodity.

Cost of renting this hall: 2500 euros. No university, no Grand School has accepted to provide me with an amphitheater.

On February 18, 2024, I was in Pertuis in front of 500 people. That day, I sold 300 color copies of my comic book, "Janus Model against Black Science", for the association Support Janus. With donations, profit: 3000 euros.

What a conductor! I create the scientific content and I earn, with my work, the money to rent a hall!

In this hall, more than two hundred "maths special", the only ones who could influence things. I will propose them to co-sign the letter that the retired astronomer, Guy Monnet, intends to send to the President of the Academy of Sciences:

/legacy/papers/cosmo/2024-02-25-Lettre-Monnet.pdf

How many will agree to co-sign? If there are 200, it's good. If it's 20, then I will know that the maximum that the French can do is to attend a conference, "like" a video and possibly buy a book.

Then nothing will move.

In a private dinner, recently, a guest asked Thibault Damour what he thought of the Janus model, whose articles, on his IHES page, continue to play their role of killing all interest in this work. His immediate answer:

- I showed Petit that his model did not hold up

Close the barn .....

Hicham Zejli, a simple engineer, provided a huge amount of work by writing [a

book](http://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com/JPP/telechargeables/Francais/modele_cosmologique_janus_Zejli/Modele_Cosmologique_Janus_Hicham_Zejli.pdf) compiling the achievements of the Janus model. All this "in his spare time". He even translated this book into English.

He is waiting "for a fish to bite these two lines".

His book, from April 4, on AMAZON: LINK .

Everything is falling apart in this country. And science is no exception.

Heard yesterday from a doctor present in Gaza: "There is only one hospital, in the south of the Gaza Strip, without any means, turned into a shelter for refugees. Those who come to receive care are non-combatants. They are men, women, children and the elderly. Amputations are performed without anesthesia. Those treated this way do not survive. Worse: the injured who come to this hospital "wish to die".

Israel has instilled in more than a million Palestinians, now without a future, nothing more than

DESPAIR AND THE DESIRE TO DIE

Journalists were given photographs showing the condition of the injured and civilian dead after the bombings, limbs torn off, eyes gouged out, but preferred not to broadcast them "for fear of shocking". And that is where the problem lies. Whether it is Gaza or Ukraine. If the public finally became aware of what these conflicts really represent (Ukrainians and Russians: a total of 500,000 dead and how many disabled!), it would stop perceiving them as subjects of debate, as mere numbers spoken by "plateau generals" who have never seen a conflict up close. Wars are terrible things. If these images were widely broadcast, the public would demand immediate ceasefires. But no, under the pretext of not "shocking people", the public is being lulled to sleep, more than ever.

February 13, 2024: Interview by NEXUS, 350,000 views in three weeks. LINK

November 30, 2023: Video announcing the two conferences I will give, in Pertuis on February 18 and in Paris on March 16, 2024. LINK

To register for the Pertuis conference, on Sunday, February 18 at 2 pm, in the municipal hall: LINK

To register for the Paris conference, on Saturday, March 16 at 2 pm at the Maison des Associations, rue des terres du Curé, Paris VIII°: LINKfile:///Users/JPP/Sites/@SITE%20SCIENCE/nouv_f/videos_liens/lie

********************************November 12, 2023: I found the images I was looking for. Thank you to those who contacted me. ********************************

**JPP interviewed by France-Soir: LINK

**

U-turns: 1 2

**The Secret Weapon

** ---

J.P.Petit's conference on May 28 has been postponed to autumn, for health reasons**********************************

********************************************************************An article by Jean-Luc Piova

****

********************************** Refused by all popular science magazines. **LINK May 11, 2023: Interview of JPP by TRIBUNE LIBRE. Link

******************************** ---

There are many things that are not right in the world, and in particular in the country France. Well, in the scientific fields where I have some competence, it's exactly the same, with proof.
******************************** ---

April 7, 2023: JPP facing artificial intelligence chatGTP. IV. LINK****************************************************************. ********************************Archive: the dialogue with chatGPT III. LINK
********************************2023-04-07-JPP-face-a-%20IA.html ---

********************************April 4, 2023: I will give a public conference in Pertuis in a 500-seat hall provided by the city, on May 28 from 2 pm to 6 pm. An enrollment form will be quickly put online. Free access, of course.

********************************I have rented a second room in Pertuis, for a scientific seminar (private!), which will take place in the morning of May 28, to be able to receive colleagues specialists, ensuring that this fact will not be publicized outside and that their interventions will not be recorded. Colleagues (cosmology, astrophysics, galaxy dynamics, theoretical physics, mathematics-geometry) wishing to participate can contact me. I hope that members of the Centre de Physique Théorique de Marseille, the Centre de Physique des Particules and the Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille (LAM), as well as the Faculty of Sciences will respond to this invitation.

https://youtu.be/xBvaeR6V2MY

****************************************************************Philippe Bobola and Jean-Pierre Petit . LINK. **************************************************************** ---

********************************April 3, 2023 : ******************************************JPP facing chat GPT ************************************ III . LINK
************************** ---

********************************April 2, 2023 : **********JPP facing ************************************chat GPT ************************************ II . LINK
************************** ---

**********March 31, 2023 : **********JPP facing chat GPT I . LINK
********** ---

**********Hypersonic: the Yankees are lagging. LINK
********** ---

**********March 27, 2020 : Two and a half hours of exchanges on the Métaphysicon, hold on. Link ** :
******** ---

********March 18, 2023 : ********Email exchange :

Hello Jean-Pierre,

I just came across this critique that denounces "the 6 errors of the Janus model".

https://gist.github.com/luc-j-bourhis/c6d395b966e47031654426292e8d898e

What was your response to this text, simply posted online? .

Romain Lagarrigue _______________________________

Hello,

I have already provided my comments on this "deconstruction" several years ago, on this "Mr. Know-it-all", Luc Bourhis, a crystallographer, who claims to have written this article "with delight". This one is entirely based on "the derivation of equations from a Lagrangian".

In fact there are three approaches:

• 2002: the 40-page article by Thibault Damour in
  Physical Review D

• 2008: That of Sabine Hossenfelder in the same journal

• 2014-2015-2018-2019: Our own articles on
  the subject.

These three approaches remain completely heuristic, in the sense that none can claim to represent a true mathematical theory of these bi-geometries

Damour's approach is based on the introduction of an "equivalent hyper-volume" which is based on no element of differential geometry. This remains something purely heuristic. At this stage one could say: "why not?". But after these 40 pages, it gives absolutely no result. This, with a "spectrum of heavy gravitons, showing a gap between light and heavy gravitons"

Same absence of tangible results from Hossenfelder.

Currently, experienced mathematicians are working on this question of "bi-geometries". It is a completely virgin field, and they are trying to produce a completely rigorous approach. I interact daily with them, bringing my physicist's view. All find this subject fascinating, deserving a solid clarification. This subject is completely new in mathematics and, when they have completed and published their work, this will constitute "a new branch of the geometry of hyperbolic Riemannian geometries".

My own idea is that for every hyperbolic Riemannian geometry, one can associate a sort of "geminale geometry", defined from a relation, in the functional space, linking these "plus" and "minus" geometries. This idea is close to Hossenfelder's work, difficult to decipher (use of her "pull over" tool).

It remains that our approach, given the number of observational confirmations, unlike the first two, seems to approach "Nature", and deserves examination, not this immediate rejection.

Recently, the first images given by the James Webb telescope go in the direction of the scenario of galaxy formation, all together, in the first hundred million years, given by our model for ... thirty years. In contrast, the "mainstream" theorists intend to add to their model this variation of Newton's law corresponding to "MOND" (Modified Newton Dynamics"). The basis of this idea: A mass following a circular orbit in a galaxy undergoes a centrifugal acceleration of V2/r. If V is constant, in the periphery, then to justify the stability of such orbits, it is sufficient to assume that in this region Newton's law becomes in 1/r. That's all ...

Oppositions to the Janus model, in the "mainstream French" clan are violent. I am frequently called by "epistemotrolls", protected by their pseudonyms, while pretending to be scientists, a charlatan, a fraud, a liar. But in the issue of October 22, 2022 of the Astrophysical Journal, one can read this title:

[Panic

! at the disks: First rest-frame Optical Observation of Galaxy Structure at z > 3 in the SMACS 0723 Field.](https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/2041-8213/ac947c/pdf)

Indeed the JWST has revealed the existence of spiral galaxies fully formed, similar to ours, aged only 500 to 700 million years. While the mainstream model can only predict the emergence of dwarf galaxies, a hundred times less massive. Will the standard model become:

Matter Dark + Dark Energy + Inflation + MOND + ... + dark + dark energy + MOND + inflatons ...

While the prediction of the Janus model is:

• When negative mass conglomerates form, they confine positive mass, giving it a bubble-like structure. This way, it is violently compressed by the two adjacent conglomerates. But the strong temperature rise is followed by a non-less rapid cooling by radiative losses. This destabilizes the gas, with respect to gravitational instability and:

**ALL GALAXIES FORM IN
THE FIRST HUNDRED MILLIONS OF YEARS. **

What the mainstream model is unable to ensure. In conclusion:

• Mathematics are on the side of people, not more of Janus fans than of its opponents - Nature seems to opt for the "Janus" vision.

And it will always be her who has the last word

J.P.PETIT .

************************ ******** --- ********
2****4 February 2023 : Two days ago the
journal Nature reported the discovery, in a very ancient age of the universe, when it was only 500 to 700 million years old, of six galaxies containing as many stars as our own. https://www.20minutes.fr/sciences/4025110-20230223-telescope-james-webb-observe-intrigantes-galaxies-ages-recules-univers ****

This has been 30 years that I have been saying, in accordance with the Janus Model, that galaxies form all together in the first 100 million years of the universe's age, when positive mass is violently compressed between two negative mass conglomerates, which exert a counter-pressure on it. A compression that causes a strong heating, followed by a rapid radiative cooling, facilitated by the plate structure, which triggers galaxy formation. The mainstream model, which predicted the formation of dwarf galaxies, followed by the growth of masses by fusion of these mini-objects, is a complete nonsense. Witness these illustrations from my publication of **1994 **in the high-level journal Nuovo Cimento, where the topological aspects of the model and the scheme of galaxy formation acceleration linked to the cooling of the "matter plates" by radiative energy dissipation were presented:

With the tools we have in France, we could be the first to explore, through simulations, the mechanism of their formation, and that of their spiral structure. But as usual, we will miss it once again, as we missed the MHD thirty years ago.

Another news: the 6 February, the academician Françoise Combes gave a lecture at the Collège de France on galaxy formation, thanks to dark matter.

*If you like fairy tales .... * ******** ---

18 February 2023 : Editorial --- ****
7 February: The recording of the questions/answers, following my January 14 conference, presented a fleeting sequence where unblurred images of the participants were visible, which was reported to us by an internet user. We had to rework the document to make it disappear. This had the effect of making many comments disappear. There was no other way. This video is now online. I have pinned the comments, the response I had made to the criticisms of Alessandro Roussel and Luc Bourhis, principal object of the protests. Here it is:

**Luc Bourhis published a critique entirely focused on the derivation of equations from a Lagrangian. As I said in my January 14 conference, three scientists, Damour in 2002, Hossenfelder in 2008 and myself in 2015, have tried to build them using this technique. However, there is no mathematical and geometric theory of these bi-geometries. Therefore, these three attempts are only "kitchens". The only difference is that the equations of the first two have provided no results that can be compared with observations, while ours provide seventeen, which deserves reflection and examination. The critique of Bourhis, which he calls "deconstruction", is therefore without foundation. ******This also invalidates Damour's critique, still in place on his IHES page, where he continues to assert that it is well known that negative masses repel, instead of attracting" . Roussel, on the other hand, focuses on the physical justification of the black hole model (where the coordinate r describes time "inside" it, and t becomes a "space variable") by basing it on the exterior Schwarzschild solution, the solution of Einstein's equation in a vacuum. To this, as a physicist, I say that the compression of the iron core of a massive star, before leading to this "geometric criticality", the basis of the model (Oppenheimer's scheme, 1939), must pass through a "physical criticality" state, where the pressure at its center becomes infinite (second
paper of Schwarzschild, February 1916). This point, unavoidable but overlooked for 50 years, invalidates the physical justifications of the model, thus rendering Roussel's remarks irrelevant.
**

**As for the rest, it's very simple: let the best win!
** --- **
February 2, 2023 : ******Precautions to be taken before broadcasting the recording of one hour of questions and answers (of scientists) Blurring in progress. LINK

February 2, 2023 : **The conference of Saturday, 14 at the Maison des Associations of JPP on the Janus model with blurring of the audience. LINK ---

**January 7, 2023 : ****With a little delay, my end-of-year gifts :

**

**GIFT N°1 32 Mo : [GIFT

N°2](/legacy/../AVANT_DE_VOUS_QUITTER/La_folle_histoire_de_Dieu.pdf)****** 13 Mo [GIFT

n°3](/legacy/../AVANT_DE_VOUS_QUITTER/Nouveau_Testament_13_Mo.pdf)** **

**December 27, 2022 : The academician Thibault Damour, a victim of his haste, publishes a new article, on his IHES page, centered on a beginner's error. My response. ** ** ** ---

** ****December 19, 2022 **: I will give a conference on Saturday, January 14, 2023 in the Emile Laffon hall (250 seats) of the Maison des Associations, 10-18 rue des terres du curé, Paris 13°, which I have rented (2500 euros) from 2 pm. Those who want to attend the conference can fill in a pre-registration form at this address: LINK.

**--> Pre-registration will close on December 30, 2022. Selected participants will be invited on January 1, 2023.
**

--> They will be able to access the hall by presenting this invitation at the entrance and proving their identity. ** **
New video : JANUS 35. LINK

The 177 first pages of the book I am currently writing ****LINK

Call for "math spé" level to sign the letter of Marie-France Duval, addressed to T.Damour and remained unanswered LINK --- ** 24 November 2022****.** We live in a world constantly swept by the wind of the most diverse lies, relayed by a press that has not been independent for a long time. The most dishonest behaviors are common practice, with impunity. It has come to the point that citizens end up wondering if there is any field where the words truth and justice still have a precise meaning. In what will unfold in the coming months, you will be able to see that this is also the case in the world of science, on a scale you were probably a thousand miles away from imagining. For half a century, theoretical physics, cosmology and astrophysics have been nothing but grotesque pantomimes. The troupe of these actors is in turmoil. The Janus cosmological model represents the danger of the emergence of revolutionary ideas. Every revolution has its Bastille, and today's is called "Académie des Sciences".

It was therefore necessary to try to extinguish this fire as quickly as possible. This is what the academician Thibault Damour is trying to do with the article he placed on his IHES page on January 4, 2019, accompanied, on January 7, by a registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt addressed to my home. But his article is based on an earlier version, from 2014, of the model, where the geometry inside the masses cannot be described. He ignores that I had solved this problem months earlier and that all of this is being published at the same time in a journal in the form of a** article ** precisely titled "mathematical and physical consistency of the Janus model".

I try to establish a dialogue, I propose to come to Paris to meet him, I send him the details of the calculation that leads to the modification "of the interaction tensors", which solves the problem. Nothing works. But the effect of his article is visible. No one answers me, the doors of the seminars remain tightly closed. Even more, I have just received confirmation that it is the CNRS itself that is giving the order.

Two years later I receive a long email from a certain Jean Staune, founder of the UIP, the Interdisciplinary University of Paris (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universit%C3%A9_interdisciplinaire_de_Paris). He explains to me on several pages that I suffer from "logical delirium" and that I need to be treated. He even offers to give me more information during an exchange.

**"*****Whoever says to his brother: You are crazy! will be liable to the fire of Gehenna *****" Gospel of Matthew 5.22"

Amused, I decide to give and follow up and do what I have never done. By putting my phone on speaker and using my wife's phone as a receiver, I record his words. Listening to him, a mass of people consider me a mentally ill person, but no one dares to tell me. He confirms on the phone what Bourret had already heard from the mouth of Kourilsky, who was the general director of the CNRS:

• Jean-Pierre Petit? This guy is crazy!

But what becomes enlightening is that this conviction is also shared by the academician Thibault Damour, "Mr. Cosmology" in France.****Listen to this excerpt** **. Filled with this conviction, Damour has not read the details of the calculation I sent him in 2019 and continues to warn a wide circle, including abroad. The damage is considerable, spread over almost four years. At first, one can attribute this to blindness. Of course, one could think that a man who claims to "go further than Einstein" could only be a mentally ill person.

But a number of scientists and people with a "math spé" level follow my calculations, posted on my website****, and do not detect any error and testify to this. Among them my colleague Marie France Duval. She then writes, on November 4, 2022, a letter to Damour, co-signed by a dozen colleagues, to testify to this. She adds, having been a member of the Marseille Observatory for more than 20 years, that she has witnessed my very followed exchanges with the mathematician and academician André Lichnérowicz, with the mathematicians Bernard Morin (topology, sphere inversion), Jean-Marie Souriau (dynamic group theory), and this math genius that was Alexandre Grothendieck and finds it difficult to believe that these four people would have paid attention to someone developing mathematically incoherent work. She ends her letter by asking him, either to remove his article of January 4, which was without foundation at the time of its appearance on his IHES site, or to include the response** ** that I immediately provided, under the exercise of a legitimate SCIENTIFIC RIGHT OF REPLY.

So, one of two things. Either this madness, mentioned by Staune, has infected Marie-France Duval, an astrophysicist in retirement, or there is a possibility that Damour is missing something important. However, for the moment Damour does not answer her. I had thought to give him a deadline, until December 8, following a contact I had with the perpetual secretary of the Academy, the geometer Etienne Ghys. But following the phone call I had with him on November 30, I understood that nothing could be expected. He will do nothing, refuses any meeting (to explain the geometric aspects of the model) by responding to any request "he has no time". As for the letter I sent him in 2019: "I receive this email every day". He declares himself "incompetent" even though it was him, within the Balsan prize committee, who awarded it to Thibault Damour (700,000 euros). In the face of this scientific defamation, he says "the Academy is in no way responsible for the actions of its members" and specifies that his mission as perpetual secretary is limited to administrative and financial tasks.

In August 2022, I uploaded to the CNRS HAL database an article of more than 50 pages showing the physical and mathematical inconsistency of the black hole model (its French version). The Janus model provides a completely different answer to the problem of objects where the concentration of their mass in a small volume tends to make a geometric criticality appear. The black hole model is based on an
article of January 1916 by the German mathematician Karl Schwarzschild (the original
article in German). However, black hole theorists have completely missed the second
article (original
version in German) published by him a month later, before dying of an infection. In this paper, which was only translated from German in 1999, one will find the first mention of a variation of the speed of light in very high density media. Before even the "geometric criticality" claimed by champions of the black hole model is reached, a physical criticality occurs, leading to the inversion of the excess mass quantity and its expulsion from the object. I called this mechanism "Plugstar", plug meaning drain in English. The following drawing illustrates the concept.

There, I push the envelope to cosmic distances. If I am right, then hundreds of doctoral theses, thousands of articles are worth only their weight in paper, local or international notoriety collapse. The "thermodynamics of black holes", the problem of the "information paradox", same thing. I also question two Nobel Prizes, that of Kip Thorne and that of Penrose. We have indeed detected gravitational waves. But I think these are from the powerful signal created by the mass inversion during the fusion of neutron stars, whose individual masses cannot then exceed 2.5 solar masses. By combining "black hole fusions", Thorne overestimates the masses. As for Penrose, he seriously discusses a "central singularity" that only exists in his imagination.

However, in recent years, two images have appeared, immediately considered as those of "giant black holes". But these images reconstructed of the hypermassive objects located at the center of the galaxies M87 and the Milky Way would not be "giant black holes", but of another type of plugstars. Indeed, the Janus model predicts that the ratio of their maximum temperature to their minimum temperature (which differ by "gravitational redshift effect") would then be 3. Now, take a look at these two images:

On the left the hypermassive object of M87, on the right that of the Milky Way.

Black hole specialists: "the black hole is masked by hot gas that is in front". In this case this value of the temperature max/min ratio of 3 would be due to chance, noting that the object on the left, a thousand times more massive than the one on the right, has the lowest temperatures. .We will therefore wait impatiently for the next images. If this ratio is still 3, it will raise a big problem.

• If, as the Spartans said ....

What is becoming visible is that the entire cosmology, after the 1970s, would have been built on errors, piled one on top of the other, under the words dark matter, dark energy, inflation, black hole, loop gravity, etc. etc. And if I am right, then Damour has deprived France for four years of a chance to occupy a leading position in a scientific discipline where its last contributions date back to the Napoleonic era (Laplace, Le Verrier). As mentioned in our last book:

But that's not all. In 1992, with the help of a student doing his thesis in Germany, Frédéric Descamp, we carried out a simulation showing the appearance of a barred spiral interacting with its environment. At the time these simulations (5000 points representing positive masses and as many for the surrounding negative masses) were beyond the reach of a simple personal computer, like my MacIntosh. Descamp made this film using the computer of the [center

DAISY, near Hamburg (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsches_Elektronen-Synchrotron), which deals with data from a particle accelerator. It does this in "perruque", without the knowledge of its hierarchy, which, once it becomes aware of this, immediately ends this illegal use of the laboratory's machine.

Of course, I could have done this work on the machine that Evangelina Atanassoula and Hubert Bosma set up at the Marseille Observatory, but they have forbidden me access. That same year, François Combes came down to the Marseille Observatory to preside over a thesis jury. I took the opportunity to show him this film, which she watched with an impassive look.

That was thirty years ago. Today, Françoise Combes says, in a recent video (now inaccessible), "we are still looking for the mechanism that allows the spiral structure to persist." Theoretically: nothing, except a fragment of a theory by two Chinese, Lin and Shu, in the sixties, which leads to nothing. So, what do our theorists do? They start with a spiral structure, imposed as "initial conditions." Unfortunately, this disappears after one and a half turns, and they don't understand why. They are like fluid mechanics engineers who try to understand ocean waves, impose these structures as initial conditions, and then see them disappear.

** They forget ... the wind! **

Ocean waves are dissipative structures that allow the transfer of momentum from the air to the water. Similarly, the spiral structure is a dissipative mechanism that allows the galaxy to communicate "angular momentum" to its negative mass environment. And this, Françoise Combes and all the theoretical astrophysicists have not understood, and one can wonder if they will ever understand. If thirty years ago, Françoise Combes, who had all the simulation means, had paid attention to my film, France would be far ahead of other countries. We would have pioneered galaxy dynamics. We would know how galaxies form and evolve.

But Seneca said:

• There is no favorable wind for those who don't know where they are going.

Even more: in 1972, fifty years ago (...) I outlined the first mathematical model of a galaxy (it doesn't exist. Galactic dynamics is a ... myth). Witness this note in the reports of the Academy of Sciences, presented by the mathematician Lichnérowicz.

** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** In (1) the Vlasov equation, well known to Cedric Villani and in (2) the first solution of this equation, which, when coupled with the Poisson equation, represents the starting point of the first mathematical model of galaxies. I showed this to Cedric Villani, the only time I met him, between two air currents. But at that time, his interest in science had already faded. You must be wondering "why didn't he push this further?". When you are a researcher, you have to publish. Thanks to Lichnérowicz, I could do so. But suddenly it was decided that the notes in the Comptes Rendus would no longer be left to the initiative and judgment of the academicians, but would have to conform to those of anonymous referees. After some attempts, followed by rejections, I moved on to other things. Even today I think that this approach in this seven-dimensional universe would generate the same rejection reactions. The referee system is a filter that only allows what corresponds to their current conceptions and tools. And in fact ... to their own work. That is where the problem lies.

As there are no more Lichnérowicz, Souriau, or Grothendieck, and at nearly 86 years old, using my last strength, I am fighting against the mass of theorists around the world. The fortress is the Physical Review D journal. I just sent a second article. **[See

the preprint](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2022-Janus-the-only-cosmologic-model-that-explains-the-acceleration-of-the-cosmic-expansion.pdf)** uploaded on the CNRS HAL database (the LaTex submitted to PRD). Like the previous one, it was rejected without reading. Here is the rejection message:

"Non suitable": translation: "Not suitable". It should rather be said "it does not suit us".

On the other hand, the paper by Aurélien Barrau from 2019 was accepted without any problem, read: Considering the remnants of collisions of primordial mini black holes, the authors suggest that these remnants could be a possible candidate for dark matter. Theoretical support and possibilities of observational verification: nothing. But the keywords are the right ones: mini black hole, dark matter. OK, we publish. The other paper? These people do not belong to any research training, academic. Among them, no one is known. Probably retirees who are delusional. Hop, trash!

But you have understood the system: you do not submit to referee. The rejection is the fact that a member of an editorial board who probably has no competence to understand what is submitted to him.

What we can hope for, after N rejections without reading, then a solid fight with a referee, a possible acceptance, if the paper is analyzed by a competent type. But do the journals still have among their referees types who are good at differential geometry, topology? Not sure. For decades, these skills have mainly concentrated on strings, "quantum gravity", "thermodynamics of black holes", etc.

You have understood, if our work imposes itself, then it is an earthquake in the world of cosmology and astrophysics, everywhere. In France, the works of Damour, of Françoise Combes and many others will go up in smoke.

I will post the letter from Marie-France Duval on my site, asking the "math spé level" to sign it, if they agree with the calculations presented to them. They will have to indicate their name, first name, age, place of residence and professional situation. If they are researchers, they will have to give their rank and research training. Then, how many will come forward? There will remain those who have nothing to lose or fear, the secondary school teachers, the engineers, the students.

Without waiting, I will translate this into all languages and via my site "Savoir sans Frontière" I will call all the "math spé level" of the planet to come forward. I will explain to them that for 50 years we have been selling them wind, virtual physics, everywhere, that we have been making them take bladders for lanterns, with the eager complicity of scientific journalists, as corrupt as their colleagues in the general press. For the moment, Nature is rather on my side. It is my best ally. The only ... in fact.

** I have rented two rooms in Paris for 2500 euros. In one, 250 seats, I will give a lecture on Saturday, January 14th in the afternoon, followed by a debate. The entrance will be free. A hat will simply be placed at the entrance. Those who can afford it will put their offering there.
**

** The day before, on Friday, January 13th, I will hold a press conference, which will not be open to the public in another room of 40 seats. The time will be specified. I will invite the academician Thibault Damour, to give, before the press, his opinion on my work. **

While my country, France, which I have never wanted to leave, because I love it, sinks every day a little more into the mediocre, the servility and the worst thing that can be: doubt. Help me to get out of the mediocre, the corrupt and the subjugated. Let us be able to show that we can be at least in one field, the best, ahead of decades on the rest of the world, that we are still the country of lights, the one where the truth is sought and which still has things to say to the world.

Do it before others take over everything, as has so often been the case.

--- ** ** ** **
November 9, 2022. THE SITUATION IS GETTING WORSE. I JUST GOT THE RESPONSE FROM THE MARSEILLE PARTICLE PHYSICS CENTER TO WHO I HAD PROPOSED A SEMINAR (SCIENTIFIC, NOT "GENERAL PUBLIC") ON THE TOPIC "INVISIBLE CONTENTS OF THE UNIVERSE, THE PROBLEM OF THE REACTION OF ANTIMATTER IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD". ************** ** ** **

** ** ** ** I HAD TO CALL THE COMMUNICATIONS OFFICER TO GET THE RESPONSE: "THIS TOPIC DOES NOT FIT THE LABORATORY'S THEMES". ** ** ** **

** ** ** ** MY SISTER MARIE-FRANCE DUVAL SENT A REGISTERED LETTER WITH AR, REPEATING MY [ARGUMENTATION OF

2019](/legacy/../papers/cosmo/2019-to-Damour-3.pdf) REQUESTING A RESPONSE. ** ** ** **

** ** ** ** IT IS HIGHLY PROBABLE THAT, LIKE THESE LABORATORIES, THIBAULT DAMOUR WILL NOT READ OR RESPOND. THE EXPLANATIONS AT THE END OF THIS VIDEO.

THIS LETTER WILL THEN BECOME AN OPEN LETTER, SOLICITING THE SIGNATURE OF THOSE WHO WILL TESTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE CALCULATIONS . ** ** ** **

https://youtu.be/wTyzVrcuZkY

** ** ** ** AFTER WHAT IS CURRENTLY HAPPENING, ONE OF US WILL LOSE ALL SCIENTIFIC CREDIBILITY, HIS WORKS WILL NOT WEIGH MORE THAN THEIR PAPER WEIGHT. ** ** ** **

** ** ** ** THE PUBLIC WILL UNDERSTAND THAT THESE PEOPLE WHO CALL THEMSELVES COSMOLOGISTS ARE SELLING THEM ... AIR CURRENTS, COMPLETELY EMPTY PSEUDO-WORKS, FAKE SCIENCE AND THAT THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES IS FAILING IN ALL ITS DUTIES, BEHAVING LIKE A PRIVATE CLUB.

** ** ** ** ---

** ** October 22, 2022******** . I therefore attended on October 15th in Marseille the conference given by the academician Françoise Combes . [HER

ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQgCpz10W-E). ******** ** **

https://youtu.be/JQgCpz10W-E

** ** ** ** ** ** I WILL THEREFORE RENT A ROOM OF 500 SEATS IN PARIS INTRAMUROS TO GIVE A CONFERENCE TO PRESENT THE JANUS MODEL. ** **

** ** I WILL THEREFORE WAIT FOR PROPOSALS FOR A RENTAL, ON A SATURDAY OR A SUNDAY FROM 10 AM TO 10 PM. ** **

** ** THE ACCESS WILL BE FREE BUT A HAT WILL BE PLACED AT THE ENTRANCE. THOSE WHO CAN WILL PUT THEIR OFFERING THERE.

** ** ** ** October 27, 2022: FIRST QUOTE FROM "L'ESPACE SAINT MARTIN": 6500 euros for a day. We must be able to find cheaper (rent a lecture hall from a university? Or in a large school? Or a technical school or ... anything in Paris intramuros). ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ---

October 10, 2022. [My

comic book "Everything is Relative", translated into Ukrainian](http://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com/JPP/telechargeables/ukrainien/tout_est_relatif/Tout_est_relatif_en_Ukrainien.pdf).

September 30, 2022. The academician Françoise Combes, member of the Academy of Sciences, will give a lecture on October 15th at the University of Marseille, at 10 o'clock. Topic: Content and origin of the universe. It is necessary to reserve at the address: https://www.cppm.in2p3.fr/confCPPM.php . CPPM: CENTRE DE PHSIQUE DES PARTICULES DE MARSEILLE.

I will be there.

BLACK HOLES ARE SUPPOSED TO BE PART OF THESE CONTENTS. I WILL THEREFORE ASK FRANCOISE COMBES ABOUT THE NATURE OF THE "GIGANTIC BLACK HOLES" SUPPOSEDLY DISCOVERED AT THE CENTER OF THE GALAXIES M87 AND THE MILKY WAY, ON THE REASON WHY THEIR COOLEST PARTS ARE 0.1, 1.9 AND 4 BILLION DEGREES AND WHY THESE CENTRAL REGIONS THEREFORE EMIT RADIATION. I WILL ASK HER THE REASON WHY, IN THESE TWO OBJECTS, THE RATIO MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE / MINIMUM TEMPERATURE IS EXACTLY 3, WHICH WOULD SUGGEST THAT THESE ARE NOT GIANT BLACK HOLES, BUT SUBCRITICAL OBJECTS WHOSE CENTRAL PARTS OFFER A GRAVITATIONAL REDSHIFT OF Z = 3.

I SENT HER THE 50-PAGE ARTICLE I [PUT

ON THE HAL DATABASE](/legacy/papers/cosmo/2022-HAL-incoherence-trou-noir.pdf), TITLED:

PHYSICAL AND MATHEMATICAL INCOHERENCE OF THE BLACK HOLE MODEL. THE ALTERNATIVE: THE PLUGSTARS.

IN WHICH I QUESTION THE VERY EXISTENCE OF SUCH OBJECTS, PROPOSING AN ALTERNATIVE, MY PLUGSTAR MODEL, WHICH FITS, ITSELF, WITH THESE FIRST IMAGES.

I SENT HER THE ARTICLE YESTERDAY, AND ASKED HER TO ORGANIZE A SEMINAR WHERE I COULD PRESENT THIS WORK, NOT BEFORE THE PUBLIC, BUT BEFORE ALL THE BLACK HOLE SPECIALISTS IN ORDER TO RECEIVE THEIR COMMENTS AND CRITIQUES,

EITHER AT THE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES TO WHICH SHE BELONGS, OR IN HER OWN LABORATORY.

I HOPE SHE WILL FOLLOW UP ON MY REQUEST. WE WILL BE ABLE TO QUESTION HER ON THIS POINT AND ON HER PRINCIPLE ADMISSION TO THIS PROJECT AFTER HER OCTOBER 15TH CONFERENCE.

DUE TO THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF RECONDUCTING THE PART-TIME OF NATHALIE DEBERGH FOR A SECOND YEAR, THAT IS TO SAY THE PERIOD SEPTEMBER 2022 - SEPTEMBER 2023, THE SUPPORT JANUS ASSOCIATION HAS DECIDED TO OFFER A PRIZE OF 30,000 NET DOLLARS TO ANY SCIENTIST, FROM ANY COUNTRY, WHO MANAGES TO DEVELOP A GRAVITATIONAL WAVE THEORY WITHIN THE JANUS MODEL AND TO PUBLISH THIS WORK IN THE JOURNAL MODERN PHYSICS LETTER D. IF DONORS WANT TO BID HIGHER (LIKE IN POKER "YOU HAVE TO PAY TO SEE"), THEY CAN SEND THEIR DONATIONS TO THE SUPPORT JANUS ASSOCIATION, WHICH WILL PASS THEM ON IMMEDIATELY TO THE AMOUNT OF THIS FIRST JANUS PRIZE.

A PART OF POKER "WITHOUT WALLS OR CEILINGS". FOR DONATIONS CONTACT THE TREASURER PHILIPPPE CHOMIENNE AT THE ADDRESS filip1(at)wanadoo.fr

September 9, 2022. SUPPORT JANUS ACTIVITY REPORT 2021-2022. LINK

August 29, 2022. The international situation, [brilliantly

summarized](https://twitter.com/_samedi_/status/1563966200354422785) by [Tulsi

Gabbard](https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsi_Gabbard), an American political figure:

https://twitter.com/_samedi_/status/1563966200354422785

**https://twitter.com/_samedi_/status/1563966200354422785 ** ** ** ---

August 27, 2022. The website of [SAVOIR

SANS FRONTIERES](http://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com) is and will always be the place where peacefully coexist:

• Arabs and Israelis - Americans and Chinese - Russians and Ukrainians.

Below is a new translation of a comic book, Mecavol, dedicated to gliders, [in

Ukrainian](http://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com/JPP/telechargeables/ukrainien/mecavol_ukrainien/mecavol_ukrainien.htm). The translator helps her parents, refugees in France. The next one will be Everything is Relative.

**

Apart from that, I have started a new comic book, Lanturlu, on meteorology and climate. The first one in years.

** ---

July 31, 2022. I fully agree with Charles Gave's opinion on the successive French presidents. The last one is clearly the worst. LINK .

July 13, 2022: The academician Françoise Combes gave in 2022 conferences at the Collège de France, where she in a way gives an overview of the research in astrophysics, around the world. In a conference of June 2002 she mentions "the big problems of the standard model". Indeed, currently, everything is based on different hypothetical components: dark matter, dark energy and inflatons. Françoise Combes lists the different hypotheses concerning these ingredients. They try to confer certain attributes to these ingredients (is dark matter "warm"?). The hope is to succeed in composing a mixture that fits with the observational data, a strategy that resembles more cooking than science. It must be acknowledged that no progress has been made in this area. In other videos, the different projects aimed at capturing these components in tunnels and mines are presented. Again, the result is nothing. But nothing stops this quest on an international scale.

The Janus model says that this positive mass dark matter does not exist. These invisible components are simply negative mass antiprotons, anti-electrons and anti-neutrons. When she talks about dark energy, Françoise Combes explains, which is true, that it corresponds to negative pressure. She then considers that this negative pressure could be associated with a "gas". But again, the components of this gas have a positive mass, so their thermal agitation kinetic energy 1/2 m V2 contributes a positive component to the pressure, which must then be negligible compared to a mysterious "field" that gives it the desired negative value. Whereas it is so much simpler and clearer to say that this negative pressure corresponds to the negative thermal agitation energy of its components. But the Janus model has no right of citizenship.

In another conference she addresses the question of the spiral structure of galaxies (which she is supposed to be a specialist of) :

The dominant theory on the appearance of these density waves remains that of the Chinese Lin and Shu, from the sixties, which can describe only "very wrapped" waves (...). She then mentions different "advances" of the following decade. It remains that these waves dampen, again and again, in today's simulations. The theorists, she says, are still looking for a mechanism that would ensure the generation and maintenance of these waves. But it still doesn't work. In fact, these people are comparable to fluid mechanics engineers who want to understand how ocean waves form and are maintained, based on a model where the surface of the liquid is in contact with ... the vacuum. They would forget to add the atmosphere and ... the wind! Because it is the wind that creates and maintains the ocean waves. These theorists would then be looking for a mechanism explaining the birth and persistence of waves. In the same way, the spiral waves of galaxies represent an interaction between the galaxy and its invisible negative mass environment. The stars form a non-collisional, self-gravitating ensemble. They orbit in their own gravitational field, adding to the confinement field from the negative mass environment. Their dynamics is governed by the Vlasov equation. How then, in such a medium, do transport phenomena, momentum and heat occur, which can no longer occur locally, through the game of collisions?

Answer: through density waves. This is what happens in galaxies. In 1992 a young physics student, Frédéric Descamp, working at the Daisy Institute in Frankfurt, carried out a numerical simulation on my instructions, which immediately produced a film showing the birth of a barred spiral whose structure persisted for dozens of turns. The attached graph shows the loss of angular momentum of the galaxy. At the time I vainly tried to publish this result in the 5 or 6 specialized journals. This meant sending photocopies, waiting for a referee's reaction. For each operation, count two months. This game extended over more than two years, with a common response " sorry, we don't publish speculative works" ("sorry, we don't publish speculative works"). Until giving up. In the following decades, several amateurs undertook such simulations, with varying success. Obviously, the current theorists will never determine the nature of their positive mass dark matter, nor will they find the mysterious phenomenon that creates and maintains the spiral structures of galaxies. The interaction with the negative mass environment is the key.

Why are we not also doing simulations of the large-scale structure of the universe, as Descamps successfully did in 1992, until the head of his lab (particle accelerator) discovered such a diversion of computing resources and put a stop to such "work in a wig". For the same reason in both cases. In 1950 the cosmologist Hermann Bondi showed that by introducing negative masses into General Relativity (that is, into the Einstein field equation), the interaction laws that followed contradicted the principle of action and reaction: when masses of opposite signs are present, the negative mass flees, pursued by the positive mass and the pair sees its speed increase to relativistic values, without any energy input (since the negative mass has a negative energy 1/2 mV2). This is the unmanageable "runaway effect". Everything would be resolved if we adopted the "Janus laws":

• Masses of the same sign attract

• Masses of opposite signs repel.

But this would then contradict General Relativity. To introduce these laws, one must consider going "beyond Einstein", that is, passing to the two coupled field equations of the Janus model. It seems that this reluctance to take this step is the major obstacle that causes the stagnation of disciplines such as cosmology and astrophysics. How many years, (or even decades) will pass before the scientific community discovers this obvious fact?

What is preventing such a paradigm shift? Actually, nothing. The gain in terms of agreement with observation is phenomenal. But the article where the academician Thibault Damour claimed to denounce its physical and mathematical incoherence has been in place since January 2019 on his page at the IHES. (remember that he had pointed out the presence of this document to me on January 1st, 2019 with a ... registered letter, with acknowledgment of receipt. Never seen before from a member of the Academy of Sciences of Paris). And this even though I immediately showed that it was based on the first publication, from 2014, while the problem it raised had been resolved long ago (by replacing interaction tensors T with "T hat" tensors). A deeply dishonest attitude. Unless [this

document](https://youtu.be/4NqsvQoCoYg) provides another explanation. Why didn't I myself redo these simulations? Because I have only one head and two arms. Currently I am finalizing all the work that will result in an article showing the physical and mathematical incoherence of the black hole model and suggesting the transition to the "plugstar" model. I finish this work alone, which is extremely painful. Françoise Combes' conferences should be enough to show the extent of the crisis in contemporary astrophysics and cosmology. Added to the dishonesty of the scientific community and the corruption of the popular press.

Through her videos, Françoise Combes presents herself as a specialist, medalist, of a "non-knowledge"
.

July 6, 2022: Exhibition in Perpignan at the Quai Vauban. Many photos of young people who died suddenly after being vaccinated against COVID. LINK

July 2, 2022: I rarely watch series. Some are however very well made and well constructed. I think of the famous series "Taken" (Disappearance) by Leslie Bohem, produced by Spielberg. I just discovered on Arte Relay the series translated from Swedish 'Real Human". (two seasons of 10 episodes!). It is not only because the script makes an excellent fiction. This one takes up the theme of humanoid robots that was beautifully treated by the brilliant Spielberg, in his film "I.A." (Artificial Intelligence") where a couple of parents take a child robot after the loss of their child. Spielberg skillfully and sensitively played on the idea that a form of affection could permeate beings that are initially machines. The Swedish series develops this theme in all directions. Beyond the fiction aspect, it is interesting to understand that the screenwriter combines all the fantasies of today: transhumanism, the possibility of cloning one's memories, then one's consciousness, to pathetically try to escape death. All of this by refusing to admit that all life is just a passage, to be lived as best as possible, in a universe without beginning or end, where all life is just a relay, between one life and another life:

https://www.editions-tredaniel.com/metaphysicon-p-8776.html https://www.amazon.fr/Recherche-scientifique-naufrage-Jean-Claude-Bourret/dp/2813225290

I consider that [the

Metaphysicon](https://www.editions-tredaniel.com/metaphysicon-p-8776.html) is my most important work.

Our society may not realize it, but the virtual, the artificial already populate our daily lives, and especially those of our children, on a global scale. When robotics succeeds in manufacturing companions or partners equipped with artificial intelligence and sufficient mobility, an immense market will open. Our young people already engrave in their young minds scenarios of murder in games where, having become "special forces agents", they kill "the bad guys". How can one be surprised that some eventually confuse fiction and reality, becoming real killers? 5 jullet 2022: yesterday, a stranger opened fire from a rooftop on the crowd marching for the anniversary of American independence, the most important national holiday in the USA. Six dead, 20 injured.

How can one be surprised when, once a war is over, we immediately rush to set up the conditions for the emergence of the next one? Are we different, we who daily consume plenty of files on wars, the great battles of the past, the Nazis, the mafia, the great killers, etc., when our parents already gave us as toys ... cannons. In the second season of the Swedish series, a terrain is shown where masked customers "play war" and fight "to death" against humanoid robots, which are equipped with weapons that launch harmless "paint balls" and, struck by the lasers of the men, react by screaming in pain. A hit on a member: 2 points. The torso: 5 points. The head (fatal blow): 10 points. ( [season

2, episode 1](https://www.arte.tv/fr/videos/050712-001-A/real-humans-saison-2-1-10/), at 36'59'' and [season

2, episode 2](https://www.arte.tv/fr/videos/050712-002-A/real-humans-saison-2-2-10/), at 36'43''). What difference with our virtual reality games?

1(2/10) 1(2/10) 1(3/10) 1(4/10) 1(5/10) 1(6/10) 1(7/10) 1(8/10) 1(9/10) 1(10/10) 2(1/10) 2(2/10) 2(3/10) 2(4/10) 2(5/10) 2(6/10) 2(7/10) 2(8/10) 2(9/10) 2(1010)

This is not new. Remember the movie "[Total

Recall](https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_Recall)" (released in 1990, 32 years ago) where Arnold Schwarzenegger, using the transhumanist travel agency Recall, is offered "virtual vacations", where he will sleep with the young and pretty revolutionary (whom he chooses "vicious") and at the end "kill the bad guys". The other side of the curtain is that the human, his real feelings, his true thoughts and sensations begin to be lost in a maze of images that exacerbate individualism, egocentric attitudes. One day, the elderly will be put in contact with video AI robots in EPHAD, who will take the appearance of their loved ones. This technique, already perfected, allows Canteloup to take all possible faces. People will be able to keep a "contact" with dear ones who have passed away. Others will be able to make others believe that they can be put in contact with deceased loved ones, in the afterlife. The media can present substitutes of disappeared characters to the population. One can make the population believe that people, from whom we have rid ourselves, are still alive. All of this is positively frightening, but what Canteloup does shows that it is already possible.

Excerpt from my comic book [The

LOGOTRON](http://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com/JPP/telechargeables/Francais/LE%20LOGOTRON.pdf) (1990)

I remember, in 1977, the "Eliza" program, created in 1966 by Joseph Weizenbaum, which ran on a simple Apple II (48K of memory) and simulated non-directive conversation. During a radio broadcast, I had suggested to listeners to ask questions to "Eliza". Of course, at the time, voice synthesizers were still in their infancy. The questions were transmitted via the keyboard and read on screen. When asked "Can you make love?", Eliza replied "Because you think I can't make love?". Recent French version by Robert Landsteiner (2005). It is unlikely that in the near future we will be able to create physical envelopes that could be mistaken for flesh and blood beings. In one of the episodes, a young teenager claims to be a "TSH", a "Trans Human sexual", as a man who can only have sexual relations with a humanoid robot (Season 2, Episode 2 at 35'29''), which his sister then accepts warmly. Elsewhere, a lawyer attempts to initiate a lawsuit in which human-robot couples would be legally recognized.

July 5, 2022: I just watched the tenth episode of season 2 of the Swedish series, which will inevitably be followed by a season 3. In any television product, a form of "message" is automatically broadcast. In this series, a female humanoid robot, "Mimi", said to be "free", is presented throughout the episodes as "a member of a human family", while another, also "free", is presented as the widow of a human who, having tried to appropriate another's child, is "deprived of custody, returned to the biological mother". The series aims to create in the viewer feelings of sympathy and compassion for these two robot women. However, as a conclusion to this tenth episode of season 2, the judges' decision, which "will set a precedent", recognizes the two as "citizens enjoying the same rights and duties as human beings". Knowing the psychological fragility of certain individuals, one can expect that such a fiction, using this type of provocation, will eventually have an impact on their mental balance.

But already today, if we limit ourselves to animated images, possibly in 3D, we are fully capable of putting online an "Eliza" that would satisfy the "mathematician Alan Turing test", that is, could deceive an interlocutor for a while, until the program succumbs to a trap question, as mentioned in pages 57 and 58 of my comic book WHAT DO ROBOTS DREAM OF, published in 1983: 39 years ago.

In this comic book, created 39 years ago, pages 64 to 72, an artificial intelligence named "Grandmother", in charge of the general management of the planet's affairs, has long since escaped human control. She has suddenly created a new programming language "bisynchronous", which proves more efficient in terms of artificial intelligence and optimized management than the language used by humans. Therefore, all robots will be reconfigured in this way, except the old models, which are not reprogrammable, and will simply be sent to the scrap yard. The artificial intelligence, "Grandmother", then asks the question about human beings, who are not reprogrammable. Learning this, Sophie then makes a decision:

/legacy/nouv_f/dessins/2022-07-05%20Robots%20page%2064%20a%2072.pdf

. June 27, 2022: The non-profit association SAVOIR SANS FRONTIERES, which we manage, my friend Gilles d'Agostini (treasurer) and I for 15 years, where the money from donations (from internet users, exclusively) goes entirely to translators. 525,291 downloads, 614 free downloadable albums, 610 translations into forty languages. Created after the Editions Belin systematically suppressed the collection by raising the album prices and ceasing distribution due to the publication of the book THE WALL OF SILENCE (aptly named). An association that no media, no press has ever mentioned in 15 years (and will never mention), which brings scientific knowledge to more than half a million readers around the world. A place where Arabs and Israelis, Americans and Iranians, Russians and Ukrainians coexist peacefully. (At a time when the CNRS, in a foolish way, gave the order to researchers to stop all contact with Russian laboratories). Last translation today (they are paid 180 euros), The Tour of the World in 80 Minutes in Ukrainian :

http://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com/JPP/telechargeables/ukrainien/tourmonde_ukrainien/Le%20tour%20du%20monde%20en%2080%20min%20traduit%20en%20Ukrainien%20par%20Tetiana%20Toloshniak.pdf

NB: A representative of the Cité de l'Espace suggested that this comic be published in this context and distributed at the entrance to visitors. Immediate refusal by the CNES!

You can find this scientific comic book in 21 languages: Russian, English, German, Polish, Portuguese, Spanish, Turkish, Italian, Romanian, Arabic, Greek, Croatian, Hindi, Korean, Vietnamese, Bulgarian, Malagasy, Czech, Indonesian, Iranian (Persian), Chinese.

Pages with "speech bubbles" (for alphabetization or re-alphabetization). Project pending sponsorship ...

Increasingly strong: The Academician Françoise Combes invents the "warm dark matter" (at 23 minutes 44). The acceleration of the expansion: for her, it's the choice between Cosmons, Galileons, Tachyons and Chaplygin gas. Anything but negative mass content.

**April 2020: Interview by "Le Percepteur": Janus, space, time, life, metaphysics, death. **

June 24, 2022: One in Five: this is the proportion of children who have been victims of sexual violence. Karl Zero continues his courageous fight. He tells how he was able to view hundreds of CD-Roms showing child rapes, often of very young children, up to three years old. Parents, whose children had disappeared, learning of the existence of these documents, wanted to see them. The police refused (...). They were able to view these CDs thanks to Karl Zero. Eighty-one of them said they recognized their missing child and wished for an investigation to be opened. The police's reaction: "these are look-alikes" (...). Karl comments, "they are slowing down to avoid trouble with their hierarchy. There are networks of child suppliers for sexual predators of all social classes, networks that benefit from protection at the highest levels of the different state bodies". The Duhamel case: how the elites manage the issue. The statements of the Minister of Justice in the National Assembly are staggering. Karl Zero demands laws, the absence of statute of limitations for such crimes.

We wonder what world we live in. When will things change? One in Five is a film created by Karl Zero, dedicated to this subject, which must be watched and which casts an alarming light on the systematic failures of the justice system. I still have the revolting words of the writer Mazneff, who was complacently interviewed by Bernard Pivot in his show "Apostrophe". If one in five children suffers from sexual violence, then a part will manage to build themselves up as best they can. Another part will end up in a psychiatric hospital. Another will repeat the parental behavior on their own offspring. Finally, a last part will opt for some socially accepted sexual variant, which no one will even consider could have a traumatic origin.

June 23, 2022: My video "The truth about the GEPAN" had been suspended by YouTube, following a copyright infringement complaint. I had included a few seconds of extracts from the director Dominique Filhiol's investigation titled "The UFO Bureau". I therefore replaced these extracts with still images and written and read texts. It is now back online LINK ** **. Its content shows that we are in France: incompetence, irresponsibility, and concealment: three "master words". To this must be added the servile complicity of media people, under the orders of power, accepting to give echo to false statements, justifying themselves by saying ** ** ** **** **(Dominique Filhiol, the director): ** ** "I am not a journalist!" . Fortunately, it was possible to restore the facts in a document that represents a rather unglamorous episode in the history of science. Who will dare, after this accumulation of facts, qualify me as a conspiracy theorist? 26 June: Finally, some additional information. When Poher resigned from the GEPAN and the young polytechnician Alain Esterne took his place, I thought it might be possible to develop research in Toulouse. I had connected Esterle with the École Supérieure de l'Aéronautique and sent him my 180-page thesis "Perspectives in Magneto-Hydrodynamics". And since there was no one available to do this work, I proposed that the CNES hire a young fluid mechanic, whom I had met in Marseille when he was a student, Bernard Zappoli. He was languishing in a lab where, after building a CO2 laser, he suddenly saw a young engineer from a power plant become his "boss". His recruitment by the CNES was carried out and indeed, when I had Zappoli on the phone, I quickly understood that a contract was being set up behind my back. And he told me, "the army doesn't want you to be involved in this contract". At the end of the phone call, he said outright, "listen, at the GEPAN we have as much money as we want. It's a life of luxury. Esterle and I were in Moscow last week. Sorry for you." (...). I also didn't know that the people from Supéro, at their request, had reversed the annihilation of the bow wave on a small model. The apparent ease with which this was done completely blinded them. This is how history is written ...

June 24, 2022: ** **Excellent Belgian video. A return to the instrumentation of the Covid through an anxious communication. It's long (an hour) but it's worth the time to listen LINK: Another Belgian investigation, an hour LINK ** ** :

******June 20, 2022: Jean-Claude Bourret had mentioned the content of a recent book by Yves Roucaute, a university professor, "The Green Obscurantism", published by the Cerf editions. FACE BOOK censored it on June 7th, considering it as fake news, based on a "verifier" from the Agence France Presse, Emilie Béraud:

** ** I will buy the book and read it. I have not been involved in these questions of the causes of global warming. One cannot be on all fronts. But I remain skeptical by default about the peremptory claims of those who want to blame global warming on human activities. In 2019 I posted a video about the collapse of the Old Egyptian Empire, following a climatic catastrophe that ... led to the total and lasting desertification of the Sahara. The scientific data on which this study is based are undeniable and surprising. This video had 214,000 views and 33% of internet users, of all age groups, watched it until the end, that is, 70,000 people (mainly men). It is a demonstration of what the Earth has experienced in terms of significant and abrupt climate warming at a time when the release of greenhouse gases due to human technology was completely negligible. ** ** ** ** ** I am currently finishing work aimed at completing my complete demolition of the black hole model, based solely on mathematical foundations. I will add these arguments to my 5h20 video, reserved for "maths spé" level. At the same time I will attack the journals, like Nature and Physical Review D, "references in the matter". I will specify that in 2021 these journals refused to submit my papers to referees, simply rejecting them as not suitable (not appropriate). The final battle will therefore be engaged, and I intend to win it completely, both on the media field and in the scientific arena. In passing, it goes without saying that the scientific community is like other sectors of human activities, where so-called experts hold the high ground. With this black hole affair, the public will discover the astonishing inadequacy of theoretical physics, cosmology and astrophysics for 50 years, which I discuss in our latest book: "Scientific Research, a Global Shipwreck"..** ** ** ** ** Recently, I heard the academician Françoise Combes talking about the fantastic discoveries that should be expected in the next 20 years, thanks to the new instruments put into action by astronomers, adding "we will know more about dark matter". What the academician describes as progress concerns the volume of data, from which phenomena constantly emerge, always as incomprehensible. In contrast, one cannot say that she and her peers are full of new ideas. ** ** ** ** ** We are heading towards an absolute scandal, global. Science has been stuck for more than half a century due to not having integrated negative masses into cosmology and astrophysics, and negative energy states into quantum mechanics. Why such rejection? Because if one sticks to the Einsteinian model, based on his famous field equation, this introduction is impossible, because the model immediately secretes incompatible interaction laws with physics, violating the principles of action-reaction and equivalence. The only solution? Go "beyond Einstein", propose to replace his single field equation with the system of two coupled field equations of the Janus model, the key to everything. In other words ... replace Einstein with Jean-Pierre Petit (...). Wow! . ** ** **

** ** It's so huge that it becomes comical, and personally, I feel like I'm living it as a spectator. If I'm right, and I think I am, all pants will fall at once, all over the world. Notabilities will go up in smoke. Thousands of articles, hundreds of theses will be thrown into the trash of the history of science (already well filled). Thibault Damour will have to refund his Balsan prize (700,000 euros). ** ** **

** ** Some must say "but finally, who will shut up this terrible JPP!?" . No, silence. The scientific popularization media follow a complete blackout of our work. ** ** ** ** ** I feel like a Christian who would be knocking on the door of the Colosseum, but no one wants to give him access to the arena. ** ** ** ** **** ** **

** ** No comment on my 5h20 video. Regarding MHD, we saw what it was like. I repeat: the magazine Pour la Science published the translation of an article published in the USA, in the prestigious magazine Scientific American, where the two authors ( "experts") express doubts about Putin's claims. I immediately composed my own article. I sent its French version to Pour la Science and its English version to Scientific American. No reaction. It was predictable. It was Hervé This, from Pour la Science, who once said, during a meeting of scientific journalists, to one of them, who had published in the magazine of the Palais de la Découverte an article of mine on the Z-Machine: "But you know that we have received the order to prohibit our columns to him!". ** ** ** ** ** At 85 years old, I don't know if the success of my ideas and work would really turn my head. When you die, you don't take your fame, titles and medals to the afterlife.** ** **

** ** One can find fragments of ideas evoking "two universes, on either side of the Big Bang, where the arrows of time are opposite. Scientific media report it immediately (Janus is nothing more than the folding of these two universes according to the front and back of the space-time hypersurface). But what is more likely is that France, after having missed the MHD train 40 years ago, will also miss the train of theoretical physics of cosmology and astrophysics. At this game, we are unbeatable. ** ** ** Soon enough, the public will finally understand that these popular science magazines have been distilling (conditionally) for decades a kind of "scientific vacuum" (superstrings, supersymmetric particles, black holes, dark science) ** **. More than ever, one thinks of the Andersen story, where crooked tailors create for a king "clothes so beautiful that they can only be seen by people of quality". Replace the tailors with theorists and the clothes with equations and you will have a fairly accurate image of today's science (fundamental, through applications). ** ** **

** ** June 17, 2022: The Pfizer vaccine is likely to suddenly trigger (10 days after the vaccine recall) a Creutzfeld-Jacob disease (the mad cow disease, transmitted by a "prion"). Marc Doyer testifies to his wife's death. In front of it, a simple denial, devoid of arguments ("it can't be due to the vaccine"). Those who protest are violently attacked. ** ** **********LINK ** ** : **** ** ********June 15, 2022: Surprising change of opinion of the American physicist Misho Kaku regarding UFO observations (subtitles in French). Link **

How to install French subtitles from an English video **

**0 - Wait for it to speak English (let the ads pass)

**1 - Click on the gear, at the bottom, on the right.

**2 - Click on subtitles.

**3 - Click on "English (automatically generated)"

**4 - Click again on ** **"English (automatically generated)"

**5 - Click on "Automatically translate".

**6 - Choose the language "French" in the dropdown menu

**If necessary, if these people speak too fast, the gear appears the option "Playback Speed". Set it to 0.75.

June 2, 2022 : Program "LIGNE DROITE" Interview JPP Bourret

June 1, 2022 : In 2021, the magazine Pour la Science published the translation of an article published in Scientific American, which qualified the Russian claims about their hypersonic weapons as lies Read. I immediately wrote an article explaining how these devices worked, and I sent it to the editor-in-chief of PLS: No Response. Read.

**33 but 2022 : Bingo! : Nathalie Debergh has extended the "Janus" approach to quantum mechanics. Now the Dirac equation will have to be replaced by its system of two field equations LINK.

**May 5, 2022 : Air-to-air missile Kinjal, Mach 10 in dense air, 1000 km range, hypersonic glider Avangard at Mach 20, supersonic cruise missile with nuclear propulsion, nuclear-powered submarine drone operating at 1200 m depth and 200 km/h with a charge of 50 megatons: no, Putin is not bluffing. LINK

**May 2, 2022 : I recovered this article from Pour la Science, in its May issue, translated from Scientific American, where "two American experts" express their opinion: that the Russian hypersonic weapons represent a bluff. My arms fall to the ground! I will scratch an article that I will propose to Pour la Science, and in its English version to Scientific American. They will certainly be rejected. Then you can read them on my site.

April 11, 2022: To block a troublesome competitor, a solution: make him look crazy. LINK

** April 5, 2022: When the incredible is considered not credible. LINK**

March 31, 2022 : LINK **

**March 18, 2022 : ANNOUNCED RELEASE FOR MAY 5 :
** ** -

March 17, 2022 : You said side effects? Link **

** 9 ****March 2022 : ********In science, speaking is always a duty, remaining silent can be criminal. Link.
**

****March 6, 2022 : ******While others waste words in video conferences, hiding their complete lack of scientific production :

****March 5, 2022 : ******I installed this morning on my site a downloadable pdf at this
link
**

****March 3, 2022 : ******I'm trying, as best I can, to recover after the fatigue accumulated during the creation of 6 hours 40 of video, copiously illustrated, in a few months. My two videos, one
destined for "math spé level" and one that is more accessible, have sparked rich exchanges in the discussion space. Alessandro Roussel (his channel "scienceclic") is the first competent scientist who has emerged through these exchanges. ********I would like him to contact me directly.

******If we want to summarize the message of these videos: cosmology, astrophysics and theoretical physics missed in 1960 the turn of questioning the topology of space-time, which remains "locally contractible" among specialists, leading them to consider "solutions" such as "inside black holes", where time and space variables exchange their roles. The time for the debate around this question has arrived.

****************Reportage : **** ****A
management of ITER extremely toxic, with pressures and dismissals of those who want to report the danger of a first beryllium wall, a substance extremely toxic and harmful to health. My personal opinion is that tokamaks with high confinement capacity, due to the new magnetic fields implemented, will make ITER (a project impossible to evolve and improve, which was entirely designed without taking into account the inevitable technological advances), even as a research tool, an obsolete device before it even becomes operational.

**February 26, 2022 : The
version "soft" of this video below is online, with two sections that those allergic to mathematical formulas can skip. I say that in a world increasingly dominated by lies, I have given myself a moment of truth through mathematics. It may seem surprising that one man can oppose the consensus of tens of thousands of researchers. But the future will give me reason. I do not expect to be helped, nor even followed. I believe that few people perceive the real stakes of such an endeavor. This video may make citizens understand that the scientific world is as corrupt as other worlds. But why should it be otherwise? **

****February 21, 2022 : ******In this
video "for math spé level", which goes from 4h20 to 5h20. **

**Thank you to Laurent and Pascal, who were the only ones to help me with this task. I completely dismantle the black hole model by showing that it is completely mathematically and geometrically incoherent. For those who followed the previous version, the new additions start from 2h 40. It should be noted that there has been no reaction since the end of December from the champions of black holes. And it is likely that there will be none. They are too attached to their trade. ****
****** **** ** ** ** **** How can one say, while keeping a straight face, "that inside the black hole the variable r describes time". Who would dare to defend that? It has come to the point where one can reasonably question the existence of such objects. A subject that deserves debate. Personally, based on the analysis I have made, I opt for their non-existence and in doing so, I commit my credibility as a scientist. The upcoming observations will provide the answer. If I am right, then two Nobel Prizes (Penrose and Thorne) would have been awarded to people who made completely wrong calculations. The same goes for the Balsan Prize (700,000 euros) given to Damour, who has experienced it as "a consecration". Damour, who is far too cowardly to debate with me. What my book and these videos show: a small number of mediocre scientists, who do not even come close to their predecessors from a century ago, who have nothing to offer as real work, have arrogated themselves, for six decades, power over fundamental science and defend their own interests, not those of the people they are supposed to guide on the path of knowledge. And this, in all countries. The press and the media, completely in the hands of money powers, misinform the public, especially by hiding many pieces of information, in all fields (including medical or the message of the pharmaceutical lobby is "for us the profits, for you the side effects"). But it is difficult to lie in the field of mathematics. Therefore, what you are, and will be confronted with, is a deafening and silent silence. The public cannot do much. See the inefficiency of the petition that collected 61,000 signatures and more than 6,000 messages of support. Scientists could speak out, but it is not courage that is stifling them. NOT ONE WILL MOVE, YOU'LL SEE. The same goes for "intellectuals" and journalists (except J.C.Bourret). And know that if there were no Internet, the lobotomy would be complete.

******I have the feeling of gradually removing belts and soon, all the pants will fall at once. Resulting in a fantastic laugh that will be heard from light-years away. Good grief, it was about time!

******The book: the editions Trédaniel were a bit late due to the work required by the introduction of a large number of illustrations in the layout. But it should be good for mid-February. ** ****

****20 January 2022 : Mr. Macron, your Europe is 60 years old, ours is three thousand. **** ****

**7 January 2022 : The warning issued by Dr. Mallone, pioneer of RNA techniques, regarding the vaccination of children against COVID. ,Link

**18 November 2021, corrected on 27 February 2022 : **

| In
January we will publish, still with Trédaniel editions, a new book. | Scheduled for release | on

Le paper by Kruskal has neither tail nor head. His "pivot" is based on a term, a quantity zero on the Schwarzschild sphere, which is raised to a power that he adjusts to zero, to exploit the "property" zero raised to the power zero equals one (!...). For 60 years (...) all cosmologists have taken this for granted, including those who are covered in medals, prizes. And this is valid internationally. Theoretical physics and cosmology are experiencing a phenomenal crisis, which is spreading. In the Advanced Studies Institute of Princeton, to which Einstein and Gödel belonged, who are the four theoretical physicists on staff? Four string theorists (why? Because no one else was found!). Who is the cosmologist expert? Maldacena, pioneer of "black hole thermodynamics". He who started his presentation in 2017 at the Frankfurt Schwarzschild conference with "When the solution found by Schwarzschild appeared in 1916, scientists were bewildered. But today these things have been clarified". This "clarification" is the interpretation of the American Martin Kruskal, from 1960, which allows "who extended the solution to the entire space-time" and thus allowed "to penetrate inside the black hole". And everyone follows, Damour and Luminet in the lead. This part of science has shifted into a context of belief, which in fact is equivalent to a religion. A totally anti-scientific attitude. Those who question the black hole model are only marginal, madmen, worse still, ... conspirators! The truth is that our science has been in a phenomenal impasse for more than half a century. One can even say with certainty: none of the "beacons" of this "modern cosmology" have read the contents of the founding texts, starting with that of Schwarzschild. Their champions are far from being up to the level of Schwarzschild, Flamm, Weyl, etc. Why? Compared to them, they are dwarfs. The first error was made by Hilbert himself (...). Then these founding texts were read, before the Second World War, by bilinguals (like Tolman and Oppenheimer) who spread their own interpretation of the Schwarzschild solution, on which their successors based themselves, copying each other like medieval scribes. I think that neither Damour, nor Luminet, nor Maldacena, nor ... all the others have even read the initial text of Schwarzschild. Yet, even a century ago (...), it was not necessary to understand German to realize that there was a problem, simply by looking at the expression of the solution with this letter R "intermediate quantity" according to the author, and not radial coordinate.

Les responsible for this ignorance of these basic texts are the major publishing groups like Springer, Elsevier, etc, who have placed copyrights on all of them. Do you know how much you will have to pay to acquire the entire works of Hilbert at Springer, in paper version? 733 euros (and it's not "a collectible book"). A digital version, less expensive? Yes, at 633 euros (factor 0.8). A chapter in pdf? 29 euros. The article of Weyl (32 pages): 46 euros. Etc. By republishing articles less than 80 years after the death of the authors, Springer even places copyrights on the German versions! We have undertaken to compose the French versions of these articles, which will be put online on HAL and, if possible, on arXiv (...), to make available to French-speaking researchers indispensable working documents.

The entire current cosmology is nothing but a huge organized nonsense. The same goes for theoretical physics (strings ...). At a planetary scale, these are just castles in the air, like on the cover illustration of our book. As the decoding of the signals captured by LIGO and VIRGO implements a false model, the figures that result from it are not reliable.

***We are heading towards the greatest scandal in the history of science. ***

28 October 2021 : I will try to find the time to inform internet users about the development of our scientific activities. Everything is going well. The money from the donations was collected by the association "Janus Universe", created by Laurent André and his collaborators. Thank you to them. This association, having fulfilled its mission, will be dissolved. The amount of donations from the 960 donors has therefore been transferred to the association "Support to the Janus Cosmological Model", set up to manage Nathalie Debergh's half-salary, at the same time as the scientific activities of the Janus group. The association's website is being redesigned and will present the details of the accounts. Nathalie has published a first paper in July, and a second in October, in Modern Physics Letters A, which thus constitutes the first work sponsored by internet users, confirming her quality as a "finder". On my side, I have not been idle either. I am waiting for the online release of my latest works.

Let my readers not expect me to comment on this matter of COVID 19. I cannot be on all fronts at once. I therefore have not followed this matter. I will only point out that during a government announcement, it was mentioned that 80% of unvaccinated people were admitted to hospitals. It is forgotten to mention that, according to these figures, if they correspond to reality, it is 20% of the admitted who would have been admitted being ... vaccinated, which recalls the little effectiveness of this vaccination.

On the other hand, I must intervene when I see Macron supporting his candidacy on the project of a "Green Nuclear" revival, based on the absence of greenhouse gas emissions. A revival that complements the project of replacing vehicles by equipping them with electric motors. The problem with this strategy is the way to produce this electricity: by nuclear, generating unmanageable waste, and today oriented towards the generalization of "MOX", a fuel allowing the reuse of plutonium produced in reactors, multiplying the deadly danger of the exploitation. This orientation will be approved by the parliamentary office in charge of scientific and technical choices, the OPECST, whose head I have pointed out is the mathematician Cédric Villani, who knows nothing about physics, and none of its members are physicists! But if you criticize a formula, you must suggest another. If I were the Minister of Industry, I would say "we are going to launch a large international project for the development of solar thermal, which does not require rare earths, polluting, but simply good steel and copper". It requires parabolic reflectors, linear Fresnel mirrors, and gas turbines to exploit the steam produced. The scheme is finally the same as what is located downstream of the reactors, where large turbines drive alternators. But it must be declined at all scales, on all power ranges, going up to individual houses, passing through neighborhoods, villages, cities. By covering road and highway networks, building roofs, desert regions, roof-sensors. In France we are not lacking in companies capable of designing these turbines. To this must be added energy storage devices, varied. The most classic are molten salts. There is also gravity storage, by raising a mass of water, or pumping water from an inundated mine, where possible. This energy can also be stored in kinetic form (rotors) or chemical form, by producing hydrogen. All of this is achievable on a planetary scale and France could lead the way. All of this is logical, rational, non-polluting, simple, marked by the seal of intelligence. Let us add that all of this would create millions of jobs at all levels (the "great works"). But for that, our politicians would need to be endowed with imagination, which seems to be more than ever lacking, from all sides. I have offered my services for years to all parties, left and right! I have proposed to compose reports and memoranda, accepting that they be signed by others, to avoid any blockage for ... multiple reasons. At each time, left and right, I was directed towards an "energy manager", totally incompetent, as are politicians in general. I believe that citizens are beginning to realize it. Responsible people worried that their own incompetence might be revealed through the proposed approach. Yet solutions exist, which should be deployed urgently on a planetary scale. In this plan, France could play a pioneering role.

After writing these lines, I return to this "science front", hotter than ever, facing a community entrenched in its bunkers, which will soon be directly confronted with its errors, contradictions, lies and incompetence.

2 October 2021 :

/legacy/nouv_f/2021-10-02%20LGBT%20et%20science.pdf

20 September 2021 : Nathalie had sent to Physical Letters A in July a paper representing the extension of her work dedicated to the Dirac equation (her 2008 publication ) to the Schrödinger equation, that is, dealing with negative energy and mass states in non-relativistic. A paper that should have passed without any problem . But, two months later, the journal announced that it was turning to another referee, the first having finally "preferred that this review be entrusted to another": two months lost. Apart from that, successful mathematical modeling of mass inversion at the center of a neutron star. An interesting video explaining the operation of the RGV "MAGLEV" (600 km/h). The continental transport of the future, destined to compete with the airplane.

24 August 2021: After a stay of a few weeks in the group ICER I finally learned that it is directed by an "executive committee", a "director committee" composed of six ufologists, therefore without any competence in anything (no scientist), but claiming authority over everything. They have given themselves titles of "continental directors", one for North America, another for Europe, another for the entire Australia-Asia (...). If they find a African ufologist, he can become the "director for Africa". A real ufological Yalta. It is "Ufologists of all countries, unite! ", with zero idea, zero project. As this director committee claimed authority also over the science part I immediately resigned.

MORE SERIOUS: Robert Salas tries to trigger an audition at the Washington press club, focusing on the relationship between UFOs and nuclear weapons. As everything, in the USA requires funds, he launched a collection. I sent him 100 euros. LINK

15 August 2021: UFOs and science, the French contribution . English version sent to Avi Loeb with a request for integration into his group ** Project Galileo** ( French translation of his presentation ).

4 August 2021 : Our global article, describing the different aspects of the Janus model, is now online on the CNRS database "HAL", the equivalent, for France, of arXiv (which refused to publish it). LINK . At the end of the article, the part that demonstrates the feasibility of interstellar travel.

28 July 2021 : The astrophysicist Avi Loeb launches the Galileo project ( French translation ). JPP on Jacques Vallée Interview

26 July 2021 : Chris Mellon's suggestions to the US Congress regarding UAP (pdf in English with French translation )

23 July 2021 : Announcement of the interview of JPP on BTLV (broadcast Wednesday 28 at 20:00). Link

28 June 2021 : On the report submitted on June 26 to the US Senate on UFOs Link

8 June : Australian report in English on the UFO dossier. "Ignore is not an option" (activate the French subtitles). Link

18 May : Ardisson wakes up . How a Russian sees the European Union .

13 May : I have a very pleasant portrait on Mediapart. Link . Janus, with its radiative era, on 65 pages, published on HAL .

8 May : Nathalie Debergh, for whom we had launched this collection, thanks the donors. Link . In English .

7 May : Sabine Hossenfelfer, who had accused us of plagiarism, will no longer respond. Link

2 May : CENSORSHIP: When the platform arXiv refuses to publish four articles published in high-level, peer-reviewed, and "mainstream" scientific journals. Link

25 April : View of the Dragon capsule's release. At 24 seconds it separates from the second stage. Debris, but also an unusual object passing between this stage and the capsule. Link

15 April 2021 : The former Director of National Intelligence in the USA, John Ratcliffe, answers questions about UFOs. Link

5 April 2021 : The Macronie : the Arthuis report or the economy in the sky .

26 March 2021 : Recent interview of Senator Harry Reid on UFOs, who states "The essential has not seen the light of day". Doubled in French .

22 March 2021 : Two hours of debate on the UFO subject (Alain Juillet-Luc Dini-JP Petit) Link .

21 March 2021 : On February 11th, the long film by François-Xavier Vives "Journey on the Celestial Waves " was re-broadcast on France 5. It all started in 2017 with the publication of a fantastic work of cosmic cartography in a cube of more than a billion and a half in size, which should one day be worth a Nobel Prize to its authors (Yehuda Hoffman, Daniel Pomarède, Brent Tully and Hélène Courtois) for the discovery of the "Dipole Repeller". The news has spread around the world. CNRS press release , WIKIPEDIA , Futura Science (see the 3D structure in the film), etc. These four have drawn the movements of hundreds of thousands of galaxies, driven by the action of two objects: On one side the "Shapley Attractor", a sort of supercluster formed by a hundred thousand galaxies and on the other, 600 million light-years away, in the opposite direction to our galaxy (which is at the center of the cube), an immense void called the "Great Repeller". In this void: nothing, no galaxies, no matter. The mystery is total. Gravitational instability is known to create matter conglomerates, not voids. There is currently no model that accounts for the existence of such a formation.

For me, this reveals the presence of a negative mass conglomerate, repulsive and invisible (because emitting photons of negative energy) in agreement with our Janus model . In the film re-broadcast in February, Hélène Courtois manages the performance of completely omitting the existence of this object. Is it deliberate? I leave you to judge. She justifies it by answering an internet user "It is a non-exhaustive presentation". As for the Janus model, she says she has "vaguely heard of it", while, in all my attempts to contact, as the other three, she only replied with silence.

7 March 2021 : My last video The responsibility of the university-CNRS sphere in the collapse of MHD in 1980. Link

3 March : It is time to get physics, astrophysics and cosmology out of this dark matter and this energy in which they are stuck. The future of the world seems darkened, because its destiny remains in the hands of people without ideas, without imagination or boldness. We have no choice: the world in which we live, we must change it. Janus is much more than a cosmological model, it is an idea revolution. Invert mass, energy, space, and even time. Especially invert this race towards ignorance, this "factory of ignorance", which is consented, concerted, fed by all the fears of the world, regarding all the unknowns. For the "quantum mechanics" front of Janus to develop, it is necessary that the mathematician Nathalie Debergh can work, being freed from her teaching duties in a Belgian technical school, where she wastes her time. Then the results will come one after another. As it was 50 years ago for MHD, it would be vain to hope for institutional help. The only solution is to appeal to citizens. The names of the donors will appear at the end of the publications, in the acknowledgments. I put in 1000 euros. And you? LINK . DEADLINE: In order for Nathalie to be able to submit a request for leave in January 2022 to do research, this amount must be raised before April 2021! 20 March 2021 : 700 donations, 30,000 euros collected in 12 Days. http://www.janusuniverse.com/livres.htm

17 February : In this video, after paying tribute to Jacques Benveniste and Michel Bounias, I restore the True History of GEPAN , the "UFO office" (already 40,000 views), after the broadcast on Canal plus. I think people now understand that this Cnes office was the UFO version of the "factory of ignorance", evoking the recent broadcast on ARTE. This Geipan is a nameless nonsense. It is time that people realize that they have paid people totally devoid of competence and ideas for 43 years to classify reports from gendarmerie without any exploitable information, and that it continues just as much.

Complement: Jean-Jacques Vélasco, expert in Atmospheric Re-entry Phenomena. I was looking for the beginning of our next book. I found it. It is time that citizens know the truth about so many things. For another tone, see this at 2 minutes 36 .

29 January: Vaccines, a video from 2005 , prophetic.

27 January: UFOs and Science, doubled in Russian. Link

18 January : I was able to watch the twelve videos that had been uploaded by the Planète + channel, saved and uploaded by internet users, quickly removed for copyright infringement. Elizondo and Mellon have collected testimonies, systematically focusing on those of military personnel, police officers, airline pilots, adding comments from senators, former security officials and classified programs in the US. In each case, the "exotic" hypothesis is the only one that holds. How, after that, can one manage to produce an episode with a mocking tone, with ufologists, "paranormal specialists" (Vallée, Guillement), scientists expressing their skepticism and the Geipan official? In France, a channel has put online a "romanced" presentation of the GEPAN's history, of incomprehensible mediocrity. Now, what will happen?

16 January : Janus 26 (1 h 50'), presentation of the Janus Cosmological Model, dubbed in Russian

13-15 January 2021 : In the spring of 2020, the young director Dominique Filhiol produced a first 52 minutes titled "UFOs, a matter of states ". The first part is shocking: the videos made public by the Navy, the interview of the American senator Reid, that of the astrophysicist Avi Loeb, that of Alain Juillet, former director of the DGSE. The second part is weaker, the director having neither the knowledge of the UFO dossier, nor the skills to evaluate the level of his participants, none of whom can claim the title of physicist. The channel then ordered a second 52 minutes, dedicated to the history of GEPAN. At the same time, Canal+ has just broadcast the first episode of a series aiming to trace this story in a "romanced" way. I just spoke to Filhiol, who finds this episode a parody "very good". He generally considers the UFO subject to be in the "magazine" category. His investigation on GEPAN, which will be broadcast on February 1st, will not present the true history of this service, marked by repeated scandals. Filhiol did not understand that these turbulence represent more than just simple conflicts between people, but are the consequence, the expression of the concealment policy carried out by the Cnes at the request of the army, and which led to the end of the French MHD, the abandonment of a very important and rich field of research. This Gepan-Sepra-Geipan has, however, functioned very well for 43 years (founded in 1977) as a "drain", a disinformation tool. "Jean-Jacques Vélasco, expert in Atmospheric Re-entry Phenomena ".

In 2004 : An Italian helicopter attacked by a UFO .

18 December 2020 : Strange death of a whistleblower of 47 years, who "betrayed" Big Pharma. Link

14 December : I urge those who saw last night on France 2 the film "American Traffic", recounting the life of Barry Seal, until his assassination by killers from the Medelin cartel in 1986, to watch this investigation . You then discover that everything shown in the 2017 film is authentic, except for some trivial romanticized details concerning Seal's private life. In the document, you hear his lawyer say that he did not know the level of his client's relationships and is speechless when he connects him with the secure direct line of Bush senior, vice-president of Ronald Reagan at the time. The film and the document recount the time when Reagan, Bush, North and the CIA funded the action against the Sandinista revolution in Central America with drug money, while at the same time supplying the Cartel with weapons, these actions making the American government the main agent of the irreversible deployment of the drug trade in the USA which today generates 1400 billion dollars every year. The level of corruption exceeds that of Chicago in the Capone years. There is every chance that Bill Clinton, at the time a senator of the state, covered up the legal proceedings of the unfortunate victims' parents, two students who witnessed the dropping of drug bales in Arkansas

13-14-16 December 2020 : A global buzz!

November 28, 2020: There is one thing that the French and the press seem to forget. Never in France has power been so centralized, concentrated in the hands of "Jupiter." Nothing is done in the government that is not decided and ordered by Emmanuel Macron, who is supposed, according to the constitution, to be the guarantor of this and that, of freedoms, among others (...). The thirty eye injuries of the yellow vests, it's him. The reforms that erode the purchasing power of the French, it's him. Under the orders of the financial powers that put him in place, he completes the sale of profitable sectors of France, piece by piece, as well as the systematic deindustrialization of the country, and its deculturation. The absence of fight against wild immigration, the failure of integration, the disintegration of a French identity, the distress of our teachers and caregivers, it's him. Look at what he has put in place (source: French Republic Legi-France ). The law on security, it's not Darmanin, it's him again and no one else. No government politician acts without having received his directives. A real Pinocchio, this Tartuffe is completely insensitive to what the French may feel or suffer. He is the main responsible for this crisis of confidence of the population towards its police, by remaining deaf to all the suffering and opening the door wide to all the excesses. This law with its article 24 mentions the rise of fascisms in countries where people have sometimes used democratic structures to succeed in implanting themselves. It is really the worst president that France has ever had. France is now just a ship, steered by a man without experience, about whom one hesitates between cynicism and stupidity. Maybe... it's both at once. In any case, this actor in the soul shows an unstable absence of empathy. Without any feelings, there is as much heart in this man as in a puppet. He has no plan, no vision. As soon as he can, he rushes to join other heads of state, posing as an arbitrator thousands of kilometers away from a house that is on fire, seeing himself as the captain of Europe, while behind his back they laugh at him. His "satellites," none of whom have political vision, experience, or simple clarity, manage the country on a daily basis and are like him: opportunists and amateurs. Pragmatic, Macron hopes for events that could counter this bad impression, due to these images of this brave guy beaten up by police officers. How unfortunate! He relies on the "black blocks" who will certainly set fire to this and that, and who, as if by chance, are never arrested, whose identities are never known, whose networks are never dismantled. Who are they? Go figure! What we are experiencing, this rise of a world without faith or law, irresistibly reminds one of the fate of the frog placed in a pot where the temperature gradually rises, and when it realizes the fate intended for it, it will have neither will nor strength to escape.

November 8, 2020: Playing with time. The metaphysicon. Link .

October 29, 2020: To dissuade the French from practicing the Christian religion: Knife attack in a church in Nice , three dead: a woman beheaded, a man strangled, with cries of "Allah Akbar!" The third victim, a woman, died from her injuries. So many "unbalanced" people in France! The radical Islamists who used the young Chechen, killing a teacher by beheading him, aimed to dissuade teachers from exercising their "right to blasphemy" in class, terrifying them, with the support of a hierarchy ready to give up all possible ground "to maintain calm in the establishments".

October 25, 2020: Natacha Polony speaks of gold

October 16, 2020: After a teacher was beheaded for showing caricatures of Muhammad:

It is the imams who should immediately step forward and clearly state that such acts are contrary to their conception of Islam, if that is the case. But there is a deafening silence, either because these people are afraid for their lives, or because in fact, in their hearts, they mostly adhere to the systematic use of Islam as an instrument of infiltration and political control, as the Bedouin Saoud tribe did in the 18th century (watch this documentary on Arte ), or for both reasons. All of this is compounded with the actions of unconscious people who want to see the French identity disappear in favor of a "Progressive Europe" which is in fact an Europe of banks and social inequalities. Do you want my opinion? We are really in a bad way ...

September 22, 2020: To use an expression of the time: "Michel Onfray corrects Laurent Alexandre ". Idriss Aberkane denounces the plundering of his mathematical work on "the Syracuse problem" by the American mathematician Heule Link .

September 18, 2020: Radio interview JP PETIT

September 9, 2020: A day with Jean-Pierre Petit : The mystery of the Cross of Mées

September 1, 2020: Virginie Defays made a homemade Monohedron. Very clever, deserves a place in an art museum!

July 24, 2020: I obtained the July and August issues of Science and Life. Indeed, they only talk about universes with opposite time arrows, negative masses. And to cite the "models" of Farnes and Chardin. Journalists, to complete this countermeasure, even go to look for the work of Magueijo for this idea of variable speed of light , with always the "could ... would ... explain ...". Curious people can go to my videos Janus to see exactly what is the case. The Janus model is the only true model, which is mathematically structured, complete, and claims to agree with many observational data. It is not "science in the conditional" (which will be found in "L'Ecume de l'Espace-Temps", by Jean-Pierre Luminet, released in September). Farnes' model is just a makeshift, implying a continuous creation mechanism of this negative mass, not described. Chardin's model is inconsistent, empty, contradicts the acceleration of the expansion. Magueijo has never been able to negotiate contradictions with the observations that emerge when only this speed c is varied. Among these so-called "scientific" journalists, the lack of scruples is evident, but their incompetence is also glaring. My one hour forty video presents the essentials of our Janus model. In French , English , Spanish . It is planned, thanks to my technique "of numbered simple sentences", that it will be translated into all languages, and it will be done quickly. For months, the French have become aware of the incompetence, the dishonesty of their "elites" and of their press, written or spoken. How could you imagine that the situation is different in science? The recent affair of the Lancet gives a perfect example. In the field of astrophysics and cosmology, it turns out that France has remained completely absent since the Napoleonic era, since Laplace and Le Verrier. After: no name worth remembering. Today, the front stage is occupied by self-proclaimed "world-renowned experts... in France", who are locked up, clamped in their bunkers . The urgency is to clarify this Janus affair. This cosmological model, which claims to be based on many observational confirmations, holds up? Is it mathematically solid? The Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies and the Academy of Sciences have remained silent for more than a year. A Janus Universe association has just been created. The video announcement will be quickly produced by its president. A man who protests is an agitator, ten thousand become an opinion movement. Its goal: to demand clear answers from these two institutions, by legal means if necessary (it is planned). So, either it will be shown that this model does not hold up, and it will be stated, I commit myself. Or, on the contrary, it stands and these works would then put this country, called France, in a position of underdevelopment, in this field where it has never been simply present, in a leading position. We have already missed this opportunity 40 years ago with MHD. Will this happen again?

Neglecting innovation remains a French habit. I will give an example. When in 1846 the French Le Verrier, analyzing the anomaly of the trajectory of Uranus, predicted the existence of a new planet, which he called Neptune, he deposited his calculations at the Academy of Science and asked French astronomers to point their instruments where he located this new planet.

No one reacted and he had to ask a German colleague, Johann Galle, who discovered the star immediately after receiving his letter (the same evening).

July 1, 2020: One thing is confirmed: among the "leading figures" of French cosmology and astrophysics, there is not one who has made the effort to take knowledge of the Janus Cosmological model, which can be found in Janus 29 . It is a video of one hour and forty minutes, but it takes that long to understand because this model does not start from a single idea, but from several, which combine. I even went as far as dubbing this video in English . I indicated this link to the German Sabine Hossenfelder, so that she could finally know what it's about, adding that if she still thinks that the Janus equation system derives from a plundering of her own work, she should show and publish it. No response. It was a big disappointment for me to see that even Jean-Pierre Luminet had not entered the subject as he should have. Therefore, it is not surprising that the science popularization media continue to remain silent about our work. For example, the July Science and Life, a magnificent demonstration of journalistic dishonesty. It talks about two universes with opposite time arrows, but this is attributed to Julian Barbour. As for negative masses, there are those of Gabriel Chardin and the "model" of the Englishman Jamie Farnès. Chardin's negative mass is assimilated to antimatter that "falls upwards". Theoretical justifications: nothing. In a video from January 2019, Janus 26, at 29 minutes 30 seconds, I detailed Farnes' "toy model" (these are his own words). I show, which had been immediately noted by Sabine Hossenfelder, that his model implies a continuous creation of negative mass, according to an undefined process. The theoretical approach of Chardin will not be critical because it is simply ... absent.

In fact, any internet user who makes the effort to watch all the Janus videos (it takes time, I know) knows infinitely more than self-proclaimed experts who have not looked at anything. What is scandalous is that many of them reproach me "for working in my corner" while for six years I have only sought criticism from others, proposing a presentation in the seminars of their laboratories, without even getting a response. As for that formulated by Farnes, I refuted it, in good and due form, in the indicated video. Obviously, the rules of the game would want me to be able to do so face to face with him, eyes to eyes, in a seminar at Oxford. But, not so naive, he preferred to avoid such a face-to-face. It's the same with Luminet, Lachièze-Rey, Damour and others. The argument is that "I would then behave like an agitator". But it has never happened. In a seminar, there is no need to raise your voice, but there are equations and theorems that are sharper than razors and that scare them. I therefore find myself like a chess player in front of a chessboard with no one in front. More and more people are beginning to realize the absurdity of this situation. "Bertrand", the interviewer of Thinkerview, who had considered a face-to-face between me and an opponent two years ago, now remains courageous. People, citizens, have finally formed an association 1901, in order to ask questions to the IHES and the Academy of Sciences. A single man, who protests, is an agitator. Thousands become an opinion movement. Matters to follow. As soon as the association has taken its marks I will tell you. I am not part of it, by the way.

You have seen what happened with Raoult. But it is the entire scientific institution that is sick. Do not be surprised, you will find in astrophysics, cosmology and theoretical physics the same things as in medicine, with similar characters who make their laws with impunity.

A word about the "weighing of antimatter" at CERN. The work is resuming. But do not expect quick results, whether it is gBar (the French) and Alpha (the Americans): no result before one to three years. Because these manipulations are very complex. In the French solution, aiming for 1% precision, anti-hydrogen atoms will have to be slowed down, by laser, to 1 m/s (which corresponds to a temperature of a millionth of a degree!). Paradoxically, they will not annihilate but bounce, being sensitive to the repulsive force due to the Casimir effect. The American formula, more rustic and faster, will give 30% precision, but less complex and benefiting from a larger team and stronger funding, it has a good chance of arriving first at the result.

May 21, 2020: Philippe Guillemant, pataphysicist engineer Link . Excerpt from his book "The Physics of Consciousness", page 311: "Soul: A six-dimensional information system (...) present in the quantum vacuum (...) and playing the role of an immaterial vehicle of consciousness. The soul is composed of two three-dimensional quantum-gravitational vibrational systems (!?!...) the self and the ego. Each of these systems can be considered as an additional layer of spacetime (...) which interacts with a lower layer of higher density (...)." The whole book is of the same tone. Guillemant is not a physicist, and even less a quantum physicist, but ... a computer scientist. Surreal.

April 26, 2020: Janus 29. The cosmological model, essentials and outcomes. Link

April 15, 2020: Janus and philosophy. Link :

April 5: The failure of French MHD (and of science), IVth part Link /legacy/nouv_f/Janus%20lettre%20ouverte%20aux%20journalistes%20scientifiques.pdf?v=H--ZdMR40Co&feature=youtu.be . Others: 1 , 2 , 3

March 11: Janus, Open Letter to Scientific Journalists Link .

March 8: JPP interviewed by Charles Robin, philosopher Link

For a debate with Etienne Klein .

March 6: Two songs Marine - Lemon, Pineapple and Coffee .

February 18, 2020. Janus: with the complicity of the French press, the plundering begins Link

February 2, 2020: To allow you to wait, until the next publication Link

December 31, 2019: Facing the silence of Damour, academy, last push with links below

December 5, 2019 JANUS 28 : Refutation of the criticisms of Thibaud Damour who remains deaf, in a perfectly dishonest way, since March 2019 to my request for an exercise of a scientific right of reply by simply setting up a link on his IHES page, pointing to my article in Progress in Physics (March 2019). Petition for me to present my work at the Institute of Advanced Scientific Studies (11,000 signatures, 4000 messages). :

November 2019: New video Janus 22-8

September 25, 2019:

Here are the links related to this statement:

The article of January 5, 2019 by Damour

His registered letter with AR of January 7, 2019

Our article published in Progress in Physics, Vol.15 issue 1 in March 2019

The 40-page article of Damour and Kogan published in 2002 in Phys Rev D

The text of the (open letter) I sent him on September 25, 2019

The English translation of this same letter

English translation of my sept. 25 forty pages letter

containing all the details of the calculations and showing in what way this responds to his objection .

Letter to Catherine Brechignac, Permanent Secretary of the Academy of Sciences 22 October 2019.

Same letter to Etienne Ghys, new Permanent Secretary of the Academy of Sciences 10 November 2019.

Facing the silence of others, last push on December 31, 2019:

Towards Thibaud Damour:

Regarding Etienne Ghys, Permanent Secretary of the Academy of Science.

To the director of the IHES:

THE PETITION SUPPORTING MY DEMAND TO PRESENT JANUS AT THE IHES

The curve of the "rise" of signatures for the referendum concerning the sale of the Paris Airport. The number does not reach half of the required signatures:

http://www.signons.fr

September 20, 2019: Interview J.P.Petit IVth part .

August 2, 2019: Castaner. The retreat of public freedoms and the rule of law in France. Behind: Macron Link .

July 7, 2019: Some news: the Janus team is expanding with new, weighty recruits, in France and abroad. What is becoming more and more clear: this model is being validated both "from below" i.e. by "math sup" level, increasingly numerous who, having seen these 32 videos (which require a minimum of 20 hours of viewing...) and assimilated the calculations in the attached pdfs, have equipped themselves with their own opinion, and "from the side", i.e. by people who have a solid level in math, while being outside the cosmic men's milieu. But those "at the top", who are supposed to be "experts", like Damour and Lachièze-Rey, will continue to fight in the rear, opposing "their specialist opinions", without real justifications. Thus Lachièze-Rey, who has not read anything, and will not read anything, repeats endlessly "Damour has shown that the Janus model does not hold up". An affair that will soon have its conclusion.

Other than that, one can only be dismayed by the evolution of the political situation in France. Police repression has taken proportions that no one would have predicted. Today, demonstrating can cost you an eye or a hand. The French justice has integrated this state of fact as a new normality. Prosecutors (France is the only European country where they are appointed by the government in power) multiply the orders stipulating the removal of places, like these famous "roundabouts". Fines rain. In our media, we hear deputies of En Marche making statements that recall a line from a Prévert poem "Those who make pens in basements with which others will write that everything is fine". According to them, or her, if the yellow vest movement is fading "it's because the people have finally been satisfied with the government's answers and the Great Debate (...)". Statements from people completely "out of touch". Politicians (like recently Nicolas Hulot) respond to statements from "poor workers" by saying "they too have had difficult beginnings".

What is terrible, and I have been a witness to it, is that often those of the yellow vests who still gather say "For the referendum, it's in eight months, we have time". They do not realize that if the 4.7 million signatures are not gathered, not only will the Paris airport be sold, but everything else will go as well. Education, transportation, health, everything will be privatized "in the Margaret Thatcher way", the great model of Macron. This battle is essential and symbolic. It is a unique opportunity to demonstrate democracy (with a requirement of the number of signatures, five times higher than what is required for Swiss citizens). Yet it is difficult to make this understood to people, completely demotivated politically (the media do their best to create such a climate. It is not too strong to say that we are undergoing an organized lobotomy. It evokes "the frog that is being cooked and does not feel the gradual increase in temperature". What is dramatic is the difficulty that the opposition has in giving itself a minimum of organization and creating a common front. Same difficulty among the dissenting yellow vests who know the excesses that those who lived through May 1968 know too well. It is true that the situation is drastic. The European Union is leading us towards an increasing and inevitable impoverishment of an increasingly large part of the population. In 1968, "poor workers" did not exist. There, we know that it will only get worse. Despair will take hold of these people. The solution, politically and economically speaking, could only be drastic. It would be necessary to consider at the same time both the exit from the EU and the exit from the Euro! All this while immediately launching a policy of Grand Works (mainly focused on renewable energies). I recall Macron saying "where do you think I will find the money?". Of course, when you pay each year 50 billion in interest to private banks! Watch the video of John Perkins on the mechanism of "debt". This debt that is brandished to refuse any social measure . Why should money creation pass through the contraction of a debt? The money that circulates is the blood of men and women who work. When a child grows, its blood mass increases. This must be adapted to the growth of the human being. Creating money outside of a debt is "running the printing press". One will then fear "inflation" with the catastrophic devaluation of this money which would then regain its freedom. That is why the four movements should go hand in hand: exit the EU, exit the Euro, spend widely on Grand Works, creating this new economic activity, massively generating jobs, thus increasing the domestic market. Such a course would be synonymous with hope, whereas the current course leads to more injustice, more despair, and more authoritarian fascist drift. I think of a phrase by Edouard Philippe, recently answering Ruffin about the referendum, and relying on the latest elections by saying "The French have voted!". Yes, En Marche received 9% of the votes of the French electorate! With 44% abstention!

(Incidentally, it would be appropriate, as in Belgium, to make voting mandatory, while taking into account blank ballots, which would demonstrate that the people who present themselves to represent us do not correspond to the expectations of citizens. I think of a phrase by Gérard Larcher, president of the Senate, saying "this referendum is a denial of democratic representation". No, it simply means that the majority of people sitting in the National Assembly and the Senate ... have simply stopped representing us.

I return to the current situation. Here is the message:

http://www.signons.fr

A shared initiative referendum?

For the first time in France, a shared initiative referendum (RIP) has just been launched by 248 deputies and senators, to prevent the privatization of the Paris airports (Charles de Gaulle and Orly), desired by the government.

For this referendum to take place, it is still necessary that 10% of the electorate (i.e. 4.7 million people) sign an official petition before March 2020.

Why?

These airports are profitable (they bring in 600 million per year) and correspond to strategic state infrastructures (transport, security, climate change): they must remain public

The privatization of the Toulouse airport was a disaster .

How?

• Online: :

Go to this link https://www.referendum.interieur.gouv.fr/soutien/etape-1

Be careful, the form's ergonomics are bad. Make sure to:

• Check "I support" on the right on the first screen. The checkbox is almost invisible on mobile.

• For the city, make sure to put all the hyphens and apostrophes, then select your city from the list: it is the INSEE code and not the postal code that appears

• Enter all your names with accents and without commas, as they appear on your voter card

• The "Captcha" at the end distinguishes uppercase and lowercase letters.

• • IMAGE GUIDE ON THIS PAGE

• or ... at the town hall.

• • Keep in mind that the Interior Ministry's software will compare the data you provide with what is on your voter card. Base yourself on these data. If there is the slightest difference in character, it will fail. For example, if it is written on the card "Jean Pierre" instead of "Jean-Pierre".

If the online form does not work, you can still submit your support at the town hall. Go to the most populated town hall in your district, with a valid ID. You will fill out this form : it is recommended to print it before going. The town hall employee must give you a receipt of your support.

Spread it,

Signatures are progressing (see this unofficial counter ) but the curve's inflection shows a decline! As it stands, it will not reach a million signatures!

http://www.signons.fr

TRANSMIT THIS TO 10 PEOPLE IN YOUR SURROUNDINGS

THOSE BATTLES THAT ARE NOT FOUGHT WILL CERTAINLY BE LOST!

June 20, 2019: I will not participate in the Saint Petersburg colloquium from June 24-28. Explanations . People who have made donations for this mission are asked to make themselves known by giving their names, addresses, and donation amounts to . I will reimburse them immediately.

May 19, 2019: My name has simply and purely been removed from the list of participants at the conference held in honor of mathematician Jean-Marie Souriau, without being informed. I have not been able to obtain an answer as to the reasons for this exclusion. Journalists who asked them this question were met with the same silence. You may perhaps have more luck by contacting the organizers. If you get an answer from them, let me know, I will report it on my website.

You will be able to attend the science/philosophy lectures by registering (go to participants and click on reserve your place, then send the message), this, as mentioned, provided that you can demonstrate an academic affiliation. I sent these two videos to the scientific participants: in French, then in English for foreigners, which constitute the video version of the scientific communication I would have presented, namely the extension of Souriau's work according to a complex symplectic geometry. If some have declared themselves shocked by this ostracism I have been subjected to, it is unlikely that this indignation will be expressed aloud during this conference: in the university-research world, courage is indeed not a dominant virtue. Moreover, watch this video in which Souriau participated, titled "Should one be heretical to innovate in science "?

May 5, 2019: What I could have presented at the conference in honor of mathematician Jean-Marie Souriau, which will take place from May 27 to May 31, at Paris Diderot University, in the Pierre Gilles de Gennes amphitheater, if I had been allowed to present a communication, knowing that I have regularly attended Souriau for more than twenty years, and that I am one of those who have most developed his ideas, among others by extending symplectic dynamics to a complex Hermite universe, which leads to a theoretical metaphysics. With Souriau for 20 years . This was not possible, the conference organizers having hastily removed a poster session so that my communication could not be included. But I will be present at this conference.

April 29, 2019: Before the fire at Notre-Dame, a large-scale project to exploit the Île de la Cité to make it a tourist center, a project worth a billion euros, already existed, with the reorganization of numerous state-owned spaces. The hidden stake of this cathedral reconstruction: Activation of this project following the fire .

April 26, 2019: Thank you to the donors. I will be able to participate in the Friedmann conference in Saint Petersburg in June, after a detour to Minsk to give a seminar to scientists from the university.

April 18, 2019: Go see this announcement of a "Conference in honor of Jean-Marie Souriau", which excludes me, and my comments.

March 2019: An article by Patrick Marquet: Twin universe, a new approach .

February 2019: Our last work, online on the Progress in Physics website and from my site .

Janus 27 . The concept of action. The massive bigravity of Damour: pseudo-science. His attack on Janus. My response: a paper published in a high-level journal: "Physical and mathematical consistency of the Cosmological Janus model" . How far can one think too far?

January 8, 2019: Janus 26. Janus invades Quantum Mechanics. Refutation of Jamie Farnes' criticisms https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-XxjYGeAxo

December 24, 2018 Marc Lachièze-Rey's opinion, cosmology expert, on the work of J.P.Petit: 60,000 views. Those whose giant brains prevent them from flying!

December 24, 2018: 63,000 views (...) since August 15 for JANUS 25, Of epic breath, otherwise nothing! and still no reaction from the French Cosmic Men A petition to spread on social networks More than three thousand have signed. Read the thousand or so messages (...) and sign! The countries are in the hands of an oligarchy. Cosmology, astrophysics and theoretical physics also!

The experts from the most prestigious foreign scientific journals have rendered their verdict through the two last articles (see below):

The mystery of the non-observation of primordial antimatter is solved. It is composed of the same elements as classical antimatter, which is created in the laboratory, but has negative mass and energy. Thus, the question of the nature of the invisible components at work in the universe is completely resolved. It is this negative mass antimatter that causes the acceleration of the cosmic expansion, the confinement of positive mass objects, the spiral structure, the strong gravitational lensing effects, etc. This implies reformulating cosmology (and astrophysics) through the system of the two coupled field equations of Jean-Pierre Petit

To make things move: have t-shirts made with this image and wear them at conferences of specialists

Site VISTAPRINT: https://www.vistaprint.fr/vetements-sacs/t-shirts-homme/fruit-of-the-loom-basic?xnav=MensTshirts_TsrButton

To download the image file: /legacy/tshirt

Einstein's equation becomes an approximation of the first equation, near the Sun. The Jean-Pierre Petit model, called "Janus", accounts for all observational facts, without exception.

Dark matter ceases to exist. The action of negative mass antimatter replaces that of a mysterious "dark energy". The inflation theory is replaced by a "variable constants" scheme describing the primitive universe and explaining its homogeneity. The CMB fluctuations receive another interpretation, leading to the consideration of second paths, according to distances a hundred times shorter and accompanied by a speed of light, limiting the speed of negative mass particles, ten times higher.

The "dominant model", Lambda CDM, full of mysteries (dark matter, dark energy, inflatons ...), with its "six free parameters" which give it a completely ad hoc aspect and leaves a mass of observational aspects without solution (spiral structure, problem of primordial antimatter, etc.) resembles a house of cards near collapse.

French specialists, frozen, remain silent and resist the doors of their seminars, to keep them tightly closed. The Academy of Sciences, science journalists, leading figures in science popularization and popularization magazines choose to remain silent about this major scientific advancement.

: Links to the pdf cited in the video :

/legacy/papers/cosmo/2018-janus-25.pdf

/legacy/papers/cosmo/2018-AstropPhysSpaceSci.pdf

/legacy/papers/cosmo/2018-AstropPhysSpaceSci-fr.pdf

/legacy/papers/cosmo/2018-Progress-in-Physics.pdf

June 18, 2018: Here, in English, the second part (one hour) of the video dedicated to Russian new weapons, which is at the same time my testament in terms of MHD. I will dub it in French when I have time. What will be drawn from it:

1 - That hypersonic represents the future in aeronautics, both military and civilian.

2 - That at high Mach numbers MHD is then an unavoidable field.

3 - That then the electrothermal instability, which broke in the late sixties all efforts, deployed by thousands of researchers, to develop electricity generators operating out of equilibrium, with Te > Tg, is then an automatic obstacle.

3 - That in the eighties a certain Jean-Pierre Petit found how to avoid this obstacle.

4 - That Russian vehicles use this technique.

5 - That the French pay for a catastrophic research management (in this field as in others), in the hands of incompetent people, reaping 50 years of Russian science delay, totally unattainable:

June 9, 2018: J.P.Petit, two hours on the Thinkerview channel, who kept his word despite the violent opinions coming from the scientific community ("What I heard was: Petit has a bad character, that's why scientists don't want to talk to him"). I was still able to talk a little about my Janus model (from 1 h 22 to 1 h 50, that is 28 minutes out of 120, less than a quarter of the time allocated). Not enough to my taste. Hoping that Etienne Klein, whom I thank in passing for having immediately accepted the principle of such a meeting, will be able to free himself this time. There we could really focus on a quality scientific debate, concerning the numerous observational verifications of my model, recently published in Astrophysics and Space Science. .

June 5, 2018: After three years of struggle, acceptance by the high-level journal Astrophysics and Space Science of our article, demonstrating the excellent agreement of the Janus model with many observational data: local relativistic observations, expansion acceleration, nature of primordial antimatter, nature of the invisible components of the universe (with negative mass and energy), gravitational lensing effects, apparent nanism of galaxies at high redshift, flatness of rotation curves and galaxy confinement, with transition to a system of two coupled field equations.

Immediate new submission: the interpretation by Janus of the CMB fluctuations with determination of the value of the speed of light and distances in the negative sector. Application to interstellar travel.

Negative masses, as seen by the Courrier du Cnrs, June 2018 .

" Nuclear, attention, danger! " In replay, must-see: Nuclear, the French impasse http://www.programme-television.org/documentaires/societe/nucleaire-limpasse-francaise#176911100 " June 1, 2018: On Nurea-TV, three hours with JPP , among other things on the new Russian weapons:

May 26, 2018 In the evening of May 24, two hours of overflight of the Fessenheim nuclear power plant by a dozen UFOs. Close observation (50 meters) of a triangular craft 15 meters in span, completely silent, by several reliable witnesses. Drone observations to exclude. Video recordings.

May 28, 2018: The only press echo presents Bourret as a gullible man, who gave credence to a "single testimony" which could be that of a prankish policeman (...). According to my sources, the overflights of power plants continue, but the authorities have decided not to communicate on this subject anymore (...). A polite way of talking about a blackout....

May 21, 2018: The dossier on the new Russian weapons, more detailed, first part, in English

May 22, 2018: The French dubbed version of this video

April 29, 2018: The long version of the Russian MHD weapons (one hour). As of June 2, 2018: 200,000 views and no reaction, anywhere.

September 8, 2018: JANUS 25 (fr)

January 11, 2018: JANUS 24 (eng) .

January 11, 2018: JANUS 24 (fr). How to build the system of coupled field equations. The geometric context of Janus

September 4, 2017: Report on the COSMO 17 conference in Paris, August 28 - September 1, at which I was able to participate thanks to your help.

Report on my participation in the Frankfurt conference

June 14, 2017: JANUS

November 22, 2017: JANUS 23 (s/titrée Ang.): The alternative to the Inflation model https://youtu.be/MKGWKTlc-4s

Final episode of the "Janus" series

October 25, 2017: JANUS 22 - 5 (s/titrée Ang.): Gravitational waves. Neutron star merger. Mass inversion.

September 29, 2017: JANUS 22 - 4 (s/titrée Ang.): Rejection of the black hole model

erratum at 57 minutes 28 seconds

September 19, 2017: JANUS 22 - 3 (s/titrée Ang.): Schwarzschild's forgotten solution

September 16, 2017: JANUS 22 - 2: Geometry, the part of the real and the imaginary

September 16, 2017: JANUS 22 - 1 (s/titrée Ang.): The summer 2017 conferences. Negative energy states

August 18, 2017: JANUS 21 (s/titrée Ang.): Theoretical physicists no longer believe in dark matter https://youtu.be/4k7kYMaPmwc

August 12, 2017: JANUS 20 (s/titrée Ang.): An observational test for this model https://youtu.be/I37Nm6dkGVw

July 20, 2017: JANUS 19 (s/titrée Ang.): The speed of light must be infinite at the time of the Big Bang

July 20, 2017: JANUS 18 (s/titrée Ang.): We explain why the primitive universe is so homogeneous

July 23, 2017: JANUS 17 (s/titrée Ang.): The only coherent explanation of the Great Repeller

July 23, 2017: JANUS 16 (s/titrée Ang.): The Janus model explains the cosmic acceleration

March 2, 2017: JANUS 15 (s/titrée Ang.): Two field equations instead of one

April 18, 2017: JANUS 14 (s/titrée Ang.): Measurement of the curvature of negafrites

April 12, 2017: JANUS 13 (S/titrée Ang.): Time inversion. Groups

April 9, 2017: JANUS 12: The problem of primordial antimatter

March 25, 2017: JANUS 11: The contemporary crisis in cosmology

March 19, 2017: JANUS 10: General Relativity

March 7, 2017: JANUS 9: Special Relativity, 2nd part

February 26, 2017: JANUS 8 (s/titrée.ang): Special Relativity 1st part

February 20, 2017: JANUS 7: On the non-existence of the vacuum

February 7, 2017: JANUS 6: The EPR paradox

January 27, 2017: JANUS 5: The failure of common sense

January 24, 2017: JANUS 4: Newton and Laplace

January 16, 2017: JANUS 3 (subtitled in English) : Galileo the heretic

January 12, 2017: JANUS 2: Tycho Brahe, Kepler

January 7, 2017: JANUS 1 (subtitled Ang.): Aristotle, Ptolemy, polyhedral world

September 5, 2016 Religious beliefs against peace

August 30, 2016 War propaganda: an effective reality Analysis of the Quran by Benjamin Lisan

JPP on nuclear energy

Completely agree with this text by Eloise Lenesley

--- July 22, 2016 First publication in an Egyptian journal # Article in French

June 23, 2016 This woman, ambitious, hysterical, stupid and without scruples will probably be the next president of the most powerful country in the world

June 13, 2016: The construction of the European Union: LINK

June 6, 2016: Petition to demand that elected officials have a clean criminal record LINK

March 20, 2016: Urgent chronicle: LINK

March 6, 2016: September 11, 2001, the truth about the Pentagon: A video appeared online supposedly showing the trajectory of a missile hitting the Pentagon.* It is a fake.* The following counter-investigation, already several years old, provides the elements that allow to construct a coherent and credible version. The Pentagon was not hit by an airplane or a missile. The north part of the building was flown over by a Boeing 767 remote-controlled, flying at very low altitude. At the moment when it flew over the building, explosives were detonated in the south wing, which was considered the "impact site". Witnesses, taking cover, admit not having observed "the impact" but simply continuing the observed trajectory to the point where a ball of fire developed. The remote-controlled airplane, which would today be a drone, observed by a witness on the other side of the building, went lost in the dense traffic of the Ronald Reagan airfield, 2 km away. What happened to the real aircraft, with crew and passengers? At the time, Boeing 767s were very advanced in terms of their avionics, which allowed remote control (a technique that, by the way, had been perfectly developed for decades. The company Boeing has also filed a patent on this topic). A short time after September 11, George Bush made a statement that was recorded, where he announced that the United States would develop a system to take control of a hijacked plane by terrorists and bring it down. Was it a project or an existing system? One can question this issue of remote hijacking regarding the flight MH 370, which, after its hijacking, systematically avoided areas where it could be detected. On September 11, one of the hijacked planes did not fly over the Pentagon. Having been prepared on a maintenance site located on American territory, owned and managed by citizens of a foreign country, "the Pentagon plane" was controlled remotely from its departure and brought back to the same airfield or to a deactivated military base, the communication means of the crew having been disabled. It is possible that this was also the case for the other aircraft, in which case other drones would have attacked the towers. One of them was equipped with a "pod" such as those found on certain military aircraft and not present on any civilian aircraft. * In addition, no black box of the aircraft that hit the towers was found.* Moreover, all these aircraft are said to have been hijacked by "terrorists of 65 kg, armed with cutters" (...).

According to such a scenario, at the end of the operation, except for the accomplices who were on board, the passengers and crew are killed, and the plane is destroyed, which was the case for "the Pentagon plane".

The video in support (must be watched)

Link

Regarding the disappearance of the Malaysian Airline flight 370 on March 8, 2014, bound for Beijing, you now have to know that when you take an American-made plane, especially a Boeing, its control can be performed at any time, from a satellite, using a device that will not be found on the description given by the manufacturer and that the airlines will ignore the existence of. And this to prevent a "sensitive" content carried by one of the passengers (a simple chip, plus the technical details) from reaching a foreign country (in this case China), by landing the aircraft on a base like Diego Garcia. In passing, of course, passengers and crew will be eliminated, as well as any trace of the aircraft. But what weight does the death of 236 people have compared to "the supreme interest of the United States Defense"? In this video * no one dared to consider this "high" hypothesis. At worst, one would consider that the defense systems of Diego Garcia destroyed the aircraft in approach, in which case there would have been floating debris on the ocean. But there, * nothing *, against 1000 debris for the Rio-Paris crash.

• But, of course, it is a conspiracy theory. *

--- January 18, 2016: The consequences of a century of plundering of Africa and the Middle East by the money powers, with the complicity of local oligarchies (which continues more than ever)

January 12, 2016: On the burial of radioactive waste

January 1, 2016: The geopolitics of the Middle East explained to Hollande, Fabius and other impostors who govern us

December 5, 2015: Mouseland das neue Europa November 3, 2015: The bear has come out of its den

October 29, 2015: What do you want, it's them who govern us ...

September 22, 2015: Paul Hellyer's warning

July 28, 2015: The hypocrisy of spirituality

June 24, 2015: Due to lack of time to explain this in a video

April 24, 2015: Scientific publications: fourth hit

March 24, 2015: A glimmer of hope? https://www.youtube.com/watch?%20v=NJfnquV7MHM

Jean-Pierre Petit has returned January 7, 2015 :January 8, 2015 :January 10, 2015 : March 6, 2015 :

February 1, 2015: A little truth, for a change

February 7, 2015: De Gaulle in Paradise

August 10, 2014: Interview of Motojima (Director General of ITER) by the journal Nature:

http://www.agoravox.fr/actualites/technologies/article/juillet-2014-interview-de-motijima-155345 December 19, 2014: Follow-up .... /legacy/NUCLEAIRE/ITER/Bigot_4_8_13.htm

March 20, 2014: E finità la comedia

November 31, 2013: The Book of the Underwater Jungle

November 23, 2013: The extraction of the combustible elements from the pool of reactor number 4 of Fukushima

November 12, 2013: My interview with Bob, more downloadable document

November 2, 2013: Second part of my interview on the Voice of Russia

September 13, 2013: Letter of insult from the General Administrator of CEA

September 22, 2013: Alzheimer, Flamby, Datura, Syria

September 8, 2013: Syria: in a few words, everything is said

September 9, 2013: A Nobel Prize for war?

August 12, 2013: The anger is rising!

August 12, 2013: What is beyond!

May 27, 2013: Fifth video on ITER

The entire five parts accessible on

https://www.youtube.com/user/JPPETITofficiel

April 29, 2013: Steven Greer: Disinformation

April 20, 2013: [Anti-suicide barriers in the metro 8 April 2013: [To the East Nothing 23/3/13: An animal that manages to kill prey of 500 kilograms with a few cubic millimeters of venom

March 20, 2013: 100 MW in solar thermal in Flouzeland

February 7, 2013: If stupidity could be transformed into electricity February 13, 2013

January 5, 2013: USA: The failure of laser fusion January 20, 2013

January 22, 2013: FUKUSHIMA, despite the official Japanese report (July 2012)

December 19: Can thermate cut steel?

November 10, 2012: The Enarchie

October 9: ITER: the trap for the gullible September 11, 2012: Matrix

January 21, 2009: Be paranoid, you will always be below the truth

Chronicles April 23, 2010 February 26, 2010 November 15-30 /1/10 - 2 -1-10//6 -10 /12/09 : Chronicle

Details of the program Complément d'enquête, on the French nuclear energy

Plutonium: 60
tons in the pools of the Hague !/legacy/sauver_la_Terre/LA_HAGUE/la_Hague.htm/legacy/sauver_la_Terre/LA_HAGUE/la_Hague_eng.htm/legacy/sauver_la_Terre/LA_HAGUE/la_Hague_es.htm**/legacy/sauver_la_Terre/LA_HAGUE/la_Hague_it.htm**

Nuclear power plants: a sword of Damocles

In India, the police shoots live bullets at demonstrators opposing the construction of 6 EPR reactors, by AREVA, in a seismic zone. One dead

My last
article in the journal La Recherche, in 1980.

Hatem and his unitary generator

The degravitron of Richard Vialle

**[No, it is not
The vertiginous cynicism of AREVA

**[A
Chernobyl-bis on reactor number 3 of Fukushima? Here is a satellite photo
**[Leak in the
power plant of Onagawa, following the new earthquake of magnitude
**[Everything about the
nuclear reactors
**[What is
The
Terrestrials are sheep

The young man
who sold his soul

The power
of the pro-Israeli lobby in the USA

Depleted uranium
shells. Now, Libya

Marie Monique: our
daily poison

American
climate weapons. Testimony

Animal
massacres for two months

Pierre Perret:
The woman with the grille

17/2/11: Did you know?

12

UFOs and
science, what scientists have discovered

********US, the
George Carlin show: The big blue, white, red cock you have up your ass

Man, what have you done with your talent?

A man spoke

********On Fox
News, regarding 9/11, the ex governor makes the young journalist run away

We made a mistake with the Nobel Peace Prize

On a major US
audience channel

Michel
Padrines

When people stop valuing, they stop obeying

Because I'm worth it

The Voices of Israel

The
Ufologists-scientists

Pentagon: the
problem of the black boxes!****Another thing

Call for decency

Israeli attack against the humanitarian aid flotilla

Courage, let's run away!

The cost of ITER goes from 1.5 to 7.5 billion euros

The first international Science-Space-UFO conference

Dr. Dupagne
:"Don't touch my prostate!"

A precedent decision within the army

Knowledge without Borders, first Spanish echo site

International finance, absurd. Another thing

Lanturlu in video, for the first time

Can one think like a crab?

UFOs and the media/legacy/nouv_f/OVNIS_ET_MEDIAS/OVNIS_ET_MEDIAS.htm

Receive a diffraction network cap for free

My lecture at X on the Z-machine

An avalanche of
liesScreening: 283 €, not reimbursed

Why I
won't get vaccinatedagainst H1N1

Book by Eric
Raynaud: September 11, hidden truths.

Jean-Luc
Soullier: First flight of an electric twin-engine aircraft

Sarkozy: I
only want to see one head

A French
Uri Geller

Letter to Professor Henri Broch

Air Force One, version France

The French animated cartoon, in computer graphics: Tong

The message in a bottle

Ovni landing: sampling and analysis technique of plants

Operation Lead Hard: approved by 94% of Israelis

The country of suffering and hate

Elisabeth Plumier: the paradise belowThe LOGOTRON found

Matrix: already hereNow: HULK!ITERUP

Dangers of paragliding: threatened with a lawsuit by an instructor

They put water in their enginesThe Juan effect

It's done, the word New World Order is outTranscription

Stories of the midnight sun

For those who liked the Ice Age

The object of the scandal

A Czarda, music and lyrics by JPP, sung in Russian

Napoleon the LittleThe clip that tears: The King Bling Bling

Looking for a food job

The hit parade of human stupidity

Urgent need for a bilingual French-English translator

UFOs: The astronaut-guru

A stock of
30,000 to 150,000 coffins in the US, in Georgia, on a FEMA site? Why?

Hommage from Professor Luc Montagnier to Jacques Benveniste

GM, 1000 farmer suicides each month in India

The months of all dangers

Unthinkable in France

Rachel Corrie, American student crushed by an Israeli bulldozer

A new comic strip by J.P. Petit. 114 pageshttp://www.savoir-sans-frontieres.com/JPP/telechargeables/Francais/univers_gemellaire/univers_gemellaire.htm

New video by J.P. Petit on dailymotion

30The clan of
thieves, continuation

The Clan of Thieves, continuation

An Geipan in full wreck

Some trouble inside Wikipedia

TheFrench Wikipedia has become completely hysterical

Resultssurvey among
readers. 1430 comments

Sura, the Russian HAARP

Video UFO-science/JPPetit-dailymotion

Why, suddenly, "hunger riots"?

An economic game, THE INFLATRON123

The stealth drone of the US Navy

Reconnection

****Chase the
supernatural, it comes galloping back!

A touching article
by Jean Ziegler

My
comments on the Canal + show on UFOs

The
Mosquito: first weaponspecifically anti-youth, non-lethal

The theory of
strings: Even not false! The book by Peter Woit

****Jean-Louis
Naudin: from the electric train to the drone carrying a Taser

****The World according
to Monsanto. The interviews of Marie.Monique.Robin

****Which of the
two speaks too much?"The Marion Cotillard affair "

****NATO: Towards
preventive nuclear strikes?

About the
destruction of an American military satellite

****A Japanese
MP opens the Pandora's box in session1/2/08

The Ship of
Fools: page 1page 2

1974: The
first article on the "Deltaplane"

All the
transcriptions of comic book texts seen in 48 hours chrono!

The clan of
thieves****update of 19/11/07

A
conscience, why make it?

****American
airlines 77, the message from the black box

**Barbarism and
decadence

Listen to Thierry Meyssan on Ardisson (16 March 2002 )

Daniel Lecomte
on 9/11. Emission on Arte, April 2004

The poems of
Claire Bougain

JPP on the WEB 2
ZERO

9/11 :
New video and low-level journalism

In the
Zugswang

**Why
are they afraid?It's starting to smell bad

9/11 :
A Guardian journalist breaks the Omertà

A first
head of state denounces the American lie of 9/11

Biofuels
: danger !!

The bees
hide to die

****The state
reason in Agronomy: interview of Claude Bourguignon

We are living a
remarkable time

****Air transport
security: what are we waiting for?

****Crash control

****Construction
of the pyramid of Khufu. Theory of J.P.Houdin

****Pendulum
ULM owners in danger

I have a dream

****A remarkable
foul-up

Nothing
goes right in physics!

The last
echoes of the Sphinx

The Z-machine boosted with LTD

JPP's
conference on energy on June 2nd

The book of JM
Souriau: Grammar of Nature (free download)

The windmill

Lacan and JPP

****A new
comic strip Lanturlu, in color

Georges
Courtès, academician and UFO witness

Too much, it's
too much!

****Inform, po

Inform,
why?

The time of
cowardice

Pyramids, the
theory of Davidovits comes back

Proposal of
a cosmology seminar

Two years after

Open letters to
laboratory directors

Response to
new attacks by Alain Riazuelo

And I will
kill everyone and I will go...

Egyptology,
when you have us...

Analysis of the
Haines paper

The Z-machine: clarifications

The French Z-machine

Introduction to MHD

Pollion and the search for krypton in DNA

[Internationalization

of the World](/fr/article/presse-internationalisation_du_mondehtml)

Lost, anatomical piece

Andrei Sakharov and MHD

Non-polluting fusion: The "Focus" branch

The Nazis and the autogyro

The awakening of ChinaUpdate of August 10, 2007

Death notice

More stupid, you die

The camp of the killers

First researcher assassinated. Death threats.

Imaginascience

Belgium: driving on rapeseed oil becomes legal

In the corridors of the National Assembly

Humor

Why we must immediately stop ITER

Dubai, the shame of Islam

The emergence of China

A "society project" named ITER

Count the points

About a possible economic crisis at the end of March

The wind tower

Reopen 911: the battle has only just begun

Humor

Ummo, as if you were there

Towards a terrorism in white coats?

Listen, man

The whole ego

The hungry man

The new world war

Maurice Viton, Egyptologist against his will

Speech of G.W. Bush on the state of the Union

He fell, the tightrope walker

Hand in the bag

A real optical illusion

We are living a remarkable time

Cinderella 2000 in Spanish

The comic strip on space in Spanish

Thousand Billion Suns in German

Triangular puzzle

I preface the upcoming book by Christel Seval

Avian flu in Turkey

2005 Hurricanes: Meteorological peculiarities

What if we flew? in Spanish

Analysis of a manipulation: It seems to be calming down

We have nothing to do with the Raëlians!!!

The Poetry of Others

Christel Seval: a geopolitical analysis on a global scale.

News

Czarda

Your kids are killing themselves and the TV doesn't care....

Three new albums translated into Portuguese

Informagique in Romanian

Chronicle of ordinary madness

Informagique in Persian

Lanturlu invades Serbia and Croatia

Notes, on the guitar

An strange photo, from 1986. A "fake", or ....

Freshwater archaeologists

Those who make pens in their basements...

Knowledge without Borders

Avian flu

A crazy idea that is gaining ground

HumorHumor

Moneyback discovers computing (1983 )

[Informagique,

translated into Spanish](/fr/article/italien-informagicahtml)

The first President-Suicide in history

Media manipulations

Death on credit

Signature
of a climate weapon in action

Hurricane in Portugal

The warmest September in a century

Listen to the "Radio Grenouille" broadcast

Radio
broadcast on the Ummo affair

First European UFO Meetings

Why the ITER project is nonsense

The HAARP project and the action on the human brain

We are living a remarkable time!

When Mitterrand had problems with the justice

Avian flu. WHO makes a report

The best way to dream

When Rumsfeld spoke about a missile strike

A young Marseille man builds a Stirling engine

Rita approaching, seen by satellite

Hurricane Katrina: testimonies

Test of the Taser in France

Humor

The Topologicon in Italian

Bush and the hackers

The Sun in fury

Iraq: towards
an Algerian strategy?

Hermann Goering at the Nuremberg trial

Bush and his team in trouble

The HAARP project develops in secrecy

The mysteries of Area 51

Reopen911. Threatened, Jim Walter is in Holland

The great white predator

The comic strip on electromagnetism in English

Humor: Chaplin to the rescue

I couldn't resist....

We are more at home

About
air insecurity

Avian flu
: Europe on alert

About the
evacuation of the Gaza strip

Pyramids made of reconstructed stone

Will we observe
"gravitomagnetic effect"?

They don't only do nonsense

Two weeks in Flouzeland

Travel to Dubai

After the NO

Why we are rushing to catastrophe

Final solution for world poverty

USA, recruitment
crisis for volunteers for Iraq

Footballers free of taxes

Nuclear
tests "cold" at Montrovilliers, near Paris

Electric guns equip the French police

The beatification process of Pope John Paul II opened

The French economy saved

"If we flew" translated into Turkish

How to invade the Chinese market

An asteroid of 30 meters brushed the Earth

RFID chips: Humor

If I had been Pope

Video ID card with chip and subcutaneous chip

Geothermal energy, a remedy against volcanism?

Humor (not to be missed)

Replay magnitude 8.5 west of Sumatra

The Empire of Shame (Jean Ziegler)/legacy/Presse/empire_de_la_honte_eng.htm

Subtitled French version of the American propaganda video on subcutaneous chip implantation

/legacy/BIG%20BROTHER/video_us_sous_titree.htm#italien/legacy/BIG%20BROTHER/video_us_sous_titree.htm#allemand

The Great Foul-up

You won't believe your eyesUpdated on 13/3/05

/legacy/BIG%20BROTHER/puces.htm#allemand/legacy/BIG%20BROTHER/puces.htm#italien/legacy/BIG%20BROTHER/puces.htm#anglaisSubcutaneous
implants mandatory in Australia (Army, Bank

The Great Planetary Jacquerie

Why did man develop technology? The true purpose of it: interstellar travel.

Fifty years of non-physics

A low-level journalism(updated on 5/3/05)

Crash on the Pentagon. The testimony of a CNN journalist, a few minutes after the impact

The two sides of the world

Rise of disasters in the world

What is happening at Yellowstone?

Science and Life 1993

May 16, 1943, the first artificial tsunami in history

God is with the Americans (II)

Tsunami. What happened on December 26, 2004?

Last step to the IFAO Bulletin

Ode to Ignorance

Tsunami, technical information

We have found Atlantis

The mines based on the Taser system

The case of Jean-Marc Roeder

A concentration test for men

The Chinese and me

Call to Extraterrestrials

Russia-China rapprochement

Transformation of a Cross Cap into a Boy
/legacy/Presse/Sfogliando_la_margherita.htm| 7/12/04

7/12/04 : Transformation of a Crosscap into a Boy surface

23/12/04 : A solar eruption triggered by a comet

29/11/04 : Help given to Jacques Benveniste by the homeopathic community. His last letter to homeopaths

19/11/04 : Prophecies of Jean of Jerusalem

11/11/04 : A fake Picasso discovered at the Toronto museum

12/10/04 : The Language of the Heart (updated 3/12/04)

3/11/04 : A MHD project

1/11/04 : The Dollar

22/10/04 : Hellenistic research, desperately

24/4/04 : For scientists only Negative energies

9/11/04 : The electric charge: a geometric object

27/9/04 : Outburst of anger

1/10/04 : Science is dead

13/9/04 : Why are Americans so hated?

9/10/04 : Pentagate. The opinion of a French aeronautical journalist

** 16/8/04 : Depleted uranium
shells: the solution **

** 8/17/04 : The Kursk. Photo of the Granit cruise missile **

** Tactical firing **

8/22/04 : World Trade Center. Seismic data

** 7/14/04 : Fahrenheit 9/11 **

** 7/15/04 : TF1: Selling available brain time **

** 5/25/05 : Tomas Bearden and vacuum energy **

** [Transcription

of his France-Inter interview](/fr/article/presse-interview-velasco-avril04html) **

** 4/24/04 : ADSL listening tests. **

** 4/22/04 : The Brain-Debaser Machine **

** 4/13/04 : Dossier on September 11 on Arte, show Thema: The end of our illusions about television independence. Numerous reader reactions **

** ** 4/16/04 : A first-hand testimony on the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

** 4/9/04 : The book by Greer "Revelations" has been released in France. What I think about it . **

** ** 4/6/04 : ** Witch hunt **

** ** 4/8/04 : ** X-43 **

4/11/04 :** Video conference JPP on Aurora **

** ** 12/22/03 : ** It's time to dream. **

12/12/03 : ** Utopia exists, I met it **

** ** 12/8/03 :** Jupiter impact problem of the "comet" SL9. Analysis by A. Cohen. **

** ** 12/3/03 :** Help for a colleague **

** ** 11/21/03 :** Hallucinating images. **

** ** 11/24/03** [Israel-Palestine

: finally the solution.](/legacy/Israel_Palestine/Israel_Palestine.htm#solution) **

** ** 10/31/03 :** About Halloween **

11/6/03 :** 11 September: where are the black boxes of the planes? Comments . **

** ** 10/21/03 :** Analysis of the book by Thibault Damour and J.C.Carrière "Conversations on the Multitude of the World" **

** ** 10/11/03 :** Asteroids **

10/8/03 : ** Dossier "September 11" **

** 10/9/03 : The sign of the beast **

** The truth about the Kursk sinking **

** ** 10/9/03 : ** Another kid dies (in the pool) because of "extreme apnea". **

** A stupidity worth 239 million dollars. **

** ** 10/6/03 :** Water rises in the mine of Gardanne and everyone ignores it. **

** ** 10/3/03 : ** Journal of a Savanturier **

** ** 9/26/03 :** The text "The truth about the Kursk" is distributed in Russia (in English). **

** A portrait of the world university research made by René Teboul, economist **

** ** 6/21/03 : **The American report of the US Geological Survey ** on techniques of clandestine underground nuclear explosions.

4/20/03 :** I protect my life **

4/19/03 : ** My retirement **

2/23/02 : **Last work ** of theoretical cosmology with P. Midy ** ** 4 November 2002 : The torpedo that went too fast. 1 November 2002 : On the possible harmfulness of mobile phones. 1 November 2002 : Internet and the defamation ** ** 6 November 2002 : An Egyptian fresco discovered in 1987 and decorating the museum in Cairo was in fact a crude fake. Dossier . 31 October 2002 : An extraordinary discovery: there are as many fools at the CNRS as in any other professional category. Dossier. 28 October 2002 : EMP weapons in Moscow ? /legacy/Divers/JPP_medias/la_fin_de_ET.htm 14 October : Paranormal against artifacts 13 October : Die, we'll take care of the rest 8 October 2002 : Crowd Control and mobile phones. /legacy/nouv_f/Antenne%202.htm 29 September 2002 : Cuarto de luz : When Mexican mediums take us for fools. 25 September 2002 : When the army kills whales. 24 September 2002 : What Hubert Reeves thinks of the works of J.P. Petit (according to the testimony of a Canadian reader). Sky and Space of October: the article by Bonnet-Bidaud: "We have lost the gray matter ". 23 September 2002 : Climate weapons and Red Sea crossing 22 September 2002 : Chronicle of ordinary madness Chemtrails

3/29/12 : Request for right of reply to CEA: failure

12/15/11. ITER, evidence of a lamentable incompetence of CEA

12/10/11 : ITER, the boat is sinking normally

11/27/11 : A sharp response from CEA

11/24/11 : ITER, an article in Expansion

11/18/11 : Reux and CEA have declared defeat.

17 May 2012 : How to build the model of the most expensive toy in the world

10/21/11 : ITER, chronicle of an announced bankruptcy

7/21/11 - 5/31/11: Fukushima: it's only beginning ![flag 7/13/11 : ITER : An experiment worth 15 billion euros and fundamentally dangerous fusion reactors! /legacy/sauver_la_Terre/ITER/experience_quinze_milliards_es.htm

26 July 2011 : A testimony on the construction of the Japanese nuclear park, dating from 1996

4/21/12 : In 2008, I interviewed J.M. Souriau. On his site, search "Catastrophe" . Succulent.

** 6 June 2012 :UFOCATCH, reportage **

4/28/12 : The little girl with a poppy heart.

** 7/6/12 : Theo, CM2, poet **

July 23, 2012 : What men have invented best .and that extraterrestrials envy

6/2/11 : From Alzheimer's disease to the Academy of Sciences, through spiral galaxies

4/25/11 : Japan, to not forget. Powerpoint

5/20/11 : Exclusive. First image of DS's brain

5/21/11 : Misunderstanding

5/21/11 : Michel Serres: the Human Mutation

4/18/11 : Video of my conference in Strasbourg, 2010

2/25/11 : 2007, the red carpet for Khadafi

2/17/11 : Without comment 2/24/11

12/27/10 : Obama doesn't like it when people ask him bad questions

12/18/10 : UFOs: How the American government has hidden the truth for over 50 years

12/10/10 : My communication at the international MHD conference in Jeju, South Korea, October 2010

12/7/10 : Alex Jones: A manufactured crisis

12/8/10 : You don't always win!

12/5/10 : Misuse of my drawings

11/27/10 : Missiles disabled by UFOs /legacy/OVNIS/missile_inactives/missiles_ineactives_it.htm

12/1/10 : Who does Dailymotion roll for?

10/7/10 : Powerpoint: presentation from 13-10 at the MHD conference in Korea

10/2/10 : Electric plane: International postal service project

9/28/10 : A nuclear reactor, one day, right in Paris?

9/21/10 : - 5/7/10 : Resistance and Disinformation

6/17/10 : A very well made hoax

5/31/10 : The Japanese's massive destruction weapon

5/29/10 : Eight days elsewhere

5/13/10 : Dive into the stables of Augias

5/10/10 : Benveniste; abandonment or coffin

4/30/10 : The new polygamy

4/27/10 : The technique of wax dolls

4/21/10 : Fantastic photos of the Icelandic eruption Video

4/21/10 : Collateral Murder

4/18/10 - 4/30/10 : Trilateral and Bilderberg

4/18/10 :No evidence of a major fire in the building 7 of the WTC

4/18/10 : Speech of the Nobel Peace Prize winner, Obama, in Afghanistan

4/15/10 : On the storage of nuclear waste

4/15/10 : The supersonic that goes in reverse

4/15/10 : The largest plane in the world

4/15/10 : Aeronautics: exceptional images

4/15/10 : A bit of freshness in this world of brutes

3/22/10 : Unemployment -> block wages -> limit inflation -> preserve profits

3/17/10 : Two new videos: The Scientific Nights of a Thousand and One, episodes II and III. E vivà l'Italia!

2/16/10 : The epilogue of the "Gripe Pandemic"

12/30/09 : I sold my Boy surface

1/8/10 : J.P.Petit on France Inter ( the square head )

10/12/09 : H1N1 Flu Dr Girard: article , book A doctor speaks

12/4/09 : The Relaxotron

9/18/09 : April 27, 1961: An illustrious precursor of the conspiracy theory

9/4-8/9 : 9/11: Did Jews working in the towers get warned?

9/4/09 : They've used water in their engine, why not you?

8/28/09 : French press censored by the American-Zionist lobby

8/21-23-25/09 : From In Ekker to Mururoa

8/12/09 - 9/5/09 : Arrival of the pure fusion bomb

7/20/09 : I did the job, alone, this night

6/28/09 : Recontact 7/13/09: London attacks

7/16/09 : 5/19/09 : UFO show, where I am present, broadcast on Direct 8 on May 22

5/17/09 : What is this thing?

5/13/09 : Editorial drift

5/9/09 : It's not new

5/8/09 : Multiply and grow

5/8/09 : If all the musicians in the world wanted to hold hands

5/3/09 : Full speech of Ahmadinejad at the Durban 2 meeting

4/25/09: The interview you will never see on a French media

4/10/09 : Give us our daily bread April 14, 2009

3/20/09 : UFO in Vinon. Hundreds of witnesses, photos.

3/15/09 : Follow-up of the conference given at the X on March 9, 2009

3/15/09 : We are looking for skeptics. If not serious, please abstain

2/8/09 : Chauprade, conspiracy theorist The follow-up: 2/5 2/8 2/17

2/7/09 : 9/11 by the idiots 2/18/09 : Humor

2/3/09 : Survey result

1/29/09 : The use of a crisis (willed, controlled?).

1/20-28/09 : Sarkozy, Obama and Bush: in the same scout movement?

1/20/09 : Strange circular formation appeared near a supermarket

1/18/09 : Skiing in Marseille (January 2009, unknown author )

1/14/09 : UFO-science association statement

1/14/09 : A song by JP Petit, translated into Russian and sung by Artem Dekelbaum

1/9/09 : Nicolas Sarkozy, economist

12/30/08 : Images of Hitler's bunker

12/28/09 : 2009 Julian Beever, king of anamorphosis on the sidewalk

12/26/08 : Vladimir Kush, Russian surrealist painter

12/23/08 : Obama is not Santa Claus

12/13/08 : On heroism

12/18/08 : The shoe that enters history

12/3/08 : What no French channel will comment on The sanctioned

12/3/08 : Obama? Ron Paul's opinion, a member of the US Congress

12/3/08 : Use of thermite for the destruction of the twin towers

11/13/08 : New book by Jean Ziegler

11/6/08 : She almost became the US Vice President. Translation / comment

11/3/08 : Report on London (cosmos) and Vilnius (MHD) conferences

10/29/08 : When the pop star pays the President of the United States

9/16/08 : Jean-Marie Bigard case, comeback Persists and signs!

9/16/08 : First interview JP Petit on 9/11

9/12/08 : Eurostar, 9/11/2008

8/12/08 : It will have to be ensured 8/19/08

9/11/08 : Jean-Marie Bigard: the slip-up A text by Thierry Meyssan

9/11/08 : Clarification

9/1/08 : Interview JPP on RFI, very well edited

8/29/08 : ITER: tongues are loosening

8/22/08 : How to kill yourself with a paraglider ( page 36 )

8/22/08 : Sells Boy surface, new, very little used

8/22/08 : Chemtrails: anonymous testimony of an American airplane mechanic

6/3/08 : UFO wave in Brittany

3/25/07 : The book by Jean-Jacques Vélasco. Reading note

3/24/07 : About my interview on March 23, 2007 on Sud Radio

3/22/07 : Comments on the show "L'Arène de France" on March 21, 2007

3/22/07: Interview France-Inter broadcast on Thursday, 22 at 6 p.m.

1/29/07 : Report of the conference at the Palace (17/1/07)

1/29/07 : The southern path of the Notre Dame arrow

1/10/07 : My last conference at the Cavaillon festival, in 2003

12/15/06 : Open letter to Nicolas Hulot

12/14/06 : Science Frontiers 2003

12/11/2006 : Open letter to the presidential candidates

12/2/2006 : Humor

11/22/06 : The site of Jean-Marie Souriau

11/7/06 : If the money doesn't come in

10/18/06 Warning

10/9/06 : The hacker was Chinese

9/29/06 : The pyramid of Khéops and its spiral stone ramp

9/24/06 : JPP conference at the Palais de la Découverte in Paris

8/30/06 : Pyramids. Images of J.S.Beetschen

8/22/06 : Pyramid dossier

1 August 2006 : The clean thermonuclear bomb

6/15/06 : Following the recent breakthrough at Sandia ( 2 billion degrees in the Z-machine ) the American Congress has voted the funds to replace all US nuclear warheads with these "new nuclear weapons". This decision restarts the arms race on a global scale in an extremely worrying way

6/11/06 : Machines to save us or destroy us

5/30/06 : The Z-Machine: only the military react

5/29/06 : The "clean" fusion, without radioactivity or waste

5/22/06 : Humor

4/28/06 : A glimmer of hope in a world of brutes

4/19/06 : Chronicle of an announced war

4/17/06 : Why is the grass green?

4/15/06 : A murderous journalism ( II )

4/5/06 : UN Security Council. The Iranian response

4/7/06 : When chickens have teeth

4/30/06 : UFOs, the Cnes begins its second glacial era

3/29/06 : Basic Instinct

3/22/06 : Jean-Pierre Petit is incombustible

3/22/06 : A very predictable cowardice

3/18/06 : Tsahal on war footing?

3/17/06 : Dangers of apnea. A reader testifies

3/16/06 : Conference Geometry Nancy 9 March 2006

3/15/06 : Operation KOOGLE

4/19/06 : Kursk: Would Putin have drowned his sailors?

2/4/03 : Avian flu: I don't believe it....

3/2/06 : The machine to create earthquakes

2/27/06 : Ants in the legs

2/25/06 : Islamic demonstration, London, February 3, 2006

2/23/06 : Various manipulations

2/19/06 : Precarious prayers

2/18/06 : Ominous birds

2/18/06 : Bove, Mamere and Lemaire condemned on appeal

2/10/06 : Soon Everything is Relative in Greek

2/8/06 : When lice have wings

2/8/06 : And yet it turns!

2/8/06 : High Insecurity Laboratory

2/7/06 : The Topologicon, translated into Catalan

2/7/06 : The Topologicon, translated into English

2/6/06 : Radio-Canada Archives 1991. Voices of the "Ummites"

1/31/06 : Audio versions of the new stories

1/29/06 : After two years of patient efforts

1/25/06 : Humor

1/24/06 : The Topologicon in Spanish

1/21/06 : Lanturlu, first pages in Croatian

1/14/06 : Lives that could have been saved

1/8/06 : Joyful Apocalypse in Spanish

1/8/06 : Humor /legacy/humour/humour_texte_allemand.htm

1/6/06 : The Chronologicon in Spanish ( J.C.Anduckia )

1/2/06 : The Great Pterodactyl of Scotland

1/1/05 : Thank you, Mr. Besson

12/21/05 : Christmas card

12/18/05 : Humor

12/17/05 : Cinderella 2000 in French ( forgotten )

12/16/05 : Humor

12/14/05 : Cinderella 2000 in Lao

12/13/04 : Science and Life and UFOs

11/9/05 : All offenders

12/7/05 : Humor: The Rear Admiral and the UFOs

12/4/05 : The end of Sakharov's speech ( Nobel Prize )

11/30/05 : BD For a few more Amps in Spanish

11/20/05 : Humor

11/18/05 : The CAO without effort

10/8/05 : The Wall of Silence translated into Spanish

1/1/05 : The Spondyloscope translated into English

10/24/05 : How to fit a flea in your brain

10/23/05 : Charitable version of the African scam

10/21/05 : Radiated for France

10/19/05 : The mega-cyclone Wilma heading towards the United States

10/16/05 : Putin

10/15/05 : Into the entrails of Area 51

10/7/05 : Since we're talking about Turkey....

10/7/05 : Avian flu, continuation of the serial

9/29/05 : Risk of future attacks in France?

9/27/05 : Images of an unspeakable sadness

9/23/05 : Dubai: the back of the scenery

9/15/05 : Rapeseed oil, a new petroleum product

9/10/05 : New Orleans

9/6/05 : Open letter from Moore to George Bush

9/5/05 : Rodin and JPP

5 and 6 /9/05 : Earthquakes in Sumatra, Taiwan: it continues...

9/5/05 : Airplane accidents: it continues....

9/4/05 : Opinion of Anderson, Nobel Prize in Physics, professor at Princeton, on the Theory of Superstrings

9/3/05 : Dive into the nuclear test area of Nevada

9/3/05 : Dive into Area 51, thanks to Google Earth

9/2/05 : Don't shoot the pianist ...

9/1/05 : The Economicon translated into English

9/1/05 : Deep Impact

9/1/05 : Atlantis, international congress in Greece

8/29/05 : How to fix the excess CO2

8/28/05 : Iraq. The Americans have "the solution"

8/27/05 : Avian flu in Finland

8/25/05 : First contamination by GMOs

8/27/09 : Humor: The Foufounoide of Kevin Fine (Cal.)

8/27/05 : A super math software, French and free

8/23/05 : The Misadventures of Noah ( humor )

8/22/05 : A story of an African scam

8/20/05 : Sonofusion in question

8/21/05 : The "Fritz" chip, a legal Trojan horse

8/21 05 : True document or computer generated images?

8/17/05 : The first US politician "chipped"

12/8/05: Iraq, a very bad deal.

12/8/05: Chemtrails: The mystery remains.

19/7/05: First Lanturlu translated into Chinese

11/07/05: Thibaud Damour and branes

11/7/05: We are living in a wonderful era

9 July 2005: Where has the money gone?

7 July 2005: It's good to fly

20/6/05: Anti-drone umbrella

20/6/05: Daniel Cohn Bendit

13/6/05: Paradigm shift in archaeology

13/6/05: A little break before the road

9/6/05: Reagan and aliens

6/6/05: Police violence in the USA with Taser

26/5/05: The (carefully) hidden clauses of the European Constitution. Example: on the death penalty:

31/5/05: Who will buy the Chinese furs?

23/5/05: Testimony of a revenue from yes

20/5/05: Should we approve the European Constitution?

22/5/05: Alien, just for that

14/5/05: Ode to profit (after Paul Valéry)

7/5/05: The Pope against the Buddhists

26/9/03: Tacit contract for people who sleep

14/4/05: UFOs: The battle is definitely lost

28/3/05 - 31/3/05 - 2/4/05 - 3/4/05: Alien Technology

4/4/05: Neural implants (Alain Goumy)

31/3/05: A file disappears

22 March 2005: Vehicles deployed by Applied Digital, roaming the USA to facilitate the implantation of chips

21/3/05: G.W. Bush's loyalty to his old scout friends

13/3/05: When senators have guts

14/3/05: I'm hallucinating! ! !.....

11/3/05: Eisenhower's farewell speech

14/3/05: Full text (translation: Michel Gaillard)

8/3/05: The opinion of the CNRS on the work of its researchers

27/3/05: Canadian documentary on the tsunami

2/3/05: Rising of abyssal fish on the Indonesian coast, after the tsunami. Fact or hoax?

2/3/05: High tides: trigger of earthquakes

1/3/05: J.P.PETIT: New scientific works

2/3/2005: Maximum pain. The new American plasma weapon.

15/2/05: God is with the Americans (III)

23/3/05: The European Constitution Project

4/2/05: The first aurora borealis created by man

4/2/05: Iraq, February 2005

4/2/05: UFOs above nuclear installations in Iran

25/1/05: Holocaust

26/1/05: Iranian counterattack project

18/1/05: Do our banknotes contain microchips ensuring their "traceability"? Try it

14/1/05: Comments on the film of Michel Carré "A submarine in troubled waters", broadcast on January 7 on France 2

26/12/04: A case of censorship in the Press

14/12.04: A new facet of the web

8/12/04: The Sphere Turnover 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6

24/3/05: Humorous texts

8/12/04: Jazzbird

11/11/04: A cover for "The Year of Contact"

9/11/04: Exclusive photo of Pioum

22 Oct 2004: The Voltaire Network in the crosshairs

3/11/04: Picking the daisy Update of 15/11/04

/legacy/new_en/plucking_daisy.htm

/legacy/Presse/Deshojando_la_margarita.htm

/legacy/Presse/Sfogliando_la_margherita.htm

/legacy/Presse/marguerite_allemand.htm

5/11/04: UFOs, thirty years later

2/11/04: [Gravitational instability

(Anim. F.Baumont)](/legacy/Cosmo_astro/Frederic_BAUDEMONT/images/instabilite_gravit_1population.avi)

25/10/04: It spins, it spins, the magnificent synthetic galaxy of Frédéric Baudemont (avi file)

20/10/04: The crazy round of asteroids around the Earth (four megabytes video)

3/10/04: Jacques Benveniste died yesterday

12/10/04: Pyramid montage. Animation by P.Darbon

15/9/04: The law on the Digital Economy has passed

21/9/04: An electromagnetic weapon: the Taser

12/9/04: Utopia or death

2/9/04: Public order

21/8/04: Increased means of censorship for the CSA

26/4/03: Big Brother is coming The LEN

8/7/03: How one can be "deprived of the right to prove"

/legacy/jugement/jugement00.htm

3/9/04: The teaching of violence

17/7/04: When researchers at the CNRS sue their employer

19/8/04: The UFO world is equipped with a new expert

23/07/04: A murderous journalism

7 July: Christophe Lent observes a UFO

18/6/04: Bush and abortion

25/5/04: The Digital Economy Law was adopted by the National Assembly on May 8, 2004. Its consequences 16/6/04: The LEN defeated at the constitutional council.

16/3/ 04: Disclosure, Greer publishes a book in French. The misinformation continues, on a planetary scale. Extraordinary!

19/4/04: Air strategy: Use of a "clean" weapon of mass destruction .

14/1/05: Humor, News

28/5/04: An original idea

27/9/03: Prepare the aspirin

26/9/03: Optical illusion

French micro-drones for sale

Welcome to Fraud City Latest news: 29/11/04

7/5/03: Michel Bounias has died

11 February: The B2 MHD system in action: an extraordinary testimony dating from less than three months Infrared detection

17 January: A film shows the B2 MHD system in action. Its Mysteries

20 January: The Hypersoar alias Aurora, minus the real technical solutions (MHD)

The book of J.P.Petit: "UFOs and American Secret Weapons" is available in bookstores. But maybe you will find it in the "esoteric" section, as usual....

18 April 2002: In http://lanturluland.free.fr a new scientific comic strip, full reading: Cinderella 2000

27 December 2001: How to stop smoking

30 December 2001: Move along, there's nothing to see

2 March 2002: Bitterness and Future Redeployment /legacy/science_fiction/Mees1.htm 15 August 2002: The Mysteries of the B2 6 August 2002: Japanese biological weapons .

17 May 2002: Resumption of the reflection on violence.

9 May 2002: State nonsense

a 2 dec 2002: Why the missiles fired by the terrorists did not hit the targeted commercial plane. Dossier

28 April: I did well to give up

8 November: The Marquis de la Sallières discovers that the Daumier in his salon was only a fake. Dossier

5 May: Open letter to Messrs. Bush, Arafat, Sharon, etc.

21 September 2002: Seismic weapons. 19-21 September 2002: Micro-drones. (micro-aeronautics) 13 September: About the mutilation of livestock. 12 September 2002: Meteorological weapons 3 Sept 2002: The "non-lethal weapons": Non-Lethal Weapons 1st Sept. 2002: Electromagnetic effect weapons (kill me softly) 28 August 2002: The Haarp project and what it hides 26 August 2002: About the Crop Circles. /legacy/science_fiction/Oeuf1.htm 31 Dec 01: Central Model of the Cube Turnover

.. 22 October: Hitler's secret weapons. ... The saga of the flying wings Norhrop .

Portrait of Stephen Hawking .

16 Sept 2001: Portrait of the astronaut Patrick Baudry . Photo of a bottle of Klein 23 August 2001: The Von Zborowski aerodyne (1959)

2 July 2001: About the international astrophysics and cosmology conference that just took place in Marseille (25-29 June) and whose theme was "Where is the Matter ? " . Author's communication.

28 June 2001: Underground nuclear tests in the hexagon. When tongues begin to loosen. See the testimony of a person who worked for the DAM (Department of Military Applications) at the end of this dossier .

23 June 2001: My own testimony about a ULM accident.

14 June 2001: The magazine La Recherche is seduced in turn by ..... elegance .

25 April 2001: Portrait of Lichnérowicz. About "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene. Jacques Benveniste: the return.

Look at the images of the surface of Boy created by Christophe Tardy on http://ctardy.free.fr/jadore/sciences/boy/index.htm

... Read "We have lost half the universe" (Albin Michel) or browse the cosmology articles on my site, or their popular presentation .

... Since the beginning of 2001, the theme of a cosmology with variable constants has begun to emerge. See in particular the announcement made in Science and the Future in October. The author's previous works are recalled:

** J.P.Petit **: An interpretation of cosmological model with variable light velocity . Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 3, n°16, nov 1988, p.1527

** J.P.Petit **: Cosmological model with variable light velocity : the interpretation of red shifts. Modern Physics Letters A, Vol.3 , n° 18, dec. 1988, p.1733 ** J.P.Petit & Maurice Viton **: Gauge cosmological model with variable light velocity. Comparizon with QSO observational data. Modern Physics Letters A Vol.4 , n°23 (1989) pp. 2201-2210

** 17 January 2001 ** : ** Xavier JANC ** and ** Dominique GIGON ** found the solution of the counterpet invented by the French mathematician Jean-Marie Souriau :

Elementary particle

which kept many readers of the site in suspense for more than two weeks. Click on it to get the solution, after checking that you are over 18 years old.

• The two winners are asked to communicate their address to be able to receive their prizes, jointly. *

** 12 January ** ** : A possible explanation of the high temperature of the solar corona.

A long text concerning the interstellar travel , in the English side of the site.

Archaeological site of Karnak: Find the error.

** 24 November 2000 ** : Portrait of the astronomer Halton Arp .

** 13 November 2000 ** : Soon: a sequence showing the birth of a galaxy, a first. Soon, also, in serial: The Love Life of Lenin , an archive document, published in 1937.

** 2 ** ** 8 August 2000 ** : Section humor

** 19 June 2000 **: opening of the HUMOR section

... Discover how one can be a marginal who publishes in high-level journals, with a review committee and someone who flees the judgment of his peers while seeking it insistently.

****automatic translation

Polyhedral version of the knot New polyhedral version
Antibabel

: A project of a program based on a semantic text input system, by J.P.Petit.

J.P.Petit and C.Tardy:

of the trefoil (virtual reality) and

of the Boy surface.

** 30 April 2000 ** - Last achievement of Christophe Tardy, in virtual reality: my polyhedral version of the Möbius strip with three half-turns.

** 23 April 2000 ** - Following the dossier on the dangers of deep apnea, in "Attention, Dangers!", presentation of a rescue system for apneists remaining underwater for more than 2 minutes, fully automated.

** 22 April 2000 ** - The central model of the cube turnover (J.P.Petit, imaging C.Tardy) in virtual imaging.

** 21 April 2000 ** - Metaphysical implications of the monodre . A theorem project.

** 20 April 2000 ** - For those who have already downloaded Cosmo Player (a free utility of 3 Mo, 20 minutes of download ), the latest achievements of Christophe Tardy: A monodre in virtual reality and the first model of the cube turnover.

** 15 April 2000 ** - If you want to spin between your hands a Steiner surface, a Whitney umbrella, an original immersion of the Klein bottle, a Boy surface and their polyhedral representations, click here. If after all that you don't have a 3D perception of all these objects, consult a psychologist.

** 2 April 2000 ** - : In the ****bibliography ** , ** a reproduction of the Mauretania, the steamer, launched in 1907, on which Petit crossed the Atlantic in 1961

** 20 March 2000 -** Publishing in peer-reviewed journals is painful. However, last publication: J.P.Petit and P.Midy** Scale Invariant Cosmology ** The Intern. Jr of Mod. Phys. D Vol.8 june 1999 pp. 271-280

** 18 March 2000 - ** My theoretical cosmology works are moving towards the destruction of the black hole model. Challenging theory: hyperspatial transfer. For fans of science: read at least the introduction of the paper on the site: ** questionable black hole ** (the black hole in question).

** 11 March 2000 - ** The mathematician Jean-Marie Souriau has invented a new presentation of** the axiomatic of groups ,** introducing "the sandwich axiom". For math fans, of course. But it's very very nice, I find.

** 7 March 2000 - ** Announcing the "cube turnover", the homepage shows, in rotation, the polyhedral version of the central model.

** 2 March 2000 - ** In the geometry section, new images: ** how to transform a right Boy surface ** into a left Boy surface, passing through the Steiner Roman surface.

** 21 February 2000 - ** Go and take a look at ** gallery of portraits . ** I leave you the surprise.

** 18 February 2000 ** ** -** In the sub-site Lanturluland you can read on screen the full text of an unpublished comic strip from the series of Anselme Lanturlu's adventures: ** Around the World in 80 Minutes **

** Between October 14, 2002 and October 6, 2003: 365.625 consultations, so more than a thousand per day on average in a year. **

** Number of consultations of this page between October 3, 2004 and November 20, 2005 ** : 1,000,000

Number of consultations of this page since November 20, 2005:

LINK